Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Video recording from tonight's Webinar/Conference Call March 25th, 2019
Zoom Webinar #2 March 25th 2019,
https://zoom.us/recording/share/rLim_hSdv7qpn6cQXeXLdE5YQB2wcqtgB-nQGgAydt0
That link will also show up on the top of our videos page here every week:
http://www.annavonreitz.com/videos.html
https://zoom.us/recording/share/rLim_hSdv7qpn6cQXeXLdE5YQB2wcqtgB-nQGgAydt0
That link will also show up on the top of our videos page here every week:
http://www.annavonreitz.com/videos.html
Monday, March 25, 2019
1700-1704: Factoids From Tonight's Conference Call -- March 25, 2019 from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
I hate it during teleconferences
when people go blat-blat-blat and spout out names of legislation and
books and everything else so fast and I am left wondering if I heard it right or got the right number, etc., so I am doing a little due diligence here to help the Listeners and recap for everyone:
books and everything else so fast and I am left wondering if I heard it right or got the right number, etc., so I am doing a little due diligence here to help the Listeners and recap for everyone:
About our American Government:
The Republican States of the Union
[The United States--- unincorporated] control and own the Republic
States of the Federation [The United States of America---
unincorporated] which control and own the Confederate States of the
Confederation [the States of America] which are actually "States of
States".
The states own the States which own The States of States.
This is why it is necessary for the
living people to correct their political status records so that they can
act in their capacity as People, assemble their States of the Union,
and finish the reconstruction of The States of States we are owed.
As you can see from the above, only
Lawful Persons can operate Republic States, and only the Republic States
can create and charter their own Confederation States [aka States of
States].
This is what is necessary to finish the restoration and reconstruction of our lawfully mandated government.
Our American Government operates by
Declarations known as "Freeman Letters" and does not function on
Executive Orders or Municipal Code.
The book I mentioned that explains
"Republican in Form" --- that is, the Republican States, is Emergence
from Illusion -- Nation Building Should Begin at Home, by Ricardo
Johansson, pages 77-91. The author doesn't understand some of the fine
points of other issues of jurisdiction and our peculiar American
History, but his explanation of the form of government we are owed is
spot on. So is his expose of University Publishing and the
Confederation Congress and the promotion of Hickey's corporate charter
"constitution" from 1847 onward.
The other reference I made was to
the Lanhan Act, also known as the Trademark Act of 1946, which prohibits
Trademark Infringement, dilution, and false advertising. It's
important to know that your Proper Name is a Trademark protected under
the Lanhan Act, Title 15, Statutes at Large 60 Stat 427, 15 USC 1051 et
seq, which especially protects Unregistered Trademarks--- 15 USC 1125
(a).
This is protection that the
Territorial Government owes to you and to millions of private
unincorporated business owners throughout the county whose Business
Names are also Lawful (Common Law) Trademarks and therefore Unregistered
Trademarks: Joe's Bicycle Shop, Kate's Dog Day Kennel, and so on.
When you record the Re-Conveyance of
your Proper Name to the land and soil of your birth State, you are
recording your Trademark's permanent domicile and leaving no doubt as to
its lawful ownership and provenance. This is an Unregistered Trademark
in Common Law protected by the Lanhan Act.
So is your thumbprint or any other unique Seal you use for business or Trade purposes
Many State of State organizations
also provide additional protections as part of their General Session
Laws, which are designed to administer State Trust interests owed to the
People of each State.
As living people we are not party to
nor subject to any of these codes or regulations, but we may invoke
these public obligations of the Territorial Government for our private
purposes, especially when dealing with employees of the Territorial
Government. They have a commitment to fulfill regarding the protection
of Unregistered Trademarks and you now know exactly where that
commitment is stated --- and thank you for the reminder, C.Johnson!
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
The Jester's Defense
By Anna Von Reitz
Yes, you can claim to be an "idiot"
and walk out of almost any imaginable court scenario that doesn't
involve actual harm to people or property. This is because when an idiot
admits being an idiot, he cannot be held responsible and cannot be
expected to make a sensible or responsible reply. There is nowhere the
court can go with him and make it stick.
Why? Because he's an idiot.
This is also called "The Jester's Defense".
Monarchs were prevented from killing, fining, or otherwise harming Jesters under the same provisions of law.
So long as you have done no actual material harm, and stand there and
claim to be an "idiot" every time the court or prosecutor addresses you,
they are stuck honoring the among the oldest traditions of all law: The
Jester's Defense.
As damaging as this might be to one's pride, the assurance of an almost
certain dismissal of charges when faced with charges related to taxes
and infractions of vehicle codes and thought crimes and small quantity
marijuana possession and 80 million other such legislative horrors, it
could be well worth smiling at the judge and loudly proclaiming, "I'm an
idiot!" every time anyone says anything to you.
Especially for poor people and those unable or unwilling to spend large
portions of their lives learning administrative and martial and
international and municipal law, this particular defense strategy is
very simple and very hard for any prosecutor to overcome.
It does not require you to be or claim to be an "absolute idiot" ----
like a Medieval Jester, you may be perfectly functional, witty, light on your feet, and still successfully make The Jester's Defense.
like a Medieval Jester, you may be perfectly functional, witty, light on your feet, and still successfully make The Jester's Defense.
Likewise, it does not suggest mental illness, just an incapacity.
Just remember that once any questioning about pleas and so forth begins, you are limited to one reply: "I am an idiot!"
There's a popular country song right now called, "What Was I Thinking?"
--- which describes a young man's response to his own behavior and risks
he took to romance a certain young lady at the risk of a shotgun.
Many young men who find themselves on the short end of a situation that
leaves them wondering the same thing--- what was I thinking? --- would
be well-served and well-advised to just throw up their hands in front of
the judge and the prosecutor and say, "I'm an idiot!"
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
About Law and Lawyers and Practice Thereof
By Anna Von Reitz
From time to time we get accused of "practicing law without a license". As with other licenses, we don't need a license to practice law.
We also get "returning lawyers" ----
Bar Attorneys and former Judges and Magistrates who are disillusioned
or who have one way or another stumbled on the truth for themselves, and
who are looking for a way forward. We all need to be able to shepherd
these people into a new life along with the rest of us. So here, first
of all, is a good succinct run down of the facts provided by Kelby
Smith:
"The
practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board
of Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. In Sims v.
Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) "The practice of law is an occupation of
common right." Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedures, Title 12, sec. 2017
(C) "If an infant or incompetent person does not have a duly appointed
representative he may sue by his next friend or by a guardian ad
litem." Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar
(377 U.S. 1); Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; Argersinger v. Hamlin,
Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be assisted by unlicensed layman
during judicial proceedings. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United
Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715); and Johnson v. Avery 89
S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who are competent non lawyers can
assist other members of the group achieve the goals of the group in
court without being charged with "Unauthorized practice of law."
And furthermore, former Bar
Attorneys who revoke their membership in the Bar, can continue to
function lawfully as Counselors of Law. The one thing they can't do is
speak directly for anyone who is not an infant or otherwise incompetent,
and instead must "stand at the elbow" of the actual litigant, giving
blow-by-blow advice.
Loss of a Bar Card does not mean the
Soup Kitchen for former Bar Attorneys. For many, death to the lies and
frauds is a new lease on life and a new relationship with law in all
its many forms.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Ron Vrooman is Simply Wrong
By Anna Von Reitz
Ron Vrooman is Simply
Wrong
He thinks he is acting as an American. But he's
not.
He thinks that a "US Citizen" is the same thing as
an American.
In fact, as can be simply proven, the two things
have never been the same.
He thinks that a "State" is the same as a "State of
State".
That, too, is simply wrong.
He thinks that he can act in the capacity of an
Oregonian -- a State National or State Citizen of Oregon -- and at the same time
continue to claim that he is a "US Citizen".
That's wrong, too.
He even claims that he is the coordinator of the
Oregon Assembly, but that's wrong also.
You can't act as a US Citizen of any stripe and act
as the Coordinator (or even be a member of) the Oregon Assembly.
In these delusional assumptions, Ron is not unlike
many other Americans who persist in error even after they have been shown the
truth and even after it has all been patiently (and repeatedly) explained to
them.
The ONLY thing that a "legal person"---- and all US
Citizens are legal persons by definition ---- can assemble is by definition a
State of State corporation, not a State.
People acting in the capacity of Lawful Persons are
the only ones who can assemble a State of the Union.
Period.
This is the Law, the Fact, and the History of it.
Ron Vrooman is welcome to stay a US Citizen of
whatever kind, but he is not welcome to make false claims of American State
Citizenship while he is doing so.
This is like a Spaniard claiming to be Irish and a
member of the Irish Government to boot.
What he is doing is in fact anti-American.
Until he understands the requirement of singular
allegiance to his State of the Union, he can't do what he wants to do as an
Oregonian and he can't lead others to success, either.
Everything he is saying, preaching, doing is wrong
and it is wrong because he can't or won't grasp the difference between "America"
and " the United States" and can't see the difference between a "State" of the
Union and a "State of State" corporation.
Don't follow Ron into the same old trap.
He is doing and assuming the same kinds of things
that I warned Bruce Doucette and the Colorado Nine against.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
The Reason for All the Paperwork
By Anna Von Reitz
There is really only one purpose for
all this paperwork, and that is to establish a public record and
evidence of who you are and the capacity in which you choose to act.
There is in turn only one reason to do that --- and that reason is to
protect you and your family from oppression and foreign subjection and
false claims in commerce.
Your identity has been stolen and
false claims have been established against your Good Name in violation
of treaties, conventions, and commercial service contracts that both the
Territorial and Municipal Governments owe to you.
Just as it requires action on your
part to reclaim your identity after a credit card hacker makes
unauthorized charges, this situation requires you to take action to
reclaim your identity from this abuse by government service providers.
Beyond the paperwork involved, you need to educate yourselves about the actual Public Law you are heir to.
Last, every American who can qualify
to serve as an American State Citizen is encouraged to join their
lawful State Assembly and serve. There is a large back log of issues to
be addressed and work to be done.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment