- For those who prefer to read things online, an unofficial
but complete transcript is here: http://www.silt3.com/index.php?id=573
-
-
- What if there really was no need for much - or even most
- of the Cold War?
-
- What if, in fact, the Cold War had been kept alive for
two decades based on phony WMD threats?
-
- What if, similarly, the War On Terror was largely a scam,
and the administration was hyping it to seem larger-than-life?
-
- What if our "enemy" represented a real but
relatively small threat posed by rogue and criminal groups well outside
the mainstream of Islam?
-
- What if that hype was done largely to enhance the power,
electability, and stature of George W. Bush and Tony Blair?
-
- And what if the world was to discover the most shocking
dimensions of these twin deceits - that the same men promulgated them in
the 1970s and today?
-
- It happened.
-
- The myth-shattering event took place in England the first
three weeks of October, when the BBC aired a three-hour documentary written
and produced by Adam Curtis, titled "The Power of Nightmares http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/3755686.stm
-
- If the emails and phone calls many of us in the US received
from friends in the UK - and debate in the pages of publications like The
Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html
are any indicator, this was a seismic event, one that may have even provoked
a hasty meeting between Blair and Bush a few weeks later. According to
this carefully researched and well-vetted BBC documentary, Richard Nixon,
following in the steps of his mentor and former boss Dwight D. Eisenhower,
believed it was possible to end the Cold War and eliminate fear from the
national psyche. The nation need no longer be afraid of communism or the
Soviet Union.
-
- Nixon worked out a truce with the Soviets, meeting their
demands for safety as well as the US needs for security, and then announced
to Americans that they need no longer be afraid. In 1972, President Richard
Nixon returned from the Soviet Union with a treaty worked out by Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger, the beginning of a process Kissinger called "détente."
-
- On June 1, 1972, Nixon gave a speech in which he said,
"Last Friday, in Moscow, we witnessed the beginning of the end of
that era which began in 1945. With this step, we have enhanced the security
of both nations. We have begun to reduce the level of fear, by reducing
the causes of fear-for our two peoples, and for all peoples in the world."
But Nixon left amid scandal and Ford came in, and Ford's Secretary of Defense
(Donald Rumsfeld) and Chief of Staff (Dick Cheney) believed it was intolerable
that Americans might no longer be bound by fear.
-
- Without fear, how could Americans be manipulated? Rumsfeld
and Cheney began a concerted effort - first secretly and then openly -
to undermine Nixon's treaty for peace and to rebuild the state of fear
and, thus, reinstate the Cold War. And these two men - 1974 Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld and Ford Chief of Staff Dick Cheney - did this by claiming
that the Soviets had secret weapons of mass destruction that the president
didn't know about, that the CIA didn't know about, that nobody but them
knew about. And, they said, because of those weapons, the US must redirect
billions of dollars away from domestic programs and instead give the money
to defense contractors for whom these two men would one day work.
-
- "The Soviet Union has been busy," Defense Secretary
Rumsfeld explained to America in 1976. "They've been busy in terms
of their level of effort; they've been busy in terms of the actual weapons
they 've been producing; they've been busy in terms of expanding production
rates; they've been busy in terms of expanding their institutional capability
to produce additional weapons at additional rates; they've been busy in
terms of expanding their capability to increasingly improve the sophistication
of those weapons. Year after year after year, they've been demonstrating
that they have steadiness of purpose. They're purposeful about what they're
doing."
-
- The CIA strongly disagreed, calling Rumsfeld's position
a "complete fiction" and pointing out that the Soviet Union was
disintegrating from within, could barely afford to feed their own people,
and would collapse within a decade or two if simply left alone. But Rumsfeld
and Cheney wanted Americans to believe there was something nefarious going
on, something we should be very afraid of. To this end, they convinced
President Ford to appoint a commission including their old friend Paul
Wolfowitz to prove that the Soviets were up to no good.
-
- According to Curtis' BBC documentary, Wolfowitz's group,
known as "Team B," came to the conclusion that the Soviets had
developed several terrifying new weapons of mass destruction, featuring
a nuclear-armed submarine fleet that used a sonar system that didn't depend
on sound and was, thus, undetectable with our current technology. The BBC's
documentarians asked Dr. Anne Cahn of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency during that time, her thoughts on Rumsfeld's, Cheney's, and Wolfowitz's
1976 story of the secret Soviet WMDs. Here's a clip from a transcript of
that BBC documentary:
-
- "Dr ANNE CAHN, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency,
1977-80: They couldn't say that the Soviets had acoustic means of picking
up American submarines, because they couldn't find it. So they said, well
maybe they have a non-acoustic means of making our submarine fleet vulnerable.
But there was no evidence that they had a non-acoustic system. They're
saying, 'we can't find evidence that they're doing it the way that everyone
thinks they're doing it, so they must be doing it a different way. We don't
know what that different way is, but they must be doing it.'
-
- "INTERVIEWER (off-camera): Even though there was
no evidence.
-
- "CAHN: Even though there was no evidence.
-
- "INTERVIEWER: So they're saying there, that the
fact that the weapon doesn't exist.
-
- "CAHN: Doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. It just
means that we haven't found it."
-
- The moderator of the BBC documentary then notes:
-
- "What Team B accused the CIA of missing was a hidden
and sinister reality in the Soviet Union. Not only were there many secret
weapons the CIA hadn't found, but they were wrong about many of those they
could observe, such as the Soviet air defenses. The CIA were convinced
that these were in a state of collapse, reflecting the growing economic
chaos in the Soviet Union. Team B said that this was actually a cunning
deception by the Soviet régime. The air-defense system worked perfectly.
But the only evidence they produced to prove this was the official Soviet
training manual, which proudly asserted that their air-defense system was
fully integrated and functioned flawlessly. The CIA accused Team B of moving
into a fantasy world."
-
- Nonetheless, as Melvin Goodman, head of the CIA's Office
of Soviet Affairs, 1976-87, noted in the BBC documentary,
-
- "Rumsfeld won that very intense, intense political
battle that was waged in Washington in 1975 and 1976. Now, as part of that
battle, Rumsfeld and others, people such as Paul Wolfowitz, wanted to get
into the CIA. And their mission was to create a much more severe view of
the Soviet Union, Soviet intentions, Soviet views about fighting and winning
a nuclear war."
-
- Although Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld's assertions of powerful
new Soviet WMDs were unproven - they said the lack of proof proved that
undetectable weapons existed - they nonetheless used their charges to push
for dramatic escalations in military spending to selected defense contractors,
a process that continued through the Reagan administration.
-
- But, trillions of dollars and years later, it was proven
that they had been wrong all along, and the CIA had been right. Rumsfeld,
Cheney, and Wolfowitz lied to America in the 1970s about Soviet WMDs.
-
- Not only do we now know that the Soviets didn't have
any new and impressive WMDs, but we also now know that they were, in fact,
decaying from within, ripe for collapse any time, regardless of what the
US did - just as the CIA (and anybody who visited Soviet states - as I
had - during that time could easily predict). The Soviet economic and political
system wasn't working, and their military was disintegrating. As arms-control
expert Cahn noted in the documentary of those 1970s claims by Wolfowitz,
Cheney, and Rumsfeld:
-
- "I would say that all of it was fantasy. I mean,
they looked at radars out in Krasnoyarsk and said, 'This is a laser beam
weapon,' when in fact it was nothing of the sort. ... And if you go through
most of Team B's specific allegations about weapons systems, and you just
examine them one by one, they were all wrong."
-
- "INTERVIEWER: All of them?
-
- "CAHN: All of them.
-
- "INTERVIEWER: Nothing true?
-
- "CAHN: I don't believe anything in [Wolfowitz's
1977] Team B was really true."
-
- But the neocons said it was true, and organized a group
- The Committee on the Present Danger http://www.fightingterror.org -
to promote their worldview. The Committee produced documentaries, publications,
and provided guests for national talk shows and news reports. They worked
hard to whip up fear and encourage increases in defense spending, particularly
for sophisticated weapons systems offered by the defense contractors for
whom neocons would later become lobbyists.
-
- And they succeeded in recreating an atmosphere of fear
in the United States, and making themselves and their defense contractor
friends richer than most of the kingdoms of the world.
-
- The Cold War was good for business, and good for the
political power of its advocates, from Rumsfeld to Reagan.
-
- Similarly, according to this documentary, the War On
Terror is the same sort of scam, run for many of the same reasons, by the
same people. And by hyping it - and then invading Iraq - we may well be
bringing into reality terrors and forces that previously existed only on
the margins and with very little power to harm us.
-
- Curtis' documentary suggests that the War On Terror is
just as much a fiction as were the super-WMDs this same group of neocons
said the Soviets had in the 70s. He suggests we've done more to create
terror than to fight it. That the risk was really quite minimal (at least
until we invaded Iraq), and the terrorists are - like most terrorist groups
- simply people on the fringes, rather easily dispatched by their own people.
He even points out that Al Qaeda itself was a brand we invented, later
adopted by bin Laden because we'd put so many millions into creating worldwide
name recognition for it.
-
- Watching "The Terror of Nightmares" is like
taking the Red Pill in the movie The Matrix.
-
- It's the story of idealism gone wrong, of ideologies
promoted in the US by Leo Strauss and his followers (principally Wolfowitz,
Feith, and Pearle), and in the Muslim world by bin Laden's mentor, Ayman
Zawahiri. Both sought to create a utopian world through world domination;
both believe that the ends justify the means; both are convinced that "the
people" must be frightened into embracing religion and nationalism
for the greater good of morality and a stable state. Each needs the other
in order to hold power.
-
- Whatever your plans are for tonight or tomorrow, clip
three hours out of them and take the Red Pill. Get a pair of headphones
(the audio is faint), plug them into your computer, and visit an unofficial
archive of the Curtis' BBC documentary at the Information Clearing House
website http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1037.htm (The first
hour of the program, in a more viewable format, is also available here
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/ 121104powerofnightmares.htm
-
- For those who prefer to read things online, an unofficial
but complete transcript is on this Belgian site http://www.acutor.be/silt/index.php?id=573
-
- But be forewarned: You'll never see political reality
- and certainly never hear the words of the Bush or Blair administrations
- the same again.
-
- ===
-
- Thom Hartmann (thom at thomhartmann.com) is a Project
Censored Award-winning best-selling author and host of a nationally syndicated
daily progressive talk show. http://www.thomhartmann.com
|
No comments:
Post a Comment