Using a Far Infrared Heating Pad to Help Treat Cancer
Orthodox oncologist’s have it wrong in their choice of the type of rays
they use for radiation therapy to treat cancer. They picked the
dangerous killing type of radiation that causes cancer as opposed to far infrared life generating rays
that offer healing and dramatically increased immune system strength.
In the future oncologists, hopefully, instead of using dangerous
radiation will come to their senses and start using positive forms of
radiation that add to life instead of destroying it. There is nothing
more helpful, medically speaking, than an infrared heating pad. Alone it can bring comfort, support and hope and a quicker recovery from whatever one is suffering from.
Scientists have found more than enough evidence that elevated body
temperature helps certain types of immune cells to work better.[1]
This research was reported in the November 2011 issue of the Journal of
Leukocyte Biology. John Wherry, Ph.D., Deputy Editor of the Journal of Leukocyte Biology says, "This research report and several others are showing that having a fever is part of an effective immune response.
"An increase in body temperature has been known since ancient times to
be associated with infection and inflammation," said Elizabeth A.
Repasky, Ph.D., a researcher involved in the work from the Department of
Immunology at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York.
Low body temperature
and low immune system strength go hand in hand. It is almost impossible
to recover from chronic disease and cancer if one’s body temperature is
too low. Increasing temperature increases the activity of the immune system and there is no better way of doing that than with infrared mattresses one can sleep on and use during the day.
Though doctors have used live bacteria to stimulate a fever to beat
cancer there are safer ways to increase core body temperature to
stimulate the immune system to defeat cancer. Using infrared heat therapy
is safe and easily done in the comfort of one’s own bedroom and is much
less expensive than using shortwave hyperthermia in a clinic to do
thermotherapy.
The history of oncological hyperthermia
started from some evidences of cancer cure by concomitant febrile
diseases described in XVIII-XIX centuries. It seems that the inhibition
of tumor growth by high fever caused by malaria was for the first time
described by de Kizowitz (France) in 1779. In 1866, Busch (Germany)
described the complete remission of histologically confirmed face
sarcoma after two erysipelas infections with subsequent 2-year
disease-free survival. He then used the intentional contact with
erysipelas infection to treat several patients. Apparently, in the
second half of XIX century, the practice of infectious febrile therapy
was quite common not only in Germany and France but also in Russia, and
it was used to treat a wide range of diseases including mental diseases.
In 1882, Fehleisen discovered Erysipelas agent—Streptococcus pyogenes.
He inoculated live bacteria to seven cancer patients and achieved
complete remission in 3 cases. Bruns in 1887 reported a case of complete
remission in a patient with multiple recurrent melanoma after
Erysipelas with temperature over 40°C for several days, with 8-year
disease-free survival. He also collected 14 reported cases of erysipelas
in proven malignant disease: in most cases there was complete and
stable remission. The method was called febrile therapy and hyperthermia
per se was only one component of the complex body reaction, and it was
not considered as a separate treatment modality.
The Healing Light Returns
Here is someone who is taking infrared radiation to its fullest
potential. Though not to be used at night like this, during the day one
can make a sandwich out of oneself by using a big infrared mat and a
smaller one. Together they concentrate the heat and because the rays
penetrate deeply all the tissues sandwiched in between are effected.
This technique raises temperatures to levels that cancer cells do not
enjoy.
I am not suggesting that infrared heat therapy
is a cure for cancer. Oncologists, if they were honest, would not say
that radiation or chemotherapy cures cancer either. Both radiation and
chemotherapy cause cancer meaning they increase the chances of getting
more cancer in the future, besides bringing a whole range of serious
side effects that are tough to live with.
There is no doubt that infrared heat therapy increases core body
temperature if used aggressively enough. There is no doubt that increased body temperature is correlated mathematically with increased immune system strength.
Draw your own conclusions. Medical scientists and pharmaceutical
companies believe enough in the immune system to have patients spend a
hundred thousand dollars or more to use drugs to treat cancer to do what infrared heat therapy can do. These are all cancer facts!
Infrared light therapy will alleviate pain, detoxify the body,
strengthen cardiovascular system, devitalize, and clear pathogens from
the body. Infrared therapy produces potent antioxidants,
neurotransmitters and artery wall relaxers. Infrared therapy helps
regulate muscle tone of the arteries and prevents arteriosclerosis and
is anti-inflammatory preventing injury to vessel walls and normalizing
blood pressure in the process.
Infrared mats are a wonderfully safe and easy-to-use means of achieving
ever-accelerating levels of health, wellness and more efficient, natural
regeneration and rejuvenation. They provide "noticeable" and
"comprehensive" health benefits to make your body feel well and be the
best it can be.
Death Star Medicine
Some people just cannot get themselves away from the deadly nature of modern medicine.
Radiation therapy is taken to an extreme with focused proton beams that
deliver precisely targeted blasts of radiation. The particle beams are
delivered by 500-ton machines in facilities that cost from $100 million
to $200 million, and can require a football- field sized building to
house. A typical treatment costs about $50,000, twice as much as
traditional radiation therapy.
“Proton-beam therapy is like the death star of American medical technology;
nothing so big and complicated has ever been confronted by the system,”
said Amitabh Chandra, a health economist at Harvard University’s John
F. Kennedy School of Government. “It’s a metaphor for all the problems
we have in American medicine.”
One machine can generate as much as $50 million in annual revenue and
new facilities are sprouting up around the country. “It’s like a nuclear
arms race now, everyone wants one,” said Anthony Zietman, a radiation
oncologist at Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital, which has had a
proton-beam accelerator since 2001.
Data suggest only a small population of men with intermediate-risk of
prostate cancer will benefit in terms of cost effectiveness using proton
therapy.[2]
Even when based on the unproven assumption that protons will permit a
10-GY escalation of prostate dose compared with IMRT photons, proton
beam therapy is not cost effective for most patients with prostate
cancer says research published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
A report posted in Cancer Today states:
A study of nearly 13,000 men published in the April 18, 2012,Journal of the American Medical Association
indicated that prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy
were more likely to face gastrointestinal side effects than those
treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)—a form of
X-ray radiotherapy. Results published in the Jan. 2Journal of the National Cancer Institute “found no difference [in these side effects] between proton radiation and IMRT.”
[1] T. A. Mace, L. Zhong, C. Kilpatrick, E. Zynda, C.-T. Lee, M. Capitano, H. Minderman, E. A. Repasky.Differentiation of CD8+ T cells into effector cells is enhanced by physiological range hyperthermia.Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 2011; 90 (5): 951 DOI:10.1189/jlb.0511229
[2] Is Proton Beam Therapy Cost Effective in the Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate?
Andre Konski et al; 2007 by American Society of Clinical Oncology; http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/25/24/3603.full
No comments:
Post a Comment