|
My second open letter to Steve Bannon, Trump's inside man |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)
|
|
My second open letter to Steve Bannon, Trump's inside man
By Jon Rappoport
Yesterday, I published my first open letter to Steve Bannon:
Trump's chief strategist, special counselor, and, yes, avowed enemy of
major media and their fake news bubbles.
Here is a follow-up. Like the first, this one involves solutions aimed at improving life in America.
And believe me, I understand that Progressive vampires and
their allied subalterns are very nervous about workable solutions,
especially as they empower people to succeed beyond permanent dependence
on government, The Universal Teat and Provider. So be it.
Again, I remind you, there are millions and millions of
people out there who aren't polled or counted or factored into the
algorithms of political calculations. Some of them voted for your man,
some didn't vote at all. All of them want a role in the political
process, and if sufficiently motivated and encouraged, they will
suddenly show up and support you with an energy that will knock you off
your chair.
They are against the multitude of lies big government has
been feeding them for decades---lies that come back to the basic issue
of HEALTH.
Here is an introductory list of what these millions of Americans are burning about:
GMOs in the food supply (never proven to be safe, never
proven to increase crop yields). Toxic pesticides drenching the food
supply. The lacing of our water with toxic fluorides (forced medical
treatment with no informed consent). Harmful vaccine after vaccine
injected into our children, and the cooked studies that claim these
substances are universally safe and effective (watch the film Vaxxed for
a window into the fraud). The pharmaceutical assault on the population
with toxic and unnecessary drugs (killing, at minimum, 106,000 Americans
every year, a million Americans per decade---see Starfield, JAMA, July
26, 2000).
Let's start with those. There are more.
I assure you, Steve, people with stacks of evidence, beyond
official pronouncements, could come forward and make a case for the
destructive toxicity of these substances. They already have. The crazies
in this situation are actually the corporate and media front men, who
are parroting what sold-out scientists at the FDA, CDC, and other
agencies are feeding them.
Ridding the country of poisons, to put it frankly, would
certainly rank as a solution. Healthier adults and children, filled with
energy, alert and alive? Isn't this a fundamental?
Of course, I'm showing you a tall hill to climb here, given
the ubiquitous special interests who have been squeezing America for so
long. But I would point out that you and others have been taking the
fight to the proponents of global warming and exposing them for the
frauds they are. That's a big hill, too.
The toxic items I listed above are on the same hill.
Part of the solution? Serious DOJ prosecutions against FDA
and CDC personnel for fraud, reckless endangerment, and waste of
enormous federal funds.
You want to see a massive silent majority explode in support
of your administration? Carry out those prosecutions. Extend them to
pharmaceutical executives who have knowingly foisted their highly
destructive drugs on the population.
At this point you'll be thinking you can't go that far. It's
too much to take on. Well, you took on climate change because you saw
the agenda involved torpedoing the economy. What I'm giving you here
(massive and unending toxicity in various forms) torpedoes the right to
life itself.
This isn't some wild-eyed appeal from the fringe, Steve. As
an independent reporter (one of many) who has been covering these issues
for more than 30 years, I assure you there is a whole library of
evidence to support the points I've sketched out here.
You're an expert on corrupt media. I guarantee there is no
greater media corruption than in the area of health and medicine. Those
boys and girls are locked up tight. If they aren't lying, they aren't
living. From what I can see, you take great pleasure in overturning
apple carts. Here is the big one. Flip it over, and you'll watch some of
the weirdest and slimiest creatures on this green Earth come crawling
out.
You want a real revolution? It's there.
Talk to the mother of a child whose brain has been hit and
damaged with a vaccine. Listen to her. Look in her eyes. This is the
fire of truth no liar can contradict. This is devastation.
It's time to do something about it, come hell or high water.
Whether it's your time, Steve, is up to you.
PS: I attach a letter about the fluoridation of our water supplies. It's self-explanatory. It's a bombshell.
Here is what the EPA Union of scientists (!) had to say about fluoridation:
Quoting from a May 1, 1999, statement--- "Why EPA's Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation"---written by William Hirzy, PhD, [Union of Scientists] Senior Vice-President, Chapter 280:
"...our opposition to drinking water fluoridation has grown,
based on the scientific literature documenting the increasingly
out-of-control exposures to fluoride, the lack of benefit to dental
health from ingestion of fluoride and the hazards to human health from
such ingestion. These hazards include acute toxic hazard, such as to
people with impaired kidney function, as well as chronic toxic hazards
of gene mutations, cancer, reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, bone
pathology and dental fluorosis."
"In support of this concern are results from two epidemiology
studies from China that show decreases in I.Q. in children who get more
fluoride than the control groups of children in each study. These
decreases are about 5 to 10 I.Q. points in children aged 8 to 13 years."
"Another troubling brain effect has recently surfaced:
fluoride's interference with the function of the brain's pineal gland.
The pineal gland produces melatonin which, among other roles, mediates
the body's internal clock, doing such things as governing the onset of
puberty. Jennifer Luke has shown that fluoride accumulates in the pineal
gland and inhibits its production of melatonin. She showed in test
animals that this inhibition causes an earlier onset of sexual maturity,
an effect reported in humans as well in 1956..."
"EPA fired the Office of Drinking Water's chief toxicologist,
Dr. William Marcus, who also was our local union's treasurer at the
time, for refusing to remain silent on the cancer risk issue. The judge
who heard the lawsuit he [Marcus] brought against EPA over the firing
made that finding---that EPA fired him over his fluoride work and not
for the phony reason put forward by EPA management at his dismissal. Dr.
Marcus won his lawsuit and is again at work at EPA."
"...data showing increases in osteosarcomas in young men in
New Jersey, Washington and Iowa based on their drinking fluoridated
water. It was his [Dr. Marcus'] analysis, repeated statements about all
these and other incriminating cancer data, and his requests for an
independent, unbiased evaluation of them that got Dr. Marcus fired."
"Regarding the effectiveness of fluoride in reducing dental
cavities, there has not been any double-blind study of fluoride's
effectiveness as a caries preventative. There have been many, many small
scale, selective publications on this issue that proponents cite to
justify fluoridation, but the largest and most comprehensive study, one
done by dentists trained by the National Institute of Dental Research,
on over 39,000 school children aged 5-17 years, shows no significant
differences (in terms of decayed, missing and filled teeth) among caries
[cavities] incidences in fluoridated, non-fluoridated and partially
fluoridated communities. The latest publication on the fifty-year
fluoridation experiment in two New York cities, Newburgh and Kingston,
shows the same thing. The only significant difference in dental health
between the two communities as a whole is that fluoridated Newburgh,
N.Y. shows about twice the incidence of dental fluorosis (the first,
visible sign of fluoride chronic toxicity) as seen in non-fluoridated
Kingston."
"John Colquhoun's publication on this point of efficacy is
especially important. Dr. Colquhoun was Principal Dental Officer for
Auckland, the largest city in New Zealand, and a staunch supporter of
fluoridation-until he was given the task of looking at the world-wide
data on fluoridation's effectiveness in preventing cavities. The paper
is titled, 'Why I changed My Mind About Water Fluoridation.'
In it Colquhoun provides details on how data were manipulated to
support fluoridation in English speaking countries, especially the U.S.
and New Zealand. This paper explains why an ethical public health
professional was compelled to do a 180 degree turn on fluoridation."
"...mutation studies...show that fluoride can cause gene
mutations in mammalian and lower order tissues at fluoride
concentrations estimated to be present in the mouth from fluoridated
tooth paste. Further, there were tumors of the oral cavity seen in the
NTP cancer study...further strengthening concern over the toxicity of
topically applied fluoride."
"So, in addition to our concern over the toxicity of
fluoride, we note the uncontrolled - and apparently uncontrollable -
exposures to fluoride that are occurring nationwide via drinking water,
processed foods, fluoride pesticide residues and dental care
products...For governmental and other organizations to continue to push
for more exposure in the face of current levels of over-exposure coupled
with an increasing crescendo of adverse toxicity findings is irrational
and irresponsible at best."
"We have also taken a direct step to protect the [EPA]
employees we represent from the risks of drinking fluoridated
water...the union filed a grievance, asking that EPA provide
un-fluoridated drinking water to its employees."
"The implication for the general public of these calculations
is clear. Recent, peer-reviewed toxicity data, when applied to EPA's
standard method for controlling risks from toxic chemicals, require an
immediate halt to the use of the nation's drinking water reservoirs as
disposal sites for the toxic waste of the phosphate fertilizer
industry."
Steve, does that make you pause?
This is just one piece of evidence in a vast library,
pertaining to every American's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness.
Free from disastrous toxicity that is, at this very moment, undermining that right.
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment