Fiasco France: Lie to Me Once (updated)

Posted by Gordon Duff on January 12, 2015

Did Netanyahu Give France Their 9/11?

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
The recent events in Paris, whether hateful and obnoxious leftists were shot, and few on this earth begged for it more, or police were killed by terrorists now conclusively proven to have been shooting blanks, we simply don’t care. We are sick of the comic opera of carelessly staged false flag terrorism.
We will be featuring a series of videos that demonstrate ballistic performance. You see, Americans have AK47s and cameras, the French don’t, or most of the them anyway. If they did, whoever staged this might have thought first. When we are done, we will have exposed the epic “false flag fail” of all time. (link to original Liveleak video)

Blank Miss, dust cloud, subject uninjured

At least in America we hire trained professionals with the exception of the giggling parents from Sandy Hook.
Please note, our “terrorists” were fighting on behalf of French intelligence, the Mossad and the criminal banks, part of the pro-Israeli ISIS organization. How did they get back to France? Only French intelligence services or the Mossad could have flown them to training centers in Turkey or
Jordan and, when they “wanted a rest,” back to France.

(Note: Double dust cloud caused by double impact of hot gasses followed by the paper plug from the blank cartridge. Subject (victim?) unaffected by shot drops two frames later. Normally a director would call for a retake in a scene like this.)
Photo represents the first acoustic signature at the speed of sound, 1126 feet per second, received approximately 100 feet away. By that time, the bullet/blank wad, hot gasses, moving at up to 2500 feet per second have pushed a cloud of dust under the still elevated “victim” with hands still raised.
The sound took .088 seconds to reach the camera. An AK round at 2460 feet per second traveling 3 feet would have impacted in .0012 seconds. Based on the differential between light speed and the speed of sound, the victim impact would have been visible .0868 seconds into this frame. By that time, the victim would have been obliterated in a pink mist.
At the time seen the frame, the bullet will have traveled 213 feet unless its path was altered. As noted above, during the first .0012 seconds, it would have obliterated the head of our very alive and well at the time, police officer. Then again, bullets break up chunks of concrete, something we will also demonstrate and don’t simply dust off a sidewalk.
See if an AK round fired into a watermelon causes a dust cloud…
What does this prove?

No bullet was fired
There was no impact on the victim
This was a blank cartridge

Later Sky News came to the scene to photograph the huge blood stain caused by the miss and dust cloud, blood not seen on the actual shooting video, not a single drop. This is totally insane, Jim W. Dean says it looks like it was done with a paint roller. Liquids don’t move around like this, flowing up and down and around unless “helped.” Shame!

[Editor’s Note. Next is a YouTube of a news report at this scene. Note how he says “the blood that has been put there”. The repeats are in the original video. We did nothing to it. Was it just a slip of the tongue? If so, a very strange one indeed. But when you look at the roller paint effect added to this slip, and all the bells and whistles start going off.
Also, as this reporter describes, after all the shooting going on at the Charlie office on the other side of the square, this unarmed cop is just going to be standing there…doing what? He has no weapon. We see no radio in his hand that he would be using to describe the car they might be driving, none was on the sidewalk. And it seems he took no evasive action when two masked guys get out of a car with AK-47s.
Now I ask you normal folks out there, what would you do, unarmed…after hearing the shooting? Would you just stand there or duck and using the parked cars for cover…run like hell. Would a trained police officer just stand there?

If they would have shot me, it would have been in the back or my ass, as I would have been a moving target…still a big disadvantage with two AKs, but a hell of a lot better than standing there, magically taking rounds going right through me and not bleeding…Jim W. Dean]

This is a test of sporting hollow point AK ammo. Military full metal jacket (FMJ) has much more penetration.

Even hollow point sporting ammo goes through several feet of ballistic gel. Thus, even the first rounds would have caused catastrophic physical injury though none could be detected. There is no forensic evidence at the scene any weapon was used whatsoever.

Now for the concrete test:

What do you have to do to declare a false flag fail?

Note again there is no bullet pock mark in the concrete, quite a large hole if an AK is used. (typically 4x4x4 inches) What if someone actually died here. This would mean someone was brought here after the attack and shot but who would do such a thing? Did they video that shooting too?
Then, when in France, though they were obviously on every “no fly” and “terror watch list” in the world, armed to the teeth, they manage to gun down a dozen, dozens, shoot up a synagogue, a delicatessen (I have been looking for a good Jewish deli in Paris for years) and an ADL/JINSA/Simon Wiesenthal “reading room.”
Not only do these jokers magically cross borders, pass through customs like wraiths, they are better armed than the current Wehrmacht. You are telling me they weren’t watched, followed and wiretapped every second? Few nations have the armies of cockroaches trailing visitors around than the French do.
If an American veteran visiting France quickly does an ‘about face’ on a sidewalk, the army of security stooges following them around is likely to collapse in a twisted heap. The French have NO civil rights, no limits to their surveillance state and watch everyone. So, if something happens, France wanted it to happen, France or the “controllers of France,” and France is “controlled.”
The videos are out there, dead police texting “selfies,” or terrorists running through streets that Google Earth can’t find, shooting at walls and sidewalks that don’t exist with bullets that leave no marks into bodies that don’t bleed.
Now the hatefest and media event moves forward.
Don’t believe a word of it. Let’s say “Charlie” was testing their “freedom of speech.” Well, they can consider this test a failure whether or not they were killed (or not) by real terrorists or the “usual suspects,” Mossad assets floated through customs with bombs in their underwear, always without passports, visas or even airline tickets.
If only the rest of us could travel like that!
You know, Europe is filled with “hate speech laws,” typically only protecting Jews, one of the ethnic groups that is notoriously able to defend themselves “speech-wise.” With a virtual stranglehold on press/media/entertainment, taking on “the Jews” in a “hate speechfest” is worse than bringing a knife to a gunfight.
Then again, we have to remember, if one aspect of this was false, and the video totally proves this, then it all is false. If there are dead, the powers that be, whether French Zionists, the Mossad or the criminal gangs of Eurotrash that plague the Middle East and Africa with terror bombings and pretend terror groups like Boko Harum and Al Shabab, wanted them dead.
I do love France, have lived in Paris and maintain a bureau in Paris. The French people are a joy. However, the only bad experiences I have ever had in France have involved young and obnoxious leftists who work tirelessly to destroy the reputation of the French people.
I can well understand that the French find themselves overwhelmed with a large Islamic population. However, France loved that same Islamic population when hundreds of thousands of them died defending France in two world wars plus Indochina.
The French people have the right to feel as they do. However, millions of those French people are Muslims. Has this caused serious problems? Yes!
Is it extremely likely that this “event” was staged to take advantage of these social stresses in order to destabilize France and to promote an anti-Muslim agenda during a time when Europe is turning away from Israel, with many seeing it as a criminal state?
Yes.

Gordon Duff

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War.He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.

Gordon Duff is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists.He manages the world's largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.

Gordon Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than "several" countries.He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration.Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.

Visit Gordon Duff's YouTube Channel

Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on pinterest_share More Sharing Services 47

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by Gordon Duff on 2:32 pm, With 26464 Reads, Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

69 Responses to "Fiasco France: Lie to Me Once (updated)"

rmstock January 13, 2015 at 1:41 am
A couple of folks seem to expect some form of mea culpa from Gordon Duff as he initially stated that the Video of the Paris shooting was not recorded in Paris, according to his research on google earth/maps. Here is the counter evidence that the Video of the shooting was recorded two streets away from the Charlie Hebdo office :
https://donquijotte.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/vluchtrouten-parijs.jpg
(Escape route to the 2nd “shootout” where the fake murder of the agent took place. Point A is the Charlie Hebdo office, Point B is 1st shootout, Point C is the 2nd shootout which was recorded by a guy who now went to the press to testify
read more ... Log in to Reply
LC January 13, 2015 at 12:35 am
Mr. Duff:
Shortly after VT’s first page on this bogus shooting came out I also called it a false flag ZIOP & that if did actually happened it could well be the work of Rothschild’s backyard terrorist called: “FRENCH FOREIGN LEGION”.
Since you bring up the usurpation of Muslims & Muslim nations by the French I must remind readers of the brutality of above Rothschild terrorists in North Africa from the mouth of two Algerians whose parents had been murdered by those terrorists (I think in the 50s).
They said the French terrorists rounded up families from their houses and made children watch the death of the parents in this way:
The French Legionaries force the parents naked at gun point & forced them to sit on coke
read more ... Log in to Reply
Paul James January 12, 2015 at 9:34 pm
I’ve got an AK47 and have fired hundreds of the FMJ 7.62×39 rounds and those mothers are nasty. If that cop had been shot in the head, it would’ve of exploded.
It’s good to keep up the truth battle, but you’re mostly preaching to the choir, the other 88% brain-damaged Americans are still huddling in fear, ready to lash out against the Muslim world, thanks to the Zionist owned MSM puking out nonstop lies about Arabs and Muslims so we’ll become a carbon-copy of Israel; filled with a hateful rage against Palestinians.
Log in to Reply