Mainstream fake-news: the devious limited hangout
By Jon Rappoport
Big media attacks "fake news." Independent reporters rightly
point the finger at big media as the predominant purveyor of fake news.
Oops.
Here I want to comment on one of the most devious forms of MSM fake news: the limited hangout.
When necessary, news outlets will do a PARTIAL EXPOSURE of a
hidden crime. The assumption is, once the story is published and
broadcast, everyone will shake their heads and say, "That's terrible,"
and move on. The whole thing will be forgotten in a matter of days, as
if the whole truth has been revealed. Limited hangout.
From media's point of view, a limited hangout means: "We
won't do any further digging. We'll shut down further investigation."
Vital questions won't be asked:
Why did the criminals do what they did? Why are they still at
large? Who is refusing to press charges and make arrests? What deeper
crimes are still secret?
The mainstream press could set their hounds loose and build a
story into a huge wave. Over time, they could bring hidden players out
into the open and expose them and wring confessions out of them. They
could get some of these players to roll over and point to higher-level
criminals. The story could achieve tsunami status, at which point the
government would have to make arrests and lay on trials in open
courtrooms.
But that doesn't happen. Limited hangout rules the day.
I'm going to present a story about a crime now. It's big.
Very big. It was covered, to a degree, by the mainstream press. The
coverage seemed to be significant. But it was a limited hangout.
As you read on, imagine what might have happened if the press
had decided to go in with guns blazing and investigate all the way,
over a period of months, releasing new revelations as they discovered
them. Imagine the repercussions. Imagine the public outcry. Instead of a
limited hangout, we would have seen...well, I'll leave it to you to
fill in the blanks.
In 1975, the US signed on to an international treaty banning
the production, use, and stockpiling of biological weapons. Ditto for
chemical weapons, in 1993. Another treaty.
Here's a quote from the Washington Post (9/4/13, "When the US looked the other way on chemical weapons"):
"...The administrations of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush
authorized the sale to Iraq of numerous items...including poisonous
chemicals and deadly biological viruses, such as anthrax and bubonic
plague..."
Between 1985 and 1989, a US 501C3 firm, American Type Culture Collection, sent Iraq up to 70 shipments of various biowar agents, including 21 strains of anthrax.
Between 1984 and 1989, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control!)
sent Iraq at least 80 different biowar agents, including botulinum
toxoid, dengue virus, and West Nile antigen and antibody.
This information on the American Type Culture Collection and
the CDC comes from a report, "Iraq's Biological Weapons Program,"
prepared by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS).
Then we have a comprehensive article by William Blum (one of
the good investigators in this whole story) in the April 1998
Progressive called "Anthrax for Export." Blum cites a 1994
Senate report confirming that, in this 1985-1989 time period, US
shipments of anthrax and other biowar agents to Iraq were licensed
by...drum roll, cymbal crash...the US Dept. of Commerce.
Blum quotes from the Senate report: "These biological
materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of
reproduction. It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by
the United States were identical to those the United Nations inspectors
found and removed from the Iraqi biological warfare program."
This 1994 Senate report also indicates that the US exported
to Iraq the precursors for chemwar agents, actual plans for chemical and
biowar production facilities, and chemical-warhead filling equipment.
The exports continued until at least November 28, 1989.
Blum lists a few other biowar agents the US shipped to Iraq.
Histoplasma Capsulatum, Brucella Melitensis, Clostridium Perfringens,
Clostridium tetani---as well as E. coli, various genetic materials,
human and bacterial DNA.
Blum also points out that a 1994 Pentagon report dismissed
any connection between all these biowar agents and Gulf War Illness. But
the researcher who headed up that study, Joshua Lederberg, was actually
a director of the US firm that had provided the most biowar material to
Iraq in the 1980s: the American Type Culture Collection.
Newsday revealed that the CEO of the American Type Culture
Collection was a member of the US Dept. of Commerce's Technical Advisory
Committee. See, the Dept. of Commerce had to license and approve all
those exports of biowar agents carried out by the American Type Culture
Collection. Get the picture?
Now, as to other US companies which dealt biowar or chemwar
agents to Iraq---all such sales having been approved by the US
government---the names of these companies are contained in records of
the 1992 Senate hearings, "United States Export Policy Toward Iraq Prior
to Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait," Senate Report 102-996, Senate Committee
on Banking Housing and Urban Affairs, 102d Congress, Second Session
(October 27, 1992):
Mouse Master (Georgia), Sullaire Corp (Charlotte, North
Carolina), Pure Aire (Charlotte, North Carolina), Posi Seal (Conn.),
Union Carbide (Conn.), Evapco (Maryland), BDM Corp (Virginia), Spectra
Physics (Calif.).
There are about a dozen more.
This also from the Blum article: "A larger number of American
firms supplied Iraq with the specialized computers, lasers, testing and
analyzing equipment, and other instruments and hardware vital to the
manufacture of nuclear weapons, missiles, and delivery systems.
Computers, in particular, play a key role in nuclear weapons
development. Advanced computers make it feasible to avoid carrying out
nuclear test explosions, thus preserving the program's secrecy. The 1992
Senate hearings implicated [Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA - among
others]."
Hewlett Packard said that the recipient of its shipments,
Saad 16, was some sort of school in Iraq. But in 1990, the Wall St.
Journal stated that Saad 16 was a "heavily fortified, state-of-the-art
[Iraqi] complex for aircraft construction, missile design, and, almost
certainly, nuclear-weapons research."
If you review and think about all these WMD shipments from
the US to Iraq, you understand there were many US officials and
corporate employees who knew about them. Knew about them then, in the
1980s, and knew about them later, during 2 US wars in Iraq, when
American soldiers were sent to Iraq, and could have been exposed to the
bio/chem weapons.
And these officials and employees said nothing.
Officials at the CDC and the Dept. of Commerce said nothing.
People at the American Type Culture Collection said nothing. People at
the Pentagon and the CIA and the NSA said nothing. Presidents said
nothing. Employees of the corporations who supplied germs and chemicals
said nothing.
---Now imagine the NY Times and the Washington Post releasing
their hounds to dig deeper into this boggling story. Interviews with
the players. Investigations into the role of the CDC. The cover-ups.
After a year of relentless probing and publishing, this would have built
into an unstoppable tidal wave. The whole country (and the world) would
have been agog. Prosecutions would have followed.
But it didn't happen.
Instead, the story dissolved and went away.
The history that could have been made...
Wasn't made.
This is fake news at its finest; by omission. By limited hangout.
No comments:
Post a Comment