Four days before he died, Supreme Court Justice Scalia voted to
stall Obama's plan to force drastic climate-change rules on the American
economy. The vote was 5-4. (see: The Hill, 2/13,
"Greens faced with nightmare scenario at the Supreme Court")
With Scalia now gone, the vote would be 4-4.
With a new Obama Supreme Court appointee, if Obama could ram his choice
through, the vote would be 5-4 in the President's favor. Ditto, if the
next President shares Obama's position. And the climate-change agenda
would roll ahead. (see: The Washington Times, 2/16,
"GOP showing signs of backing down from vow to block Obama SCOTUS pick")
We're not talking about small climate-change rules. We're talking about the Big Ones.
And note: such rules could very well dovetail with the Brave New World
spelled out in the upcoming TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership).
It's a wedge formation, a squeeze play, a pincer movement featuring new
EPA climate-change regulations on one side, and new draconian
possibilities embedded in the TPP.
If Scalia was murdered, the above agenda was sufficient reason, because
the climate agenda has the force to transform life on the planet.
If Scalia's murder were a movie, he would have been told, as a warning:
"You have no idea how big this thing is; you really don't understand the
forces you're messing with."
Of course, most Americans don't believe a political murder along this
line could happen in real life. They can only accept it in a movie,
where it makes perfect sense. That tells you something about the
schizoid nature of the public mind.
Adrenaline-driven in front of a screen; tranquilized and programmed to
be passive and accepting of recognized authority, otherwise.
"Don't be silly. Scalia, murdered, and murdered for that reason? It
couldn't happen. That's so...barbaric. We're civilized." That opinion
and $6 will get you a rainbow smoothie.
Obama's climate-change plan uses the EPA to act out international
agreements signed at the recent Paris summit. But in order to, yes,
scam these agreements into force in the US, the EPA has to stretch and
bend and distort already-existing US law. And it has done so.
However, a number of states have sued to stop the EPA, which wants to make
all
states cut CO2 emissions from electrical power production by 32% in the
next 15 years. Aimed mainly at coal-burning plants, these regulations
would create deep reductions in the overall US energy supply and
output---
a primary mission of the economy-wrecking Rockefeller Globalists.
The US Supreme Court, four days before Scalia's death, with his
vote, declared a narrow 5-4 halt to the Obama plan, pending a
lower-court decision on the issue. The 5-4 vote didn't knock out the
plan, but it stalled it. And if Scalia had stayed alive, his vote going
forward on the Obama plan could have remained crucial.
The pending TPP, another Globalist trade treaty, contains a section that
allows endless changes and additions in the text as years pass. In
other words, the passion for cutting energy production for the US, and
the rest of the planet, can easily be expressed and ratified by the
member nations.
The TPP also reveals a cynical attitude toward the "humanitarian goal of
saving the planet from CO2 death." Major corporations that burn coal
and employ other ways of releasing CO2 can relocate to far-off lands
(e.g., Vietnam) and spew CO2 to their hearts' content, without messy
environmental controls.
In other words, the true underlying Globalist scheme, vis-à-vis climate
change has nothing to do with messianic rescue: it has to do with
lowering energy production.
Drive economies further into despair. Move more jobs out of industrialized countries.
Create further poverty and chaos.
And then bring new order in behind that---one planet, under the tight
rein of one worldwide political and economic management system.
That's the true meaning of the climate-change agenda, notwithstanding
solemn promises and heraldic pronouncements about replacing lost energy
with new renewable technologies.
"I have an idea. Let's cut our electricity-use in our home by 30%,
while we figure out how to replace it with some new source. That'll
work. I'm sure of it."
On top of all this, the entire manmade-warming hypothesis is riddled
with fraud and guesswork dressed up to look like United Nations
science. A hypothesis is supposed to be able to make useful and
specific predictions. The warming hypothesis is a dud in this regard.
It was never meant to be science---it was always a strategy designed to
cut energy production on planet Earth, torpedo economies, heighten human
suffering, and usher in an elite Globalist triumph.
This is what Justice Scalia was going up against.
If he was murdered, there was sufficient reason.
The FBI can do two kinds of investigations, depending on the orders of the Attorney General: heavy or lite.
Heavy means leaving no stone unturned. It means taking control of the
Scalia's body now and doing whatever can be done with it, in its
embalmed state, to determine cause of death. It means raking wackaloon
Judge Guevara over the coals, along with US marshals, to find out
exactly how the verdict of "natural causes" was reached. It means
extensive interviews with everyone at Poindexter's ranch. Wall to wall
forensic analysis of rooms and spaces at the ranch. And so forth and so
on.
Lite means a brush-off, meant to avoid any disruption in the present scenario.
So far, from what I see, the FBI is doing Lite. Scalia's body should already be on an autopsy table.
There continues to be no uproar inside the Beltway about the absurd, insane, useless declaration of death by "natural causes."
And there is something else going on. It's the convenient mind-control
program that says, "Mustn't disturb the dead. Don't interrupt the
expressions of sadness at his passing. Don't dishonor the man by
raising questions about his possible murder. Give the family their
privacy during this period of grief."
It's the passivity of the obedient mind. Whatever induced mood,
fabrication, lie, omission can feed and expand that passivity...is
deployed:
"We need to be more accepting. He was an old man in ill-heath. He
passed away. Natural causes. The great cycle of life. Be gentle.
Nothing to see. Move along, slowly."
"Possible murder of a US Supreme Court Justice? Please, not at this
time. It's a discordant idea. Unharmonious. Let the man go gently
into that good night."
No comments:
Post a Comment