Who owns diseases?
By Jon Rappoport
---All right, look, here's what we'll do. We'll take a few
general symptoms like fatigue, fever, and swelling, and we'll invent one
new disease label that covers them. We'll say this is a specific new
disease and we're looking for the cause. Of course, there is no single
cause because this isn't a single disease. It's a vague generality. But
since we control the disease label, the name, we can convince everyone
that this is a specific and real disease. It's a total con, but we can
sell it---
Over the years, my readers have seen how I attack disease labels and disorder labels; how I expose them as fictions.
Let me show you an example of the disease label game. The citation is: Blackman,
JA. MD, MPH; Gurka, MJ, PhD, "Developmental and Behavioral
Comorbidities of Asthma in Children", Journal of Developmental &
Behavioral Pediatrics, 28(2):92-99, April 2007:
"Children with asthma have higher rates of
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; diagnoses of depression,
behavioral disorders, learning disabilities; and missed school days (all
p < .0001). The more severe the asthma is, the higher the rates are
of these problems."
Let's start with asthma. We know that many cases of
lung-airway obstruction are called asthma. Try to find a single known
cause for asthma. You can't. The many instances of airway obstruction
can have many different causes (e.g., allergies to different
environmental substances). Therefore, "asthma" has never been proved to
be one unique condition.
In the citation above, the researchers state that asthma in
children is associated with higher rates of ADHD, depression, behavioral
and learning disorders. But these conditions, too, don't have a single
proven cause. Try to find one.
Go to the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, and look for a lab test that would confirm a diagnosis
of any of these conditions (ADHD, depression, etc.)---you won't find
one. No blood test, no urine test, no brain scan, no genetic assay.
What are we looking at here? We're looking at attempts to
define, label, and own disorders and diseases which have never been
proven to be singular and specific.
While treating, say, asthma with a drug might bring relief
(along with adverse effects), long-term treatment that gets to the root
cause and creates a cure---well, that's never going to happen unless the
unique individual with the problem is addressed---rather than invoking
generalities.
Modern medicine floats disease labels that are generalities, as if they were specific. Often, they're not.
Here's the rule: IF YOU CAN'T FIND A SINGLE CAUSE OF A
DISEASE CONDITION, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CALL IT A SPECIFIC DISEASE
CONDITION IN THE FIRST PLACE.
IT MAY WELL BE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT CONDITIONS COMING FROM A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT CAUSES.
FOR LONG-TERM RESULTS, WORK WITH THE INDIVIDUAL PATIENT, NOT THE GROUP.
"Children with asthma tend to have higher rates of
depression." The first condition---asthma---for which a single cause has
not been found, leads to the higher rate of a second
condition---depression---for which a single cause has not been found.
Of what possible use is such gibberish? It's useful in marketing and selling gigantic amounts of drugs.
No comments:
Post a Comment