|
5G wireless: a ridiculous front for global control |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
|
5G wireless: a ridiculous front for global control
By Jon Rappoport
5G speed, for people who must download a whole season of
their favorite show in two seconds: "It's the next (fifth) generation of
cellular technology which promises to greatly enhance the speed,
coverage and responsiveness of wireless networks. How fast are we
talking about? Think 10 to 100 times speedier than your typical cellular
connection, and even faster than anything you can get with a physical
fiber-optic cable going into your house. (You'll be able to download a
season's worth of 'Stranger Things' in seconds.)" [CNET.com]
Lunatic 5G installation of small transmitters packed close
together every few hundred feet: "The next big thing in cellular
technology, 5G, will bring lightning-fast wireless Internet - and
thousands of antenna-topped poles to many neighborhoods where cell
towers have long been banned."
"Wireless companies are asking Congress and state lawmakers
to make it easier to install the poles by preempting local zoning laws
that often restrict them, particularly near homes. The lobbying efforts
have alarmed local officials across the country. They say they need to
ensure that their communities do not end up with unsightly poles
cluttering sidewalks, roadsides and the edges of front yards."
"They also are hearing from residents worried about possible
long-term health risks. Until now, much of the cell equipment that emits
radio-frequency energy has been housed on large towers typically kept
hundreds of feet from homes [also harmful to health]. The new 'small
cell' technology uses far more antennas and transmitters that are
smaller and lower-powered, but clustered closer together and lower to
the ground." [The Washington Post]
I keep hammering on this 5G issue, because it contains the blueprint of a future only elite madmen want.
For the rest of us, it's a catastrophe in the making.
I've covered the extreme health dangers of 5G in another article. Here, I want to flesh out the hidden agenda.
A few decades ago, a movement was started to create an
interconnected power grid for the whole planet. We were told this would
be the only way to avoid wasting huge amounts of electricity and, voila,
bring all nations and all people into a modern 21st century.
But now, it's a different story, a classic bait and switch.
The bait was the promise of One Grid for all. The switch is what 5G will
bring us:
100 billion or more NEW devices online, all connected to the
Internet and the Cloud. What could be more wasteful? What could be more
ridiculous? This is the opposite of sane energy use.
Who really cares whether his 5G-connected refrigerator keeps
track of the food items inside it and orders new items when the supply
dwindles? Who has to have a 5G driverless car that takes him to work?
Who must have a 5G stove that senses what is being cooked and sets the
temperature for four minutes? Who lives and who dies if a washing
machine doesn't measure how much soap is stored inside and doesn't order
new soap? Who is demanding a hundred devices in his home that spy on
him and record his actions?
With 5G, the ultimate goal is: every device in every home
that uses energy will be "its own computer," and the planetary grid will
connect ALL these devices to a monitoring and regulating Energy
Authority.
As Patrick Wood details in his classic, Technocracy Rising,
that worldwide Energy Authority was the dream of the men who launched
the Technocracy movement, in America, in the 1930s.
They set out the key requirements---which weren't technically
possible then, but are quite doable now: continuous real-time measuring
of both energy production and energy use from one end of the planet to
the other...
So that both energy production and energy consumption could be controlled. "For the good of all," of course.
5G is the technology for making this happen.
"We're promising a stunning long-range future of 'automatic
homes', where everything is done for you. But really, that's the cover
story. Ultimately, we want to be able to measure every unit of energy
used by every device in every home---and through AI, regulate how much
energy we will let every individual consume, moment to moment. We
control energy. We are the energy masters. If you want to run and
operate and dominate the world, you control its energy."
Terms and projects like smart grid, smart meters,
sustainability, Agenda 21, smart cities, climate change---all this is
Technocratic planning and justification for Rule through Energy.
The beginning of an actual rational plan for energy would
start this way: DUMP 5G. Dump the whole plan of installing small
transmitter-cells on buildings and homes and trees and lampposts and
fences all over the planet. Forget it. Don't bring 100 billion new
devices online. Aside from the extreme health dangers, it's ridiculously
expensive. It's on the order of saying we need thousand-foot robots
standing on sidewalks washing the windows of office buildings.
If some movie star wants to install 30 generators on his
property and have engineers build him an automatic home, where he can
sit back, flip a switch, and have three androids carry him into his
bathtub and wash him and dry him, fine. But planning a smart city? Who
voted for that? Who gave informed consent? Nobody.
A global Energy Authority, of course, is going to decide that
a small African country needs to be given much more energy, while
Germany or France or the US will have to sacrifice energy for the cause
of social justice. But this is yet another con, because you won't see
government cleaning up the contaminated water supplies of that small
African country, or installing modern sanitation, or curtailing the
forced movement of populations into poverty-stricken cities, or
reclaiming vast farm land stolen by mega-corporations and giving that
land back to local farmers.
The whole hidden purpose of an Energy Authority is control.
And because the Authority is Globalist and Technocratic, it
aims to lower energy use in industrial nations and help wreck their
economies, making it much easier to move in and take over those
countries.
Having said all this, there are gaps in our knowledge about
5G. For example, who in his right mind would propose a wireless system
that relies on many, many, many cells/transmitters placed closely to
each other, all over the world?
This system would be far more vulnerable to physical disruption than the present 4G.
You can find many articles that claim the US military must
have 5G for their most advanced planes---and for their developing
AI-controlled weapons. How does that work? Where will all the
transmitter/cells be placed on the ground and in the air?? Something is
missing here. Is there another version of 5G we're not being told about?
Is geoengineering of the atmosphere the means for tuning up space so 5G
signals can be passed along without cells/transmitters?
Part of the US obsession to bring 5G online quickly stems
from competition with China, which at the moment is in the lead on
developing and exporting the technology. "If China has it, we have to
have it sooner and better." This attitude sidesteps the issue of why we
must have 5G in the first place.
And now there are reports that the US government is
considering a plan to build the whole 5G network itself---rather than
leaving the job to corporations. Of course, a few favored companies
(like Google) would be chosen by the government in a non-bid situation
to provide VERY significant help. If such a plan were to launch, we
would have a very tight club at the top of the communications and energy
pyramid. And that club would maximize 5G to expand already-saturated
surveillance of populations.
Wouldn't you---if you had nothing better to do than control the world?
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment