As my readers know, I've reported on a number of scandals
concerning the toxicity of medical drugs and vaccines, including
shocking death numbers in the US.
These scandals are leaks from inside the National Security State.
If you visit Wikileaks, Cryptome, Public Intelligence, and other similar
sites, how many purely medical documents do you find posted?
How many damaging leaks exposing the crimes of the medical cartel do you find?
Very, very few.
Where are the medical insiders who are liberating and passing along incriminating documentary evidence?
Some of the best exposers of political, intelligence-agency, and
military crimes are way behind the curve, when it comes to medical
matters.
The medical sphere, for various reasons, is far better protected than any other segment of society.
For the hundredth time, let me cite Dr. Barbara Starfield's stunning review,
"Is US health really the best in the world?" published on July 26, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Starfield, at the time, was working as a highly respected public health expert, at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
She concluded that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans a year. That would add up to 2.25 million deaths per decade.
Laid directly at the door of the American medical complex.
106,000 of those annual deaths, as Starfield reports, are the direct result of medical drugs
Aside from the genocidal death toll, Starfield's findings also reveal
massive fraud in all medical journals that routinely publish the glowing
results of clinical trials of drugs.
How could such trials open the door to the marketing of drugs that kill,
according to Starfield, 106,000 Americans every year, unless deep,
continuing, and abetted research fraud were the order of the day?
Indeed, Dr. Marcia Angell, the editor of New England Journal of Medicine for 20 years, wrote the following:
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical
research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted
physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in
this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two
decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." (NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009)
The FDA, of course, is the single government agency responsible for
certifying drugs as safe and effective, before their public release is
permitted. Yet the FDA takes absolutely no responsibility for the
deaths.
Can you imagine the feeding frenzy, if, say, some leaker in the Pentagon
passed along a political/military document to Wikileaks that showed the
Dept. of Defense was poisoning to death, like clockwork, a hundred
thousand of its own soldiers every year?
Let's stop this insane nonsense of separating one whole set of
government crimes from another, simply because the propagandized priests
in the white coats are above reproach.
We're not living in 1950 anymore, and this isn't Kansas.
In 1988, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., I stated that
medical covert ops are the most successful methods for pacifying,
debilitating, and controlling populations, through toxification, because
these ops fly the flag of political neutrality.
They appear to favor no king, dictator, president, government administration or partisan position.
Their propaganda is all about healing and helping.
In fact, the medical cartel is, in the long run, the most effective
branch of political repression, from one end of the planet to the other.
It favors top-down control by those in power, whoever they are, whatever they claim to stand for.
Consider this: when Ed Snowden released NSA documents that showed the
extent of government surveillance on populations, no one from the
intelligence establishment made a serious case that Snowden's
revelations were false. Instead, they attacked Snowden for exposing
"methods" of "the war on terror."
However, in the medical arena, leakers would be afraid that doctors,
medical bureaucrats, public health agencies, government leaders,
drug-company fronts, and major media outlets would, all at once, deny
the validity and truth of the leaks---despite the fact that the truth is
there for all to see.
In other words, the best protected cartel in the world---medical---would
act in a far more Orwellian fashion. It would say: the truth is not
the truth, the facts are not the facts, 2 and 2 do not equal 4---and the
cartel would get away with doing that.
This is the kind of clout we're talking about when it comes to medical matters.
Over the years, I've alerted mainstream reporters to the Starfield
review, cited above, and other confirming published studies that reveal
the horrific extent of medical destruction. Those reporters who
bothered to get back to me issued blanket denials. They essentially
said, "Yes, I see the evidence and the facts, but the facts aren't
facts. What's happening isn't happening."
Now we're talking about some heavy brainwashing.
By comparison, it makes the quality of the scandal around Snowden seem like a Sunday lunch in the park.
A few years ago, I had one reporter, who exposes political leaks, tell
me: "I don't mess with medical stuff. It would ruin my credibility."
Indeed. Another indication of how powerful the medical apparatus is.
Recently, the Washington Post highlighted a new study that puts "medical
errors" as the 3rd leading cause of death in America. There hasn't
been any significant follow-up. There hasn't been an explosion of
outrage. So even when exposure occurs, the brainwashing factor is so
strong it makes no difference. It's just another ho-hum day in the news
business.
That's mind control par excellence. That's tremendous protection of criminals.
That's like a crime boss saying, "Yeah, I kill 225,000 people every year, but it's an accident"---and nothing happens.
He goes his merry way, and everyone praises him as a humanitarian.
Talk about inventing and selling false reality.
This one is at the top of the charts, and it stays there.
No comments:
Post a Comment