Was Scalia murdered? Forget "conspiracy theory." This is real. by Jon Rappoport

Was Scalia murdered? Forget "conspiracy theory." This is real.

by Jon Rappoport February 16, 2016

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Let's jump right in with quotes from the Washington Post, 2/15, "Conspiracy theories swirl around the death of Antonin Scalia".  The Post published extraordinary statements from the Facebook page of "William O. Ritchie, former head of criminal investigations for D.C. police": "As a former homicide commander, I am stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia." "You have a Supreme Court Justice who died, not in attendance of a physician.  You have a non-homicide trained US Marshal tell the justice of peace that no foul play was observed. You have a justice of the peace pronounce death while not being on the scene and without any medical training opining that the justice died of a heart attack. What medical proof exists of a myocardial Infarction? Why not a cerebral hemorrhage?" "How can the Marshal say, without a thorough post mortem, that he was not injected with an illegal substance that would simulate a heart attack..." "Did the US Marshal check for petechial hemorrhage in his eyes or under his lips that would have suggested suffocation? Did the US Marshal smell his breath for any unusual odor that might suggest poisoning? My gut tells me there is something fishy going on in Texas." If this isn't enough, the Post goes on: "Scalia's physician, Brian Monahan, is a U.S. Navy rear admiral and the attending physician for the U.S. Congress and Supreme Court. He declined to comment on Scalia's [prior] health when reached by telephone Monday at his home in Maryland. "'Patient confidentiality forbids me to make any comment on the subject,' he said." "When asked whether he planned to make public the statement he's preparing for [Texas Judge] Guevara, Monahan repeated the same statement and hung up on a reporter." As long as no law-enforcement investigation of Scalia's death is launched, the doctor is justified.  Confidentiality applies, unless Scalia's family lifts it.  But if such an investigation is opened, all bets are off.  Confidentiality no longer applies. There are reports that, after Scalia's body was transported from the celebrity ranch in Texas, closely guarded and shielded by a bevy of marshals, it was rapidly embalmed.  If so, that would apparently make toxicological tests far more difficult or impossible. As for a murder motive, try: upsetting the voting balance of the US Supreme Court.  Try: a push to appoint a new Justice now, thus ensuring the appointee's political persuasion, regardless of the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election.  Try: attempting to shift the Court's voting balance in upcoming cases on abortion, immigration, and Obamacare. Dismiss the comfortable notion that "this couldn't happen."  JFK couldn't have been murdered, but he was.  High political figures don't carry special immunity. Dismiss assurances from incompetents in Texas that Scalia died of natural causes, and dismiss the press repeating these assurances---which add up to: nothing. Dismiss calls for "propriety in a time of grief." Dismiss whatever opinions, pro and con, circulate now about Scalia, his points of view, his decisions, his character, his life.  They're irrelevant to the facts of his death.  Those facts are as clear as mud. Dismiss the typical accusations of "conspiracy theory."  It's no theory when key facts are unknown and incompetents supplied the current "information." In addition to what I've cited above, count as relevant the fact that Scalia's federal protection had been removed while he was at the Texas ranch.  We're told Scalia didn't want that protection.  Maybe yes, maybe no.  We're also told Scalia's family didn't want an autopsy.  Again, maybe yes, maybe no.  The family has been silent.  Or if not, their statements aren't being reported. Consider, as potentially relevant, the report that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head. Consider, as relevant, that Judge Guevara, deciding without seeing the body that Scalia died from natural causes, ruled against doing an autopsy---and a counter-opinion, offered unofficially by another Texas judge, Bishop, that she would have wanted an autopsy.

Concerning Judge Guevara, this may or may not be relevant---heavy.com reports, "Judge Cinderela Guevara: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know": "This isn't the first time Guevara has been the source of controversy. In 2013, Melaney Parker Rayburn was found dead after being hit by a train in Marfa, Texas... Liz Parker, Melaney's mom, questioned how Guevara handled the investigation of her daughter's death, The Daily Kos reported. Melaney was hit by a Union Pacific Railroad train and, Liz [her mother] wrote, a Union Pacific representative told her that it appeared that her body had been placed on the tracks while she was unconscious. Liz asked the Justice of the Peace and the Sheriff to open the case as a homicide investigation, but they would not. Guevara, who was a Justice of the Peace at the time, did not order a rape kit or an autopsy, Liz wrote, because a doctor at the scene said the cause of death was obvious. "Liz later wrote a letter to the editor, published on Big Bend Now, in which she said that Guevara had asked for God to give her an answer about whether Melaney's death was suicide. Liz wrote that Guevara told her: 'Yes, this was a tragedy, but the true tragedy was that she died without accepting Jesus Christ as her savior.'" Bottom line so far: Any reasonable law-enforcement agency would immediately open an investigation into Scalia's death.  Failing to do so would rate as aiding and abetting a concealment of the truth, whatever that turns out to be.

You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.com.

Jon Rappoport The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.