Christchurch Revisited
Israel Shamir • March 20, 2019
You
don’t have to be a white nationalist to commit a mass murder in a house
of worship like the one in Christchurch, though if you only read
mainstream media you’ll probably associate them with the unique
depravity of doing so. Without the slightest intention to wax apologetic
for the crime and
rejecting conspiracy theories, I want to
contextualise the event and preclude political profit-taking and
guilt-assigning by the liberals.
White nationalists are not exceptional. A Muslim can do it just as “well.” In Egypt, Muslims massacred in April
2017 45 Christians in two Coptic churches. There is a long list of
attacks on churches in Egypt, Syria, and Iraq by Islamic extremists.
They kill not-sufficiently devout Muslims, too: over 300 Muslim
worshippers were slaughtered by Muslim extremists in a Sinai mosque in
November 2017. The ISIS atrocities are on a different (worse) level
altogether, though they go underreported in the media that prefers to
demonise president Assad and his Iranian and Russian allies.
(Many
Muslim attacks on Christians go underreported, for media follow the
policy of keeping local native nationalists under pressure, and full
reporting would undermine this goal. In September last year, a man
poured out petrol and tried to ignite a fire on a subway train in
Stockholm. He was stopped by fellow passengers, arrested, sentenced to
four years in jail. It was hardly reported at all, and the only report does not give his name, for a good reason: it is a Muslim name. However, so-called hate crimes get a lot of coverage.)
A Jew
can do it even better. A Brooklyn Jew, Dr Benjamin (it’s all about the
Benjamins, baby!) Goldstein single-handedly massacred about fifty
worshippers in the Ibrahimiye Mosque of Halil/Hebron in Palestine on the
eve of Purim 1994. He also wounded about 150 Muslim worshippers –
though it is said that Israeli soldiers present at the spot gave him an
assisting hand. Perhaps they thought it was free-for-all.
Benjamin
(or Baruch) Goldstein is considered a hero and a sainted martyr within
his community, the fiercely chauvinist Jews of Hebron. They go to his
grave and ask for his intercession before the Almighty. Young girls ask
him to find them a suitor. Candles are constantly lit in his memory. A
book was published in his honour, and his name is frequently mentioned
among the settlers. They claim (without any evidence or factual base) that this massacre saved the Jews from being massacred by Muslims.
While
white nationalist videos have been de-platformed, YouTube has no
problem with this video exculpating and glorifying the Jewish mass
murderer. Prime Minister Netanyahu (another Benjamin, baby!) decided
to bring the party of Goldstein fans, Otzma Yehudit, into his
government coalition, and it did not interfere with his triumphal
progress to the AIPAC conference to be held on March 24, right after
Purim.
Goldstein
had his predecessors. On 26 July 1983, a Jewish terrorist group
attacked an Islamic college with hand grenades and submachine guns;
three students were killed and thirty wounded. The attackers were
eventually apprehended, sentenced and quickly pardoned by the president
of Israel after a big public campaign: over 70% of Israeli Jews demanded
their release.
As
Purim approaches, activity around Goldstein’s grave comes to a peak. A
mystic could think that the NZ shooter had been moved to action by the
Purim awakening of the Goldstein spirit. At the same time, the name of
the Jewish killer is hardly ever mentioned in the Western media, and the
Jewish American officials, while expressing their (justified) horror
and indignation regarding the Christchurch murders, never refer to their
coreligionist who preceded and inspired Tarrant. Some of them even said
that nothing similar to the mosque shooting ever happened.
So,
white nationalists are not exceptional. An unusual feature of Tarrant’s
crime was that it was a hate-less hate crime; essentially a gamer’s
crime. Apparently there is a game-acquired appeal in raining bullets
upon “vermin”. If you played videogames you would know what I mean. A
sort of FPS (First-Person Shooter Games) with your preferred enemy
instead of a zombie. And now, make the next step – consider real people
being zombies. You do not need hate for that; and Tarrant did not hate
his victims, judging by his writing. He even wrote about the great
friends he made in Turkey.
The border between videogame and reality became blurred by way of modern warfare. The video Collateral Murder,
the first breakthrough achievement of Assange and Wikileaks, gives us
the FPS of an American pilot killing innocent and unarmed people on the
streets of Baghdad. Israeli girl-soldiers operate a remote-control
killing system on the Gaza fence. It is called the Spot and Shoot system. They do what Tarrant did as their daily job. The same is done by drone operators sitting in faraway places and killing children. (To make it easier, they call their victims “fun-size terrorists”.)
Video
games that train you to kill without feeling hatred are a substitute
for this sort of killing. I’ve been to wars, and I’ve seen and
experienced the real thing. Hatred is not necessary to kill your enemy.
If you know who is your enemy, you can kill without feeling hatred, and
that is what most soldiers do, most of the time.
It’s
not something to be horrified about. We have to recognise aggression as
a necessary element of our mentality. It is not “good” or “bad”, this
is what we are, in the favourite expression of Mme Pelosi. We have an
inbuilt drive for hunt and warfare, that’s why a little boy goes “bang
bang” before he is able to talk. This is the way we are hard-wired.
People like to shoot people; if they aren’t allowed to in real life,
they do it in games. But they dream of doing it for real, to fight, to
kill and perhaps, to die. This drive, like other destructive drives, is
normally canalised, or sublimated. A boy’s hunting instinct and his
drive for war have been transformed into heroic actions, into defence of
one’s home and country, or into performing Herculean feats. Without it,
we would be still sharing bananas in the African jungle.
However,
we live in a feminised society where feats are against the law. A boy
is supposed to behave like a girl; a girl, like a boy. Not only clothes
and toilets are unisex, so is the indoctrination. The propaganda of
gender-fluidity aims at killing masculinity at its root. A young
working-class man has very few prospects in life. He can get a low-paid
temporary job with no security, at best. And he can pour out his
indignation and desperation in a video games saloon or in a fighting
club. Or just use more drugs and alcohol.
Games,
and shooter games in particular, are very popular, because they cater
for basic needs – as pornography does. They are so popular that the
Swedish gamer who was mentioned by Tarrant has ninety million followers:
it is many times more than any article-writing journalist can ever
reach. So there are many frustrated and dissatisfied men. Will the games
provide a sufficient outlet for the pent-up tension? Perhaps; porno
certainly influenced sexual relations by making so many men less
interested in the real thing.
It
is not in the best interests of mankind. For mankind, it is better for
men to be interested in women and perform feats of courage for the best
of the community to win their love. For the people who consider
themselves our masters, there are other priorities. They want to have
calm herds of many cows and oxen; bulls are trouble. This comparison is
somewhat misleading: humans are not herbivores, and we are more
rebellious, clever and strong-minded.
In order to quell the rebellious spirit, our would-be masters invent traps and fake vents. Greta Thunberg
and her demonstrations against global warming provide such a faux
outlet for the rebellion. The Yellow Vests of France are fomenting a
real rebellion, and that is why they are being demonised by the mass
media. Our society should be reorganised to allow young men to perform
real feats. They want to save the world, and the only things they are
being offered is to flip hamburgers or play video games.
This
desire to save the world is evident in Tarrant’s Manifesto. He
describes the world in which he and other working-class young men are
displaced, and though his proposed solution (terror) is wrong, the
problem is real. He sees the people he is being replaced with, the
immigrants, and he seeks to deal with them.
The
replacement is real, but the culprits are not the immigrants he is being
replaced with. It’s people who organise the replacement, who bomb
Muslim lands to create living hell in the once-prosperous Middle East
and North Africa, who bring the refugees to Europe (and its extension in
Australia-NZ), who indoctrinate against ‘xenophobia’ instead of
denouncing greed.
Actually, Tarrant is aware of it. He wrote in his Manifesto:
The major impetus for the mass importation of non-Europeans into Europe is the call and want for cheap labour. Nothing drives the invasion more and nothing needs to be defeated more than the greed that demands cheap labour… In the end human greed and the need for increasing profit margins of capital owners needs to be fought against and broken.
He
is definitely right on that, spot on. Greed of capital should be
destroyed in order to save mankind, but killing Muslims is not the right
way for it.
Tarrant’s
concern about the low birthrate of Europeans is understandable, but for
one reason only: he takes for granted this demand for cheap labour and
more sales have to be satisfied. However, it does not have to be
satisfied at all. If greed is controlled and defeated, and immigration
blocked, the population can gently decline until a new sustainable level
is found. For a while, the population will grow older, true; but this
is a temporary effect. We are not doomed to ever-increasing population,
ever-increasing profits and sales, ever-rising shares, endless
expansion. It can be changed.
And
we should, because if we don’t, our ‘masters’ will organise a giant
bloodletting, a new great war to turn millions of deprived young men
into Tarrants in their service, as they did in 1914 and 1939. Mankind
will defeat greed and work for its better future, or will it turn upon
itself. This is the main lesson of the Christchurch massacre.
Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net
This article was first published at The Unz Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment