Thursday, January 17, 2019

Chapter Six ABRAHAM LINCOLN: LAST PRESIDENT TO FIGHT THE MONEY POWER: The Federal Reserve Conspiracy by Antony C. Sutton from archive.org


Chapter Six Abraham Lincoln: Last President to fight the money Power   

       Abraham Lincoln was the last of several populist presidents  to fight against the money monopoly. Lincoln from the very  beginning of his
Administration faced a heavy burden of  financing the Civil War with a monetary system under private  control. During the Civil War the Union government was  hardpressed to raise sufficient funds to pay troops, there was a  shortage of coin and the private banking system was unwilling to  meet the needs of the Union Army without personal gain.   Lincoln was in the Jeffersonian-Jacksonian tradition. This  tradition reserved the right to issue currency to the Federal  Government and argued that this right could not lawfully be  transferred to a private monopoly. In 1862 Lincoln presented to  Congress a bill to make United States notes full legal tender and  so enable the Federal Government to print sufficient paper money  to finance the Civil War. Presumably while Lincoln did not  envisage the inflationary potential in expanding the government's  spending power there is little question that his financial program  was intended as a means of paying off debts and     49     The Federal Reserve Conspiracy     government expense without allowing the private money monopoly to  profit from the public purse.   Unfortunately, Lincoln's Secretary of the Treasury, Samuel  Portland Chase, was an ally of the banking interests. During the Civil  War Chase supported Lincoln's monetary policy but later presented  legislation to Congress favorable to the banking interests. Similarly  Senator John Sherman, responsible for Senate passage of financial  legislation, added even more financial power to that already granted the  money monopoly in the form of National Bank legislation.   Lincoln's legal tender bill was reported on February 25, 1862.  This was to issue $150 million of legal tender United States notes. At  that time Secretary Chase commented:   I have a greater aversion to making anything but coin a  legal tender in payment of debt;. ..it is however at present  impossible in consequence of the large expenditure entailed by the  war to procure sufficient coin for disbursements: And it has  therefore become indispensably necessary that we should resort  to the issue of United States notes. (1>   In similar manner Senator John Sherman of Ohio advocated the  measure on the grounds, "in no other way could the payment of the  troops and the satisfaction of other just demands be so economically or  so well provided for."   However this program of a national currency was opposed by the  New York banking interests and Senator John Sherman's advocation did  not, as we shall see later, reflect his true intent. (To be repeated in 1913  by Senator Owen and Congressman Glass who misrepresented their  true positions to the public on the Federal Reserve Act.)   The idea of a national currency was opposed by banking interests,  the money power, because it would obviously remove from bankers the  privilege of issuing an effective     50     Abraham Lincoln: Last President to Fight the Money Power   substitute for money (defined in the Constitution as gold and silver).  What bankers wanted the government to undertake was transfer the  right to issue money to banking interests, i.e., to allow bankers to act as  agents of the Federal Government. The U.S. Government would then  be a perpetual borrower required to borrow funds at interest from a  private money monopoly - which had obtained the monopoly power  from the government itself. Given the restrictions of the Constitution,  banking interests had to tread carefully.   The Clinton Roosevelt (Bank of New York) proposal was to  remove the Constitution, shadowed in the late 20th century by the  Trilateral Commission pleas that the Constitution is outdated.   Moreover the public itself, apart from Constitutional limits, would  hardly agree to a private money monopoly if the truth were to be widely  known. So we find from the time of Jefferson to the 1990s that any  discussion of a private money monopoly is quickly and thoroughly  suppressed. Nothing is more dangerous to the power of the elite than  the public discovery and understanding of the private control of money  supply.   What the bankers wanted in the 1860s was for the government to  issue interest-bearing bonds. These bonds were to be used as the basis  of bank credit. While Lincoln pushed his legal tender act the bankers  met to draft what became the National Bank Act of 1863.   The purpose of the National Bank Act was to give control of the  money issue to bankers. This monopoly could be used for profit and  with the Civil War, profits would be substantial.   The difference between Lincoln and the money power was  essentially whether the medium of exchange (convertible bank notes  and inconvertible bank credit transferred by check) was to be created  and issued by     51     The Federal Reserve Conspiracy _     private monopoly or government monopoly. In other words, whether  the power of government is subordinate to a banking elite or bankers  subject to the power of government which, if Congress did its job  honestly, also means subordinate to the power of the people.   An extraordinary letter from Senator John Sherman to Rothschild  Brothers in London dated June 25, 1863 (and leaked on Wall Street in  1863) demonstrates the double dealing of even "prominent" and "well  regarded" politicians.   Sherman saw a chance to curry favor with the preeminent world  bankers of the time and personally brought the possibilities of the  proposed National Banking Act to the attention of international bankers.   On the following pages we reproduce a letter from Rothschild  Brothers (London) to Ikleheimer, Morton and Vandergould (Wall  Street, New York) acknowledging receipt of a Sherman letter and  relaying its contents. These bankers reply to Rothschild Brothers on  July 6, 1863, with details of the National Banking Act and some  insights into the character of Senator John Sherman.   London, June 25, 1863;   Messrs. Ikleheimer, Morton and Vandergould No. 3, Wall St., New   York, U.S.A.   Dear Sirs:   A Mr. John Sherman has written us from a town in Ohio,  U.S.A., as to the profit that may be made in the National Banking  business, under a recent act of your Congress; a copy of this act  accompanies this letter.   Apparently this act has been drawn up on the plan  formulated here by the British Bankers Association, and by that  Association recommended     52     Abraham Lincoln: Last President to Fight the Money Power   to our American friends, as one that if enacted into law, would prove  highly profitable to the banking fraternity throughout the world.   Mr. Sherman declares that there has never been such an  opportunity for capitalists to accumulate money as that presented by  this act. It gives the National Bank almost complete control of the  National finance. "The few who understand the system," he says, "will  either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors that  there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the  great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the  tremendous advantages that Capital derives from the system, will bear  its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that  the system is inimical to their interests....   Your respectful servants Rothschild  Brothers   New York City   July 6, 1863   Messrs. Rothschild Brothers,   London, England.   Dear Sirs:   We beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 25, in which  you refer to a communication received of Honorable John Sherman of  Ohio, with reference to the advantages and profits of an American  investment under the provisions of the National Banking Act.   Mr. Sherman possesses in a marked degree the distinguishing  characteristics of a successful     53     The Federal Reserve Conspiracy   financier. His temperament is such that whatever his feelings may  be they never cause him to lose sight of the main chance.   He is young, shrewd and ambitious. He has fixed his eyes  upon the Presidency of the United States and is already a member  of Congress (he has financial ambitions, too). He rightfully thinks  that he has everything to gain by being friendly with men and  institutions having large financial resources, and which at times  are not too particular in their methods, either of obtaining  government aid, or protecting themselves against unfriendly  legislation.   As to the organization of the National Bank here and the  nature and profits of such investment we beg leave to refer to our  printed circulars enclosed herein, vis:   "Any number of persons not less than five may organize a  National Banking Corporation.   "Except in cities having 6000 inhabitants or less, a National  Bank cannot have less than $1,000,000 capital.   "They are private corporations organized for private gain,  and select their own officers and employees.   "They are not subject to control of State Laws, except as  Congress may from time to time provide.   "They may receive deposits and loan the same for their own  benefit. They can buy and sell bonds and discount paper and do a  general banking business.     54     Abraham Lincoln: Last President to Fight the Money Power   "To start a National Bank on the scale of $1,000,000 will require  purchase of that amount (par value) of U. S. Government Bonds.   "U. S. Government Bonds can now be purchased at 50%  discount, so that a bank of $1,000,000 capital can be started at this  time for only $500,000.   "These bonds must be deposited in the U.$. Treasury at  Washington as security for the National Bank currency, that will be  furnished by the government to the bank.   "The United $tates Government will pay 6% interest on the bonds  in gold, the interest being paid semi-annually. It will be seen that at the  present price of bonds the interest paid by the government itself is 12%  in gold on all money invested.   "The U.$. Government on having the bonds aforesaid deposited  with the Treasurer, on the strength of such security will furnish  National currency to the bank depositing the bonds, at an annual  interest of only one per cent per annum.   "The currency is printed by the U.$. Government in a form so like  greenbacks, that the people do not detect the difference although the  currency is but a promise of the bank to pay.   "The demand for money is so great that this money can be readily  loaned to the people across the counter of the bank at a discount at the  rate of 10% at thirty to sixty days time, making it about 12% interest on  the currency.   "The interest on the bonds, plus the interest on the currency which  the bonds secure, plus inciden-     55     The Federal Reserve Conspiracy   tals of the business, ought to make the gross earnings of the bank  amount to from 28% to 33-1/3%.   "National Banks are privileged to increase and contract  their currency at will and, of course, can grant or withhold loans  as they may see fit. As the banks have a National organization and  can easily act together in withholding loans or extending them, it  follows that they can by united action in refusing to make loans  cause a stringency in the money market, and in a single week or  even a single day cause a decline in all products of the country.   "National Banks pay no taxes on their bonds, nor on their  capital, nor on their deposits. "   Requesting that you will regard this as strictly  confidential....   Most respectfully yours,   Ikelheimer, Morton and Vandergould (3)   It was particularly important to international bankers that they  succeed with Lincoln. If Lincoln implemented public control of finance  in the United States then other nations would pluck up courage to strip  financial power from their bankers.   European bankers, especially those in England, organized against  Abraham Lincoln and used commercial banking channels to pressure  bankers in the U.S. for support. The Legal Tender Bill wanted by  Lincoln was subjected to intense lobbying in Washington and so loaded  with amendments as to become useless. One amendment required that  interest on bonds and notes - mere pieces of paper - was to be paid  twice a year in gold coin. Suffocation by ridiculous amendments was  successful. Defeat of the Legal Tender Bill was followed in 1862 by a  bill to allow banks to issue private bank notes less than $5.00 within the     56     Abraham Lincoln: Last President to Fight the Money Power   pistrict of Columbia, a first step towards a privately controlled fiat  money supply.   On July 23, 1862 Lincoln vetoed the Private Bank Note Bill on  grounds that it was the responsibility of the Federal Government to  provide a circulating medium and that United States notes could  equally fulfill the function of small private notes. This veto was  Lincoln's challenge to the banking interests.   Lincoln was a caustic critic of bankers. A delegation of New York  bankers came to Washington to lobby in favor of the Legal Tender Bill.  The Secretary of the Treasury introduced the delegation as follows:   These gentlemen from New York have come to see the  Secretary of the Treasury about our new loan. As bankers they are  obliged to hold our national securities. I can vouch for their  patriotism and loyalty, for, as the Good Book says, "for where the  treasure is, there will the heart be also. "   Lincoln replied: There is another test that I might apply,  "Wherever the carcass is, there will the eagles be gathered together."^;   Lincoln's national currency scheme was in direct opposition to the  international bankers who at that time planned to extend the Bank of  England gold standard private money to the United States. Later in the  20th century bankers went for fiat money not backed by gold but in the  mid- 19th century the gold-silver system offered more opportunities for  personal gain.   Lincoln was proposing that instead of the Federal Government  borrowing paper or created money from the bankers that the bankers  borrow coin or gold from the Treasury. In this way the banking interest  would be unable to create fictional wealth from the printing press.     57     The Federal Reserve Conspiracy   The National Bank Act was presented to the United States  as a device to raise money to run the Civil War and achieve  financial stability. Under the Act any five persons could form a  bank with a capital of $50,000 or more. After deposit in the  United States Treasury of interest-bearing bonds equal to one-  third of the paid-in capital, the Government would print National  Bank certificates on behalf of the bank to the amount of 90  percent of the part value of the bonds printed.   These National Bank certificates could then be used by the  bank to carry on banking business and receive full profit on them  as though they were the bank's own notes. Furthermore the bank  received from the Federal Government interest payments in gold  coin on bonds deposited in the Treasury.   In other words the bankers had a double profit. First, interest  on government guaranteed money issues and second, interest paid  on bonds in gold. The National Banking Act was a guaranteed  profit making machine for anyone who wanted to get into  banking.   Once again the Jeffersonian-Jacksonian tradition raised its  voice. It claimed that the National banking system would create  an even greater centralization of the money power than the Bank  of the United States - which Andrew Jackson had vetoed.   This time around the money power was much more  organized. The National Banking Bill was in the Senate only three  or four days and in the House only two days before it was rushed  through at a particularly critical time in the Civil War. The Bill  was signed into law by President Lincoln on February 25, 1863.     58     Abraham Lincoln: Last President to Fight the Money Power     Endnotes to Chapter Six     (1) Letter from Secretary of the Treasury Chase to Elbridge, G.  Spaulding, January 29, 1862. Quoted in American Nation History  Series, 1861-1863 by Hosmer, vol. 20, pg. 169.   (2) John R. Elsom, Lightning Over the Treasury Building (or an  expose of our banking and currency monstrosity, Americas most  reprehensible and un-American racket), (Boston: Meador  Publishing Co., 1941), pp. 51-52.   (3) Op. cit. pp. 53-55.   (4) Ibid.     59     Chapter Seven:  THE MONEY TRUST CREATES THE FED   

No comments:

Post a Comment