Tuesday, May 15, 2018
1002-1006 The Long and Short of It All -- Part 2
By Anna Von Reitz
All you currently active duty and reserve and retired United States Marines out there-- what was it you were shouting every day of your Marine training?
All you currently active duty and reserve and retired United States Marines out there-- what was it you were shouting every day of your Marine training?
All you United States Army guys --- which one are you?
This same question applies to the Air Force, the Navy, even the Coast Guard.
The answer determines whether you
are an American and an honorable member of the American Armed Forces or
you are acting in the capacity of a filthy commercial mercenary --
albeit, not getting the big bucks of merc wages.
Did anyone ever tell you that when
you signed up to enter military service you were enrolled as a mercenary
in the employment of commercial corporations
and given a share in the profits via a stock portfolio? No?
No doubt this is coming as Big News,
but yes, the rats set you up with a stock portfolio they were supposed
to give to you when you left military service. The catch is that so far
as their records show, you never left their jurisdiction.
This is another example of the
criminality infesting every aspect of the "government" corporations ---
your DD214 is not a discharge from "US citizenship". So you are still
snagged.
You have to go back to the head of
your branch of service and serve Notice that you have returned to your
birthright political status as an American State Citizen. Otherwise,
they just presume that you are a "Lifer" and still obligated to bow,
scrape, and salute. And they just keep your stock portfolio and manage
it "for" you until you die, at which point they claim it as "abandoned
property".
And you thought you were serving
your country all the while you were serving the "US CORP". Nobody told
you any different, either. Until now.
So fire up your writing instruments and re-convey your Trade Names to the land and soil of the state where you were born (www.annavonreitz.com,
Article #928, Editable pdfs) and give Notice that you left "US
Citizenship" behind effective the date of "Discharge" noted on your
DD214 and you are owed a stock portfolio and/or income therefrom earned
while unwittingly employed as a commercial mercenary.
Direct the Service Branch Office to
update your political status records and forward your claim to the
Office of Military Settlements. That should put a bulwark in the
retirement resources of a lot of American veterans. And when you get a
chance, say, thank you, to the True God. The rats didn't intend for it
to be any actual benefit to you. They just wanted to stand around and
say, "Gee, look at all these accounts nobody ever collected. What a
bunch of patriotic guys!"
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Here It Is AGAIN for All Those Who Need to Know
By Anna Von Reitz
There is a widespread swath of gross
ignorance in America populated by True Believers who think that they
know all they need to know and devil take the hindmost.
No doubt that is comforting to them and they cling to their suppositions accordingly, like Linus clinging to his Blanket.
---Until, that is, they land in a
"US District Court" and are told that they have no constitutional
guarantees and other wake up calls come due.
For all of those who think that I am
a "Patriot Guru" and that I can't possibly know what I am talking about
despite the abundant factual and actual proof that I do (admittedly not
paying federal income tax since 1998, for example) here is a
compilation of primary source quotes from people as diverse as Frederick
Douglas and JFK in support of the information I am giving you---300
pages worth:
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
The Long and Short of All of It
By Anna Von Reitz
Either these people are: (a) my employees, owing me good faith service,
or (b) they are foreign commercial mercenaries trespassing upon me and
engaging in inland piracy.
In the first case, they are obligated to honor and protect my person and
property. That is the only credible reason for any government to exist.
In the second case, they are pirates and every anti-piracy law ever
created kicks into gear, including the international treaties that
directly obligate both the Holy Sea and the British Monarch and their
respective organizations to protect my person and property.
Read that: Checkmate.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
The [Municipal] United States Corporation -- a Lesson About Larry Becraft
By Anna Von Reitz
Here's a good example of how attorneys deliberately avoid and obscure the actual truth and substance of things. Larry finds an obscure reference somewhere in my writings to the Act of 1871. It was probably a quote from someone else or part of a list of historical actions undertaken by Congress --- he doesn't say, so it's impossible to know where he picked this bit up, whether it is in context or not, but he quotes it as something I referenced:
Larry:
Contrary to your present denial, I have specifically quoted an article
you wrote that was posted on Crackpot Arnie's website, which is as
follows:
Claim
15. 1871: The Corporate Congress begins to set up shop for itself by
creating a separate government for the District of Columbia. The
initial effort fails but seven years later the
Washington DC Municipality is created as an independent international
city state run as a plenary oligarchy by the members of “Congress”.
Also in 1871, the Corporate Congress claimed to own all United States
corporations— 41st “Congress”– Third Session, Chapters 62, 63, 64, and
65.
Anna:
Here for your education --- AGAIN --- is the entire, truthful history of the Act of 1871:
1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which
was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions----
“An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of
Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and
continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of
1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved
March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in
force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of
June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102,
District of Columbia Code (1940)).
It doesn't really matter,
Larry, that the original Act was repealed and then passed in pieces
later --- what matters is the substance of the Act, which is apparently
what you wish to avoid and gainsay: the creation of the US Corp.
And it can only be the creation of the US Corp that we are looking at, Larry, because: the District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, so there was no need to do that in 1871 or 1874 or 1878.
Nowadays, Larry, it isn't
necessary to dig up the entire history of the Act of 1871 to prove that
the US Corp exists. It was emblazoned on every fork and spoon issued to
the US Military throughout World War II, painted on canteens, and
spray-painted on jeeps. There are thousands upon thousands of such
"admissions" available to anyone who cares to look.
And as if that were not
enough, there are many different commercial registries all over the
planet. Dunn and Bradstreet is just one such registry that people can
look up from their comfort of their computer console and see for
themselves that yes, indeed, what we think of as "the government" is in
fact functioning as a commercial corporation in the business of
providing "essential government services".
A small sampling of around
a hundred of the DUNNS numbers belonging to the US Corp are listed in
the Appendix in the back of my book, "You Know Something Is Wrong When",
and with a little poking on search engines like Manta.com, Edgar.com
and Thomas.com people can discover the CAGE and EIN and other proofs of
the commercial nature of such things as the "US GOVERNMENT" and the
"BLM" and the "STATE OF OHIO".
People can also search the
data bases of the State of Delaware, where most of these corporations
maintain registration. It's all online, Larry. No need to try to
obfuscate or hide the truth anymore.
And while people are at
it, they can look up the Clearfield Doctrine, which very clearly
enunciates the principle of the law which says that when a government
steps down and functions in the capacity of a corporation, it is subject
to all the same limitations as any other corporation.
As everyone, even Bob
Hurt, can now see, Larry's hair-splitting does him no credit and serves
no truth. He is simply obfuscating and trying to avoid admission of the
fact that the Act of 1871 led to the creation -- howbeit, seven years
later -- of the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia, more
popularly known by its dba "US Corp".
Well, there it is, folks
--- the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the Act
of 1871, for your knowledge and enjoyment --- so that when some
hair-splitting shyster tries to tell you that the Act of 1871 was
repeated in 1874 (which it was) you are prepared to tell him the rest of
the story just as I told it to Larry.
And I trust that my
credibility on the matter now stands heads and tails and nose and
whiskers above anything Mr. Becraft might have (left) to say.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Statehood is a Capacity
By Anna Von Reitz
It really does not matter for the purposes of the Federal Union that Texas came in as a "republic" or a "territory" or a "colony" either --- Texas agreed to act as a State of the Federal Union.
Being a "State" is a capacity ---
for example, you might agree to act in the capacity of an elector, or in
the capacity of a wife, or in the capacity of employee in a book
store.
In the same way the Body Politic of
Texas can act as an independent republic, a State Republic, a State, or a
State of State, or a Council of County Governments or, or, or.
Having agreed, Texas joined the
Union and has been part of the Union as a member-State ever since. If
it joined some other Union it might be called a "region" or a "borough"
or a "principality".
So in its own internal affairs,
Texas functions as a republic--- as all the State Republics are supposed
to (though largely don't) and with respect to its relationship with the
other States functions as a State of the Federal Union.
I wish people would take the time to
understand capacity. It's really not that foreign to us. We all act
in different capacities all the time. Why is it difficult to conceive
of our government acting in different capacities? Especially when it
is right in front of us? We can literally see that "Ohio" is different
than "State of Ohio"---right? So why don't people pick up on that
fact?
I spend a good deal of time
explaining the fact that The Texas Republic is a different entity from
The Republic of Texas, which is a different entity from Texas, which is
different from Texas State, which is different from The State of Texas,
which is different from the State of Texas, which is different from the
state of texas, which is different from the STATE OF TEXAS or
TEXAS...... and you can plug in any other state in place of "Texas" and
find the same array of capacities.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment