Sandy Hook: Megyn Kelly and NBC perpetrate a Fraud on the Public
Jim Fetzer
With great fanfare, "Sunday Night with Megyn Kelly" and her encounter with Alex Jones over Sandy Hook finally arrived. Although her viewing audience disappointed the network with only 3.5 million, the program itself--where Alex Jones was straddling the fence not wanting to lose fans who believe Sandy Hook to be a hoax, while trying to pacify the left watching NBC by saying he believed that children had really died there--was laden with false information, perpetrating a fraud on the public.
The most telling exchange occurs during the introduction, where Kelly asks Jones for the source of his information. He replies that 95% of what he covers comes from articles he has read, where she replies, "But if you haven't ascertained the veracity of that article and it's all BS, then you put out a bunch of disinformation!" Here's the broadcast for your viewing. Kelly and NBC have clearly never verified the "Sandy Hook Story", which is BS: They are putting out massive loads of disinformation.
Given the controversy swirling around the forthcoming broadcast, when I learned it was possible to write to NBC with comments or suggestions on their programs, I sent NBC the following advisory:
A responsible network, concerned about the accuracy of a program on such an inflammatory and controversial subject, would want to take pains to make sure what they were promoting was true or at least well-founded on the available evidence. But we have ample proof that it could have cared less!
MAJOR MATTERS
(1) Neither Megyn nor NBC appear to have even read Stephen Sedensky's Report on the Shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and 39 Yogananda Street, the purported residence of Adam Lanza, the alleged shooter or they would have known that his fingerprints were not on the .22 caliber rifle with which he is supposed to have shot his mother and that none of the 150 bullet fragments with the Bushmaster means it fails to tie the shooter to either his weapons or his victims. See note 53, page 37:
(2) Some lies are bigger than others, where Neil Heslin, who is supposed to have lost his son, Jesse, at Sandy Hook, talks about holding his body with a bullet hole through his head in his arms on the scene. But, as Wayne Carver, Medical Examiner, explained during his press conference, the parents were not allowed to see the bodies but only to identify them using photographs. So if you assumed that something like this really happened at Sandy Hook, which is telling the truth? Which is lying?
(3) Had NBC downloaded NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), which I released for free as a pdf when it was banned by amazon.com in an act of political suppression--where Jay Carney went from the White House to become its Senior Vice President shortly before--it could have reviewed the FEMA manual included as Appendix A, which explains the sign, "Everyone must check in!", the Porta-Potties already in place and the number of those wearing color-coded name tags on lanyards:
(4) At one point, Megyn asks Alex, "What happened to the children?" The observations made by the contributors to the book--that the children were wearing clothing that appeared to be about 10 years out-of-date--has been confirmed by the discovery that Noah Pozner, for example, was created out of photos of his purported older step brother as a child, which they would have known had the followed the link that I provided to "Sandy Hook Charade: 'Noah Pozner' WAS Michael Vabner as a Child":
(5) Alex Jones and Inforwars.com had been aware of the book having been banned and published an article about it not long thereafter, which was much appreciated by experts on the case. But it was only up for 38 minutes, during which it had received 138 comments. The swift removal followed by its erasure from the archives for the show appears to have been induced by the IMAGE CREDIT to CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE, who were running the show and which had to be covered up:
LESSER POINTS
(6) Kelly opens by attacking Alex for claiming that elements of the US government allowed 9/11 to happen to convey the impression: if Alex is willing to go that far on 9/11, why should he possibly be taken seriously on anything else? Evidence supports the far stronger position that the CIA, neocons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad did not simply allow 9/11 to happen but orchestrated its occurrence. The public doesn't know better, so she succeeds in raising doubts about his credibility.
(7) Alex doesn't handle himself very well, being careless about the Manchester event, for example, where there was a rehearsal a year in advance and photos showing "victims" are of adult men lying on the floor, not teen-age girls. Manchester appears to be one of at least three staged events in the UK --at Westminster Bridge, at Manchester and at London Bridge--that appear to have been intended to boost the political prospects of Theresa May. Here's that rehearsal, which was captured on video:
(8) Megyn features Charlie Sykes, a right-wing opponent of Donald Trump from Wisconsin, which appears designed to introduce the notion of "toxic paranoia" as a prelude to Sandy Hook. Otherwise, there is no good reason for his presence. He was used as "filler" to connect the President's interest in Alex Jones with those who fault him on virtually every count. This was probably the least interesting aspect of NBC's coverage of Sandy Hook, about which Sykes knows next to nothing. Embarrassing!
(9) When Alex published his "Father's Day Message to Newtown Families", I posted a comment on the basics of the case, only to discover that his own web site would not allow it to stand. This was so stunning to me that I returned to post a second time and then, when that post was likewise deleted, one final time for emphasis. That Alex Jones has sold out Sandy Hook Truth is now beyond dispute, where none of us should continue to place any trust in him at all. He's just one more limited hangout:
(10) Even Matt Taibbi, whom I have regarded with a certain degree of respect in the past, decided to stand with Megyn in her attack on Alex, "Megyn Kelly Vivisects Bloated Conspiracy Hog Alex Jones", Rolling Stone (20 June 2017). What he displays is that he knows no more about Sandy Hook than do Megyn Kelly and NBC, where, however, i am less disposed to infer that his motives are equally corrupt. I posted the following comment, which disappeared less than 30 minutes later:
CLOSING REFLECTIONS
The proof that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax is both abundant and compelling. Because so much of the evidence is visual, here are three of the videos I have done on Sandy Hook, The first provides a general orientation, the second focuses upon the SWAT team and Wayne Carver, and the third--with a highly qualified EMT--explains that proper medical procedures were not followed at Sandy Hook or in San Bernardino, where we even have the Craig's List ad for extras on the set. It's simply appalling:
Alex has published the interview with a running commentary, but nothing he does henceforth can restore public confidence in his integrity. He has sold out Sandy Hook and I can see no prospect for his redemption. Standing up for the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is demanding upon us all, where I and others have lost friends and relationships over this highly emotional issue. Someone we regarded as a champion of truth in the alternative media turns out to have feet of clay.
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus on the Duluth Campus of The University of Minnesota. His most recent books have been published by moonrockbooks.com.
Finian Cunningham: Self-Defense is No Defense for US Acts of War in Syria
Self-Defense Is No Defense for US Acts of War in Syria
The shooting down
of a Syrian fighter jet by US forces this week comes on the back of
several aggressive actions by American military on the ground. Taken
together the US actions mark an alarming escalation of intervention in
the Syrian war – to the point where the Americans can be said to be now
openly at war against Syria.
The American
military actions also come despite repeated warnings from Russia against
such unilateral deployment of force. Following the shoot-down of the
Syrian SU-22 fighter bomber this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei
Lavrov denounced the
American violence as an act of «flagrant aggression» against a
sovereign state. Some Russian lawmakers such as Duma foreign affairs
chief Alexei Pushkov went further and condemned it as an act of war by
the Americans.
Of course,
Washington’s logic is riddled with absurdity. To claim that its forces
are acting in self-defense overlooks the glaring reality that the US-led
military coalition has no legal mandate whatsoever to be in Syria in
the first place. Its forces are in breach of international law by
operating on Syrian territory without the consent of the government in
Damascus and without a mandate from the UN Security Council.
Another absurdity
is the claim that the US forces are «protecting» militants whom they
are supposedly training to «fight» the Islamic State terror group
(ISIS). On at least three occasions over the past month, American
military have carried out air strikes on Syrian government forces and
their allies near a strategically important border crossing between
Syria and Iraq. The Americans claim that the Syrian government forces
were posing a threat to a military base at Al Tanf on the Syrian side of
the border where they are training militants belonging to a group
called Maghawir al Thawra.
The Pentagon
claims that these militants are being trained to «fight and defeat»
ISIS. The installation last week of long-range artillery batteries known
as HIMARS at Al Tanf was justified as a self-defense measure. US
Colonel Ryan Dillon said: «We have increased our military footprint and
are prepared for any threat that is presented to us by the pro-regime
forces».
As with the
shooting down of the Syrian fighter jet this week, American forces are
invoking «self-defense» as a legal rationale. But as Moscow has pointed
out, the Americans have no legal right to be present on Syrian territory
and then, secondly, to be unilaterally declaring «deconfliction zones»
for what are de facto invasive forces.
A further nail to the American lie is exposed when the nature of the militant group is looked at more closely. Unverified video footage showing
the US-backed militants at Al Tanf indicates that they are another
brand of jihadist terrorism. The videos show Maghawir al Thawra
militants repeatedly shouting the jihadist slogan «allu akbar». They are
also equipped with the notorious top-of-the-range white Toyota land
cruisers that other jihadist groups have obtained through funding by
Saudi Arabia and other Gulf monarchies.
Syrian sources
have confirmed to this author that the group displayed in the videos is
indeed the Maghawir al Thawra and that they are unquestionably jihadist.
Yet this is the same group that the US has openly declared to be
training at its military base at Al Tanf to «fight and defeat ISIS», and
which the US is supposedly «protecting» from advancing Syrian army
units and their allies.
What’s more, it is reported that
in addition to American forces at Al Tanf, there are British and other
NATO troops, as well as those from two other Arab states. This amounts
to a full-scale US-NATO intervention in the Syrian war – an intervention
which seems to be clearly on the side of jihadist terror groups.
After the
shooting down of the Syrian warplane by American forces this week,
Moscow noted pointedly that Washington has openly taken sides with
terror groups aiming to topple the sovereign government of Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad. There can be no other pretense.
The bolstering of
the US military footprint at the Al Tanf base near the Syrian-Iraqi
border is another sign of brazen American siding with terror groups. As
the videos above show, the notion that these militants are somehow
«moderate rebels» who are combating ISIS does not bear scrutiny.
This US-led
charade of supporting «moderate rebels» has been going on for nearly six
years in Syria. The mercurial «Free Syrian Army» and the «Syrian
Defense Forces» are part of this smoke and mirrors game designed to
obscure the fact that the Americans and their NATO allies are using
proxy militant groups dominated by jihadist terror networks, for the
objective of regime change. The plethora of different names for these
proxies – all whom are illegally armed groups – is just part of the
cynical game to conceal the fact that Washington and its allies are
waging a criminal war against a sovereign nation.
As independent
investigative journalist Vanessa Beeley told this author: «The labelling
by the US of any extremist faction fighting in Syria as a Free Syrian
Army division is nothing more than a cynical marketing ploy to rebrand
these group as ‘moderate’».
Beeley says that
the Maghawir al Thawra militants whom the US claim to be protecting in a
supposed campaign to defeat ISIS is just another instance of Washington
«rebranding terror groups as moderates».
Another giveaway to the real nature of this US-patronized group came from a Reuters report in which one of the Maghawir commanders was interviewed.
Maghawir al
Thawra spokesman Abu al Atheer said the goal of the US forces was to
take the eastern Syrian city of Deir Ezzor. That city is already under
the control of the Syrian government forces and their allies. If the US
and its militants were motivated to defeat ISIS, then why are they
moving on Deir Ezzor?
The Maghawir
commander also revealed his extremist ideological affiliations when he
went on to talk about Iranian-backed forces allied with the Syrian
government. «The battle is not over and we will not allow the Iranian
Shi'ites to occupy our land. Our response to those who stand against us
will be cruel», he told Reuters.
Recall this is
the same supposedly «moderate» group whom the US, British and Norwegian
NATO troops are training at Al Tanf and for which the US has installed
long-range artillery batteries in «an act of self-defense».
Events in Syria
seem to be spiraling toward a bigger international war. This week Iran
hit ISIS bases near Deir Ezzor with medium range ballistic missiles
fired from inside Iranian territory. Tehran says the action was
coordinated with the Syrian government. Meanwhile, the US is stepping up
its direct assault on Syrian government forces.
Another telling
development in the slide to wider war is that the US forces are moving
towards blatantly defending jihadists like Maghawir al Thawra from
Syrian, Russian and Iranian forces who are the only ones actually taking
the battle to defeat jihadists. The US mask of hiding behind «moderate
rebels» is slipping. Washington is now seen to be increasingly at war in
Syria. It seems only a matter of time before US forces come into direct
clash with Russian and Iranian military.
Monday, June 19, 2017
Dr. Eowyn: Pedogate and the attempted assassination of Rep. Steve Scalise
On the morning of June 14, 2017, at 7:09 am at a practice of the Republican team for the Congressional Baseball Game in a public park (Eugene Simpson Stadium Park) in Alexandria, VA, about 10 miles from Washington, DC, a Bernie Sanders supporter named James T. Hodgkinson of Illinois opened fire with a rifle on the Republicans, shooting and wounding Congressman Steve Scalise (R-LA) and three other people. (Wikipedia)
As reported by Fox News,
Sen. Jeff Flake and former combat surgeon Rep. Brad Wenstrup ran to
assist Scalise after U.S. Capitol Police shot and killed Hodgkinson, 66,
who had a violent history including arrests for battery, resisting
arrest and drunken driving. Senator Rand Paul, also a witness, said he
heard “as many as 50 shots”. Calling the scene “sort of a killing
field,” Paul said, “We were like sitting ducks. Without the Capitol Hill
police it would have been a massacre.”
Shot in the hip, Rep. Scalise was the only member of Congress to be hit. The other three are:
- Zack Barth, a congressional aide to Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas).
- Tyson Foods director of government relations Matt Mika was shot multiple times and was in critical condition.
- Special Agent Crystal Griner was shot in the leg. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala) used a belt as a tourniquet to stop the bleeding.
Initially conscious after being shot, Scalise went into shock while
being taken to MedStar Washington Hospital Center in critical condition,
where he underwent immediate surgery. MedStar is the same hospital to
which Seth Rich — believed to the source of the damaging DNC emails published by WikiLeaks — was brought after being shot in a residential D.C. neighborhood in early Sunday morning, July 10, 2016. Rich died in MedStar under suspicious conditions.
MedStar surgeon Dr. Jack Sava — said to have been Seth Rich’s surgeon as
well — said Scalise had been hit by a single rifle bullet that
“traveled across his pelvis, fracturing bones, injuring internal organs,
and causing severe bleeding”. Sava said that when Scalise arrived at
the hospital, “he was in critical condition with an imminent risk of
death,” but that after surgery by June 16, although still in critical
condition, “We have controlled internal bleeding and his vital signs
have stabilized”. On June 17, Scalise’s condition was upgraded to
“serious” and he was responsive enough to talk with his family. He will
required additional operations to manage abdominal and bone injuries.
Stephen Joseph Scalise, 51, is the current United States House of
Representatives Majority Whip and representative for Louisiana’s 1st
congressional district, serving since 2008. Scalise endorsed President
Trump during last year’s presidential campaign, and has been a vocal
backer of Trump’s travel ban. As chair of the House Republican Study
Committee, he has spearheaded the effort to repeal and replace
ObamaCare.
The buzz in the Alternative Media is that
Scalise was targeted because of his strong stance against child
predators and sex trafficking. 6 reasons are cited in support:
(1) Assassin Hodgkinson specifically targeted Republicans
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.), who left the baseball practice just before the shooting, told Fox News that as he was walking to his car, a man asked him if it was Republicans or Democrats practicing. About 3 minutes later, at around 7:09 a.m., the shooting began. DeSantis said James Hogkinson was the man who had approached him.
In fact, Hodgkinson had a list of names of conservative Republican Congressmen in his pocket at the time of the shooting. (Fox News)
(2) Rep. Scalise has spoken out on child sex predators
(3) Scalise is a co-sponsor of a bill to criminalize those who make, facilitate, use, or transmit “visual images” of child sex
Scalise is one of 6 co-sponsors of H.R. 1761: Protecting Against Child Exploitation Act of 2017,
which amends title 18, United States Code, to criminalize the knowing
consent of the visual depiction or live transmission of a minor engaged
in sexually explicit conduct, and for other purposes, including the
amendment of subsections (a) and (b) of Section 2251 of title 18, United
States Code to read as follows:
“(a) Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (f), knowingly—“(1) employs, uses, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces a minor to engage in any sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct, or transmitting a live visual depiction of such conduct;“(2) produces or causes to be produced a visual depiction of a minor engaged in any sexually explicit conduct where the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and such visual depiction is of such conduct;“(3) transmits or causes to be transmitted a live visual depiction of a minor engaged in any sexually explicit conduct;“(4) has a minor assist any other person to engage in any sexually explicit conduct during the commission of an offense set forth in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this subsection; or“(5) transports any minor in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce with the intent that such minor be used in the production or live transmission of a visual depiction of a minor engaged in any sexually explicit conduct,shall be punished as provided under subsection (e).
(b) Any parent, legal guardian, or person having custody or control of a minor who, in a circumstance described in subsection (f), knowingly permits such minor to engage in, or to assist any other person to engage in, sexually explicit conduct knowing that a visual depiction of such conduct will be produced or transmitted shall be punished as provided under subsection (e).”
HR 1761 was passed by the House of Representatives on May 25, 2017. The
bill was received in the U.S. Senate on June 5, and referred to the
Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
(4) The New York Times tipped off the shooter on the Congressional baseball practice field
“When members of Congress practice in the early mornings in an Alexandrea, Va., public park for their Congressional Baseball Game, plainclothes United States Capital Police are sitting there in a black S.U.V.”
(5) President Trump knows
On June 14, the day of the shooting, President Trump and First Lady
Melania made a surprise, unscheduled visit to Rep. Scalise at MedStar.
They were accompanied by Trump’s personal physician, Dr. Ronny Jackson. (New York Daily News)
The Alt-Media say this is Trump’s way of ensuring Scalise’s survival by sending a message to Pedogate that he is watching them.
(6) Democrats sent pizzas to Scalise’s staff
Given that, it is curious that on the day of the shooting, staffers for
House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) were seen carrying several
boxes of pizza to Scalise’s office. (The Hill)
So, do you think Congressman Scalise was targeted because of his stance on Pedogate? Sound off in our poll!
Re. the assassination of Rep. Steve Scalise
By the way, two days ago, AltMedia independent journalist Jack Posobiec
tweeted that a source told him “the Podesta case is open,” implying that
the FBI is investigating John Podesta, chair of Hillary Clinton’s
failed presidential campaign and a prime player in Pizzagate.
(7) John Podesta wanted Rep. Scalise to resign
In 2015, John Podesta, chair of Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign and a prime player in Pizzagate, was part of the signature drive in a petition to get Scalise to resign.Here’s the email published by WikiLeaks:
Please pray that the evildoers be brought to justice.
~Eowyn
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- Jim Fetzer
- McKnight Professor of Philosophy Emeritus, University of Minnesota Duluth; Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth; Editor, Assassination Science; Co-Editor, Assassination Research
No comments:
Post a Comment