This post is for Bailiwick readers who also read and listen to Sasha Latypova's work and Jonathan Couey's work. Last week, Sasha Latypova emailed to let me know that Jonathan Couey had been discussing my work on his Gigaohm Biological video podcast, stating that Latypova misrepresents my legal research in her public interviews and writing. I found an email address for Couey in a group message on which we were both recipients, and — based on Latypova’s summary of Couey’s statements — contacted him to clarify that Latypova accurately presents my legal research through her own work, and request that he stop making claims that she misrepresents my work. The email exchange is below. I had not had any email exchanges or conversations with Couey before Feb. 21, I'm not on any social media other than SubStack, and I haven't had further communication with him since I sent my reply on Feb. 22. Today I listened to Couey's Feb. 21, 2024 podcast to hear what he said about my work and about the relationship between my work and Latypova's work. From listening to the podcast, it's clear to me that Couey is not familiar with Latypova's body of work in much detail. Couey acknowledged, in the video and in the email thread posted below, that he is not familiar with my body of work in much detail, including my framing of treason as the foundational crime underpinning the whole-of-government criminal conspiracy, through acts of treason committed by members of Congress, US presidents, Cabinet secretaries and their legal delegates. Since January 2022, I've worked to assemble an evidence collection documenting changes in statutory, regulatory and other US law — since the 1944 enactment of the Public Health Service Act and establishment of programs covering biological products, communicable disease control, quarantine and inspections; 1969 enactment of the Chemical and Biological Warfare program; 1983 establishment of the public health emergencies program; 1986 establishment of the National Vaccine Program and Vaccine Injury Compensation Program; 1997 establishment of the "expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics" program; 2002 establishment of the National All-Hazards Preparedness and Response Planning, Coordinating, and Reporting program; 2004 establishment of the Emergency Use Authorization program; 2005 establishment of the "targeted liability protections for pandemic and epidemic products and security countermeasures" and Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (PREP Act liability preemption); 2016 establishment of the "real world evidence" program; 2017 establishment of the "expedited development and review of medical products for emergency uses" program and many more authorization and funding acts — as the legal foundations for the intentional government-directed sterilizing, sickening and killing programs these acts authorize and fund, which have become more visible through the Covid-19 events that emerged into public view in January 2020. The essential components of the kill box law evidence collection are public documents available in complete, unredacted and accurate form. The evidentiary package includes dozens of Congressional acts with dated roll call votes and dated presidential signatures; dozens of dated executive orders with presidential signatures; and hundreds of dated regulatory amendments promulgated through Federal Register notices signed by Cabinet secretaries and their delegates. The basic kill box law evidence (statutes, executive orders and regulations) is supported by corroborating evidence in the form of contracts (often heavily redacted), treaties and treaty-negotiation documents, and other evidence collections. As far as my understanding of Couey's work, I watched a few of Couey's video podcasts in late 2022. I watch very few videos. I prefer to research using documents because documents can be skimmed, stored and searched using keywords in a way that videos can't, unless an accurate transcript is available, and also because dated, signed documents are, in my view, a better form of evidence for building legal cases and drafting legal memos, civil complaints and criminal presentments. In November 2022, I was specifically interested in Couey's discussion of Ralph Baric's work at the University of North Carolina and purified "infectious clones" as a possible vector for causing self-limiting local outbreaks of symptomatic disease or detoxification responses that could — through coordinated use of mass testing protocols rigged to produce overwhelmingly false-positive results logged on “dashboards” and interpreted for the public by government officials — be falsely attributed to pathogens with potential to cause deadly global pandemics, in order to drive public fear and thus drive public submission to military biochemical weapons falsely labeled as "Covid-19 vaccines." I was interested in Couey's hypotheses because I regarded them as a set of biologically and epidemiologically plausible mechanisms to explain events as experienced by populations at the individual, community and regional levels. I was also interested in Couey's hypotheses because of how Robert Malone reacted to them and how Malone presented information about immune dysregulation, "immune imprinting," "original antigenic sin," and "defective interfering particles." Those topics are important because, in my view, the primary target for the biological and chemical weapons known as 'vaccines' within each recipient's body is the immune system. ‘Vaccine’ weapons as a class are intentionally designed to be immuno-toxic, using techniques developed through decades of immunotoxicology research. Watt-Couey email exchange Katherine Watt email to Jonathan Couey, Feb. 21, 2024, 3:48 p.m. Eastern
Jonathan Couey email to Katherine Watt, Feb. 21, 2024. 6:07 p.m. Eastern
Katherine Watt email to Jonathan Couey, Feb. 22, 2024, 9:34 a.m.
Related Bailiwick reporting and analysis:
All content is free to all readers. All support — reading, sharing and financial — is deeply appreciated.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment