By Jon Rappoport
"Gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is
the dysphoria (distress) a person experiences as a result of the sex and
gender they were assigned at birth." (Wikipedia)
"Technocracy is shaping a new world based on twisting
morality into pseudoscientific "facts" that demand compliance. It's a
hoax on a grand scale." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
Government programs to teach the issue of gender in schools
are gaining steam. "Fluid-gender" is the artificial construct used to
promote these programs.
For years, I've been warning about the fabricated use of medical labels as a pretext for "protecting the rights of the child."
The op goes this way:
Shift a decision about morality into a decision about the
right to obtain medical treatment. For example, claim there is a
disorder called Gender Dysphoria. Claim many children suffer from it.
State that gender reassignment is the treatment that cures the disorder.
State that every child has the "right" to choose the
treatment---AND parents who oppose it are illegally restricting their
children.
Breitbart reports on a current case: "Parents of a 17-year-old girl lost
custody of their daughter for opposing her wish for transgender medical
treatments."
"Judge Sylvia Sieve Hendon of Hamilton County, Ohio has
allowed the girl to be taken into the custody of her grandparents - who
support her medical transition - allowing them to make decisions that
will further along her physical transition to the opposite sex."
"The parents reportedly continued to call their daughter by
her given name, rather than a male name, and refused to consent to
hormone treatments that were recommended by her medical team. The girl
claimed she became suicidal as a result of her parents' refusal to
accept that she wanted to transition to a male."
"'We think the grandparents are the ones who have an open
mind and will ... make this sort of decision best for the child'," said
attorney Paul Hunt, who represents the court-appointed guardian ad
litem. 'The parents have clearly indicated that they're not open to
it'."
"According to the news story, the parents argued their
daughter was not 'even close to being able to make such a life-altering
decision at this time'. A county prosecutor, however, claimed the
parents were opposed to their daughter transitioning to become a male
because of their Christian religious beliefs."
A court decides the parents are not in charge.
The parents are denying their child the right to obtain a "medical treatment."
Therefore, the State must intercede.
Here is another case that goes much further.
The basis of the decision is so insane that most people are unwilling
to think about it---the criminality is so egregious it paralyzes the
mind. AND AT THE BOTTOM OF IT, THERE IS A PRESUMPTION THAT A PERSON WHO
IS IN NO WAY INTELLECTUALLY OR MORALLY OR EMOTIONALLY OR SPIRITUALLY
CAPABLE OF MAKING A CHOICE ABOUT PERMANENTLY MUTILATING HIMSELF/HERSELF
IS, IN FACT, GRANTED SUCH A "CHOICE" BY SOCIETY.
Yahoo 7 News, Australia, reports (9/16): "A
four-year-old who identifies as transgender has begun to transition
before their first day at school, hoping to complete the full
transformation by 2017."
"While the child is the youngest on Australian record to
change their gender, the New South Wales government has revealed
'hundreds' of other children are being referred to the state's hospitals
for gender dysphoria."
"The four-year-old is reportedly being supported throughout
the transition by the education department, and is part of the Safe
Schools program."
Yes, the Safe Schools program. Safe for whom?
Deputy Secretary of School Operations Gregory Prior made this
announcement at a budget hearing, which presumably means the
four-year-old child's parents are receiving public funds for the sex
change.
No mention of how the parents of the four-year old came to
their "medical" decision. No mention of the "discussion" with the child
that led to this decision.
The New South Wales government doesn't just stand aside; it supports this madness.
A four-year old. He/she comes up with this idea (gender change) out of the blue? He/she expresses it to his parents?
He/she is supposed to understand the medical procedures and the consequences?
The doctors go along with this?
"We have a four-year old coming in today to begin a sex-change."
"Good. The team will be ready."
Not a flicker of doubt.
Here is the Wikipedia definition of gender dysphoria: "Gender
dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is the dysphoria (distress)
a person experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were
assigned at birth."
Assigned? This is supposed to be some sort of arbitrary labeling that is handed to an infant?
This whole social program has gained so much steam that many
people are paralyzed---they refuse to express outrage. They refuse to
point out the obvious. They knuckle under. The criminally delusional
parents who go along with (and urge and initiate) sex change for their
own children consider themselves enlightened. They're in a trance, and
they feel good about the trance.
"Yes, our four-year old is undergoing gender transition and we think it's wonderful."
What coaching did these parents engage in with their very young child to push along this insanity?
A boy put on his mother's dress one day, and then the parents sat down with him and engaged in a deep conversation?
A four-year old is now the ruler of his/her own fate?
This is legalized genital mutilation and torture, undertaken as a "proper medical procedure."
The doctors should have their licenses stripped, and they
should be sent to prison. They should share their cells with the
government officials who support this crime.
On some level, medical sex change for children is an
outgrowth of the obsession about children being "special."
Ultra-special. The child's wisdom extends to all sorts of insights
he/she has about life.
A child does have a free and open attitude toward life, but
this has nothing to do with making decisions that have enormous
consequences for him/her. And the word "consequences" hardly begins to
describe the surgical mutilation.
"What has become of our society?" The answer is clear. There
are masters and slaves. The slaves are going along. The masters are
psychopaths. But that leaves a lot of middle ground, where parents,
educators, and bureaucrats are willingly cooperating in destruction.
It's not simply a lack of courage. It's self-induced brainwashing.
"This is freedom. Freedom is a good thing. What could be more
free and innovative than a child deciding to change his/her own sex at
the age of four? We're creating a better world."
The parents' eyes are bright. Their smiles are wide.
And if medical sexual mutilation of a child is gladly
permitted, what isn't permitted? What "voluntary" or mandated medical
procedure would be ruled out as too grotesque?
For example, shouldn't we support, in glowing terms, mass sterilization of women through vaccination campaigns that covertly create future miscarriages?
After all, in the Third world, where such efforts have already been
made (Kenya), overpopulation is a problem. We know it's a problem
because, decades ago, Henry Kissinger said so.
In Australia, where this four-year-old child is about to go
through sex change, every doctor in the country should stand up and
refuse. They should say, "Look, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, we see what your
decision is, and we can't even begin to describe how we feel. Don't look
to us for help in committing this horror on your child. If we hear of
any doctor who goes along with your plan, we'll publicize his name and,
if necessary, physically remove him from the country. We'll see to it he
never practices medicine in Australia another day in his life."
As for the parents of this four-year old, they're lost.
They're lost to themselves and their child. They're in a hell of their
own making. And they're fashioning a worse hell for their child.
And they don't even know it.
They're "progressive" and proud of it.
They're leading their child to surgical genital destruction
and, through drugs, the permanent derailment of his/her endocrine
system.
It's "scientific and medical," so it must be a good thing.
The program of child gender change is also an attack against
society at its most basic biological level. The goal is destruction.
Behind it are decades of preparation in the form of so-called
moral relativity: every group and person has their own definition of
right and wrong, and these views are all equal. No one has the right to
challenge another's moral position as inferior.
There must be placid acceptance.
Eventually, this leads to accepting that a four-year old is
capable of understanding, and making choices about, his/her own
sexuality. No challenge. No moral outrage.
This is on the order of accepting and facilitating euthanasia.
For centuries, societies and civilizations have struggled to
define and embed moral truth in their cores. This has never been a pure
process, but it has taken place, at great human cost.
We are now seeing a reversal of that struggle. Now, monsters
can ensure that physical mutilation is placed on a pedestal. It is given
special protection, as a right. The very, very young, who have no idea
what this is all about, are coerced into agreeing to "procedures" that
violate every shred of sanity and goodness and innocence and decency.
This is evil.
And its purveyors are in the public square, touting their own humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment