Incredible vaccine lies
By Jon Rappoport
For many years as a reporter covering medical stories, I have
taken to task public
health agencies, such as WHO and the CDC. I'm used
to their lies.
In that regard, I came across a mind-boggling CDC quote dug
up by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, who has done terrific work researching
vaccine dangers.
The quote comes from the 6th edition of Epidemiology and
Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases, published by the CDC. It's
an attempt to squelch debate about the DPaT vaccine, which is given to
prevent diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Over the years, much has
been written about the severe adverse effects of this combination
vaccine---e.g., brain damage, seizures, very high fever, death.
The CDC quote asserts that, generally, there is no definable
disease "syndrome" caused by vaccines. It then makes several more
astonishing claims.
"There is no distinct syndrome from vaccine administration,
and therefore, many temporally associated adverse events probably
represent background illness rather than illness caused by the
vaccine...The DTaP may stimulate or precipitate inevitable symptoms of
underlying CNS [Central Nervous System] disorder, such as seizures,
infantile spasms, epilepsy or SIDS [Sudden Infant Death Syndrome]. By
chance alone, some of these cases will seem to be temporally related to
DPaT."
Read the quote several times to absorb the full force of its
message. It reminds me of the attempts to shunt aside deaths caused by
AZT, the AIDS drug, which viciously attacks the immune system. In that
case, the doctor or researcher will say, "The patient didn't die from
the effects of AZT. The destructive action of AIDS, by coincidence,
simply speeded up after the drug was given."
The CDC is claiming the DTaP vaccine stimulates a
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION in a baby: The baby already had a
life-threatening central nervous system illness. The illness was
temporarily on hold. The vaccine brought it to light, and then the baby
died.
Suddenly---with no evidence offered---vaccines have this
magical ability to cause underlying illness to jump into action. The
vaccine isn't at fault. The baby was already on the road to brain damage
or death.
I've seen some pretty wild excuses offered for
vaccine-induced destruction, but this one takes the cake. Whoever cooked
it up should receive some sort of medical prize for Bald-Faced Lying.
Then he can be arrested for contributing to negligent homicide.
Generally speaking, the untested medical assumption is this:
"We know vaccines cause no harm. Therefore, if a vaccine recipient
becomes ill or dies, the cause must reside in the patient." In the field
of logic, this is called assuming what you are trying to prove.
I have written many times about the 100,000 people who die
every year, in the US, as a result of correctly administered
FDA-approved medicines. Perhaps the CDC or the National Institutes of
Health could issue a statement blaming all these deaths on underlying,
pre-existing illness that was stimulated by these drugs.
Surgical errors could be accounted for in this way, too.
"Yes, we did remove the patient's testicles while we were doing the
appendectomy. But you see, we knew he had testicular cancer, so we
needed to take care of that while we were in the area. What's that? How
did we know he had testicular cancer? Well, we would never remove his
testicles by mistake. Therefore, we must have known we had a legitimate
reason to take them off. Can't you see that?"
No comments:
Post a Comment