DID THE
FEDERAL GOV'T. HIDE A FLU EPIDEMIC IN 1993 AND WHY?
By Bill Sardi
August 17, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
For
decades now, since the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic, US life expectancy has
progressively risen. But federal government documents reveal a sudden
unexplained increase in the US death rate in 1993, so severe as to cause a
decline in US life expectancy for the first time in over 8 decades. Examine the
chart below (Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2004 -- National Center for Health
Statistics)
Nearly 93,000
more deaths were reported in 1993 than the previous year. My memory bank didn’t
recall any outstanding disease or epidemic back then.
What was
the cause of this severe increase in the death rate? I began to investigate.
Not caused by a non-infectious disease
The
Monthly Vital Statistics Report said death rates for HIV infection (9.8%),
COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8.2%) and pneumonia/influenza
(8.1%) rose steeply from 1992 to 1993. However, the ten leading causes of death
didn’t change over that time period. The Centers for Disease Control said
deaths due to heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), HIV
infection and pneumonia/influenza as well as diabetes made the largest
contributions to the overall mortality increase. The cause(s) of the increase
in the death rate were spread among various diseases by the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC), far too broad to explain any single cause. Not a word was said
about this startling setback in life expectancy.
But that
same government document said some of these increases in chronic disease
(diabetes, heart disease, COPD) were “the
result of the two influenza epidemics of 1993.” [Page 9, Monthly Vital
Statistics Report, Volume 44, No 7(S), Feb. 29, 1996]
1993: Two flu epidemics
What two
flu epidemics is the report referring to?
A CDC
review of mortality patterns in 1993 also states “the decline in life expectancy likely reflects increases in death
rates for chronic disease during the two influenza outbreaks of 1993.”
[Morbidity Mortality Weekly 45:08), 1161-64, March 1, 1996] There it is again,
confirmation that two flu epidemics in the same year caused an increase in
deaths with an admission it resulted in a decline in the life expectancy of
Americans.
Timeline of historical flu
outbreaks
Americans
may be roughly familiar with the historical timeline of flu outbreaks provided
in the chart below. The chart has been adapted to show the severity of each
influenza outbreak and also the SARS coronavirus pandemic of 2003. I have added
the 1993 flu outbreaks to the chart.
Note that
the 1993 flu outbreak which resulted in nearly 93,000 more deaths than the
prior year resulted in more deaths than the well-known Asian and Hong Kong flu
pandemics and would be second only to the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918 in
comparable deaths. The Spanish flu had temporarily set back US life expectancy
gains from 50.9 years to 39.1 years. Of course, this was the pre-antibiotic
era. There were no anti-bacterial or anti-viral drugs then.
According
to charts provided by the CDC and other health organizations, it’s as if there
was no flu epidemic in the US in 1993. I had to dig deep into the health
reports of that year to find further confirmation that it was the flu, and no
other disease, that caused the American life expectancy to steeply decline for
one year.
Data
showed only 3,430 more deaths among HIV-infected residents then the prior year.
[Morbidity Mortality 45: 121-25, 1996] Another study showed only 254 excess flu
deaths among person with HIV for 1992-93 and only 191 the following year.
[Archives Internal Medicine 161: 441-46, 2001] So HIV-infected persons, through
at higher risk for death from the flu, cannot explain the unusual number of
deaths attributed to influenza in 1993.
It’s also
possible that flu vaccination rates declined in that year, but a quick search
on Google found evidence to the contrary. Vaccination rates were rising while
the flu outbreak of 1993 proceeded. (See chart below)
It struck elderly nursing home
residents. But why?
So I
began to re-read a government document I had flagged with a red paperclip
during my investigation. A flu surveillance report published by the CDC states
that the “1992-93 influenza season was
dominated by influenza B, but increasing circulation of influenza A (H3N2)
viruses toward the end of the season” which struck nursing home populations
with deadly consequences.
For reference, type-A flu viruses are the most virulent and most common. Type B are less common but almost exclusively strike humans.
For reference, type-A flu viruses are the most virulent and most common. Type B are less common but almost exclusively strike humans.
The report
went on to say that influenza B viruses predominated early in the season and
were mainly limited to school-age children, and “no excess mortality was observed.” Then sustained excess mortality
began in mid-March of 1993 and coincided with outbreaks in nursing homes.
[Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 46: (SS1), 1-12, Jan 31, 1997]
Like the
more recent swine flu outbreak which began in Mexico, the second flu bout in
1993 began late in the season.
For
comparison, the Mexico swine flu virus began in March or April of 2009 whereas
the second 1993 flu outbreak began in March and peaked even later in August and
September. The pathogenic virus involved in 1993 was identified as Type A H3N2
A/Beijing/32/92 strain. [Morbidity Mortality Weekly March 18, 1994 / 43(10);
179-183]
Still,
why would the government hide such an epidemic, particularly the second one in
1993? I had no clue.
Free flu shots begin in 1993
I had
uncovered much of this information over two years ago. But the reason for the
cover-up remained elusive until I read a Health & Human Services press
release issued in 1999. It said that Medicare coverage for flu shots for the
elderly began in 1993 as the Administration launched an effort to increase
immunization rates among older adults. The shots were free for those enrolled
in Medicare Part B. The release can be found here:
The big
difference from prior years was that elderly Americans were getting free flu
shots.
According
to The Vaccine Guide (North Atlantic Books, 2002), during the 1992-1993 season,
84 percent of samples for the predominant type A virus in circulation in the US
population were not similar to the virus in the vaccine. The flu vaccine that
year would be largely worthless. But that wouldn’t explain such a huge increase
in deaths, particularly in nursing home populations that apparently hadn’t
received flu shots in prior years due to lack of provisional funding.
There was
a very slight increase in the risk for Guillain-Barré syndrome in the period
1992 to 1994 from flu shots (one additional case per million persons
vaccinated). [New England Journal of Medicine 339: 1797-802, 1998] This would
still not be sufficient to produce a setback in life expectancy.
A death vaccine?
Now the
big question comes to mind. Was the flu vaccine in 1993 lethal in some way?
This could be the only explanation as to why this deadly flu outbreak has been
hidden from the public. If so, it would be a severe blow to the nation’s flu
vaccination program.
There is
a hint of evidence in Europe that either a deadly flu virus or a “death vaccine” was in circulation that
year. Dutch National Influenza Centrum reported that nursing home residents in
1993 experienced a severe outbreak of the flu that struck 49% of them and
caused 10% to die. That’s a death rate four times greater than the 1918 Spanish
flu pandemic. The cause of the deaths was attributed to the Type A H3N2 flu
viral strain. [Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1993 Sep 25; 137(39):1973-7]
Could there
have been some deadly vaccine in use in the US in 1993? So-called “hot” lots of vaccines are not a matter
of public record. Flu vaccines inject a “little
bit of disease” to provoke the production of antibodies and produce
long-term resistance to a particular strain of the flu. Nursing home patients
are often frail and immune compromised. Every flu vaccine is a new invention,
produced in advance of the next flu season and usually comprised of a new
combination of three viral strains that virologists believe will be in
circulation during the upcoming flu season. The three viral strains in these
trivalent vaccines could have been deadly to frail elderly patients.
It is
often stated that flu vaccines are comprised of “dead” or “attenuated”
viruses. In fact, viruses are not alive, they are proteins and genetic material
that require a host cell for replication. Virulent flu viruses are “grown” in
mammalian eggs until less virulent strains are produced, which are then used in
vaccines.
In the
process of making a vaccine in this manner, a hidden virus may be introduced,
such as the Simian 40 virus that was mistakenly introduced in the polio vaccine
some years ago. New methods of making vaccines would eliminate this problem.
But was a deadly combination of viruses hidden in the flu vaccine used in 1993?
Certainly no flu vaccine manufacturer would admit to that.
|
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Enter Your E-Mail Address:
|
The FDA
has been lax in its monitoring of flu manufacturing facilities. For example, in
December of 2000 The Idaho Observer noted that Medeva, a British flu vaccine
maker, had received a warning letter from the US FDA over filthy conditions in
its manufacturing plant, but the FDA had given the green light to sell 20
million doses of its “Fluvarin” flu
vaccine in the US in that same year without re-inspecting the plant.
© 2009 - Bill Sardi - All Rights Reserved
Bill Sardi is the president of
Knowledge of Health, Inc. San Dimas, California. Bill
Sardi's books.
E-mail: BSardi@aol.com
No comments:
Post a Comment