San Bernardino Shooting Parallels Recent Oregon College Massacre 3
Editors Note: Authors Niles and Frasier Mercado will be guests on this Monday’s Real Politik, airing on Truth Frequency Radio at 3:00PM EST.While the media is making the most out of the recent mass shooting event in San Bernardino, California, details are emerging that are making a strong case that this supposed shooting was in fact Just Another C.I.A. False Flag.
The
amount of shootings nationally has been steadily declining, even if you
choose to include the shooting hoaxes the media has been
sensationalizing as real events. Reality is just not that interesting.
If it weren’t for the hoaxes (increasing in frequency), there would not
be enough fodder for the national media to create an anti-gun narrative.In Orwell’s 1984, the government controlled the range of thought by limiting vocabulary; today, the American government eliminates certain thoughts by associating them with the last fake shooter. People are left with the remaining viewpoints that have not been eliminated. It is guilt by artificial association.
The
fake motives of fake perpetrators of fake tragedies provide the
government with REAL justification to REALLY target REAL and innocent
people, here and abroad. Let’s run through some recent examples:1) The supposed Oregon Shooter, Chris Harper Mercer, is said to have had Sandy Hook hoax videos on his MySpace page. Translation: anybody who expresses interest in these staged shootings must be the next shooter! This is the message the government-media complex wants to convey. Any glaring evidence associated with Sandy Hook being a complete hoax is thus quickly discredited (since they used another hoax shooting to associate such investigative instincts with murderous intent). Mercer’s mother is presented as having pro-gun social media posts for the very same reason: pro-gun equals parent of sociopath (when the opposite is true). This is the dumbed down twisted math used in New World Order propaganda.
2) Planned Parenthood shooting hoax was meant to associate homicidal violence with anti-abortion perspectives. If you happen to be against abortion, well then you must be the type who kills innocent people (I know the irony is heavy on that one).
3) The recent fake shootings in San Bernardino and Paris, France villainize Islamic people, implicate ISIS (or ISIL) and lay the groundwork for war with Syria and other countries in the Levant region. Doubtless these two recent shootings will result in some military action in the Middle East the same way that 9/11 was used to instigate an invasion of Afghanistan, the 7/7 bombings were used to justify England’s unpopular military involvement in Iraq, or the Gulf of Tonkin incident was orchestrated to justify a war in Vietnam.
The desired reaction of the public to these incidents is decided before they are faked, then after the event the media gets to work cultivating this reaction from the public so that they will accept the solution the government is dying to roll out. The media is so effective as the mouthpiece for the government that the public will end up begging for the government’s medicine.
How do you spot when a shooting is real or when it is just another shooting hoax? The following are some tell-tale anomalies common to staged shooting hoax events:
1) FAKE CRYING FROM CRISIS ACTORS:
People deal with grief in various different ways. If family members of people in danger were not crying at all, that would be COMPLETELY understandable. On the other hand, these fake shootings display crisis actors who FAKE CRYING, making the sounds and movements of a person crying, only without the tears. Any police detective worth his salt would take note of something like this suspicious behavior.
Figure 1: Wiping Away Imaginary TearsIn San Bernardino, California Olivia Navaro waits for her daughter and wipes away fake tears from dry eyes.
2) LACK OF PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE:
We saw that with the Oregon Shooting, cell phones were confiscated from the students of Umpqua which is why we have yet to see pictures or video coming from the students there. However, we should at least see official photos from law enforcement, shouldn’t we!? We are all familiar with crime scene images with quarters or dollar bills laid down for size perspective (when CSI folks are short on official size rulers) and getting meticulous photos of every bullet, every victim and any other item that might turn out to be remotely important. But where is all of this with the Oregon “Shooting”?
Originally the shooters of the San Bernardino Hoax were supposed to have had GoPro cameras, thereby capturing the gruesome affair on video. I even found myself wondering if actual hard evidence was going to come out on this shooting (after all eventually an actual unplanned real shooting will take place). However, this became yet another part of the every changing story that even the news media had to admit was untrue.
In fact the only actual video footage of anything even close to the “actual” event in San Bernardino we could find was the following: http://www.jeranism.com/#brid_cp_Brid_49262352662189279
This video taken by a person in the San Bernardino recreation center did manage to leak online. It shows people being lead out of the facility with their hands above their heads. This video is somewhat of an anomaly. It should be noted that it has not been broadcast on television and has repeatedly been taken down from YouTube (hence the jeranism.com link). That said this video doesn’t show anyone actually injured, no one deceased, no blood or evidence of blood, no bullets or bullet holes… keep in mind many of these things can be faked but in this case they aren’t even bothering. Similar to the Boston Bombings, the media and government can simply say someone is guilty and show some stills or footage that is not at all incriminating and the public will nod their head and yell “go get ‘em”. ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ has all but evaporated from the public consciousness.
3) LACK OF BLOOD:
In the Oregon Shooting and San Bernardino Shooting Hoax, we saw people being carried out on gurneys, but no evidence of blood. Blood is somewhat hard to fake: it gushes, it grows, it makes puddles. In time it coagulates and changes color. Blood that is shiny initially quickly becomes dull. In the Recent Paris shooting, one of the shooters was supposedly shot to death, but did not bleed. At all. See for yourself this striking direct evidence that the Paris Shooting is a complete hoax (footage is voiced over by the always-colorful Redsilverj): https://vid.me/YZaw
4) LACK OF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE:
This will become more apparent as the weeks / months / years wear on. We saw in the years after Sandy Hook, the death certificates of the victims, the supposed shooter, even his mother (who supposedly was murdered a day before the shooting), have all been suppressed (or simply don’t exist). NEVER SEEN! Not to mention the 911 calls and autopsy reports. To this day, the number of people murdered in Newtown Connecticut is officially ZERO (according to FBI statistics).
5) TIES TO THE MILITARY:
In the Oregon Shooting the shooter (Chris Mercer) had supposedly been honorably discharged from the Army. Chris Mintz, the famous million-dollar-fake-shooting-victim was on leave from the Army.
In San Bernardino one of the supposed shooter’s brothers was in the military. This may sound like a reasonable expectation; a certain portion of the overall population IS in the military after all. And maybe it stands to reason that ex-military personnel would be more likely to shoot a bunch of people randomly (especially if you lean left). However, if in San Bernardino the male shooter is supposed to have been some Islamic extremist, isn’t it somewhat odd that his brother is a member of the American military?
6) EERILY SIMILAR SIMULTANEOUS DRILLS:
At the same time as the San Bernardino Shooting was supposed to have been taking place, there was a SWAT team that was running active shooter drills nearby the San Bernardino community center (where the shooting was staged). In fact, this was the reason given for their quick arrival (making this part of the official story).
In Oregon the Principal of the Umpqua Community College claimed they had an active shooter drill a week prior to the shooting. In April and May of 2015, in Roseburg, Oregon, the Douglas County Emergency Management team hosted several drills with innocuous sounding names like Intermediate Incident for Expanding Incidents and Command System 400 for Advanced. These smaller drills are reminiscent of the much larger exercise referred to as “Abel Danger” during 9/11 which was nearly identical to the 911 hijacked plane scenario that we saw play out.
What’s It Mean?
Remember that this shooting is simply one of what will become hundreds of hoaxes played out by the time widespread gun confiscation goes into effect. The details change slightly but there seems to be a checklist they follow that makes these events easy to reproduce but also easy to spot once you know their playbook. But why the explosion of fake shootings at the same time that gun-related deaths are at a multi-decade low? Eric Holder made this fairly clear when he complained that “It’s not enough to have a catchy ad on a Monday… We have to do this every day of the week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way” (emphasis ours).
Obviously no amount of snarky TV ads was going to turn America against guns. Anti-gun staged events are needed so that the government-media complex has an excuse to dominate news cycle after news cycle. These staged shooting productions would get a film director permanently banished from Hollywood but they are good enough when you have the news media “presstitutes” at your disposal.
Niles Mercado has about two decades of experience consulting for various government agencies including the Air Force and the Department of Justice. Mercado has published the following books about conspiracies of various flavors: When Prosecutors Attack, Bush Killing Reagan, and Oregon Shooting: Just Another C.I.A. False Flag. To maintain his privacy and his family’s safety he has chosen to write this volume using the pen name “Niles Mercado”; in light of the facts laid out here in this volume can you really blame him?
Frasier Mercado has produced (and gained financing for) multiple independent Hollywood films (under his real name) including multi-million dollar productions starring: Ashton Kutcher, Jason Statham, and Mickey Rourke. Frasier uses his extensive Hollywood experience faking blood, wounds, gunshots, and explosions to spot all the tell-tale signs of a staged event and has teamed up with his brother Niles in the writing of Bush Killing Reagan and Oregon Shooting Just Another C.I.A. False Flag.
@CorruptionShow
http://facebook.com/bushkillingreagan
FREE REPORT (See all the pictures and diagrams from Oregon Shooting):
http://sixfigureteen.com/hoax
No comments:
Post a Comment