|
Current UFO disclosures and the incredible edible New York Times |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
|
Current UFO disclosures and the NY Times
By Jon Rappoport
The story about: a secret Pentagon UFO research group; a US
fighter jet that encountered a UFO off the coast of San Diego; and the
recovery of "UFO metals."
The Times broke the story, and then it quickly went global.
On the subject of UFOs, that never happens.
But it did.
Furthermore, the Times expressed no doubts about the
information it was disclosing. There wasn't the usual "he said, he said"
treatment.
No detractors and harsh critics were quoted. This was a straight-from-the-Pentagon to the Times pipeline.
The Times story had all the earmarks of a government gift, not a leak.
This, too, never happens.
But it did.
The conclusion: the Pentagon wanted this story to come to
light. Someone high up in the Pentagon, or someone outside the Pentagon,
with major clout, gave the green light to the Times. He assured the
Times the story was real. Perhaps he even gave an "order" to release the
information.
As discussion and vetting of the UFO story occurred at the
Times, before they went to print, the overriding and decisive factor
was: "somebody big wants this to move forward." Case closed.
But we shouldn't assume the motive for disclosure was, at the
top, generous and benign and innocent. Because we're talking about the
Pentagon and the CIA, the people who always have a concealed agenda.
If they give the public a few bread crumbs, or even a steak,
there is a 15-course meal behind that, and the meal is never served.
Long-time UFO researcher, Grant Cameron, has pointed out that
the American strategy for hiding secrets (for decades) has been:
partial disclosure. Periodically, now and then---"Here's a small piece.
Chew on it."
This is the US government approach.
Except---the recent Pentagon offerings haven't been leaked
via some small-press book published in a print shop---they've been shot
out of information-guns directly to the most prestigious mainstream news
outlet in the world: the New York Times.
That's different. Very different.
And just now, the Times has published two more UFO articles.
The first, by senior reporter Dan Barry, is headlined: "Dad Believed in
UFOs. Turns Out He Wasn't Alone." Barry's father was a veteran UFO
watcher. He died before the Pentagon finally admitted UFOs are real.
That's the hook of the article. It's a human interest piece. And it's
overwhelmingly positive re UFOs. Again, you don't see this sort of thing
from the Times---not ever---but there it is.
"UFOs: Is This All There Is?" is the second Times piece, by
Dennis Overbye. It's a soft back and forth: something is happening in
the sky but we don't know what it is. No harsh naysaying. No nastiness.
Both of these pieces lend support to the original Times blockbuster about the secret Pentagon UFO program.
All this could very well mean that what is being hidden, now,
is much larger than what has been hidden in the past. For example, new
technological discoveries and advances have been made in the areas of
propulsion systems and energy production, beside which the old
discoveries pale by comparison.
In that case, the latest partial disclosures needed to be
stronger, in terms of their impact. Impact as diversion from the deeper
truth.
And the NY Times would carry the ball.
Who was the paper's main source for the breaking UFO
disclosure? Luis Elizondo, the man who headed up the Pentagon UFO
program, until he resigned. Elizondo is now part of rock musician Tom
Delonge's team at his newly formed To the Stars Academy. Elizondo's new
association hardly qualifies as a "good source" for an outlet like the
Times.
Further, anyone who reads Elizondo's bio at the Academy website would have reason to pause for thought:
"Luis Elizondo is a career intelligence officer whose
experience includes working with the U.S. Army, the Department of
Defense, the National Counterintelligence Executive, and the Director of
National Intelligence. As a former Special Agent In-Charge, Luis
conducted and supervised highly sensitive espionage and terrorism
investigations around the world. As an intelligence Case Officer, he ran
clandestine source operations throughout Latin America and the Middle
East."
Excuse me? The number one mainstream news operation on the
planet accepts what Elizondo is saying at face value? On the verboten
subject of UFOs? When everyone knows career intelligence officers are
trained to lie at the drop of a hat?
The Times has suddenly become a "UFO site?"
Having received Elizondo's assertions, the Times would have
gone to its long-time sources at the Pentagon, and the Word would have
come back: this is rock solid fact. Which, again, tells you the Pentagon
wanted this story to be published. Strongly wanted.
If Donald Trump holds a water bottle in two hands and puckers
his lips as he takes a sip, the Times would wonder aloud whether he was
suffering from Alzheimer's. But all of a sudden, on the topic of UFOs,
the story the Times is being fed is honest and accurate, and there is no
need to consult the usual experts who provide "balanced" criticism and
"negative reactions."
One conclusion: the Times is prepared to publish more UFO
stories. Quotes from other military/intelligence sources. Unless the
blowback from rival news outlets is too severe.
Another inference: the Times already has other videos of UFOs and other "irrefutable" interviews in the can.
Whatever they eventually publish, no matter how shocking, it
will be a very, very small fragment of what the government (and those
who control the government) is hiding.
If, five years ago, you polled the most competent and
knowledgeable independent UFO researchers, and asked them whether they
thought the New York Times would ever publish a major positive UFO
story, who among them would have predicted what we are seeing now?
Finally, this could now happen: someone at the Times, a
senior editor, or even the publisher, goes to the Pentagon and says,
"Look, we're begging off. We've done our job. We did what you told us to
do. But now, other news operations are going to have to carry the
freight. We can't afford to incur a stain on our reputation. We broke
the barrier. You'll have to find other people to move your story
forward..."
But the Times will forever be remembered as the first---they
took their marching orders and delivered. They fronted for, and sold, a
limited hangout, against all odds.
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment