Fluoride
is an endocrine-disrupting chemical linked to thyroid disease, impaired
memory, attention-deficit hyperactive disorder and lowered IQ in
children
A
long-term study sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences found a correlation between fluoride
exposure in utero and subsequent reductions in cognitive function
Each
0.5 mg/L increase in fluoride over 0.8 mg/L in the mother’s urine was
associated with a 2.5-point reduction in IQ and a 3.15-point reduction
in general cognitive index scores in the child
As
the level of fluoride increased, IQ decreased — across the full range of
exposures — which means there’s no level at which there is no
detrimental effect on cognition; it’s only a matter of degree
In
2015, the recommended level of fluoride in drinking water in the U.S.
was lowered to reduce symptoms of overexposure, from an upper limit of
1.2 mg/L to 0.7 mg/L, but even this level is likely placing children’s
brain development and function at risk
By Dr. Mercola
Many still do not realize the proven health risks inherent with
fluoridated water, but the information is spreading. Beginning in
1945, it was claimed that adding fluoride to drinking water
was a safe and effective way to improve people's dental health. Over
the decades, many bought into this hook, line and sinker, despite all
the evidence to the contrary.
Scientific investigations have revealed that fluoride is an endocrine-disrupting chemical,1 and have linked it to the rising prevalence of thyroid disease.2
Importantly, fluoride has been identified as a developmental neurotoxin
that impacts short-term and working memory, contributes to rising
rates of attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD)3 and lowered IQ in children.4
Now, a new, long-term multimillion-dollar study sponsored by the
U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and
conducted by a research team that has produced over 50 papers on the
effects of environmental exposures on children's cognitive health, sheds
light on the price children pay when mothers are exposed to fluoride
during pregnancy.
As noted by Paul Connett, Ph.D., toxicologist, environmental chemist
and former director of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) in the video
commentary above (while retiring and handing over the director's
position to his son Michael, Connett remains very active in the
organization):
"This should spell the end of water fluoridation worldwide.
How can you possibly continue to expose millions of pregnant women and
children to a known neurotoxic substance, now that you know there's a
relationship between how much fluoride a woman is exposed to in
pregnancy and the IQ of the children born to them?"
Lowered Fluoridation Level Still Too High
In April 2015, the U.S. government admitted the "optimal" level of
fluoride recommended since 1962 had in fact been too high, resulting in
over 40 percent of American teens having dental fluorosis — a sign of
fluoride overexposure. In some areas, dental fluorosis rates are as high as 70 to 80 percent, with some children suffering from advanced forms.
As a result of these findings, the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) lowered its recommended level of fluoride in
drinking water by 40 percent, from an upper limit of 1.2 milligrams per
liter (mg/L) to 0.7 mg/L.5
The HHS will re-evaluate dental fluorosis rates among children again
around 2025, to assess whether they were correct about this new level
being protective against dental fluorosis. However, even if 0.7 mg/L
lowers incidence of dental fluorosis, the current study clearly shows
this does NOT mean it's a safe level overall.
Prenatal Fluoride Exposure Lowers IQ in Children
In a complaint filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in response to its denial of a petition to ban water fluoridation,
FAN, along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups,
presented the agency with more than 180 studies showing fluoride
causes neurotoxic harm and reduced IQ in children.6
Many of these studies found harm at levels within the range, or
precariously close to, the levels millions of American children receive
on a regular basis. All in all, there are more than 300 animal and
human studies demonstrating fluoride can cause:7
Brain damage, especially when coupled with iodine deficiency or excessive levels of aluminum
Reduced IQ
Impaired ability to learn and remember
Neurobehavioral deficits such as impaired visual-spatial organization
Impaired fetal brain development
Now we can add yet another study to this ever-growing list. This study,8,9,10,11
published in Environmental Health Perspectives last month, found a
correlation between fluoride exposure in utero and subsequent
reductions in cognitive function at the ages of 4 and 6 through 12.
Each 0.5 mg/L increase in fluoride over 0.8 mg/L in the mother's urine
was associated with a 2.5-point reduction in IQ and a 3.15-point
reduction in general cognitive index (GCI) scores in the child, leading
the authors to conclude that:
"… higher prenatal fluoride exposure, in the general range of
exposures reported for other general population samples of pregnant
women and nonpregnant adults, was associated with lower scores on tests
of cognitive function in the offspring at age 4 and 6-12 y[ears]."
Prenatal Exposure More Hazardous Than Childhood Exposure
According to lead author Howard Hu, founding dean of the Dalla Lana
School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, this is one of
the largest, longest and most rigorously executed studies on fluoride
and neurodevelopment ever conducted. The data was collected from nearly
300 Mexican mothers and their children.
While Mexico does not fluoridate drinking water, Mexicans are still
exposed to many other sources of fluoride, including
naturally-occurring fluoride in water, fluoridated salt, dental
products, supplements, pesticides and tea.
Importantly, the researchers found that prenatal exposure was far
more influential with respect to cognitive function than subsequent
fluoride exposure during childhood. As noted by Hu, "the fetal system
tends to be more sensitive to environmental toxicants than once the
child is born," and this study supports that view. According to
Connett:
"This is the biggest moment for us since the Fluoride
Action Network was formed in 2000. It vindicates the concerns we have
had on fluoride's neurotoxicity since Mullenix's study on animal
behavior in 1995 and the first two Chinese studies on IQ published in
1996."
The mean level of fluoride in the urine of the mothers included in
the study was 0.9 mg/L. In the U.S. 75 percent of the population's
drinking water is fluoridated, and according to Hu, the levels of
fluoride found in Mexican mothers is unlikely to be significantly
different from those found in American women.
Despite that, the American Dental Association (ADA) is still
refusing to see the light and commented on the study saying its
findings "are not applicable to the U.S.," and that the ADA "continues
to endorse fluoridation of public water as the most effective public
health measure to prevent tooth decay."12 How the ADA can prioritize the prevention of tooth decay over IQ loss is simply incomprehensible.
This is especially outrageous in light of research13 showing fluoride
only works — and inefficiently at that — when used topically. It has
no beneficial effects on teeth when ingested. Besides, there are far
more effective and safer options for decreasing tooth decay than using a
topical poison or ingesting a harmful industrial pollutant!
IQ Loss From Fluoride Exposure Is Significant
According to Connett, the featured study is very important, as it
reveals the loss of IQ is quite large. Essentially, a child of a
mother drinking water with 1 part per million (ppm) of fluoride would be
predicted to have an IQ that is 5 to 6 points lower than a child born
to a mother who drank fluoride-free water.
Another important point to be made with regard to this study is that
they measured fluoride in urine, which is a far more accurate indicator
of total fluoride intake than simply measuring the concentration of
fluoride in drinking water, and then calculating how much water is
being consumed.
When drinking water is the dominant source of fluoride, then
fluoride concentrations in urine and water are typically about the same.
Hence, a mean urine fluoride level of 0.9 mg/L implies these women
were ingesting the same amount of fluoride as women drinking water with
a fluoride level of 0.9 mg/L — just 0.2 mg/L above the currently
recommended level for drinking water in the U.S.
When you factor in the range of fluoride exposures in the study, the
exposure is likely very close to the range found in many fluoridated
areas of the U.S. In a personal email to me, Connett writes:
"The doses in this study are directly applicable to areas with
artificial fluoridation. There is no need to extrapolate downward from
effects at higher doses. The claims by fluoridation defenders that only
studies using much higher doses than occur in areas with artificial
fluoridation have shown a loss of IQ are squarely refuted by this
study.
Those false claims range from 11 times to 30 times higher, but
are based on the logical fallacy that it is the highest dose amongst
several studies that is relevant, when it is the LOWEST dose amongst
studies that is most relevant."
NIEHS Study Confirms Earlier Results, Necessitating Action
The study also controlled for a wide range of factors — including
lead, mercury, socioeconomic status, smoking, alcohol use and
pregnancy-related problems — that could potentially skew the results or
produce a false effect. Importantly, the researchers were able to
largely rule out the influence of these confounding factors. It also
confirms the results of earlier, less sophisticated studies done in
Mexico and China, which have been criticized for their shortcomings.
According to Connett:
"Some of those studies had higher fluoride exposures than
commonly found in the U.S., but many did not. The sole study in a
country with artificial water fluoridation (as opposed to artificial
salt fluoridation, which was likely a main source of fluoride in this
new study) was by Broadbent in New Zealand.
That study found no association between water fluoridation and
IQ and was trumpeted by fluoridation defenders. But that study was
shown to have almost no difference in TOTAL fluoride intake between the
children with fluoridated water and those with unfluoridated water,
since most of the children drinking unfluoridated water were given
fluoride supplements."
Hu and his co-authors are cautious in their conclusions, and this is
to be expected. But that does not detract from the fact that the
implications of this study are enormous. No singular study can prove
fluoride lowers IQ when consumed in doses found in fluoridated areas,
but when you add it to previous studies, it's clearly raises a bright
red flag.
Study Shows Linear Relationship Between In Utero Fluoride Exposure and IQ Loss
Another really important finding that is being downplayed or
entirely ignored by mainstream media is the fact that there was no
threshold below which fluoride did not affect IQ. The study explains
this as follows:
"The smooth plot of the association between GCI [editor's note:
IQ test at age 4] and maternal prenatal urinary fluoride from an
adjusted GAM model [editor's note: a model that corrects for extraneous
factors] suggested a linear relation over the exposure distribution
(Figure 2)."
In a nutshell, this means that as the level of fluoride in urine
increased, IQ decreased — across the entire range of exposures, from
lowest to highest. This in turn means there's no level at which there
will not be some kind of detrimental effect on cognition — it's just a
matter of degree.
Remarkably, the ADA tries to brush off these results by saying it
doesn't apply to Americans drinking fluoridated water because the source
of the fluoride was unidentified. As noted by Connett, "This makes no
sense. It is irrelevant whether the Mexican women got their fluoride
from fluoridated salt, fluoride in drinking water, or from fluoridated
dental products."
The Many Ways in Which Fluoride Harms Children's Brain Function
As mentioned, there are now hundreds of studies showing fluoride
damages brain function, in a variety of different ways. Among the
proposed mechanisms of harm, studies have shown fluoride can:14
Interfere with basic functions of nerve cells in the brain
Reduce nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Reduce lipid content in the brain
Damage the pineal gland through fluoride accumulation
Impair antioxidant defense systems
Damage the hippocampus
Damage purkinje cells
Increase uptake of aluminum, which has neurotoxic effects
Encourage formation of beta-amyloid plaques (the classic brain abnormality in Alzheimer's disease)
Exacerbate lesions induced by iodine deficiency
Increase manganese absorption, which has also been linked lower IQ in children
If everyone knew the dangers of fluoride and had a choice, most
would likely opt for fluoride-free drinking water. Unfortunately, you
don't have that choice if you live in an area that adds fluoride to its
municipal water supply. Whether you want it or not, you're being
medicated with a substance known to have toxic effects.
It's important to remember that fluoride is in fact a drug, since
it's used to prevent a disease (tooth decay), and no other drug has
ever been administered as a public health measure across the board
without regard for age, sex, medical need and other factors that might
place you at increased risk for side effects. Patients who are
prescribed drugs must be medically monitored, yet in the case of
fluoride, no one is tracking anything.
Once you put fluoride in the water, there is no way to control who
gets it and how much, and if you suffer side effects, there's no
recourse. Most don't even realize that their health problems might be
connected to fluoride toxicity. Fluoride in water is not even regulated
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), even though it
regulates fluoride in toothpaste and other oral care products, which
must bear warning labels about the danger of ingesting those products.
The FDA does not even recognize fluoride supplements
(which, like water, are ingested) as safe and effective. In fact, to
this day the FDA classifies them as "unapproved new drugs." Last year,
the FDA clamped down on pharmacies selling and misrepresenting
unapproved fluoride supplements.
They also issued a warning letter to a fluoride supplement
manufacturer, demanding it cease making the product because it's an
unapproved drug — hence it is illegal to manufacture and sell. So, how
is it that fluoride can still be added to water supplies across the
U.S. for the purpose of preventing tooth decay — a purpose that in the
eyes of the FDA renders it a drug, and one which they've never approved
as safe or effective? It's a most curious situation that no one
appears to have the answer to.
Water Fluoridation Is a Violation of Freedom of Choice
Water fluoridation is an absolute violation of your freedom of
choice — to take a drug or not, and a toxic one at that.
Fluoroquinolones (fluoride-containing antibiotic- and antimicrobial
drugs) require FDA black-box warnings, and some of the newer ones have
been withdrawn due to toxicity.15 Fluoride-containing drugs have the unique ability to penetrate your central nervous system, including your brain, which is often why fluoride is used in the formulation.
So, why should we think fluoride in water won't affect the brain? In
light of all the evidence, it's high time we cease this careless and
dangerous public health practice. It's bad medicine that is doing far
more harm than good.
Moreover, the types of fluoride typically added to water supplies
are not even "clean" pharmaceutical grade fluoride — which is toxic
enough — but rather the chemical byproducts of aluminum, steel, cement,
phosphate fertilizer and nuclear weapons manufacturing. These fluoride
chemicals have been shown to contain all sorts of toxic contaminants, including lead, arsenic, radionucleotides and aluminum.
To learn more about fluoride and how you can help end this harmful
practice, I highly recommend getting a copy of Connett's book, The Case Against Fluoride. You can also download my free report on water fluoridation for more information on the bad science and political agendas that got this toxic chemical in our drinking water.
No comments:
Post a Comment