Study Says It’s Not Just Brain Tumours – Cell Phones Are Also Causing Heart Tumours from Collective Evolution
In Brief
- The Facts:Unusual cancer called Schwannoma, cancer of the heart, in male rats has been caused by electromagnetic radiation. In addition, a study of cell tower radiation also found increases in malignant brain (glial) tumours.
- Reflect On:Animal testing is unnecessary at this point. We have tonnes of data on this, there is no more need for scientific discussion as this doesn't seem to be a debate, so why does the corporation always put up a fight?
The
thing is, it’s not just cell phone radiation, but rather a plethora of
electromagnetic radiation that’s currently being beamed out by our cell
towers, cell phones, computers, wireless routers etc. It’s a complete
sandwich and not one safety study has addressed just how much
electromagnetic radiation is currently present in our environment and
what our current human exposure levels are. Perhaps this is because it’s
becoming so evidently clear that there are no safe levels of exposure.
Now, multiple studies are emerging on the topic that is raising a clear
cause for concern.
advertisement - learn more
There are already existing issues with
current technologies, but right now, 5G wireless is making a lot of
noise. Research has also shown that the same frequencies used by the
Department of Defense in crowd control weapons
actually form the foundation of the 5G network. Dr. Sharon Goldberg,
an internal medicine physician & professor recently gave her
testimony at a hearing in Michigan about the dangers of electromagnetic
radiation. It’s a very powerful testimony.
Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects…5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research.” – Goldberg
You can watch the entire video and read more about it here.
There are currently hundreds of
scientists that have been petitioning the United Nations to look into
this topic more deeply. Ask yourself, why are there more than 2,000
peer-reviewed studies that show what we are doing with EMF exposure is
not safe?
According to the appeal sent to Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, about the EMF issue:
advertisement - learn more
Numerous scientific publications have found that EMF affects living organisms at levels far below international exposure guidelines adopted by most industrialized nations. There is discrepancy in how this matter is considered at the WHO, however. While WHO accepted its International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)’s recommendation that classifies both ELF/EMF and RF/EMF as Group 2B “Possible Carcinogens,” it also, in direct contrast to these warnings, recommends the adoption of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection’s (ICNIRP) guidelines for exposure standards. These guidelines, developed by a self-selected 2 independent industry group, have long been criticized as not protective given the science now established.
This information, and much more, is
exactly why multiple countries around the world have completely banned
cell phones when it comes to young users, cell phones in school,
wireless internet within elementary schools, daycare and pre-schools.
Awareness in Europe seems to be progressing at a faster rate than awareness in North America. Take France for example, they passed a law in
2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools. In addition to that, the
law states that Wi-Fi must be turned off in all elementary schools when
it’s not in use. A wired connection, if possible, is preferred. When it
comes to cell phones in France, all advertisements must recommend
headsets to reduce the phones radiation exposure to the brain.
Furthermore, advertisements directing cell phone use for young children
are banned.
“Putting it bluntly they are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely.” –
Dr. Martin Blank, Ph.D., from the Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at Colombia University (source)
The Heart
Researchers with the renowned Ramazzini Institute (RI) in Italy announced that a large-scale lifetime study of
lab animals exposed to environmental levels of cell tower radiation
developed cancer. A $25 million study of much higher levels of cell
phone radiofrequency (RF) radiation, from the US National Toxicology Program (NTP),
has also reported finding the same unusual cancer, called Schwannoma of
the heart, in male rats treated at the highest dose. In addition, the
RI study of cell tower radiation also found increases in malignant brain
(glial) tumors in female rats and precancerous conditions including
Schwann cells hyperplasia in both male and female rats.
The study’s findings are making headline news. Read the Corriere Di Bologna article “Cellulari, a study by Ramazzini: “They cause very rare tumours.”
Our findings of cancerous tumours in rats exposed to environmental levels of RF are consistent with and reinforce the results of the US NTP studies on cell phone radiation, as both reported increases in the same types of tumours of the brain and heart in Sprague-Dawley rats. Together, these studies provide sufficient evidence to call for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to re-evaluate and re-classify their conclusions regarding the carcinogenic potential of RFR in humans,” said Fiorella Belpoggi Ph.D., study author and RI Director of Research. (source)
The Study exposed 2448 Sprague-Dawley
rats from birth all the way until their natural death to cell tower
radiation for 19 hours per day. The exposures mimicked base station
emissions like those from cell towers antennas, and this is an important
point,
“All of the exposures used in the Ramazzini study were below the US FCC limits. These are permissible exposures according to the FCC. In other words, a person can legally be exposed to this level of radiation. Yet cancers occurred in these animals at these legally permitted levels. The Ramazzini findings are consistent with the NTP study demonstrating these effects are a reproducible finding,” explained Ronald Melnick Ph.D., formerly the Senior NIH toxicologist who led the design of the NTP study on cell phone radiation now a Senior Science Advisor to Environmental Health Trust (EHT). (source)
Here’s another telling quote about the
study, coming from Lennart Hardell, MD, Ph.D., physician-epidemiologist
with the Department of Oncology, Univesity Hospital, Orebro, Sweden, who
has published extensively on the environmental cause of cancer
including Agent Orange, pesticides and cell phone radiofrequency
radiation.
The US NTP results combined now with the Ramazzini study, reinforce human studies from our team and others providing clear evidence that RF radiation causes acoustic neuromaa (vestibular schwannoma) and gliomas, and should be classified carcinogenic to humans. (source)
Ramazzini Institute investigators have
completed nearly 500 cancer bioassays on more than 200 compounds, and
their study design is unique in that animals are allowed to live until
their natural deaths in order to allow detection of late-developing
tumours. Eighty percent of all human cancers are late-developing, occurring in humans after 60 years of age.
Below is an interview with the lead author of the study:
If you’d like to access more information and science regarding the electromagnetic radiation problem, be sure to visit the Environmental Health Trust(EHT).
There are still several issues of critical importance that need to be
addressed without somebody rolling their eyes at you. This is one of
them.
EHT is a scientific virtual think tank
conducting cutting-edge research on environmental health risks with some
of the world’s top researchers. EHT educates individuals, health
professionals and communities about policy changes needed to reduce
those risks. EHT maintains a regularly updated database of worldwide precautionary policies: more than a dozen countries recommend reducing wireless exposure to children.
What You Can Do
So, what can you do about it? Well, you
could turn off your cell phone when you get the chance. You could have a
wired internet connection, which is also faster than wireless. You
could unplug some of your appliances before you go to bed, you can
purchase electromagnetic shielding materials, like bed canopies, sheets,
clothes, paint to protect your entire home etc. These materials are out
there, all you need is an internet search to find them.
You could also write to your government
or local authority. You can create awareness by citing the science and
showing it to others. At the end of the day, there are a number of ways
to limit your exposure, but the truth is, it doesn’t have to be this
way. These signals can be transmuted without the use of damaging
high-frequency radiation, so ask yourself, what’s really going on here?
Why are we purposefully selecting frequencies that harm humans?
You can also keep a healthy immune
system, one that can fight off and defend any disease or harm caused by
these exposures. Here at CE, we’ve created a lot of awareness about the mind-body connection and how strong it is. Fear will only make things worse and doesn’t help when trying to spark your very own placebo effect.
We’ve been living with this technology for some time, but only now are younger generations actually being born into it.
The Takeaway
This is one of many examples where
industry science is clearly shown to be false, as there are a number of
repeatable scientific studies showing otherwise. This is an important
issue, and even more important is the recognition of the corporate
control over government policy. We clearly do not live in a democracy,
when so many people can become aware and concerned about an issue, yet
it never receives any attention from the mainstream media and is
constantly swept under the rug, while the corporation maintains its
safety.
How could a human being, the one who is
making these decisions and approving these process, do such a thing in
good conscience? The takeaway here is to recognize that ultimately, a
shift in consciousness is needed. Ethics, morality and a desire to do no
harm to the human race is needed and should represent the core of our
technological and intellectual advancements. These examples show us the
backwards nature of how we are living so we can recognize it within
ourselves and begin to operate more harmoniously. As we do in our
individual lives, the greater collective
does as well. No longer can we rely on a broken system to fix our
problems, we have to take the initiative, like all of the people
mentioned in this article are doing.
We Need Your Support...
In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!
SUPPORT CE HERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment