Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Sandy Hook: CT crime data confirms FBI report–but something is still wrong by Jim Fetzer (with Dr. Eowyn) from Veterans Today



 
Sunday, September 28th, 2014 | Posted by

Sandy Hook: CT crime data confirms FBI report

Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services77

Sandy Hook: CT crime data confirms FBI report–but something is still wrong


by Jim Fetzer (with Dr. Eowyn)

“According to the Connecticut State crime report for 2012, there were 27 deaths in Connecticut that did not occur in any community or jurisdiction in Connecticut. But if no one died in Newtown, no one died at Sandy Hook”–Jim Fetzer
title viral nonsenseBrasscheck TV claims that the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre really are in the FBI’s Consolidated Crime Report, if you know how to read it.
He (the author) claims that those who believe this is “the smoking gun” of Sandy Hook have committed a mistake, because the numbers are there under a special State Police designation.
He even suggests that Wolfgang Halbig and Alex Jones have been taken in, which is especially surprising since the one he refers to as “W” is a former state trooper himself.
Someone has blundered, but that would not be Wolfgang. Sandy Hook is a subdivision of Newtown. Murders in Newtown should be reported under “Newtown”, not under a State Police designation.

Brasscheck viral nonsense
For the eight (8) minute Brasscheck TV report, click here.
Murders are offenses under the law and should be reported for the community or jurisdiction that has the legal authority to investigate and prosecute them, even if the investigation were conducted by the CT State Police. Otherwise, how would any community know what crimes were committed there?
The Connecticut State Police are an organization, not a community or a jurisdiction. Like everything else about this event, there is nothing normal or consistent or coherent about it. And it therefore comes as no surprise that the FBI report has been confirmed by the state’s crime statistics for 2012:
Crime in Connecticut, page 26
Go to “Crime in Connecticut COMPLETE for 2012″ and on page 26, you will find the data that I am publishing here. At the intersection of MURDER and <10 (below 10 years of age) for 2012, you will find the number “0″! But that does not quite settle the matter, because the number “27″ appears under the heading, “State Police Misc.” buried on page 415:
CT crime report, page 415
If you put the data on page 415 together with the data on page 26, then according to the Connecticut State crime report for 2012, there were 27 deaths in Connecticut that did not occur in any community or jurisdiction in Connecticut. But if no one died in Newtown, no one died at Sandy Hook
27 people cannot have died in Connecticut and also not have died anywhere in Connecticut in 2012. The Connecticut State Police, who orchestrated this event, have been caught and are looking for a way out. The FBI is playing along, because Eric Holder, the Attorney General, was a crucial player in the hoax. 

A more interesting analysis

A far more sophisticated discussion of the FBI’s Consolidated Uniform Crime Report for Connecticut may be found in Global Research, “The Sandy School Massacre and FBI Data Anomalies” (27 September 2014), by Jason Kissner. Jason cites an article by Adan Salizar that appeared on inforwars.com to critique it and explain why its author got it wrong. He even notes that Connecticut reports zero murders for children below the age of 10 in its own report on crime in 2012:
infowars, no one killed at Sandy Hook
Kissner identifies himself as a “criminologist”, who would appear to be in an appropriate position to explain why “the data entry identified by Salazar in no way whatsoever supports the claim that the FBI says no one was killed at Sandy Hook. ” But of course it does. Since the FBI’s data is confirmed by Connecticut’s data, but no location for those deaths appears in the state report, it supports the inference no one died, since if they died they had to have died somewhere.
Kissner says, “There could conceivably be real issues as to why the Sandy Hook murders weren’t scored in the Newtown ‘Agency or Area’ even if it is true that the Connecticut State Police managed the ‘investigation.’” Because the Newtown event was scored under the “State Police Misc.” heading and the FBI received the data from Connecticut, it placed a “0” in the Newtown row. Which means the claim that the FBI says nobody was killed at Newtown is not supported by the FBI’s data point. But does Kissner really think people can die in Connecticut without dying somewhere in Connecticut?
After all, murders are reported in the communities or  jurisdictions in which they have occurred, not on the basis of the agency or organization that investigates them. Since these “murders” allegedly took place in Sandy Hook and Sandy Hook is a subdivision of Newtown, they should have been reported under “Newtown”, not under “State Police Misc.” The only reason to cite any murders under “State Police Misc.” is to obfuscate that no one died in Newtown in 2012.

Did the CT State police retract data?

When Kissner turns to an article in USA TODAY, however, he comes up with some  striking information, which is that the data originally submitted by Colorado on the Aurora “Batman” shooting as well as the data originally submitted by  Connecticut about Sandy Hook were both retracted at the request of local authorities, which were in the case of Sandy Hook, the Connecticut State Police:
USA TODAY on retracted data As Kissner observes, what sort of “mistake” could possibly have justified the CTSP to request the retraction of data on homicides? The “supplemental homicide report” (which is the “supplementary materials” mentioned here) is as simple as it gets, but the mention of the suspect’s mother, Nancy Lanza, suggests that information about her may have been in error–which given the latest research about the alleged victims, could very well have justified the retraction–along with the data on every other purported victim.  The school was closed by 2008 and no one died there in 2012.

Sandy Hook “smoking guns”

This report is not “the smoking gun” of Sandy Hook, because the word “the” implies there is one and only one. There are many “smoking guns” for Sandy Hook, including that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no 469 children being evacuated, that the Shannon Hicks’ “iconic” photograph was staged, that the “official report” by Danbury State’s Attorney does not connect the suspect to his alleged victims or the weapons he is supposed to have used and that Wolfgang has exposed the “script”. The FBI report is important because it encapsulates the problems with Sandy Hook
The FBI crime report is making an impact with the public, no doubt, because it represents the federal government and the authority of the state (not just of Connecticut, but of the United States). We tend to confound authority with truth, when truth is the authority–and where “authorities” lie to the American people all the time: about Lee Oswald, the Gulf of Tonkin, Iraqi soldiers dumping babies out of incubators in Kuwait, about 19 Arab hijackers, about Osama bin Laden, about Saddam Hussein, about Sandy Hook and about the Boston bombing–the authorities are lying to us all the time!
What is incredible is that we still tend to believe in our government, no doubt because the very idea that it would kill 3,000 of our fellow citizens to promote a political agenda is beyond our comprehension. They have experts on mind control and the dissemination of false information to instill fear into us and manipulate us for political purposes. The young Kuwati girl who testified before Congress is an appropriate illustration, since it was an emotional appeal like the emotional appeal of 20 first-graders being massacred at school.
The statistical records for crimes in states should be straightforward and unambiguous, as Jason Kissner observes: it’s a simple spread-sheet with the intersection of kinds of crimes and locations where crimes of that kind could have been committed. Had there been a murder of 20 children and seven adults–including Nancy Lanza as the twenty-seventh–then those numbers would have appeared in their proper place. It is a federal crime to report false statistics to the FBI, so the CTSP tacked on a new category of “State Police Misc.” as though that solved the problem. But perhaps Nancy Lanza also poses special problems, which have caused them some concern.

What about Nancy Lanza?

Another line of proof concern the woman alleged to be Adam Lanza’s mother, Nancy. There is more than one theory as to her identity.  One theory, which identified her with Annie Haddad, has been featured in “A sampler of Sandy Hook videos”, where I explained that studies about her tend to disappear from the internet as rapidly as they are posted. In this instance, you can find this one by clicking on this link. Both “Nancy Lanza” and “Annie Haddad” as appearing to be the person also known under the last name “Champion”.
This theme is developed further in a new book by Dennis and Sabrina Phillips, Making a Killing: The Unofficial Story of the Sandy Hook Massacre (2014). According to the Tampa Bay Times, when Nancy Lanza’s mother, “Dorothy Hanson”, was reached for comment after the shooting, she was “Too distraught to talk.” During some initial research, they came across an obituary from the St.Petersburg Times back in the year 2000. It was for an “Eleanore Champion” and it’s the one of the only obituaries connecting Nancy Lanza to the Champion name.
Nancy Lanza LIVE
An alternative account can be found here:  In the horror story of Sandy Hook Nancy Lanza, Adam’s mother, has been somewhat of a mystery and met a rather awful end, according to the official tale. It would appear that perhaps Nancy never died. The real “Undead” of this false flag. Another part of this farce known as the Sandy Hook Massacre. The absurd photographs from INSIDE the Lanza house would be enough to show normal people that her death was faked. However, here we will provide several additional layers of proof that she obviously is still living her life today. In fact, it appears that Nancy and Peter are back together again… sans “Adam”, of course. For more, follow this link.
The situation with regard to Sandy Hook boggles the mind. The Connecticut State Police submit information to the FBI that asserts 27 people died in Connecticut, but at the same time denies that they died anywhere in Connecticut. That is absurd and revealing. The objective of disinformation is to create enough uncertainty that everything is believable and nothing is knowable. But we have a mountain of proof that the school was closed by 2008 and that no one died there in 2012. Even Obama officials in the Department of Education have confirmed it. And Dr. Eowyn offers more proof that no one died in her brilliant study of the Social Security Death Index, which is apparently being shut down so students and scholars cannot compare the data it provides with the claims being made by local, state and federal authorities.
No one died in Sandy Hook: Testimony from the Social Security Death Master File

by  


When a person in the United States dies, his/her death is recorded by the federal government.
The Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a database of death records created from the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File (DMF). Most persons in the U.S. who had died since 1936, had had a Social Security number, and whose death was reported to the Social Security Administration are listed in the SSDI.
Unlike the Death Master File, the SSDI is available free to the public on several genealogy websites, such as Genealogy Bank. The “state of issue” refers to the state that had issued the individual’s Social Security number.
On January 20, 2013, I undertook a search on Genealogy Bank for the SSDI of Adam Lanza — the alleged mass murderer of his mother, Nancy Lanza, and 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on December 14, 2012.
To my astonishment, Genealogy Bank had Lanza’s SSDI as December 13, 2012 — a day BEFORE the alleged mass shooting. (See “SSDI says Adam Lanza died a day before Sandy Hook massacre“)
Here’s a screenshot I took of Adam Lanza’s SSDI record on the website GenealogyBank.com. The date (1/20/2013) and time (2:29PM) when I took the screenshot can be seen in the lower right corner of the image below.
Click image to enlarge
Adam Lanza died 12-13-2012
After the discovery of Lanza’s 12/13/2012 SSDI went viral, on or around February 2, 2013, Genealogy Bank changed Lanza’s SSDI to 12/14/2012, the day of the alleged massacre. (See “SSDI changed Adam Lanza’s date-of-death from Dec. 13 to Dec. 14, 2012 !!!”)
Another genealogy website, Ancestry.com, was slower on the uptake. Three days after Genealogy Bank had changed its SSDI for Lanza to 12/14/2012, Ancestry.com still listed Lanza’s SSDI as 12/13/2012. (See “Ancestry.com still has Adam Lanza’s date-of-death as a day before the Sandy Hook massacre”)
Lanza’s curious SSDI aside, I was able to find on Genealogy Bank the SSDI (of 12/14/2012) of all of Lanza’s victims, except one – that of Ana Marquez-Greene, age 6, whose father is jazz musician Jimmy Greene. In my search for Ana, I had used every variation of her name: Ana Marquez, Ana Marquez-Greene, Ana Greene, to no avail. I hypothesized that the lack of a SSDI for Ana Marquez-Greene may be because her parents had not yet obtained a Social Security card/number for her. (See “Dec. 14 was date of death for every Sandy Hook massacre victim, except Adam Lanza“)

But wait!

Remember what I’d written at the beginning of this post — that the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a database of death records created from the federal government Social Security Administration’s Death Master File?
What if I were to tell you that the Death Master File does NOT contain the SSDIs for any of Adam Lanza’s victims?

In other words, according to the United States Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, nobody died at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012.

That’s exactly what blogger LivingonPlanetZ of Chemtrails: The Exotic Weapon reported on Feb. 22, 2014.
LivingonPlanetZ refers us to what he calls an “originating website” — a document published on archives.org (date unknown), titled “Sandy Hook – NO DEATHS, NO VICTIMS; According to SSDI Official Master File.” (You can also read the document in PDF here or here.)
The anonymous person who uploaded the 107-page document to archives.org had accessed the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, updated through January 1, 2014, and searched for Adam Lanza’s victims — in vain.
The document says:
You are invited to search all of these records for the putative ‘victims’ of the Sandy Hook massacre. The children should all be 6 to 7 years old (“born” 2005-2006), and should have “died” in 2012. The adult “victims” appear in the appendix. (Each entry is followed by a 6-7 digit serial entry number, which demonstrates the continuity of the alphabetical listing – in other words, that they are presented here unaltered.)
I did just that and can verify the claim that none of Adam Lanza’s victims is in Social Security’s Death Master File. But before I present my findings, here are the Sandy Hook victims (name, birth date, gender, age at death), according to news accounts:
CHILDREN
  1. Charlotte Bacon, 2/22/06, female (age 6)
  2. Daniel Barden, 9/25/05, male (age 7)
  3. Olivia Engel, 7/18/06, female (age 6)
  4. Josephine Gay, 12/11/05, female (age 7)
  5. Ana M. Marquez-Greene, 04/04/06, female (age 6)
  6. Dylan Hockley, 03/08/06, male (age 6)
  7. Madeleine F. Hsu, 07/10/06, female (age 6)
  8. Catherine V. Hubbard, 06/08/06, female (age 6)
  9. Chase Kowalski, 10/31/05, male (age 7)
  10. Jesse Lewis, 06/30/06, male (age 6)
  11. James Mattioli, 03/22/06, male (age 6)
  12. Grace McDonnell, 11/04/05, female (age 7)
  13. Emilie Parker, 05/12/06, female (age 6)
  14. Jack Pinto, 05/06/06, male (age 6)
  15. Noah Pozner, 11/20/06, male (age 6)
  16. Caroline Previdi, 09/07/06, female (age 6)
  17. Jessica Rekos, 05/10/06, female (age 6)
  18. Avielle Richman, 10/17/06, female (age 6)
  19. Benjamin Wheeler, 9/12/06, male (age 6)
  20. Allison N. Wyatt, 07/03/06, female (age 6)
ADULTS
  1. Rachel Davino, 7/17/83, female (age 29)
  2. Dawn Hocksprung, 06/28/65, female (age 47)
  3. Anne Marie Murphy, 07/25/60, female (age 52)
  4. Lauren Russeau, 1982, female (age 29)
  5. Mary Sherlach, 02/11/56, female (age 56)
  6. Victoria Soto, 11/04/85, female (age 27)
Here are the search results for each of the above names in the Social Security Death Master File (DMF). In the list below, the names of alleged child victims are colored pink; those of adults are colored green:
  1. Charlotte Bacon: DMF has 36 individuals named Charlotte Bacon, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Charlotte Bacon.
  2. Daniel Barden: DMF has 6 individuals named Daniel or Danny Barden, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Daniel Barden.
  3. Olivia Engel: DMF has one Olivia Engel, but she was born on May 18, 1905.
  4. Josephine Gay: DMF has 29 Josephine Gay, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Josephine Gay.
  5. Anna Marquez: DMF has 21 Anna Marquez, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Anna Marquez.
  6. Dylan Hockley: DMF has no one named Dylan Hockley.
  7. Madeline Hsu: DMF has no one named Madeline Hsu. The closest, an individual named M. Hsu, was born on Oct. 27, 1940.
  8. Catherine Hubbard: DMF has 68 individuals named Catherine Hubbard, none of whom is the Sandy Hook Catherine Hubbard.
  9. Chase Kowalski: DMF has no one named Chase Kowalski. The closest, Chas Kowalski, was born on April 10, 1900.
  10. Jesse Lewis: DMF has 565  individuals named Jess or Jesse Lewis, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Jesse Lewis.
  11. James Mattioli: DMF has no one named James Mattioli.
  12. Grace McDonnell: DMF has 38 individuals named Grace or Gracie McDonnell, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Grace McDonnell.
  13. Emilie Parker: DMF has 12 individuals named Emilie, Emilia, or Emiline Parker, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Emilie Parker.
  14. Jack Pinto: DMF has 12 individuals named Jack or Jacob Pinto, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Jack Pinto.
  15. Noah Pozner: DMF has no one named Noah Pozner.
  16. Caroline Previdi: DMF has no one named Caroline Previdi.
  17. Jessica Rekos: DMF has no one named Jessica Rekos.
  18. Avielle Richman: DMF has 5 individuals with a first name that begins with the alphabet A and a last name of Richman, none of whom is Avielle Richman.
  19. Benjamin Wheeler: DMF has 206 individuals named Benjamin (or Benjamine, Benjemin, Benj, Benji) Wheeler, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Benjamin Wheeler.
  20. Allison Wyatt: DMF has 4 individuals named Allison Wyatt, none of whom is Sandy Hook’s Allison Wyatt.
  21. Rachel Davino: DMF has no one named Rachel Davino.
  22. Dawn Hochsprung: DMF has no one named Dawn Hochsprung.
  23. Ann Marie Murphy: DMF has 11 individuals named Ann (or Anna) Murphy, 4 of whom are named Ann Marie Murphy, but none of them is Sandy Hook’s Ann Marie Murphy.
  24. Lauren Russeau: DMF has no one named Lauren Russeau.
  25. Mary Sherlach: DMF has two Marian Sherlach, but none named Mary Sherlach.
  26. Victoria Soto: DMF has 50 individuals names Victoria Soto. The closest is a Victoria G. Soto who was born about 1985, married in Texas on July 2, 2011, but is not dead.
LivingonPlanetZ posted about the document “Sandy Hook – NO DEATHS, NO VICTIMS; According to SSDI Official Master File” on February 22, 2014.
It is noteworthy that a month later, Social Security Administration changed its policy on the public’s access to its Death Master File. On the website of the Social Security Administration, it says beginning March 27, 2014, the public can have only “limited access” to its Death Master File. To gain access to the DMF, we the American people must now jump through several hoops:
  • One must be “certified” (via having one’s application approved) to be granted “limited access”.
  • Only certain people are eligible to be “certified”. One must have a “legitimate” fraud prevention interest, or have a “legitimate” business purpose pursuant to a law, governmental rule, regulation, or fiduciary duty in order to be certified under the program. (The critical word “legitimate” is undefined, which means Social Security Administration’s bureaucrats decide what “legitimate” means.)
  • Those who are “certified” for access to the Death Master File must pay a hefty annual per-person subscription fee of $995.
Then there’s this cover-their-posterior all-purpose qualifier by Social Security Administration:
This [Death Master] file includes the following information on each decedent, if the data are available to the SSA: social security number, name, date of birth, date of death. The SSA does not have a death record for all persons; therefore, SSA does not guarantee the veracity of the file. Thus, the absence of a particular person is not proof this person is alive.

But wait!

We don’t just have to depend on Social Security’s Death Master File data to know that no one died at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012.
How do we know that?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) tells us so!
Adan Salazar reports for Infowars, Sept. 24, 2014, that recently released FBI crime statistics show that no murders occurred in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, despite reports that 20 schoolchildren, 6 faculty members, and Nancy Lanza were killed or, in the case of Adam Lanza, committed suicide on December 14, 2012.
Click image to enlarge
FBI 2012 crime stats1
In contrast to the Connecticut report, the 2012 FBI crime report for the state of Colorado shows that 29 murders occurred in the town of Aurora that year, a figure that takes into account the 12 people who died in the Century Theater during the midnight premiere of The Dark Knight Rises on July 20, 2012.
FBI crime stats2
To conclude, no one was killed on December 14, 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. More perverse still,according to the Social Security Administration’s records, none of the alleged Sandy Hook victims ever lived!
As the author of “Sandy Hook – NO DEATHS, NO VICTIMS; According to SSDI Official Master File” puts it:
ALL of the identities of the “children victims” of the supposed Sandy Hook massacre, are purely fictitious identities, with no record of either birth or death. As to the adult “victims”, the only one with an identity possibly verifiable from the intact SSD Master File, is Victoria G. Soto. The other identities may or may not have been assumed by real people at some time; but the identities themselves are nevertheless fictitious. Secondary copies of the Master File, or perhaps earlier versions, appear to have been altered or “corrected”, to include the fake identities. Such altered copies appear to be in use by popular genealogy search websites, though inconsistently.
H/t Nicholas K, Kelleigh N, Victoria M.
Dr. Eowyn is the Editor of Fellowship of the Minds. For all the posts FOTM has done on Sandy Hook, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.
Bookmark and Share
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=323148
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Sep 28 2014, With 7578 Reads, Filed under Editor, Of Interest, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

44 Comments for “Sandy Hook: CT crime data confirms FBI report”

  1. jake gittes
    September 30, 2014 - 1:26 pm
    Some good questions regarding Sandy Hook –
    http //hoaxatsandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/07/top-sandy-hook-questions.html
  2. John Kesich
    September 30, 2014 - 11:14 am
    Dr Eowyn does not include a URL for the copy of the SSMDF allegedly uploaded to archive.org by someone who chose to remain anonymous. A cursory search did not find it. Why wouldn’t an honest researcher provide that link?
    Regardless, why should we trust whatever was uploaded?
    What’s more, Eowyn quotes the anonymous uploader, “The adult “victims” appear in the appendix.” But then claims to have found only one near miss. So which is it? And why does Eowyn gloss over this discrepancy?
    But wait, there’s more. Eowyn says, “Victoria Soto DMF has 50 individuals names Victoria Soto. The closest is a Victoria G. Soto who was born about 1985, married in Texas on July 2, 2011, but is not dead.” All I know about the Death Master
    read more ...
  3. Old Jules
    September 29, 2014 - 6:59 pm
    Finally located the FY 2012-2013 School District Budget. http //www.newtown.k12.ct.us/Portals/Newtown/District/docs/BOARD%20OF%20EDUCATION/BOE%20Budgets/2012-2013%20Budgets/2012-2013proposedbudgetfinal.pdf
    Sandy Hook Elementary was allocated $95,000 for building maintenance [page 46]
    This doesn’t actually appear to be a formal budget so much as a projection of estimated Newtown School District expenses. They don’t appear to break down staffing costs and staff levels by specific school [that I've found thus far]
  4. Old Jules
    September 29, 2014 - 6:45 pm
    Evidently the statement that the school had been shut down since 2008 is in error. I’ve been web searching for School Board meetings, budgets, etc. http //www.newtown.k12.ct.us/Portals/Newtown/District/docs/BOARD%20OF%20EDUCATION/BOE%20Budgets/boe.apprv.bdgt2010-2011.pdf is the 2010-2011 fiscal year budget for Newtown School District. Page 23-24 of this budget lists the Elementary schools receiving funds for operations. The list includes Sandy Hook Elementary School.
    • wjabbe
      September 29, 2014 - 8:25 pm
      Professor Fetzer would be the most appropriate one to reply here. However, these school authorities had the habit of physically moving the school while retaining the same name. This could explain the apparent contradiction you mention here. Much information is missing for the period from 2008-2012 possibly supporting the position of Jim. Moreover, when Jim visited the School Board the group refused to say anything to clarify this seemingly simple issue. For example they could have provided extensive documentation that the SH school where the purported crimes took place was indeed open from 2008-2012. Instead they chose to remain silent. However, Jim and associates have presented a mountain of evidence indicating the school was
      read more ...
      • Old Jules
        September 30, 2014 - 12:39 am
        wjabbe I’m fairly open minded and if there’s solid evidence suggesting the school was closed since 2008 to contradict only slightly less-than-solid evidence it was open I’ll buy it. But silence on the part of the school board doesn’t meet that criterion for me. They might have been silent for other reasons including the advice of their attorney.
        The school doesn’t HAVE to have been closed since 2008 for the event to be a hoax. It could have been closed only for a week or a day, a month. But saying it was closed since 2008 while attempting to prove the event didn’t happen as reported and being wrong isn’t the strongest position to be in. Stating anything as fact that can easily be undermined by contrary evidence is for the ones doing
        read more ...
        • jeannonkralj
          September 30, 2014 - 3:57 am
          Your comments are well taken.
          All government data connected to the Social Security database is a farce and is no proof of anything.
          ” Stating anything as fact that can easily be undermined by contrary evidence is for the ones doing the hoaxing. ”
          It would seem that the positive certain identities, identify before death matching identify after death, of the Lanzas and the victim children (vicsims) would certainly qualify as “fact that can easily be undermined by contrary evidence” yet that is glaringly absent,
          I guess if any public school child anywhere in the nation is murdered at school, there is no legal requirement nor the public’s right to know that the child killed was a real living child who was the child killed.
          read more ...
          • Old Jules
            September 30, 2014 - 4:26 am
            jeannonkralj – On the other hand, having all the official documentation available on each victim seems to me to be almost essential. Having copies of birth and death certificates, for instance, on every victim, or being refused those birth and death certificates by the responsible record-holding entity. It’s such basic data where allegations of this sort are involved. If they’re refused it means someone wasn’t willing to fake them because of possible jail time eventually. If they’re furnished the opportunity to follow the trail of each ‘individual’ from birth to possibly faked death certificate is eased. Real names if they exist. Names of parents.
            I surmise the ony reason this mightn’t have been done is the $20 per certificate fee for
            read more ...
          • jeannonkralj
            September 30, 2014 - 7:12 am
            Part 1 of 3 Part comment by jeannonKralj
            Jules wrote…
            “having all the official documentation available on each victim seems to me to be almost essential.”
            Agreed. But there must be a viable goal for all this time consuming and expensive documentation gathering. Will it all culminate in an indictment? Or is that not a realistic and valuable goal?
            Wolfgang Halbig’s GoFundMe fund has over $30,000 but apparently no “official documentation” to the legal prosecution end regarding identity of the victims is part of Wolfgang Halbig’s legal pursuits, He is pursuing small local civil suits to get the defendants under oath and raising their right hand and not legally able to plead the Fifth Amendment. I think, win or lose the case, Wolfgang
            read more ...
        • jeannonkralj
          September 30, 2014 - 7:15 am
          Part 2 of 3 Part comment by jeannonKralj
          Jules wrote…
          “If they’re refused it means someone wasn’t willing to fake them because of possible jail time eventually.”
          Not agreed.
          They could be refused for many different reasons, not only the reason you identify. I rather doubt, if this corruption goes as deep and as high, as I think it does, that any “official” or employee is worried about possible jail time.
          We must realize that all government officials and agency employees, including judges and courts and elected officials operate within a blackmail, bribery, and extortion grid. They all have “the goods” on each other and they all “have each others’ backs.” If someone desires to do right and blow the whistle and thereby wonder
          read more ...
          • jeannonkralj
            September 30, 2014 - 7:19 am
            Part 3 of 3 Part comment by jeannonkralj
            Jules wrote…
            “If they’re furnished the opportunity to follow the trail of each ‘individual’ from birth to possibly faked death certificate is eased. Real names if they exist. Names of parents.”
            Agreed that having complete documentation eases following the trail of an “individual” but strongly question the validity of any trail. If all of or research into the victims of Sandy Hook and the Bosting Boming and 9-11 have shown us anything, it has shown us how long-corrupted the records. Also we have learning that false records can be totally created from scratch and then subsequently amended and further corrupted.
            Jules wrote…
            “I surmise the ony reason this mightn’t have been done is the $20
            read more ...
  5. Old Jules
    September 29, 2014 - 6:08 pm
    Newtown, CT School District School Board Meeting Feb 1, 2012 http //www.newstimes.com/local/article/Newtown-school-board-adopts-budget-2927303.php
    Parents, students, teachers and other school officials filled the board room at the Newtown Municipal Center on Tuesday night. Kindergarten teachers sat on the floor and listened to their principals — Barbara Gasparine of Head O’Meadow, Jo-Ann Peters-Edmunson of Hawley School, Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung of Sandy Hook School, and Chris Geissler of Middle Gate School — as they persuaded board members to include full-day kindergarten in their adopted budget.
  6. jmreeves
    September 29, 2014 - 4:49 pm
    Not Sandy Hook but (please forgive)
    In Colorado the Jefferson County School board has taken a position
    against teaching materials which might encourage civil disobedience.
    This resulted in some Civil Disobedience.
    You can look up the Denver Post and look for yourself.
    The thing that struck me about today’s article re missing students and teachers
    The first concern expressed is that some of the needy will miss their school lunch.
    The other is whether the days out will affect the per pupil funding for the school.
    So Much for ‘Education’ (at least at the hands of these experts).
    John
  7. Martin Maloney
    September 29, 2014 - 4:22 pm
    “…I hypothesized that the lack of a SSDI for Ana Marquez-Greene may be because her parents had not yet obtained a Social Security card/number for her…”
    That doesn’t make any sense.
    http //taxmap.ntis.gov/taxmap/pub17/p17-019.htm#TXMP5ebaa566
    “You must show the social security number (SSN) of any dependent for whom you claim an exemption in column (2) of line 6c of your Form 1040 or Form 1040A.
    If you do not show the dependent’s SSN when required or if you show an incorrect SSN, the exemption may be disallowed.”
  8. jmreeves
    September 29, 2014 - 3:36 pm
    Please add Home-schoollers to the target list for this misadventure
    To wit
    http //www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/19201-government-plan-to-stop-school-shootings-monitor-homeschoolers
    John
  9. What Happened
    September 29, 2014 - 10:11 am
    The public needs to re introduce the lie detector test to public officials. We ALLOW our politicians to lie to us. Its OUR fault.
    Where is that lying Bastard Gene Rosen. Lets round up that little troll, and strap that pussy to a lie detector test.
    I want you VT guys to keep going in your direction. BUT…sometimes I feel you actually believe if you find
    a “smoking gun” Due Process” will happen…..that’s a pipe dream.
    Just the fact that fundraising sites for SH went up DAY’s some weeks before the event is SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. Google spider crawlers DON’T LIE.
  10. Old Jules
    September 29, 2014 - 9:04 am
    A web search for Connecticut Vital Statistics reveals Newtown Town Clerk Debbie Aurelia Halstead, CCTC, CMC, MCTC as the responsible party for at least one set of these records
    “Maintaining Vital Records. All Birth, Death, Marriage and Civil Union records involving Newtown residents as well as those non-residents occurring in Newtown from the year 1711 to the present are maintained in our office.”
    Vital Records
    Printer-Friendly Version
    EFFECTIVE October 1, 2009 per Budget Bill 6802
    The following fees will be collected
    VITAL RECORD COPIES CGS Sec. 7-74
    Fee $20.00 per copy.
    Only certified copies will be issued.
    To obtain Certified copies of Birth, Death, Marriage and Civil Union certificates
    read more ...
  11. JohnnyVESCO
    September 29, 2014 - 8:22 am
    Jim ,Mark Twain Said it best , “it is easy to fool people than to convince them that they have been Fooled !”
  12. Old Jules
    September 29, 2014 - 6:07 am
    Probably the default position in the minds of average Americans is that Sandy Hook happened. That was my own position until I began encountering videos etc arguing otherwise. So as a practical matter the burden of proof is on those contending Sandy Hook didn’t happen. The reverse of the ‘normal’ state of affairs where proof it happened would be right there before everyone in the form of official documents, crime scene films, witnesses crawling out of the woodwork to write books about it and be on television undergoing careful questioning.
    But proving it didn’t happen based on all the documents that would exist if it did happen is, while ironic, going to be difficult from every direction. The what? funeral director? has already been ho hummed about the date
    read more ...
    • wjabbe
      September 29, 2014 - 10:07 am
      What single fact would convince almost everyone that this was a hoax? A peek into those caskets which were carefully covered up just like almost every physical and forensic bit of information in this case. I do not advocate breaking laws even if government routinely does so with impunity, from routine sting operations to routine violations of the 5th Amendment and the 14th Amendment with impunity and no questions asked let alone indictments or convictions. When he released the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg violated the law. While the ends does not justify the means, he had an ethical and moral pupose in doing so. Suppose someone like him decided in their own mind that it would be ethically and morally justified to personally exhume one or more of those caskets,
      read more ...
      • Old Jules
        September 29, 2014 - 10:13 am
        The stakes for doing it and getting caught would be a few years being anally raped by gangsas and studying shades of gray of prison bars. On the other hand, the reward is is, er is, hmmmm.
        The reward would be to be vilified and not believed provided there was no corpse. If there was a corpse you’d at least be able to say, “Hell, I suppose I was wrong.”
        • Jim Fetzer
          September 29, 2014 - 2:06 pm
          The issue does not hang on whether or not there are death certificates. There could be fraudulent death certificates for persons who are still alive, as in the case of Noah Pozner. (See “Are Sandy Hook critics delusional with ‘twisted minds’?”, where his death certificate turns out to be a fabrication. If he had actually died, it would not be necessary to fake it.) We know the school was no longer operating by 2008, we have DASHCAM footage showing no evacuation taking place at specific times/places cited in official reports, we have the failure of Danbury’s State’s Attorney Stephen Sedensky to make a case against the alleged perp, the faking of the “iconic” photo by Shannon Hicks, and so much more. And exhumations would be a nice touch, but even Obama officials in the Department
          read more ...
          • Old Jules
            September 29, 2014 - 2:37 pm
            Jim Fetzer I’m sure you’re probably right. It was my thought, however, that they mightn’t want to falsify official documents because of the criminal nature of doing it, combined with the fact a name would be firmly attached of the person responsible for pronouncing death.
            But if they refuse to produce death certificates, which seems a real possibility, another nail would be driven into the coffin[s]
            Without the death certificates there’s nothing to challenge the State, the FBI, SS, whatever.
          • Robbie the Pict
            September 29, 2014 - 5:03 pm
            Hi Jim,
            I asked this question a while ago but have lost track if indeed there was an answer, but has there now been a full audit of the preparation and interment of the deceased? Can we identify the funeral parlours/directors who claim to have processed, between them, the total number of supposed dead? Were there mass burials, or in groups, or individual? Were they at the same graveyard or several? Who dressed the bodies and what wounds did they observe on corpses? When the other evidence stacks up so well, immunity from prosecution might produce some scared informers. Gruesome investigative work but not as bad as the Burke and Hare approach!
        • wjabbe
          September 29, 2014 - 8:49 pm
          If the results of committing such an act demonstrated unequivocally that the caskets contained no dead bodies as claimed by the authorities, I seriously doubt if the individual(s) responsible would spend any time in jail since this would create a national scandal much greater than any in recent times. This would prove Sandy Hook to be a Hoax and leave no wiggle room for the liars and cheaters who perpetuated all this on the public. They are the ones who would likely be in jail as a result of this. I believe even the charges against former Marine Officer Ellsberg above were dropped. Ellsberg was also a top student with a Ph.D. degree. However, I do not advocate violating laws despite the numerous violations of laws and ethics by authorities every day. The ends do not justify
          read more ...
  13. Old Jules
    September 29, 2014 - 5:15 am
    Unless it’s changed during the past 30 years falsifying federal government documents is a federal felony [and probably a state felony for state and local official documents]. There’s a hint of evidence that inside the FBI, at least, noboby’s in a hurry to falsify anything that could bite them later when the worm turns. Even in Connecticutt some people might have been enjoying some party-talk with attorneys and seen their lives passing before their eyes.
  14. wjabbe
    September 29, 2014 - 5:09 am
    BO has been using a SS number issued in CT for a person who died over 120 years ago. Our government is a liar and cheater and and obstruction artist
    http //www.birtherreport.com/2013/09/report-social-security-admin-due-to.html
    quoted from above article
    Law Offices of Orly Ttaitz
    “For 5 years now Attorney Orly Taitz has pursued the issue of Obama ‘s use of fabricated IDs. the most damning evidence against Obama is his use of Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 , which failed E-Verify and SSNVS and which was traced to Harry Bounel, born in 1890.
    Currently there are 7 challenges to Obama brought by Attorney Taitz, two of them are cases specifically dealing with this issue. The cases are slightly different. The latest motion before Judge Lamberth in
    read more ...
    • Old Jules
      September 29, 2014 - 5:28 am
      You’re saying the prez was killed at Sandy Hook?
    • wjabbe
      September 29, 2014 - 5:28 am
      All US citizens are expected to voluntarily comply with all laws. Most honest citizens do. If citizens do not voluntarily comply, the government uses force, intimidation, extortion and other “legal” means to forcibly compel them to comply with laws and force them to spend enormous amounts of money (on lawyers) defending themselves against the military force and power of the US government. However, the reverse is not true. Government does not voluntarily comply with laws, at every level. They routinely give the middle finger to our precious Constitution and the mostly good honest citizens who are forced to pay for corrupt government. All we learned from Nazi, Germany, the former Soviet Union and all other tyrannical regimes throughout history is now to copy their tactics against
      read more ...
      • wjabbe
        September 29, 2014 - 5:45 am
        In line -4 above, the word now should read how. The Federal Rules and Regulations and Laws comprise at least a whole wall in any law library. Our “elected” non representatives did this to us over about two centuries. Our own government is now a criminal lawbreaker what the Founders fought to rid the world of. The citizens have virtually no practical ways to compel compliance with the rule of law by government short of anarchy and revolution. The ballot box is far too slow, corrupt and cumbersome to do the job. Both corrupt political parties have seen to this with all their corrupt state election laws benefiting both Rethuglicrats and Demothuglicans, tweedle dee and tweedle dum, flushing all abstentions down the toilet. America has lost her way. This is what happens when foolish
        read more ...
    • jake gittes
      September 29, 2014 - 1:52 pm
      Wow, after seeing that about Olivia Engel and Chas Kowalski, I tried posting that Harry Bounel link last night wjabbe, but my browser crashed. Maybe we’ve reached the 100th monkey?
      Fairfield Hills, home of the former, notorious state mental hospital, kept immigration records, and the tunnels of which were used in the movie “Sleepers,” about systematic, ritualistic child abuse. The hospital itself reportedly had a history of abuse, rape and murder of patients. Located just a hop, skip and ATV ride away, Fairfield Hills at times was stated to be where “Sandy Hook autopsies” were performed, although Sendesky’s report states Farmington.
      Police log sheets indicate officers entering “tunnels” the night after Sandy Hook well after other cops had logged out. Tunnels under the school?
      read more ...
    • Lasher
      September 30, 2014 - 11:18 am
      There was no Social Security System back before 1935, so how could someone who died over 120 years ago have had one?
  15. LC
    September 28, 2014 - 10:59 pm
    Folks lets take 5 & sing along with the Sandy Hookers;;;
    SANDY HOOK CIRCLES! SANDY HOOK HOAX SONG by Gene Rosen and the Satanists!
    *******www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKCmIQfFQ_k
  16. OrdinarySerf
    September 28, 2014 - 9:09 pm
    More superb work and the contributors to this article are to be congratulated. The ramifications (in terms of breaking through to wider public awareness) with this particular ongoing expose on Sandy Hook are massive. This one is a major headache for the perps.
  17. Preston James, Ph.D
    September 28, 2014 - 7:55 pm
    Once again Professor Fetzer and an associate, in this case Dr. Eowyn, nail down the Sandy Hook FEMA/DHS Capstone drill even further and show once again, NO DEAD KIDS, NO DEAD TEACHERS, NO DEAD LANZAS. This show be recived by the public as Very GOOD NEWS.
    In fact they establish a great case that none of these fake dead kids are even real kids, just like the fake Lanzas, all fake constructs.
    This whole major false-flag attack on the Second Amendment is now collapsing like a house of cards. Just wait and see what happens when the class action financial lawsuits are filed to claw back the 27+ million dollars defrauded from sympathetic folks who were lied to and defrauded. There is no statute of limitations on fraud. The day is coming when every single so-called fake dead kid will
    read more ...
  18. William St. George
    September 28, 2014 - 7:49 pm
    We are getting similar things now with beheadings, a commonplace for years in Mexico. And really an improvement over what some of the more recent official death penalty deaths indicate. Many indications that they are faked. But who cares. As George W. once said Some of the people can be fooled all the time and those are the ones we want to concentrate on. I believe their numbers are increasing.
  19. jeannonkralj
    September 28, 2014 - 7:39 pm
    A video I think is so far missing from the Sandy Hook videos of most importance is the following one of President Obama speaking
    https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhxjS1FO33c
    President Barack Obama Speech – Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting – Newtown, Ct.
    ” Published on Dec 14, 2012
    US President Barack Obama said on Friday he grieved about the massacre at a Connecticut elementary school as a father first, declaring “our hearts are broken today. He promised action to prevent such tragedies again but did not say what that would be. Here is the full transcript of the US president’s speech ” SNIP
    This refutes Dan Cady’s idea that “there may not be any laws against actually having staged events that happen to be televised, and if they were conducting this as
    read more ...
    • bahmi
      September 29, 2014 - 4:06 am
      Is it my imagination or does Obama purposely recommend for publication only such things that are lies? When’s the last time you can remember he told the truth on a major issue?
      A lawless nation makes it far easier to lie to than a nation girded by laws. Eric Holder has probably been as scurrilous a character in America as any before him. With my TV on in the background, I hear Obama lying once again about “we misjudged the strength of the Islamic invaders, etc etc”.
      Wonder when we’ll actually find out who this Impostor president really is. Surely the faculty at Columbia lied for him, as did the law faculty at Harvard. And people still insist we can take him at his word…..
      Listening to him causes me to retch, he’s lying personified, probably the biggest liar we’ve ever seen here.
      read more ...
  20. William St. George
    September 28, 2014 - 7:27 pm
    You astutely link our willingness to believe that X is true if an authority says it is true. Thus the greater the authority the more likely we are to be convinced. The flaw in our reasoning is that we first have to certify the authority. If and only if we have very good reasons to believe that Y is an authority of integrity, based on ample experience, should we venture our willingness to accept X as true. Even then as mature adults we should hold on to a bit of wise skepticism (David Hume is a good example to follow.).
    Like the good hunter we follow the signs and are watchful. If the animal sought is a predator he may be pursuing us as we pursue him. I do believe that with time one gets that uncanny sense of what can and what can not be trusted. Clearly we have come close to the point
    read more ...
  21. Old Jules
    September 28, 2014 - 7:06 pm
    Nice piece of work. Thanks for offering it up. Seems there’s still a lot of cracking of the enamel going on. Maybe the time will come when some light will get through.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login
at

No comments:

Post a Comment