It’s
important to remind people that we still don’t know what happened on
September 11, 2001. What is known about 9/11 is that there are many
incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the
mainstream media. Here are fourteen.
An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
One person, Shayna Steinger, issued 12 visas
to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steinger issued some of the
visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another
employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert
repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of
top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks
prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.
Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents
from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11
Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the
documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just
as Berger was trying to steal them.
The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed
several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by
saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man
who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
A third skyscraper collapsed
late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that
the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to
office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies
and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse
while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in
the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and
then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that
everything was just “confusing and chaotic”
that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies
predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that
would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly
predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable
official account for how that happened.
Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years
before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact,
when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the
government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle
on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without
regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building
construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could
ever happen again.
Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed
as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for
Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC)
buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction
community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as
stated in the official account.
AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding
the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of
cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter
Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of
suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored
and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission.
There are, of course, many more incredible facts about 9/11 that
continue to be ignored by authorities and much of the media. Let’s hope
that the next major terrorist attack results in legitimate reporting and
unified calls for truth before fourteen years have passed.
No comments:
Post a Comment