Scientists Call For Safety Testing of Aluminum Based Vaccine Adjuvants
By
Arjun Walia
Arjun Walia
In Brief
- The Facts:A new paper recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology calls into question the safety of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines.
- Reflect On:Why have there been no studies by regulatory agencies in conjunction with independent scientists to see where vaccine ingredients travel to in the body after the are injected? Why no appropriate safety testing for the aluminum vaccine adjuvant?
What Happened: A group of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in
vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science.” In
their publication, they provide evidence for their position that “the
safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any
environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the
young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further
delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still
increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in
the USA.”
The publication goes on to address concerns it has with another paper that was published a year prior, emphasizing that the authors of that specific publication, JP Goullé & L Grangeot-Keros,
--> Help Support Collective Evolution: Become a member of CETV and get access to exclusive news and courses to help empower you to become an effective changemaker. Click here to join.
Described general knowledge on aluminum (Al) exposure, kinetics and toxicity but made very little effort to delineate the scientific questions specifically related to Al adjuvants in vaccines. Instead of representing the bulk of their review, the subject of Al adjuvants covered no more than one third of the 3 page-text. Numerous important papers on the topic were omitted, i.e. 20 years of scientific publications in clinical, post-mortem, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies published by independent research teams, worldwide experts in this topic, were simply omitted.
Why This Is Important: This
isn’t the only paper that raise concerns about the role of aluminum in
vaccines. Many people claim that the amount of aluminum we take in from
other sources is greater than the aluminum in vaccines, but fail to
realize that the aluminum we take into our body from vaccines may not
exit our body. Professor Christopher Shaw from the University of British
Columbia in Canada explains that injected aluminum doesn’t come into
the same methods of excretion as the aluminum we take in from food, for
example. When we inject aluminum, it stays in the body, it may cross the
blood brain barrier, enter into cells and various organs in the body.
When you inject aluminum, it goes into a different compartment of your body. It doesn’t come into that same mechanism of excretion. So, and of course it can’t because that’s the whole idea of aluminum adjuvants, aluminum adjuvants are meant to stick around and allow that antigen to be presented over and over and over again persistently, otherwise you wouldn’t put an adjuvant in in the first place. It can’t be inert, because if it were inert it couldn’t do the things it does. It can’t be excreted because again it couldn’t provide that prolonged exposure of the antigen to your immune system. – Dr. Christopher Shaw – Canadian neuroscientist and professor of ophthalmology at the University of British Columbia (source)
In 2018, shaw published a paper in the
Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry that found almost 100 percent of the
intramuscularly injected aluminum in mice as vaccine adjuvants was
absorbed into the systemic circulation and traveled to different sites
in the body such as the brain, the joints, and the spleen where it
accumulated and was retained for years post-vaccination. (source)
advertisement - learn more
A study published in BioMed Central (also cited in the study above) in 2013 found more cause for concern:
Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells. DLN ablation dramatically reduced the biodistribution. Cerebral translocation was not observed after direct intravenous injection, but significantly increased in mice with chronically altered blood-brain-barrier. Loss/gain-of-function experiments consistently implicated CCL2 in systemic diffusion of Al-Rho particles captured by monocyte-lineage cells and in their subsequent neurodelivery. Stereotactic particle injection pointed out brain retention as a factor of progressive particle accumulation…
The study went on to conclude
that “continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable
adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe.”
These authors followed up and published a study study in 2015 tah emphasized:
Evidence that aluminum-coated particles phagocytozed in the injected muscle and its draining lymph nodes can disseminate within phagocytes throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain further suggests that alum safety should be evaluated in the long term.
A paper published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism. That particular paper has now been downloaded more than 1 million times.
The particular paper cited above was published by Dr. Christopher Exley.
Exley was also one of the authors on the main paper cited at the beginning of this article. Here
is a very interesting interview with him if you’re interested. He’s
considered to be one of the world’s leading experts in aluminum
toxicology, if not the world’s leading expert. You can find out more
about his research and what he’s up to by visiting his Instagram page.
The point is, this topic is hot right
now, as it should be, and it seems that our federal health regulatory
agencies continue to ignore the concerns being made and the studies
being published. Below is an important clip from Dr. Larry Palevsky, a
board-certified Paediatrician currently practicing in New York talking
about aluminum and how it differs in adjuvant form.
The video is important because in the
90’s, Dr. Antonietta Gatti discovered the relationship between micro-
and nano-particles as well as a great number of pathologies:
cardiovascular diseases, many forms of cancer, multiple neurological
diseases, and autoimmune diseases. She’s taken part in many
international research projects, including the pathologies induced by
depleted uranium, waste incineration, food polluted with inorganic
particles, and more.
She is also a selected expert of the
FAO/WHO for the safety in nanotechnological food, and a Member of the
NANOTOX Cluster of the European Commission and the author of a book
titled “Nanopathology: the health impact of nanoparticles,” and on the
Editorial Board of Journal of Biomaterials Applications and a member of
the CPCM of the Italian Ministry of Defense.
Furthermore, her and her husband Dr.
Stefano Montanari founded a laboratory called Nano-diagnostics for the
evaluation of the pathological tissues of patients, it’s presently at
the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
A few years ago the Italian police
raided their home, the police took all digital assets that were owned
by the the two nanopathologists, including laptops, computers, and
flash-drives, basically years of work and research.
James Grundvig via Children’s Health Defense describes what happened:Because Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and nanoparticles, from in-vivo (performed in a living organism) and in-vitro (performed in a test tube) to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.
The scientists published their work in January of 2017, titled, New Quality‐Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro‐ and Nanocontamination.
If science wasn’t plagued by corruption, an investigation should have
started, healthcare agencies would have become involved and vaccine
safety policies would have come under intense scrutiny, but that never
happened.
More Important Notes:
Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator of
Initiative For Vaccine Research at the World Health Organization,
brought up the topic of vaccine adjuvants like aluminum at a WHO
conference. In certain vaccines, without these adjuvants the vaccine
simply doesn’t work. Dr. Friede mentioned that there are clinical
studies that blame adjuvants for adverse events seen as a result of
administering vaccines, and how people in general often blame adverse
reactions to vaccines being the result of the vaccine adjuvant. He
mentioned aluminum specifically.
He showed concern given the fact that “without adjuvants, we are not going to have the next generation of vaccines.”
He also stated that:
When we add an adjuvant, it’s because it is essential. We do not add adjuvants to vaccines because we want to do so, but when we add them it adds to the complexity. And I give courses every year on ‘how do you develop vaccines’ and ‘how do you make vaccines’ and the first lesson is, while you are making your vaccine, if you can avoid using an adjuvant, please do so. Lesson two is, if you’re going to use an adjuvant, use one that has a history of safety, and lesson three is, if you’re not going to do that, think very carefully.
You can read more about that conference and find a link to it here.
So, does the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines have a “history of safety?”
According to a study published as far back as 2011 in Current Medical Chemistry
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. (source)
The Takeaway: When it
comes to vaccine safety, why does mainstream media constantly point
fingers and call those who have concerns “anti-vax conspiracy
theorists?” Why don’t they ever address the science and concerns being
raised that paint vaccines in a light that they’ve never been painted
in? What’s going on here? Why are the safety concerns addressed by many
scientists and doctors always ignored and never addressed/countered?
Would more rigorous safety testing of our vaccines not be in the best
interests of everybody? Who would ever oppose that and why?
Become Part of CE's Inner Circle
Stream content 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, documentaries and guided programs.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and help conscious media thrive!
No comments:
Post a Comment