"Repeat a lie often enough and people believe it. We all know
that. But there are millions of people out there who think a
public-health agency like the CDC, a scientific body, would never engage
in such tactics. Those millions of people would be wrong. There is a
rule: the most holy, sacred, revered, uncontestable organization hides
the biggest secrets. It's a good rule to keep in mind. Major media
don't apply it. But you can." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
There are many propaganda operations surrounding the flu. Here I just want to boil down a few boggling facts.
Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals one monstrosity.
As
Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples
are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the
kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a
flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don't have the flu.
Therefore,
even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn't
possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu cases.
The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review,
"Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...even
the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains
of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can
only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem because most 'flu'
appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of
thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those
tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive. "...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
So
even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you're on
the short end of the stick here. They're conning your socks off.
In
December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published
another shocking Peter Doshi report, which created tremors through the
halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where "the experts" used
to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the
flu.
Here is a quote from Doshi's report,
"Are US flu death figures more PR than science?" (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
"[According
to CDC statistics], 'influenza and pneumonia' took 62,034 lives in
2001-61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and
in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified."Boom.
You
see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu
and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously
assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the
flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore,
the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of
influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics:
"Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006)." These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.
This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.
No comments:
Post a Comment