Saturday, April 5, 2025
42. The Sudbury Valley School: The Underground HIstory of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org
42. The Sudbury Valley School: The Underground HIstory of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org
The Sudbury Valley School
I know a school for kids ages three to eighteen that doesn't teach anybody to read, yet everyone who goes there learns to do it, most very well. It's the beautiful Sudbury Valley School, twenty miles west of Boston in the old Nathaniel Bowditch "cottage" (which looks suspiciously like a mansion), a place ringed by handsome outbuildings, a private lake, woods, and acres of magnificent grounds. Sudbury is a private school, but with a tuition under $4,000 a year it's considerably cheaper than a seat in a New York City
public school. At Sudbury kids teach themselves to read; they learn at many different ages, even into the teen years (though that's rare). When each kid is ready he or she self- instructs, if such a formal label isn't inappropriate for such a natural undertaking. During this time they are free to request as much adult assistance as needed. That usually isn't much.
In thirty years of operation, Sudbury has never had a single kid who didn’t learn to read. All this is aided by a magnificent school library on open shelves where books are borrowed and returned on the honor system. About 65 percent of Sudbury kids go on to good colleges. The place has never seen a case of dyslexia. (That's not to say some kids don't reverse letters and such from time to time, but such conditions are temporary and self-correcting unless institutionalized into a disease.) So Sudbury doesn't even teach reading yet all its kids learn to read and even like reading. What could be going on there that we don't understand?
COVID Dossier INTERVIEWS
COVID Dossier INTERVIEWSSasha Latypova and I have done lots of interviews about the COVID Dossier. Here are a few highlights.
NEIL OLIVERFebruary 5th, 2025 This video is so shadow-banned on YouTube that even if you search for “The Secrets Are Out Neil Oliver Debbie Lerman Sasha Latypova” you will not find it! HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND with Leslie ManookianMarch 5th, 2025 Leslie is one of the smartest, fiercest and most effective health freedom fighters we have! Click on the link below for audio and video versions of the interview. https://healthfreedomdefense.org/cohf-ep37/ FLASHLIGHTS podcast with Cornelia MroseRecorded March 14th , 2025 Cornelia is an excellent interviewer and video editor. After two hours, we decided this would be Part 1 — stay tuned for Part 2 some time in May. |
The World Order: The Rothschilds: Chapter two
The World Order: The Rothschilds: Chapter two
The Rothschilds
"Let
me but issue and control a nation's money, and I care not who writes its
laws."
Mayer Amshel Bauer (Rothschild).
Rise of the Rothschild Money Network
In its issue of Dec. 19, 1983, Forbes Magazine noted that "Half of Germany's top ten banks are Frankfurt based." The modern world's financial system, an updating of the Babylonian monetary system of taxes and money creation, was perfected in Frankfurt-on-Main, in the province of Hesse. Mayer Amschel Bauer(later Rothschild) discovered that although loans to farmers and small businesses could be profitable, the real profits lay in making loans to governments. Born in Frankfurt in 1743, Mayer Amschel married Gutta Schnapper. He served a three year apprenticeship in Hanover at the Bank of Oppenheim. During this period, he had occasion to be of service to Lt. Gen. Baron von Estorff. von Estorff was the principal adviser to Landgrave Frederick II of Hesse, the wealthiest man in Europe. Frederick was worth from 70 to 100 million florins, much of it inherited from his father, Wilhelm the Eighth, brother of the King of Sweden. Baron von Estorff advised the Landgrave that Mayer Amschel showed an uncanny ability to increase money through his investments. The Landgrave immediately sent for him.
At this time, King George III was trying to put down the American Rebellion. His troops were being out fought by the hardy Americans, who were accustomed to wilderness battles. Mayer Amschel arranged for King George to hire 16,800 sturdy young Hessian soldiers from the Landgrave, a considerable addition to the Hesse's fortune. This advantageous relationship came to a halt with the sudden death in 1785 of the Landgrave, who was only twenty-five years old. However, Mayer Amschel attained absolute influence over his successor, Elector Wilhelm I, who, like Mayer Amschel, had also been born in 1743. It was said that they were like two shoes, so well did they go together. It was a pleasant change from Mayer Amschel's relationship with the former Landgrave, who had been a very difficult and demanding person. In fact, the Landgrave's sudden death had luckily placed Mayer Amschel in charge of the largest fortune in Europe.
No Joke: This Law Is Designed to Protect Vaccine Makers, Not Kids
Policy
No Joke: This Law Is Designed to Protect Vaccine Makers, Not Kids
The time for being fooled is over. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was not a public health victory. It was a legislative coup for vaccine manufacturers, granting them unprecedented legal immunity while leaving the injured with few avenues for justice.

It might be April Fools’ Day, but this law is no joke!
Since 1986, the public has been sold the idea that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) was a necessary safeguard — an essential measure to ensure a stable supply of life-saving vaccines.
But the reality is that it was not a public health victory; it was a legislative coup for vaccine manufacturers, granting them unprecedented legal immunity while leaving the injured with few avenues for justice.
The time for being fooled is over.
A law that protects industry over the injured
The 1986 Act was born out of mounting lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers, particularly over the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine.
In the early 1980s, parents of vaccine-injured children began successfully suing manufacturers, winning multi-million-dollar settlements.
Pharmaceutical companies, fearing further legal battles, threatened to withdraw from the vaccine market altogether.
But instead of enforcing stricter safety standards or demanding better oversight, Congress capitulated to industry pressure.
mRNA Vaccines Linked to Genetic Changes That Can Cause Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders
Toxic Exposures
mRNA Vaccines Linked to Genetic Changes That Can Cause Cancer, Autoimmune Disorders
A peer-reviewed study by 19 German researchers links the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to long-term changes in genetic structures that can provoke an inflammatory response, and lead to the onset of cancer and autoimmune disorders.

Listen to this article
A new peer-reviewed study links the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to long-term changes in genetic structures that can provoke an inflammatory response, and lead to the onset of cancer and autoimmune disorders.
The study by 19 German scientists was published last week in Molecular Systems Biology. The researchers said their findings may account for “post vaccination inflammatory diseases which occur in a small number of vaccinated individuals.”
Journalist Alex Berenson said the study shows that mRNA vaccines can alter human chromosomes in ways linked to leukemia and brain tumors. This occurs when the mRNA vaccines “train” immune cells to sustain a pro-inflammatory immune response.
According to epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, “This study adds to the large body of evidence describing potent immune dysregulating effects of mRNA injections.”
Hulscher said the study raises “serious concerns about long-term immune homeostasis and the potential for chronic inflammatory disease, autoimmune sequelae, and even oncogenic processes.”
Immunologist and biochemist Jessica Rose, Ph.D., said the study confirms what is already known about the risks of mRNA vaccines. She said:
“Repeat injection leads to a boatload of immunological modifications. This is not new information. We know that these kinds of changes can occur. It is not surprising to me that they found this.
“If the systemic reach goes far enough, such as to stem cells, then repeated injection could potentially induce epigenetic changes in these cells, especially since hematopoietic stem cells are known to develop innate immune memory in response to certain stimuli like infections or other vaccines.”
Epigenetics refers to how human behavior and the environment can cause changes that affect how genes work. According to Berenson, the changes caused by the mRNA COVID-19 shots are epigenetic, as “they occur around DNA’s core and activate genes in ways that can promote tumor growth.”
“The risk here is, of course, prolonged and excessive inflammation, which might contribute to tissue damage or chronic inflammatory conditions in some contexts, which we do see in pharmacovigilance data,” Rose said.
Foreign biological matter introduced into the blood through natural wounds and artificial wounds.
Thank you for reading and sharing Bailiwick News by email and social media. To support Bailiwick with a paid subscription: Marc Girardot posed a question about Sasha Latypova’s views. Sasha wrote, in her MAHA bravely fights Big Soda post:
Girardot commented:
My reply: I can’t speak for Sasha. I didn’t know what bolus theory was until I did a search on it just now. I don’t think the introduction of biological agents and toxic chemicals into the bloodstream through vaccination is accidental or inadvertent. |
Tragedy and Hope 101 The Illusion of Justice, Freedom, and Democracy Joseph Plummer: CHAPTER 8 False and Designing Men
Tragedy and Hope 101 The Illusion of Justice, Freedom, and Democracy Joseph Plummer: CHAPTER 8 False and Designing Men
CHAPTER 8
False
and Designing Men
In the previous chapter, we touched on one of the more devious ways that leaders can manipulate the public: they can choose to implement a dual policy (that is, a policy of publicly pretending to honor the will of the people, while simultaneously doing everything possible to evade it). By any reasonable measure, dual policies constitute an egregious betrayal of democratic principles and public trust. They also reveal the deeply dishonest nature of the ruling class. However, dual policies are not the most effective or the most immoral way to manipulate the public. For that, we must turn to the false-flag operation.
The term “false flag” usually describes a deadly or immoral act that is planned and carried out by one group but is made to appear as if it was planned and carried out by another. Adolf Hitler’s Operation Himmler provides a good example. It consisted of a series of false-flag operations, each designed to create the appearance of Polish aggression against Germany. One way the Nazis achieved this was by taking prisoners from concentration camps, dressing them in German uniforms, and then killing them on the Polish frontier.1 These “dead Germans” were later used by Hitler as a justification for attacking Poland in 1939.
While false flags are commonly used as a pretext for war, they can also be used by leaders to justify silencing dissent, suspending civil liberties, and seizing additional power. Again, we can turn to Adolf Hitler for an example. Prior to the German election of March 5, 1933, the Nazi Party had done all it could to weaken and disrupt opposing political parties, but despite their best efforts, it appeared
1 Tragedy and Hope, page 657
as if the Nazis would still face stiff competition at the polls. Here, Quigley describes how they dealt with this problem:
What was the Great American Republican Experiment?
The Bait and Switch History of Fraud
When the People decide to embark on an extremely important journey to independence it is wise to inquire as to whether a roadmap already exists, rather than to boldly and unwisely venture out into the unknown and thus engage the potentially self-defeating acts of trial and error if they're at all avoidable. Fortunately, when we search for a roadmap we find but only one: We discover that we're actually "reviving" and perhaps enlarging upon the largest undertaking of its kind in the history of Mankind that already occurred in 1774, historically known as The Great American Republican Experiment. There is no other known model of independent Republican Government from which to compare, before or since.
What was the Great American Republican Experiment?
The great experiment was to create a government that was truly in the hands of the People, not the King or his Representatives, that would provide peace and harmony for the People and for the Earth itself. More definitive is the Magnificent Supreme Republican Statute of Rome: OF the People, BY the People, FOR the People, TO the People, FROM the People of the Natural Family Mother, guided and governed only by the Devine Providence over all Worldly Men!
It is important to point out that the Natural Republican State is completely defined and contained in one single statute; and you will find the underlined referenced in the dedication of the July 4, 1776 Unanimous Declaration of These United American Colonies.
In order for all the People to fully understand the highly significant elements of this Great American Republican Experiment, they must first be aware of the application of the original Latin in which over one third of the text of the original Colonial Declarations of candid Republican government were written. It is a well-known principle of law that the exact determination of a lawful or legal document is dependent upon a precise uniform knowledge of the law of grammar in which the document is written at the time it was prepared by its framing Deputies; otherwise known as “functional literacy” preservation.
To prove a very important point here, perhaps a very embarrassing one, at the turn of the 20th Century in America, a very simple qualifying literacy question was asked the prospective Voter as follows: Sir (or Madam) how many main grammar usages make up the entire English Vocabulary?
How many folks out there today, whom you know, could readily answer that simple, but very important literacy question; much less even understand the question?
You can think about the correct answer while we proceed on.
America’s Legacy of Recklessness and Covert Biological Crimes
America’s Legacy of Recklessness and Covert Biological Crimes

The United States’ decades-long pursuit of biological weapons has remained shrouded in secrecy, deception, and scientific recklessness.
While publicly condemning biowarfare as a threat to global security, the government has simultaneously engineered microbes to be deadlier, more infectious, and capable of insidious long-term damage. This hidden legacy stretches from the covert biological experiments of World War II to Cold War-era human testing and, most disturbingly, to modern genetic manipulations that raise urgent ethical and existential questions. The shocking truth is that biological warfare is not merely a relic of the past. It continues today under the guise of biodefense and pandemic preparedness. Whether in the dark corridors of Fort Detrick, in secretive overseas laboratories, or within controversial gain-of-function studies, the pursuit of enhanced pathogens has placed humanity on the precipice of disaster. The question is not whether a catastrophic outbreak will occur—it is only a matter of when.
The chilling reality is that the very institutions meant to protect public health have blurred the line between defense and offense. Military applications targeting whatever enemy is the flavor of the day are prioritized over ethical responsibility. From the intentional exposure of soldiers and civilians to deadly pathogens in secret experiments to the development of viruses that could be deployed as weapons of geopolitical strategy, America’s bioweapons research has demonstrated a terrifying disregard for the sanctity of human life. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exposed these risks. Questions are revived about laboratory origins, immune suppression, and the potential consequences of unchecked biological experimentation. If history has taught us anything, it is that pathogens, once released, whether by accident or design, cannot be controlled. They evolve, spread and ultimately return to haunt those who created them. The dangers posed by this ongoing research are not hypothetical. They are real, they are imminent, and they demand immediate scrutiny before the next catastrophe unfolds.
You Wouldn't Want to Be Him on That Dreadful Day
You Wouldn't Want to Be Him on That Dreadful Day
“Perhaps history is teaching us that today’s popular leaders like Donald Trump and Marine Le Pen are not the people’s last chance. They are the globalist’s last chance.” — Kurt Schlichter
Do you see the pattern? Populist party leaders all over Western Civ getting undone by the law courts — Călin Georgescu in Romania, election cancelled; Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, de-railed by President Lula’s stooge judges (with CIA help); Prime Minister Robert Fico of Slovakia shot-up with five bullets in May last year (survived miraculously); the Alternative-for-Deutschland Party de-platformed by the Scholz-Merz ruling junta; then, this week, Marine Le Pen, leading candidate (by far) for President of France, defenestrated on Mickey Mouse charges in the Paris court. And, of course, since 2015, Mr. Trump, hounded relentlessly, but not yet overthrown, due to sheer pluck and testosterone (the official hated hormone of the Left).
International lawfare is about the last remaining tool in the “Globalist” kit-bag for “color revolution,” which means regime change by
underhanded means, election interference being the favorite device. The
poster child, of course, was the US CIA / DOD State Department regime
change operation in Ukraine, 2014, that ousted Russian-leaning elected
President Viktor Yanukovych, eventually leading to the installation of
coke-head Volodymyr Zelensky, and ultimately to the Ukraine War that has
killed over a million people. These days, astroturf (i.e., fake) street
revolution (e.g., Maidan in Kiev 2014) is out; lawfare is in.
The Geography of Nowhe...
James Howard Kunstler
Best Price: $1.17
Buy New $11.88
(as of 10:41 UTC - Details)
By Globalist, let’s just say the broad alliance of the EU, the European Central Bank & friends, the WEF-and-cronies in the global corporatocracy, the US Democratic Party, billionaires such as George Soros and Reid Hoffman, and sundry residual mass-formation world-savors of the crypto-communist-green-bullshit persuasion.