The Damaging Effects Of 5G Wireless On Your Health by Arjun Walia from Collective Evolution
Wireless radiation is a huge health
problem that continues to be ignored and another opportunity for us to
gaze into the past of similar occurrences and learn from our mistakes.
Take tobacco for example, at one time in history you were considered a
fool and ‘crazy’ for speaking up against the big tobacco
companies and
letting people know that cigarettes compromise our health. Today,
science has spoken, and it has spoken for a long time, despite what the
corporations put out into the public and the “science” they used to
approve these things in the first place.
advertisement - learn more
There doesn’t seem to be much more of a difference
between communication companies that sell and manufacture wireless
products and services, which, according to hundreds of scientists and
countless amounts of publications, are urging authorities to pay closer
attention to what wireless radiation is doing to human health.
This is one of the multiple examples where corporate
control rules and dictates government policy, policies that favour big
corporations at the behest of planet Earth and the rest of the human
population. But it’s more so apparent in North America.
European Restrictions
In Europe, multiple countries have restrictions on
WiFi and have pointed out some disturbing things. France passed a law in
2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools, the law states that WiFi
must be turned off in all elementary schools when it’s not in use. W
wired connection if possible, is preferred. Advertisements directing
cell phone use towards young children are banned.
An example from Namibia states
quite clearly that current so-called “safety” standards don’t protect
citizens from long-term health effects, and that the guidelines
governing their use do not guarantee adequate protection against the
effects of long-term exposure.
Other countries include Belgium, Spain, Israel,
Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, India, Finland, Cyprus
and more.
advertisement - learn more
Why are they saying no to WiFi? See for yourself:
You can access hundreds of these scientific papers and read more here,
just click on the science section and under each heading, there are
links directly to the research. If you click on the drop-down tab, a
list of scientific references as documentation appears.
Related CE Article with more information:
Yes, we are making progress, and awareness is being
created and steps are being taken, but the corporate take over of North
America and almost the entire planet is simply brushing our health under
the table, because, unfortunately, they have the power to do so.
At the same time, we are the ones using this
technology. It’s becoming so useful, and so easy to just rely on the
corporation like we do with everything else. How ironic is it that we
raise money and advocate for cancer, yet support the very things that
are contributing to it, on grande scales?
Millions of children and adults in schools around the world spend significant amounts of time around wireless devices and Wi-Fi. Many schools are introducing Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies and installing industrial wireless routers for tablets. However, wireless devices expose students and staff to microwave radiation that can impede learning and overall health. Studies have shown that microwave radiation can damage reproductive systems, impact the immune system, alter brain functioning, and may increase cancer risk. Tablets have up to 5 antennae that are constantly emitting short intense bursts of radiation even when not connected to the Internet. Wireless devices in classrooms thus result in multiple sources of wireless radiation exposure. – Environmental Health Trust
The 5G Health Concerns
So, what about 5G? Science already indicates that the
current wireless technologies of 2G, 3G and 4G – in use today with our
cell phones, computers, and wearable tech. – creates radio frequency
exposure which poses a serious health risk to humans, animals and the
environment. 5G is the term used to describe the next-generation of
mobile networks beyond the 4G LTE mobile networks used today. 5G is
intended to be the technology that allows the “Internet of Things” (IOT)
to exist and connects all internet connected devices together.
Scientists have been studying the health effects of
5G and wireless radiation and are deeply concerned with their findings
and are calling for a stop to the rollout of 5G, as well as a halt to
the proposed increase in radio frequency radiation exposure to the
public.
Thanks to all of the efforts by various researchers,
scientists and more, the world is waking up to this information and it’s
actually starting to become talked about within the mainstream. It
always seems like such a long process from the point where something is
known, to actually mass consensus and action steps being created.
A CBS news report recently emphasized:
The wireless industry is in a race to roll out 5G service. The network is supposed to be up to 100 times faster than current data speeds, but it requires cellphone tower equipment to be closer to users than before. Wireless companies in the U.S. say they’ll have to install about 300,000 new antennas – roughly equal to the total number of cell towers built over the past three decades. That’s causing outrage and alarm in some neighbourhoods, as antennas go up around homes.
5G requires the installation of new equipment across
the U.S. Every wireless company is working to build its own 5G network.
This is worse than cell phone use, and yet, according to government
health authorities, “a limited number of studies have shown some
evidence of statistical association of cell phone use and brain tumour
risks… but most studies have found no association.”
Waiting for high levels of scientific and clinical proof before taking action to prevent well-known risks can lead to very high health and economic costs, as was the case with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.
Melissa Arnoldi, who leads AT&T’s efforts, said “if it’s not already in your neighbourhood, it’s coming.” This is quite concerning, she told CBS news that “5G uses high-frequency waves that support faster speeds but don’t travel as far as current wireless frequencies. So instead of relying on large cellphone towers spread far apart, they need “small cell” sites that are much closer together.”“Putting it bluntly they are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely” (source)
Sometimes I wonder, how is this even allowed to happen? Who are the people which control what type of information with regards to our health gets emphasized, and what doesn’t?
This new 5G equipment is currently being installed in a neighbourhood near you.
I’ll leave you with this TED talk by a Silicon-valley engineer turned technology health advocate, Jeromy Johnson.
Related CE Article:
FCC Intimidates Press & Evades Questioning About Wireless & Cancer at 5G Rollout
Solutions Exist
You can use a wired connection, which is very fast and in most cases faster than a wireless connection. Minimize your cell phone use, and perhaps look into some devices that may be used to block the biological effects this stuff is, does, and can have on us.FactSheets:What Parents Need to Know About Wireless Radiation,
American Academy of Pediatrics Recommendation Protect The Ones You Love Card English,Spanish
BabySafe Project: “Reduce Your Wireless Exposure”English Brochure, Spanish Brochure
New Jersey Education Association “Minimize health risks from electronic devices”Article,PDF of Recommendations
No comments:
Post a Comment