Fake News and NATO’s Plans for “Persuasion and Impacting the Media.”
In his excellent “NATO, a Monstrous Institution” (1) Karel van Wolferen writes:
“Having
survived Afghanistan, NATO continued to play a significant role in the
destruction of
Gaddafi’s Libya, and in the destruction of parts of Syria
through covertly organising, financing, and arming ISIS forces for the
purpose of overthrowing the Assad government. And
it continues to serve as a cover for the war making elements in Britain
and France. America’s coup in the Ukraine in 2014, which resulted in a
crisis in relations with Russia, gave NATO a new lease on life as it helped create entirely uncalled for hysterical fear of Russia in Poland and the Baltic states.” (Emphasis added.)
Professor
van Wolferen puts his finger on an often forgotten fact, NATO has to
continually seek a “new lease of life”, a raison d’etre. If factions –
predominately Western and US led – were not encouraged, or inspired by
oil and other natural resources to be bloodily carpetbagged, NATO would
be redundant. When the Berlin Wall came down and the world rejoiced,
things must have looked bleak in NATO-land.
Nothing
could make this more cynically, starkly clear than a letter, written in
June 1979, from General Alexander Hague, NATO Secretary General, on
handing over the position to his successor Joseph Luns. The letter
reads:
SUPREME HEADQUARTERS ALLIED POWERS EUROPE
GRAND QUARTIER GENERAL DES PUISSANCES ALLIÉES EN EUROPE
BELGIUM
26th June 1979
His Excellency Joseph M.A.H. Luns
The Secretary General
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Brussels/Zaventem Autoroute
B-1110 Brussels, Belgium
Dear Joseph,
On
leaving the post of Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, I feel it my
duty to stress once again certain aspects of allied strategy which
demand our further attention and effort.
Yet
in my view, planning for the deployment and use of modernized nuclear
forces in Europe can be adequately be accomplished only if full
understanding and cooperation are achieved. It is therefore necessary to
prepare systematically and persistently, a basis for making a success
of the NATO council meeting in December, bearing in mind primarily the
crisis inside the Alliance over neutron weapons deployment. Every effort
should be made to counter any hesitation or vacillation among the
allied nations during decision making meetings.
We
will never be able to put in to effect our joint plans in this vital
area unless quite exceptional efforts are made to check European
tendencies toward neutralism, pacifism and unilateralism. To achieve
this, it is necessary, I feel, to emphasise the theme that nuclear
weapons balance, particularly in the European theatre, has changed
sharply in favour of the East. We should constantly bear in mind the
necessity of continuously directing attention to the Soviet military
threat and of further activising our collaboration with the mass media.
If
argument, persuasion and impacting the media fail, we are left with no
alternative but to jolt the faint hearted in Europe through the creation
of situations, country by country as deemed necessary, to convince them
where their interests lie. This would call for appropriate action of a sensitive nature which
we have frequently discussed and I have been greatly encouraged by the
absence of disagreement between us regarding priorities. Back in the
States, I shall not cease to monitor the European situation in any role I
may be called upon to play and hope to continue our hitherto fruitful
exchange of views.
The course of action which we have in mind may become the only sure way of securing the interests of the West.
Sincerely,
(signature)
ALEXANDER M. HAIG, JR,
General, United States Army
Supreme Allied Commander.
So it was vital that:
“… quite exceptional efforts are made to check European tendencies toward neutralism, pacifism and unilateralism.” Peace, détente, the European Union even, must have presented a nightmare.“If argument, persuasion and impacting the media fail, we are left with no alternative but to jolt the faint hearted in Europe through the creation of situations, country by country as deemed necessary, to convince them where their interests lie. This would call for appropriate action of a sensitive nature …”
It
has to be wondered if the current onslaught on respected, well informed
websites which have consistently shone light into the war propaganda
darkness, being attacked as “fake news” and worse, has anything to do
with the fact that they have gone a long way to waking up the public. “ …
argument, persuasion and impacting the (main stream) media” have been
massively sidelined.
The
anti-warmongering cat has been released from the bag, yelling “Iraq
weapons of mass destruction was a lie”; “Libya was destroyed for making
the country the richest in Africa and planning to switch to trading in a
pan-African Dinar”; “Afghanistan was invaded because it has $ trillions
in natural resources”; “the Syrian ‘uprising” was planned from within
the US Embassy in Damascus in 2006”(2.)
The cat could go on – and on, but thinks, for now, the NATO letter is food for thought in our times.
Notes:
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Felicity Arbuthnot, Global Research, 2017
Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page
Become a Member of Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment