Templeton Times: Another Ebola Military Smoking Gun Really Bad Ebola News and a Really Good Natural Solution from Dr. Rima

By Administrator on September 26, 2014 No Comments

Another Ebola Military Smoking Gun
Really Bad Ebola News and a Really Good Natural Solution
Legal Defense Fund: http://donate.DrRimatruth.com
.
I have just finished reading the papers listed at the end of this article and I have some really bad news for you that will not shock you if you have been following our Ebola material. But, since we are always focused on natural solutions, I have those for you, too.
.
This is, however, going to be a rocky ride. And you will not like it one bit. And remember, the government does not want us to tell you this.
.
Here’s the bad news: the US Army [U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)] knows full well, and has published numerous papers, on the aerosol transmission of Ebola. They know exactly how aerosol (droplet) transmission differs from contact transmission (e.g., when you breathe the virus in, you get more lesions and more inflammation and more bleeding in the lungs early on than when you get it by contact). No surprise.
.
But here’s the worst news: Ebola and similar viruses are MORE communicable by droplet transmission in non-tropical environments so the amount of droplet transmission in the Northern Hemisphere fall and winter that we are going into will make the pandemic more likely and, should it take root here, Ebola will be more contagious, not less.
.
You see, the scientists tell us that in the tropics the Ebola virus gets desiccated by the heat, damaged by the humidity and sterilized by the sun.
.
In cold climates, they write, its aerosol transmission profile will be like that of the Avian Flu, a disease that spreads by droplets caused by coughing, sneezing or talking.
.
That is precisely what the CDC told medical and airline personnel in their special advisories to those groups. And it is also precisely what they told the personnel of those industries NOT to tell the rest of us, saying that information was not intended for the general public beyond their industries.
.
The studies listed below are a small sampling of the information that we have on the droplet transmissibility of Ebola in non-human primates. There are also studies in non-primates showing the same.
.
And recall that we are talking about an increased virulence when the transmission route is airborne. In almost every study, every test animal died of airborne Ebola. The researchers acknowledge that the mortality of airborne Ebola in primates is at least 90%. In one study using various types of primates, out of all of the groups, only one Rhesus monkey survived. There were dozens of animals in the study.
.
In fact, one of the papers is about the development of a device used to contaminate the experimental animals with a precise dose of airborne Ebola virus.
.
Speaking of dose, here is some more bad which, in the interest of completeness I have to share with you: Low dose exposure to just a few viral particles was at least as deadly as the higher dose exposure so 50 viral units caused disease even more effectively than 500 viral units in the air.
.
Sad to say, there is a bit more that I wish I did not have to tell you: Influenza, even the most virulent and deadly, can only infect the respiratory tissues, that is, the lungs. But Ebola can infect every cell type in the body, which explains the fact that touching contaminated secretions can spread the disease even if you don’t put your hands in your mouth, for example. And these and other studies I have read make it clear that the virus is so hardy that even if it is freeze dried, it persists in the environment and is still capable of infecting someone.
.
So in cold weather, it is as easily spread by droplets as the flu and it lingers in the air and on surfaces.
.
And the government knows it.
.
You will shortly hear a great deal of nonsense about a mutation that allowed the Ebola virus to go airborne. Nonsense. It is already capable of droplet transmission as these and other studies show plainly.
.
Why don’t they want you to know that? Because, they do not want to solve the problem.
.
If they did, perhaps, they would not have recently altered the Georgia Guide Stones to include the number “2014”.
.
If they did, perhaps they would not have halted the Liberian Nano Silver Clinical Demonstrations so that they are now building containment centers providing “rudimentary care” for the victims of Ebola (and whatever looks like Ebola since the tests are incredibly inaccurate) so that they can die in isolation from their families and communities.
.
If they were interested in solving the problem, Air France would not have been directed to NOT deliver 200 bottles of Nano Silver 10 PPM and 100 tubes of Nano Silver get to Freetown, Sierra Leone.
.
Liberia is already under WHO control. Sierra Leone had a 3 day martial law lock-down. North American police are militarized, ready to hunt us down and lock us up according to the two latest Executive Orders allowing us to be seized, “treated”, incarcerated and lost along the way, topping off the rest of these monstrous “orders”.
.
Ready for some good news? Despite the fact that FDA/FTC have hand delivered a warning letter telling us not to say this to you, we are saying it: Nano Silver 10 PPM, as a surface cleaner, is effective against disease causing organisms, according to the EPA, which has approved it as a surface cleaner for hospitals, food service areas, etc. That is its topical use.
.
Not only that, but it has over a thousand peer reviewed studies showing that, as a nutrient, it supports normal cell membrane impermeability to viral replication, both in the lab and in actual living things like you and your children. The presence of a virus in your body is not a disease! When a nutrient supports your body’s normal ability to regulate viral replication, that is not “treating” any disease!
.
I imagine that someone in the Department of Defense is pretty unhappy right about now that the the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) study was declassified, including the data showing clearly that THIS Nano Silver 10 PPM regulates Ebola virus replication. But they did declassify it in 2009. This Nano Silver 10 PPM is the one that we recommend, as part of our private expressive association with you, our supporters. This may, quite literally, save lives in the time of (weaponized) plague. You must make your own informed decision.
.
But we are going to have to fight the FDA on this one. Hard. They are, in a very real way, fighting for their lives.
.
So are we.
.
They are not in this for your health. They are following the dictates of the genocidal globalists who pay their salaries when they rotate out into cushy crony corporate or academic seats after their government job stints.
.
Give this life-saving, anti-genocide sanitizer and nutrient to the people you care about. They might not buy it for themselves now, but they sure will bless you when it saves their lives in the middle of an Ebola disaster.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Legal Defense Fund: http://donate.DrRimatruth.com
.
References consulted for this blog: 1. Elizabeth E. Zumbrun 1, Holly A. Bloomfield 1, John M. Dye 2, Ty C. Hunter 1, Paul A. Dabisch 1, Nicole L. Garza 3, Nicholas R. Bramel 1, Reese J. Baker 1, Roger D. Williams 1, Donald K. Nichols 4 and Aysegul Nalca 1A Characterization of Aerosolized Sudan Virus Infection in African Green Monkeys, Cynomolgus Macaques, and Rhesus Macaques, , Viruses 2012, 4, 2115-2136; doi:10.3390/v4102115
2. Center for Aerobiological Sciences, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702, USA
3. Virology Division, USAMRIID, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702, USA
4. Toxicology Division, USAMRIID, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702, USA
5. Pathology Division, USAMRIID, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702, USAViruses 2012, 4, 2115-2136; doi:10.3390/v4102115
6. Reed, D.S.; Lackemeyer, M.G.; Garza, N.L.; Sullivan, L.J.; Nichols, D.K. Aerosol exposure to Zaire ebolavirus in three nonhuman primate species: Differences in disease course and clinical pathology. Microbes Infect. 2011, 13, 930–936.
7. Jahrling, P.B.; Geisbert, T.W.; Jaax, N.K.; Hanes, M.A.; Ksiazek, T.G.; Peters, C.J. Experimental infection of cynomolgus macaques with Ebola-Reston filoviruses from the 1989-1990 U.S. epizootic. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 1996, 11, 115–134.
8. Geisbert, T.W.; Daddario-Dicaprio, K.M.; Geisbert, J.B.; Reed, D.S.; Feldmann, F.; Grolla, A.; Stroher, U.; Fritz, E.A.; Hensley, L.E.; Jones, S.M.; et al. Vesicular stomatitis..

Categories : Blog / Vlog