Tuesday, February 5, 2019
1554-1555: No Such Thing As An American "Constitutional Citizen" from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
I just got off the phone after a
long and boring argument with a man who thinks there is such a thing as
"Constitutional Citizenship" that applies to Joe Average American.
I am here to tell you that is nonsense.
There are two kinds of "Federal
Citizenship" created under the Constitutions -- Article 1, Section 2,
Clause 2, and Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 --- but both of these
"federal citizenship" statuses created by the Constitution(s) are
foreign to Joe Average and if either one is accepted, they deprive him
of his natural option, which is State Citizenship --- assuming that he
wants to serve his actual government in some capacity.
There is also a third "Federal"
citizenship status implied by the Constitutions -- Municipal United
States Citizenship is logically allowed under Article 1, Section 8,
Clause 17 --- you could, in theory, agree to accept Municipal
Citizenship and function as a slave.
Joe Average American assumes that
they are talking about his "United States" throughout the Federal Code
-- but they are not. They are talking about their version of "United
States".
Joe Average American also thinks
that they are talking about his citizenship --- in citations like 8 USC
1101 (a) (21) and 8 USC 1401--- and but they are not.
They are not thinking about Joe
Average American or referencing his citizenship in any part of the
Federal Code. He's not a "federal" entity. His employees have nothing
to say about his citizenship.
Nothing at all about Joe Average American was created by The Constitution(s) in any form.
So it does Joe no good to try to
call himself a "Constitutional Citizen" as a means to explain his
political status, because his actual political status as either a State
National or as a State Citizen pre-dates and exists apart from any
Constitution whatsoever.
Joe Average American's option to
serve his soil jurisdiction state government as a "citizen" began in
July of 1776 and his option to serve his Land Jurisdiction State as a
"Citizen" began in September of 1776 and his option to serve his Sea
Jurisdiction Federal State of State as a "Citizen" began in March of
1781 ---- all long before any of the Constitutions were adopted.
Joe Average American's citizenship,
to the extent that he chooses to voluntarily serve his government as a
"citizen" of any kind, is explicitly non-Constitutional, because his
government and his citizenship with respect to his government was
neither created by nor defined by any Federal, Territorial or Municipal
Constitution.
Joe Average American's citizenship,
to the extent he accepts a duty to serve his government at any level,
exists in a foreign jurisdiction, too.
Joe Average American's government
serves the land and soil jurisdiction of this country, and to the extent
that he serves his government as a citizen, he serves the land and soil
jurisdiction, not the watery domain of the Federal Government.
Poor old Joe is trying to make the
point that he is owed the Constitutional Guarantees as one of the People
of this country, but by calling himself a "Constitutional Citizen",
that is, Federal Citizen, he is unwittingly admitting that he is owed no
such guarantees at all.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
For All The Jural Assemblies -- 21 Capacity of the People
By Anna Von Reitz
While the subject matter of a case
will often immediately determine the correct jurisdiction and court to
hear it, the issue of "capacity in which the Parties act" is by no means
as clear-cut, and requires due diligence.
Consider the sentence: "Marc is one
of the people who built the Cross River Bridge." "Marc" is obviously
a man who helped build a bridge and he did so in an unincorporated
capacity, because the word "people" was used.
If we said, "Marc is one of the
persons who built the Cross River Bridge." we would have an entirely
different flavor and meaning. This would imply that "Marc" is the name
of a corporation or business of some kind that was involved in building
the bridge.
It's the same name, but different capacities are indicated. This applies all across the board:
Marc Allen Jones is a member of our football team. [Unincorporated Capacity]
Marc Allen Jones is American. [Corporate Capacity -- International Trade -- International Land Jurisdiction]
Marc Allen Jones, Inc. provides tax
accounting services. [Incorporated Capacity -- International Commerce -
International Jurisdiction of the Sea]
We, too, can choose to act in the
capacity of one of the people (our national soil jurisdiction) or one
of the People (our international land jurisdiction) or as a Person ---
(international sea jurisdiction or municipal jurisdiction).
When we act as one of the People
standing on our international land jurisdiction, we use a Trade Name,
like "John Michael Downing". We use the same "style" of Proper Name
while operating as a "United States Person" in the international
jurisdiction of the sea.
It's the same name, but two different jurisdictions, two different capacities.
The entire Great Fraud which has
been worked against us and our country has hinged on that fact and our
employees accidentally-on-purpose misunderstanding the capacity in which
we are acting.
"John Michael Downing", one of the
People of Minnesota, standing peacefully as a State Citizen on the
international land jurisdiction of Minnesota, is owed all the guarantees
of the Constitutions and international treaties he is heir to. If he
goes to sea (enters international sea jurisdiction) the British Monarch
owes him protection. If he enters municipal jurisdiction, the Pope owes
him protection.
"John Michael Downing", a "U.S.
Citizen", acting in the capacity of a Person adrift on the international
jurisdiction of the sea without a declared permanent domicile, has no
guarantees, no treaties, and is presumed to be a Ward of the Territorial
State of Minnesota or the Municipal STATE OF MINNESOTA. He has no
constitutional guarantees or protections at all.
Those intent upon plundering and
pillaging us have, of course, chosen to interpret the capacity in which
we are acting to suit themselves and their purposes. They have been
eager to mis-characterize us as "U.S. Citizens" living in Territorial
"States of States" or Municipal STATES OF STATES instead of as Americans
living in actual States of the Union----- and to abuse us
accordingly.
When you knowledgeably take
exception to this self-interested presumption and rebut it with
pre-established evidence and join your State Jural Assembly, these
foreign British Territorial and Municipal Courts are in a bind to excuse
their predatory actions against their actual Employers and Hosts.
The shameful and criminal nature of
their activities becomes apparent --- but it only becomes apparent when
you educate yourselves and formally declare your identity and capacity
as a State Citizen, one of the People of your State, and of The United
States of America.
Many Americans are fond of spouting
off about "We, the People...." but they fail to recognize the
jurisdiction and capacity that the "People" are operating in. There
have been many arguments about the use of a capital "P" on the word
"People" --but it is actually very simple.
One of the oddities of international
jurisdiction, both land and sea, is that it is populated entirely by
legal fiction entities -- businesses, corporations, and the officers and
offices of such businesses and corporations.
So, when the people of this country
occupy their international land jurisdiction, and inhabit their States
of the Union, they act in the capacity of Jurors or occupy other
Offices of their State and as a group, act as the People of their States
and as The People of The United States of America ---- a lawful
unincorporated Federation of their States.
The State itself is a Corporate
entity --- but it is unincorporated. We see this concept whenever we
encounter a small independent business --- "Jake's Dog Wash", for
example, is "corporate" in that it is a legal fiction with a Proper
Name, but it is not "incorporated" --- it did not ask any other
corporation to adopt it or give it privileges and doesn't function under
a charter granted by any other corporation.
Our own Given Names are naturally in
the same status as our States--- and operate in the same Corporate, but
unincorporated capacity as our States of the Union and Jake's Dog
Wash.
Unfortunately, the same style of
Proper Name can be applied to Persons operating in the international
jurisdiction of the sea as incorporated franchises of foreign
Territorial and Municipal corporations, such as the British Territorial
"State of Minnesota" or the Roman (Catholic) Municipal "STATE OF
MINNESOTA".
And it is up to you to declare and provide evidence of the capacity in which you are choosing to act.
Our Forefathers sought to cut
through this conundrum and avoid the possible attendant abuses of our
people by the simple device of allowing us no other citizenship apart
from State Citizenship. We either is or we ain't.
Once you become a Juror and Member
of the your State Jural Assembly you are operating as a State Citizen
and by definition no longer operating in any capacity as a "U.S.
Citizen", voluntary or otherwise. This is because the States do not
allow Dual Citizenship, and this stands as a safeguard for you against
usurpation, false claims in commerce, and other evils that can otherwise
be "presumed" against you by their foreign corporate tribunals.
You can operate as a State National
or as a State Citizen, but you cannot at the same time operate as a U.S.
Citizen or Citizen of the United States. The terms are mutually
exclusive for our purposes.
Understandably, those who have
benefited by mis-characterizing us and being able to abuse us by
presuming that we are "voluntarily" acting in the capacity of "U.S.
Citizens" are loathe to give up their pretenses and eager to obstruct
our progress.
Our runaway Employees do not want to
submit to the yoke of their Employers and do not want to respect and
fulfill the binding treaties and constitutional service contracts that
they have with our States of the Union. The tail has been wagging the
dog for a long time and they want to continue spending our money and
hypothecating debt against our assets "for" us.
Many Americans and other people
around the world have complained that "the world is upside down", that
those we employ to protect us are abusing us instead, that our courts
provide anything but justice, that our medical care has been
commandeered by Big Pharma, that our churches have become incorporated
businesses more concerned with managing their investments than teaching
any moral precepts.
You are not imagining things. The
world is upside down. It is upside down because the employees are
running the employers ragged. So it is up to you to assert your natural
birthright capacity and political status, to accept your
responsibilities as an American ---- not as a "U.S. Citizen" ---- and
to set things to right in this country.
Nobody can object to this, as nobody
has standing to object. Nobody can accuse you of being in
"insurrection" nor "rebellion" once you firmly and clearly and
knowledgeably declare your political status and the capacity in which
you are acting.
In fact, it is our "federal
employees" ---both Territorial and Municipal---- who have flirted with
insurrection and trespassed against the people of this country.
It is now your role and
responsibility to act in the capacity of State Jural Assembly Members
--- as Jurors and as other Officers of the State and County Courts that
the people of this country are owed, to put an end to any false and
self-interested claims that we have "abandoned" our country, and act to
enforce the Public and Organic Law.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment