Breaking---CDC vaccine whistleblower given immunity to testify
William Thompson free to describe vaccine-autism fraud at CDC to Congress
Vaccine wars heat up
Sold-out media line up to defend vaccines
By Jon Rappoport
February 4, 2015
www.nomorefakenews.com
Patrick Howley at The Daily Caller reports that William Thompson, CDC whistleblower, has been given immunity from prosecution, by the federal government, to testify before Congress about vaccine fraud at the CDC.
Cautionary note: so far, The Daily Caller is the sole source on this story.
On August 27, 2014, Thompson, a long-time researcher at the CDC, published a statement through his lawyer, Rick Morgan, admitting that he and colleagues at the CDC violated the protocol in a study on the MMR vaccine's connection to autism.
The study, which was published in the journal Pediatrics in 2004, exonerated the vaccine, when in fact the study omitted vital data on a group of black babies who showed an increased risk for autism after receiving the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.
Since he released his August 27 statement, whistleblower Thompson has maintained silence and has refused to talk to reporters.
Now it appears he's ready to step into the light---if there is a Congressional hearing. That's a big if.
Thompson is working with Florida Congressman William Posey. Posey serves on the House Science Subcommittee on Oversight.
A Congressional hearing could be explosive, if members of the Committee ask Thompson the right questions, probe deeply, and find out exactly how an arrangement was made, inside the CDC, to cover up the MMR vaccine's connection to autism.
The study in question had several authors, two of whom---Frank Destafano and Coleen Boyle---are now high-ranking CDC executives in the area of vaccine safety.
If Thompson convincingly shows they were in on the fix, the whole business would explode and the CDC would be exposed as rank liars and threats to human health before the public.
On the other hand, if this is a one-day hearing, at which the testimony devolves into a boring he-said she-said proposition, and if the press barely takes notice, the outcome (and the truth) will rest entirely in the hands of alternative media.
No Congressional hearing has thus far been scheduled.
Another major CDC figure in this scandal: Dr. Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC in 2004. Would she be subpoenaed to testify?
In 2004, whistleblower Thompson wrote her a letter, in which he warned her that he had sensitive and troubling data about the MMR vaccine's connection to autism. He was shortly due to present the data at a major vaccine/autism conference.
Apparently, Gerberding didn't answer the letter, and Thompson's presentation was canceled.
***After Gerberding left the CDC in 2009, she ascended to the position of president of Merck Vaccines. Merck manufactures the MMR vaccine. Get the picture?
Interestingly, in December of 2014, Merck removed Gerberding from her august position and placed her in a new role, a role that never existed within the company before: executive vice-president for "strategic communications, global public policy and population health."
Did Merck make this move to shield Gerberding, to protect her from a possible scandal tying her to the 2004 MMR-autism fraud at the CDC? If there is a Congressional hearing, will Gerberding be conveniently unavailable because she is overseas tending to her new international duties at Merck?
Meanwhile, as these developments play out, there is a political battle taking place re mandatory vaccination vs. parents' right to choose whether to vaccinate their children.
Presidential candidates Chris Christie and Rand Paul have made statements supporting, to one degree or another, parents' right to choose. The "medical experts" have invaded television news to slam these statements as grossly irresponsible.
These are the same experts who always answer the call when some element of the medical cartel is under threat of exposure. Their job is to provide cover, sound authoritative, and make medical critics into "dangerous people."
As I've documented over the years, these professional experts are actually sitting on a powder keg that threatens to blow the whole medical system sky-high. The issue, which must never be revealed?
Medically caused death and human destruction.
Here are a few citations and facts which remain state secrets, as far as major news outlets are concerned. Reading them, think about how much credibility the "medical experts" really have whenever they open their mouths about public health in ANY form:
Citation: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer.
Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: "It calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing 'serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.'"
The report called this "one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity."
And here is the final dagger. The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA's own database of "serious adverse [medical-drug] events."
Therefore, to say the FDA isn't aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn't saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans.
Previously, I have documented that the FDA knows; because the FDA has a page on its own website that admits---without taking blame--- 100,000 people are killed every year by medical drugs, and two million more people are severely injured by the drugs. (Google "FDA Why Learn About Adverse Drug Reactions")
And for the past five years or so, I have been writing about and citing a published report by the late Dr. Barbara Starfield that indicates 106,000 people in the US are killed by medical drugs every year. Until her death in 2011, Dr. Starfield worked at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Her report, "Is US health really the best in the world?", was published in the Journal of American Medical Association on July 26, 2000.
Do an extrapolation: 106,000 people killed every year in the US by medical drugs=a MILLION deaths per decade.
Starfield didn't stop there. She also attributed 119,000 deaths per year to mistreatment and medical errors in hospitals---bringing the annual total of US medically caused deaths to 225,000.
Here's another study: April 15, 1998, Journal of the American Medical Association, "Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients." It, too, is mind-boggling.
The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:
In a given year, in the US, 106,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs. Beyond that, 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The authors write: "...Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and and administered."
Roughly 1.5 million American soldiers have died in all wars in US history.
In any given 10 years of modern medical treatment? 2.25 million deaths (Starfield).
Consider how much suppression is necessary to keep the medical death-numbers under wraps.
Now think about these "medical experts" who appear on television news programs and assure the public that modern medicine is perfectly safe.
When they blithely state that vaccines only rarely cause problems of any kind, and when they state that vaccines have absolutely no connection to neurological damage in children, what is their level of credibility?
It may interest you to know that the US system of reporting severe adverse effects of vaccines is broken. There are no reliable numbers. That's because the reporting is done by patients or doctors.
Barbara Loe Fisher, of the private National Vaccine Information Center, has put together a reasonable estimate:
"But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, 'Introducing MEDWatch,' JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]
"There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.
"Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS]; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, 'Vaccine safety,' Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]
"However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually."
Now you have the background to assess what CDC whistleblower William Thompson may say if there is a Congressional hearing on CDC vaccine-autism fraud.
Thompson states that he was part of egregious lying in a published study.
Well, how in the world do you suppose the medically caused death-and-damage I've cited in this article is suppressed and covered up and papered over?
Every single medical drug and vaccine that creates the death and damage has been written about AND CALLED SAFE in at least one study published in a "reputable" medical journal.
Get it?
Rank fraud in published medical studies is everywhere. All the time.
Indeed, here is a devastating statement, from a doctor who has examined more published medical studies than any expert who shows up on television and spouts off about our perfectly safe medical system.
For two decades, she was the editor of one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world.
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine." -Marcia Angell, MD ("Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
Hello, Brian Williams, Scott Pelley, David Muir, Wolf Blitzer, Bill O'Reilly, Jon Stewart, Rush Limbaugh, and all the so-called medical reporters for mainstream television and print outlets across America. Do you have the courage, brains, and will to cover and hammer on the biggest story of your lives---Medically Caused Death and Destruction?
Jon Rappoport The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com and OutsideTheRealityMachine.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections:
No comments:
Post a Comment