Measles outbreak in Europe: convenient lies
By Jon Rappoport
There is an invariable first rule of propaganda: know exactly
what your agenda is, and then design every statement to forward that
agenda.
The World Health Organization is now touting a measles
epidemic in Europe. And of course, they're explaining it with
propaganda---it's the fault of people who refuse to allow their children
to take the measles vaccination.
The focus is on Italy, where, "coincidently," protesters are
outraged at a new law mandating vaccination for children. Perfect. "You
see? Don't take the shot and this is what you get. A massive outbreak."
Well, here is an official report. In Italy, there are 3300 case of measles and two deaths.
That's the classic and traditional and age-old picture of
measles. 3298 children have survived. Kids get measles, they recover,
and thereafter they're immune.
As for the two children who died, you would have to do a very
careful independent investigation, to determine what health problems
they may have had before they contracted measles. And "health problems"
would include prior toxic medical treatment. The actual cause of death
isn't always what health authorities say it is.
In addition to the above, here are two revealing quotes to consider:
"...the window of vulnerability of an infant may be even
greater in vaccinated women than in with women with natural measles
infection." (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 79(5), 2008, pp. 787-792).
Translation: Measles occurring in infants---which is unusual
and dangerous---is more likely to occur when the mother has been
vaccinated against measles. Why? Because, as a result of her being
vaccinated, she no longer passes down, to her child, the natural
components of immunity to measles from her having had the disease. And
the vaccination she received didn't confer immunity to her baby.
"Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently
set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to
protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened
susceptibility." JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti
and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such children can come down
with "an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is
characterized by fever, headache... and a diverse rash (which)... may
consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules... "
In other words, the measles vaccine can create a worse form
of measles. This is not the normal form of the illness, from which
children routinely recover with the bonus of lifetime immunity. No, this
is a severe, atypical, dangerous, synthetic, vaccine-induced disease.
Does all this mean the health authorities in Europe aren't telling the whole story, are twisting the truth?
I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
To cite just one parallel in the US among many, the Centers
for Disease Control (CDC) buys and dispenses several billion dollars'
worth of vaccines every year. At the same time, the CDC is in charge of
doing key studies to test the safety and efficacy of those vaccines.
This unconscionable conflict of interest is an ongoing crime---because
there are NO circumstances under which the CDC would ever say that
vaccines are dangerous and ineffective, since they, the CDC, are a
leading commercial customer and purveyor of those medical products. They
would be cutting their own throats.
Do public health authorities lie?
Is the Pope Catholic?
No comments:
Post a Comment