The op: unelected agents now infiltrating 'critical infrastructures'
Massive collection of data
A covert op for the ages: Technocracy United
Technocracy: "control of society by a technical elite"
By Jon Rappoport
Note to readers: the people in charge of, yes, running the
future are counting on a populace who can't think beyond a few weeks or
months. That's their ace in the hole. The long-term future must always
seem blurry and vague---and a waste of time to consider. Why? It's
obvious. The people in charge are always building the long-term future,
brick by brick, and if very few citizens can grasp what it looks like,
how can they object or resist or sound an alarm?
If you want to illegally take over an area, you need to
invent an external threat justifying the takeover. We've been seeing
exactly that recently, as Russia has suddenly been painted as a hostile
force trying to destroy our "open democracy."
Therefore, the Department of Homeland Security is now in charge of US elections, to "combat the Russian hackers."
And it isn't only elections.
In the release, last Friday, that gave control of US
elections to the Department of Homeland Security (a naked coup), we also
have this, from ABC News:
"A 2013 presidential directive identified 16 sectors as
critical infrastructures, including energy, financial services, health
care, transportation, food and agriculture and communications."
"The designation announced Friday places responsibilities on
the Homeland Security secretary to identify and prioritize those
sectors, considering physical and cyber threats against them. The
secretary is also required to conduct security checks and provide
information about emerging and imminent threats."
ABC got it wrong. The responsibilities (excluding elections)
placed on the head of Homeland Security weren't invented last Friday.
They kicked off in 2013, and they represent a technocratic op to
infiltrate and exert power over every aspect of American life.
The 2013 Policy Directive, issued by President Obama, was
titled: "Critical Infrastructure Security and Review." It enumerated no
less than 16 areas of so-called US "critical infrastructure" where
Homeland Security would muscle in:
Chemical; Commercial Facilities; Communications; Critical
Manufacturing; Dams; Defense Industrial Base; Emergency Services;
Energy; Final Services; Food and Agriculture; Government Facilities;
Healthcare and Public Health; Information Technology; Nuclear Reactors,
Materials, and Waste; Transportation Systems; Water and Wastewater
Systems.
These are the areas where the head of Homeland Security is
expected to "manage risk and strengthen security." HS will also, of
course, take charge of integrating and monitoring ALL the data networks
of these 16 sectors.
It sounds reasonable to the average person. But the true
theme is control. Planning, control, execution. Move in on these areas
and exert operational command from the top.
This IS, in fact, the technocratic blueprint for global
management of a new system. We're talking about the re-engineering of
society.
Capturing the 16 areas (and their data) above was always the
long-term aim, when the Department of Homeland Security was invented in
the wake of the 9/11 attacks. If you recall, there was considerable
grousing then about the word "Homeland," because it emitted a strong
whiff of Fascism.
If the goal is engineering a new society---and it is---all
systems of data collection, communication, and surveillance must be
gathered under one roof.
The social and political engineer (aka the technocrat) views
every person (unit) as a biological machine that must be profiled six
ways from Sunday, for the purpose of inserting him into an overall
pattern. As Patrick Wood explains in his brilliant book, Technocracy
Rising, "[technology] is being rapidly implemented...to exhaustively
monitor, measure and control every facet of individual activity and
every ampere of energy delivered and consumed in the life of such
individual[s]."
In truth, the Dept. of Homeland Security is spearheading a
movement to connect, cross reference, and integrate every major
apparatus of data- collection in both the private and public sectors.
This is the ongoing op.
It is not partisan. It flies the banner of no political party. It pretends to protect the citizenry.
But, in fact, it is the major long-term threat to the citizenry.
It is planning a national and global civilization that does not ask for permission to exist.
No one is voting, because if a vote were required, and people
were informed about what is really happening, they would overwhelmingly
reject technocracy.
Which is why new enemies must be invented on a continuous basis---to justify the "proactive measures that will keep us safe."
Homeland Security, with its 240,000 employees and its 24
agencies, is in the business of securing untold trillions of pieces of
data for the forward march of Technocracy, Inc.
Suppose, instead of the political-speak we've been treated
to, the White House and Homeland Security released the unvarnished
truth? "Look, we need to collect, record, and store every possible datum
on you and you and everyone. This isn't about our so-called enemies,
this is about us, your controllers. This is about the future we're
planning for you. Somewhere up the road, when we're ready, when we think
we can get away with it, we're going to announce that the planet is in a
terminal energy crisis and shortage. Therefore, every person will
receive a card that records his use and consumption of energy, and when
his quota runs out, he'll be without energy until the next time period.
Get it? This is where we're headed..."
Again, as author Patrick Wood points out, when you encounter
terms like sustainable economy, SmartGrid, green economy, Agenda 21,
carbon taxes, cap and trade, and even Common Core (an indoctrination
process for the young masked as education), you're looking at
technocracy-in-progress. In fact, you're looking at declarations, in one
form or another, about irreversible energy shortages that requite
drastic solutions.
Since 2013, when Obama announced the 16 areas where Homeland
Security has to exert its authority, a new phase in the authoritarian
ascent to a mountaintop of control, framed as "scientific," has been
underway.
This is the long con, the long op.
The bosses are counting on the inability of citizens to grasp
what is going on. The bosses are counting on the passivity of citizens
when it comes to thinking about a future of more than a few weeks or
months.
They are also counting on the "citizen energy quotas" I mentioned above sounding like nothing more than wild science fiction.
Well, travel back, for a moment to, say, the 1960s. If
someone had told you then, "Your cell phones will be collecting data on
you, and you'll happily be profiling yourselves in great detail, for the
government, on social media," you would have said, "What mental
institution did you escape from?"
What sounds like fiction becomes fact.
No comments:
Post a Comment