‘Godfather of Vaccines’ Admits Using Orphans, Handicapped Children & More For Vaccine Experiments
By
Arjun Walia
from Collective Evolution
Arjun Walia
from Collective Evolution In Brief
- The Facts:Dr. Stanley Plotkin, known as one of the fathers of vaccines, reveals some disturbing facts about testing vaccines on orphans, colonial ruled populations, babies whose mothers are in prison, and mentally handicapped children.
- Reflect On:Why is fear used to drive vaccination rates? Why are vaccination rates dropping? Why is the information that counters a 'pro vaccine' stance never addressed nor even acknowledged? Why are doctors only taught how vaccines work, and nothing else?
Dr.
Stanley Plotkin is a well known MD who has played a very significant
role in manufacturing multiple vaccines. He’s widely known as one of the
‘godfathers’ of vaccines, a ‘medicine’ that’s claimed to have saved
millions of lives, and is heavily marketed as one of the most successful
medical developments in history. Anyone who questions this narrative
and the safety of vaccines often faces harsh ridicule, despite the
thousands of scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals that
strongly oppose conventional vaccine knowledge published by
government-run health regulatory agencies like the Food & Drug
Administration (FDA) or the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC).
advertisement - learn more
Before we get to Plotkin’s testimony, there are a few things I want to point out.
Something is wrong here. When
information and evidence is presented showing that vaccines may not be
as safe as we think, we tend to respond with ridicule or silence. Let’s
take aluminum, for example. It’s been added to vaccines for
approximately 100 years without any safety testing. There are no
appropriate studies showing that aluminum is safe to inject into a
child, yet there are multiple studies that show aluminum does not exit
the body, but rather stays in the body, travelling to distant organs and eventually ending up in the brain. This is one of many examples
that show vaccines are not as safe as they are marketed to be, but the
response to these studies is often complete silence or ridicule.
After scientists discovered that
aluminum from vaccines is transported to the brain via what are called
macrophages (white blood cells), another study was published last year
looking further into this subject by studying the brains of multiple
autistic people. When they opened the brains up, they found the highest
aluminum content in brain tissue ever measured, even more so than
Alzheimer’s patients. You can access that study, and others, in the
article linked below:
The idea that vaccines aren’t entirely
safe gained a lot of attention when one of the lead authors of a 2004
study came forward. His name is Dr. William Thompson, a senior
researcher at the CDC who co-authored one of the most widely cited
studies to debunk any link between the MMR vaccine and autism. The study
allegedly found:
advertisement - learn more
“The evidence is now convincing
that the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not cause autism or any
particular subtypes of autism spectrum disorder.” (source)
10 years later, he countered the original study, arguing:
“The [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can.” (source)A known link between the MMR vaccine and autism exists, and the evidence was destroyed.
Two years later, dozens of CDC
scientists came together to put a letter out to the
public regarding their concerns about pharmaceutical companies and
multiple corporations like Coca Cola and their connection to scientific
findings being made and published by the CDC. (source)
This isn’t the first time the CDC has
been accused of this type of misconduct. It wasn’t long ago when media
outlets were announcing the abrupt resignation of Brenda Fitzgerald, the
physician appointed in July 2017 to head the CDC. The resignation
followed on the heels of an article published by Politico,
which uncovered conflicts of interest pertaining to dubious investment
decisions made by Fitzgerald after she became the nation’s top public
health official, including the purchase of thousands of dollars of
tobacco, pharmaceutical and health care stocks. You can read more about
that here.
Apart from the many examples of
fraudulent activity related to vaccine science, there are multiple
studies and scientific facts that clearly suggest vaccinations are not
entirely safe. As previously discussed, numerous studies have proven
that aluminum, a common vaccine ingredient, may not be safe. A study
published in the journal EbioMedicine stated:
Over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries, including France, inducing worries about severe adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities, experts, and science (Larson et al., 2011).Vaccines also contain MSG, formaldehyde, aborted human fetal cells, and much more.
The fact that the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act has paid billions of dollars to families of vaccine
injured children is a perfect example of that. This statistic only
accounts for 1 percent of all vaccine injured children as well. Think about that! You can read more about that here.
There is something seriously wrong here, and parents should have the right to choose whether or not to vaccinate their children.
The idea that unvaccinated children are a threat to vaccinated children
and elderly people is completely false. For this to happen, vaccines
would have to be 100 percent effective for life, giving us complete
immunity, which is not the case. For example, there is a history of measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations. Herd immunity
is a theory that can be mathematically modelled, but it’s not
scientifically proven, yet it’s used to coerce and fool people into
vaccinating their children. Furthermore, when there is a measles
outbreak, we often blame it on unvaccinated children, without mentioning
all of the adults who have not received booster shots.
The only thing pharmaceutical companies
seemingly care about is profit, and there is often no penalty for them
if they cause harm to the population, because the Vaccine Injury Act
actually protects pharmaceutical companies from any wrong doing. This
means that they can be completely careless with their product and not be
held accountable for it.
“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.”– Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), Harvard Professor of Medicine and Former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (source)(source)
The Testimony
The development of our vaccines is
clearly under question, which is further described below. The following
was taken from a video of Dr. Stanley Plotkin under oath. In it, he
admits to using orphans, mentally handicapped kids, babies, children,
and populations that have been subjected to colonial rule for vaccine
testing. Based on my research, some examples could be the first nations
populations in Canada, who were used in testing by pharmaceutical
companies, as well as the US MK Ultra program. This is extremely
unethical, and it’s something that’s still happening in places like
Africa and India.
ATTY: Have you ever used orphans to study an experimental vaccine?
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
ATTY: Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?
DR. PLOTKIN: I don’t recollect ever doing studies on mentally handicapped individuals. At the time, in the 1960s, it was not an uncommon practice.
ATTY: So you’re saying — I’m not clear on your answer. I’m sorry. Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?
DR. PLOTKIN: What I’m saying is I don’t recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s, it was not unusual to do that. And I wouldn’t deny that I may have done so.
ATTY: Well, there’s an article entitled “Attenuation of RA 27/3 Rubella Virus in WI38 Human Diploid Cells.” Are you familiar with that article?
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
ATTY: In that article, one of the things it says is 13 seronegative mentally retarded children were given RA 27/3 vaccine?
DR. PLOTKIN: Okay. Well then, that’s, in that case, that’s what I did.
ATTY:
Have you ever expressed that it’s better to perform experiments on those
less likely to be able to contribute to society, such as children with
handicaps, than with children without or adults without handicaps?
DR. PLOTKIN: I don’t remember specifically, but it’s possible.
ATTY: Do you remember ever writing to the editor of “Ethics on Human Experimentation”?
DR. PLOTKIN: I don’t remember specifically, but I may well have.
ATTY: I’m going to hand you what’s been marked as Exhibit 43. Do you recognize this letter you wrote to the editor?
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
ATTY: Did you write this letter?
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
ATTY: Is one of the things you wrote: “The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential?”
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
ATTY: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine?
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
ATTY: Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine?
DR. PLOTKIN: Yes.
Full Testimony
You can watch the full testimony below, it’s the first video in a 9 part series on this Youtube channel.The Takeaway
It’s okay to question vaccine safety.
There are multiple plausible reasons to avoid vaccinations, but fear
seems to be used to drive most people into vaccinating themselves and
their children, along with the idea that vaccines are completely safe.
Are we looking at another case of DDT? Or Tobacco? It’s become quite
obvious that anybody who thinks vaccines are 100 percent effective, safe
and necessary has not done any independent research or looked into the
matter themselves. How can we really rely on our healthcare
professionals when they only learn how vaccinations work, and learn
nothing else about the vaccine safety, the ingredients, the
bioaccumulation of the ingredients as well as all of the fraud that’s
been exposed?
Help Support Collective Evolution
In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!
SUPPORT CE HERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment