Sunday, December 18, 2022
3921-3922: Misunderstanding Everything About "State National" and States? from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
We have another would-be guru, getting some of it right, some of it wrong:
Mostly,
this woman doesn't recognize the difference between a "state" described
in 8 USC Chapter 12, Section 1101 in Federal Code, which applies to
their foreign "state nationals" (1101 (a) 21) versus one of our States
of the Union and our "State Nationals".
She's
right to blow an alarm about David Straight, whose process only helps
people who are legitimately Federal Citizens or "citizens of the United
States"---people who want to stay attached to the federal teats for some
reason of their own, while at the same time, reclaiming their
constitutional Guarantees.
There
is nothing wrong with that so far as it goes. Americans who happen to
work for one of the Federal Corporations should not be left without
their constitutional protections--- but in the same token, David
Straight's process doesn't go all the way home.
It
leaves you paying one of the two Pipers, when, if you are an American
not employed by a federal corporation, you have no reason to pay either
one.
People
need to be aware of their choices when they choose a political status
and David is failing to fully disclose the fact that his process leaves
one still attached to one or the other of the federal corporations---
and therefore, still subject to the corporate citizenry's limitations
and debts. If that is voluntary and knowing, great. If not, not so
much.
Let
me repeat this again --- we have three populations in this country, one
that is the General Public and population of this country, people who
live in States of the Union, and two other populations that are foreign
corporation employees and dependents of Federal Government
Subcontractors--- the so-called "federal citizenry" who both "reside" in
our States of the Union under the Residence Act.
Within
the terms of their federal government, they have "states" like
American Samoa, which are "states" within their system, and Possessions
-- not States -- within ours.
I
don't recommend listening to this video, because all she does is
further confuse everyone and everything some more, but for an example of
what Junior Woodchuck Experts do to hamper Progress, this video is a
classic.
If
you went according to her view, the Americans who do work for the
Federal Subcontractors would continue to go without the protections of
the Constitution, and the Americans who don't work for the Federal
Subcontractors would also be left unprotected and undeclared, and
therefore "fair game" for either foreign corporation to mess with.
She's
right that not voting in their elections means that we have no voice in
their elections --- but if we are not shareholders in their
corporations we have neither any right nor any reason to vote in their
corporation elections, do we?
Think
about it. These Federal Corporations are just like GM or IBM or
McDonald's Corporation. I don't own stock in those corporations. What
business would I have attending one of their stockholder elections and
(a) either giving my proxy to someone to vote "for" me, or (b) vote in
one of their stockholder elections myself?
None.
Their
internal workings don't concern me. I am not part of their bankrupt
corporation and I don't want to inherit its debts as part of their
"public", that is, their citizenry, either.
One
of the foreign Federal Subcontractor corporations, the British Crown
variety, makes it illegal for Municipal Subcontractors to vote in their
elections, the other Federal Municipal Subcontractor wants everyone to
vote in their elections, because that means they can spread their debts
out among more shareholders and latch onto more private property.
And
realistically, as both Federal Subcontractors are perennially bankrupt
or going bankrupt to offload their debts on the unsuspecting American
Public, why would anyone want to be a shareholder?
Do
you realize that political parties didn't exist in this country before
the Civil War? Our American Government doesn't have or allow formal
political parties. If you and your pals want to organize for or against a
specific law or action, you are welcome to do so, but there is no such
thing as a political party in the American Government.
No Democrats. No Republicans. No billion dollar elections to rig.
This
woman, in the video referenced above, offers a thousand dollar reward
to anyone who proves that her premise that we are "American children" is
wrong.
I
don't know where to collect.... but if she looks into the United States
Statutes-at-Large or the manuals governing the Government Printing
Office, she will quickly discover that we, Americans, acquire our
"nationality" from our separate and Several States, not from "America".
That
is, we are properly called and legally recognized as "Texans" or
"Wisconsinites" or "Virginians", etc., not as "Americans" which is a
more general term that can apply to anyone born in this Hemisphere.
Thus,
our version of "State National" means that you are part of the natural
population of one of the sovereign States of the Union.
The
federal version of "state national" means that you owe a permanent
allegiance to a foreign and unspecified "state", like Puerto Rico, which
is a member of the British Commonwealth and a United States Possession
at the same time.
And
while we are on the topic, "permanent allegiance" like "allegiance to
the flag" or "allegiance to the King" is a totally foreign practice
that derives from feudal serfdom, and results in adopting foreign
citizenship obligations, too.
Again,
this woman gets some of it right. Her Shinola Sensors are on, and
that's encouraging. We shouldn't be swearing (period) and we shouldn't
be offering our allegiance to anyone or anything but our Creator. She's
right about that.
Our
allegiance has to be to a Higher Calling than acting as servants or
slaves to an inanimate thing like a flag or even to the fallen Federal
Republic that that particular flag "stands for",
Our
American Government exists to serve us. We do not exist to serve it,
though some of us, for a period of time, freely choose to serve as
government officers or officials for the common good of our country or
the good of our individual States of the Union.
Ours
is a far different kind of "Citizenship" than that foisted on British
Citizens or citizens of the Municipality of Washington, DC -- that is,
different from "federal citizenship" of either kind.
Our
American version of "Citizenship" is entirely voluntary. It begins
when we enter an Office to serve our Public, and it ends when we retire
or de-commission from that Office. It is certainly not attached to a
British Territorial Title IV Flag, and by the way, that Title IV Flag is
not the flag that flew as the Star-Spangled Banner over Fort McHenry.
I have just today written
down the entire fraud and differing law (European) surrounding the
Christian Name, the Surname, and what the two federal corporations do to
interpret these names as property claims entered in behalf of Christ
and alternatively, in behalf of the British Monarch.
Under
their foreign laws and codes, the Pope claims the Christian Name (John
Allen, Mary Jo, Patrick John, etc.) and the British Monarch claims the
Surname (Sir-name) (Steinbeck, Kopeckny, Swayze), but under American
Public Law, the State assumes no public interest in either name.
For
Americans acting as Americans and freely adopting their birthright
political status, and claiming their "reversionary trust rights" ---
the State assumes no ownership of their name or other private property
whatsoever and imposes no hereditary citizenship obligation and no
inherited debt.
And
that is part of what is glorious about America and what sets Americans
free from the treadmill of serving endless public debt for the benefit
of Popes and Princes--- or glutting members of a foreign corporation's
version of "Congress".
As
you thread your way through the mazes created to entrap you, by all
means do your Due Diligence. Learn. Grow. Use your brain, your eyes,
and your common sense. Become a power for all that is Good, because
there is more than enough power and pelf that gets siphoned off and used
for Evil.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
3 comments:
About "Your" Name -- Again
By Anna Von Reitz
Let me give you an atypical example, my own, so that you can better appreciate the situation.
In
1855, in international court, my Great-Grandfather entered -- as a
trademark -- our present family Public Name: Riezinger. He created it
out of thin air.
Unlike
copyrights and other forms of Public Claims, trademarks continue in
effect as long as they are in use and they apply worldwide.
By
creating what appears to be a new "Surname" for his family as an
international trademark, my ancestor created a Public Name for himself
and his progeny that does not belong to any government.
Although
it resembles German surnames, "Riezinger" was created to be our
private property, held within our family as a possession and birthright,
much as you might inherit any other piece of property, say a chest of
drawers, and use it from childhood onward.
This
does not reflect, however, the terms under which most people inherit a
surname. Most people in the British Dominions inherit a surname
(sir-name) as a citizenship obligation.
This
is why they go around calling everyone by titles -- "Mister", "Sir",
"Madam" and "Missus" and so on. A title implies an office and an office
implies a public duty or, as it may be expressed, a public debt.
Your Christian Name, for example, "Anna Maria'', is yours by contract. Yeshuah paid for that under Roman Law.
The
"Sur-name", aka, Family Name, however, belongs to the British
Monarch--- that is, if it is a surname at all, and not a privately held
international trademark.
Under
British Law, the use of such a Surname/Family Name obligates you to
perform as a British Citizen and accept your share of the pagan public
debt.
So
when they trafficked all of us Americans into their foreign
jurisdiction and misidentified us all as British Territorial Citizens,
they foisted their public debts off onto each and every one of us.
That
was the whole point of the name game exercise -- enlisting us to pay
their debts and serve as new collateral for them to borrow against.
Unless
you hold what appears to be your "Family Name" as a private
international trademark, or don't use a surname, the King claims to own
you and to own your land and your (formerly) private property as a
British Citizen-- an indentured servant of His Royal Majesty with an
indefinite term of service.
So
where does the Pope come into all of this? He pays the bond for the
Christian Name, so that you can't be held responsible for pagan Public
Debt --- so long as you don't use a Surname, or do what my ancestor did,
and create a new name and use it as a private international
trademark.
This situation has been caused by the necessity of paying the debts of dead men, especially war reparations.
Use
me as an example again --- I was born fourteen years after the end of
the Second World War. There's no way that I am in any way responsible
for that great conflagration or for paying for all the cost of
rebuilding afterward. But my Father and Mother could be debtors
responsible for it, and in theory, I could be held responsible for their
unpaid portion of that debt.
What's
supposed to happen in America is that the debts of dead men are to be
written off ---with corporations and businesses taking the losses, but
they objected: "Alexander Lamont Smythe" may have died in 1981, but he
still owes war reparations from WWII, and a phone bill, and as far as
they are concerned, his family is responsible for paying it.
The
King passes on this "Public Debt" via the Family Name, Smythe.
Whatever the Public Debt might be, you get your part of it by virtue of
using "his" sir-name, Smythe. All the family members of the name
"Smythe" are responsible for all the debts of everyone who ever lived
named "Smythe".
You
can now see how everyone became hopelessly indebted and why politicians
go on recklessly spending money "to be owed by" future generations.
You
can also now see how and why "Anna Maria" is held harmless by the Pope,
but "Anna Maria Riezinger" is held accountable by the British
King, unless I object and bring forward the fact that I am using a
private international trademark, not a sir-name, and, additionally, I am
an American standing on land that is outside their system of things.
In which case, both the Pope and his Overseer, the British Monarch, lose a customer.
Hopefully,
you will also understand why Americans aren't naturally part of this
system at all, and also why people like me, who use an international
trademark instead of a sir-name, escape the scheme, as do those who sign
with only their Christian Name.
This
latter option is the equivalent of saying, "Mia culpa! I, John Allen,
am a Sinner and a Debtor!" and letting "Christ" -- or at least, the man
claiming to be his Vicar, pay the price.
This
venerable "system" in play since the days of the Roman Empire is now
falling apart, along with the fantasies that created it.
The
British Crown represents the "debt collection side" of the ledger,
while the Vatican represents the "credit side" of the ledger, and it
doesn't much matter to the Pope which side of the ledger turns up,
because he owns both. For him, it's just a matter of applying a
credit for a Christian or collecting a debt from a pagan, and in either
case, his black-robed minions do it for him, as they have done since the
Second Century BCE.
The
credits and debts are all theoretical anyway, so it's a Double
Nothing-burger for the Pope, and a game for his bill collectors, even
though it has consequences for the unwitting victims, in terms of
fines, fees, time in jail, property seizures, and other ills.
Meanwhile,
back here in reality, the sense in which "Joshua died for our sins,"
has nothing to do with Mammon, but everything to do with our common
gullibility, hard-heartedness, sheep-like tendencies, laziness, apathy,
fear, greed, and shirking of responsibility.
These
are the things we have to overcome in order to have no debt, and a
clear-eyed solution to public spending and public debt is what we need
in our American paradigm.
The
most obvious way to end this antiquated evil is to use public
investments to pay for ongoing public expenses, to recognize surnames
as intellectual property belonging to individual living people, and to
make actual corporations pay their fare share.
We,
Americans, can withdraw from the foreign maze of interlocking trusts
and foreign British Territorial and Municipal "persons" used as dummy
corporations, simply by observing that American Lawful Persons are not
obligated to any unconscionable implied social contract. We don't
recognize any UCC Contract Trust and we don't voluntarily adopt any
Territorial Office or Citizenship.
As
more and more of us say this, write this, and stand there four-square
looking the Perpetrators of this Great Fraud in the eye and refusing to
accept debts owed by Legal Fictions merely named after us, the sooner
the Perpetrators recognize the necessity of ending their profiteering
scheme and adopting an honest way to pay honest debts.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment