|
No More Fake News Exclusive: inside the criminal opioid pipeline |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
|
Opioid drugs: morphine, hydrocodone, oxycodone, fentanyl, naloxone, Percocet, etc.
By Jon Rappoport
PBS Frontline, 2016: "The opioid epidemic has been called the
worst drug crisis in American history...with overdoses from heroin and
other opioids now killing more than 27,000 people a year..." (Note:
prescription opioids are now a very significant gateway-drug leading
addicts into heroin.)
CBS News: "Nearly 92 million U.S. adults, or about 38 percent
of the population, took a legitimately prescribed opioid like OxyContin
or Percocet in 2015, according to results from the National Survey on
Drug Use and Health."
On the condition of anonymity, an insider with intimate
knowledge of the opioid crime network spoke with me. He is not a
participant or a criminal. He has spent years exposing the network.
My initial question to him was prompted by the current
Washington Post series on collusion between members of Congress and the
drug industry. The collusion has produced a new law that makes it much
harder for the US DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) to shut down
major opioid traffickers. (That law is the Ensuring Patient Access and
Effective Drug Enforcement Act, signed by President Obama on 4/9/16.)
My question was: how could a corrupt little pharmacy or
medical clinic in a small town, in the middle of nowhere, sell, as
reported, a MILLION opioid pills a year?
Here is the answer my source confirmed: a criminal doctor or
doctors are writing 75-100 opioid prescriptions a day like clockwork;
"patients" are flooding in from all over the country (many of them
flying in once a month); they are sold the opioid prescriptions, and
either fill them right there in the clinic, or take them to a friendly
pharmacy.
These patients are actually dealers. They return home and sell the pills to addicts.
Where do the small clinics and pharmacies obtain the huge
number of opioid pills? From distributors. These are legitimate
companies. They may distribute all sorts of medicines. It's their
business. They know they are committing egregious crimes.
Where do these big distributors obtain their opioid pills? From pharmaceutical companies who manufacture them.
The manufacturers and the distributors have an ongoing
relationship. They know exactly what they're doing. They know the bulk
of the product is going into "street sales."
The distributors and the manufacturers are drug traffickers.
There is no doubt about this. No one is "making a mistake." No one is in the dark. No one is being fooled.
When the DEA tries to clamp down on opioid manufacturers,
this is not a sudden action, as some manufacturers try to claim. The DEA
has already made several prior visits and has tried to convince the
manufacturers to stop what they're doing---to no avail.
I suggested to my source that the opioid distributors and
their suppliers, the manufacturers, have a "nudge and a wink"
relationship. He quickly told me it was far more than that. He left no
doubt in my mind that these relationships are undertaken and maintained
with full knowledge about the trafficking enterprise these partners are
engaged in.
He pointed out that the 2016 law referenced above, passed by
Congress---with most of the members completely unware of what they were
voting for---radically changed the conditions under which the DEA could
immediately freeze huge and obviously criminal shipments of opioids.
It's not a slam-dunk anymore. Far from it.
Before imposing a freeze, instead of simply showing that the
(criminal) shipment poses an IMMINENT threat of death or grave harm to
users, the Agency now has to demonstrate there is an IMMEDIATE threat.
This word game means the DEA must establish that people could
die, not next week or next month (imminent), but "right now"
(immediate). If this seems logically absurd and intentionally perverse,
it is. Obviously, "immediate" is designed to give rise to back and forth
debate, legalistic challenges, long postponements---and ultimately a
straitjacket preventing decisive actions against opioid distributors and
manufacturers.
The Washington Post reached out to Obama, who signed the 2016
law, and his then Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, the highest
law-enforcement officer in the nation. The DEA is organized under the
Attorney General and the Dept. of Justice.
Both Obama and Lynch "declined" to discuss the law. Naturally.
Who played a central role in crafting the law and pushing it through Congress?
The Post: "Deeply involved in the effort to help the [drug] industry was the DEA'sformer associate chief counsel, D. Linden Barber.
While at the DEA, he helped design and carry out the early stages of
the agency's tough enforcementcampaign, which targeted drug companies
that were failing to report suspicious orders of narcotics."
What?
Barber worked against the drug industry while employed by the
DEA, and then he left the Agency and turned around and attacked it.
The Post: "When Barber went to work for the drug industry [he
now works for Cardinal Health], in 2011, he brought an intimate
knowledge of the DEA's strategy and how it could be attacked to protect
the [drug] companies. He was one of dozens of DEA officials recruited by
the drug industry during the past decade."
"Barber played a key role in crafting an early version of the
legislation [the 2016 law] that would eventually curtail the DEA's
power, according to an internal email written by a Justice Department
official to a colleague. 'He [Barber] wrote the...bill," the official
wrote in 2014."
The opioid crime network extends to Congress, former (if not
present) DEA employees, medical-drug distribution companies, and
pharmaceutical manufacturers.
It then includes medical clinics and pharmacies and prescription-writing doctors.
The murderous network is addicting, maiming, and killing Americans in huge numbers.
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment