Physicians For Informed Consent Say Infection Fatality Rate of COVID-19 Is 0.26 Percent
By
Arjun Walia
Arjun Walia
In Brief
- The Facts:The Physicians For Informed Consent (PIC) recently published a report titled "Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu Periods." According to them, the infection/fatality rate of COVID-19 is 0.26%.
- Reflect On:Is
the new coronavirus as dangerous as it's being made out to be, or does
it compare to other
severe respiratory viruses? Is what we've gone through with regards to lockdown measures and mask really about the virus, or something else?
What Happened: The Physicians For Informed Consent
(PIC) recently published a report titled “Physicians for Informed
Consent (PIC) Compares COVID-19 to Previous Seasonal and Pandemic Flu
Periods.” In their article, they stated the following:
The public has been made aware of the number of COVID-19 deaths and reported cases that have occurred since the beginning of the current pandemic; however, the number of unreported cases has not been widely known or publicized. Recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that more than one-third of SARS-CoV-2 (the coronavirus that can lead to COVID-19) infections are asymptomatic, meaning that initial estimations of its severity were grossly overestimated. Now, for the first time, Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) has collated data from U.S. antibody studies and produced an educational document outlining how an accurate case-fatality rate (CFR) requires antibody studies in order to guide and measure medical care and public health policies.-->FREE Documentary: Discover the latest breakthroughs in alternative treatmennts that are scientifically proven to successfully prevent and treat cancer. Click here to save your spot!Similar to CDC estimations, PIC’s analysis results in a COVID-19 CFR of 0.26%, which is comparable to the CFRs of previous seasonal and pandemic flu periods. “Knowing the CFR of COVID-19 allows for an objective standard by which to compare both non-pharmaceutical interventions and medical countermeasures,” said Dr. Shira Miller, PIC’s founder and president. “For example, safety studies of any potential COVID-19 vaccine should be able to prove whether or not the risks of the vaccine are less than the risks of the infection.“Regardless of proof of safety, however, a potential COVID-19 vaccine should only be voluntary, in order to safeguard a patient’s human right to determine what will happen with his or her body,” said Dr. Miller.
You can view the PIC’s educational document assessing COVID-19 severity and how they came to their conclusion, here. Obviously the data is always delayed and things are constantly changing with regards to COVID-19 numbers.
Who are the PIC? They are a group of
doctors and academics from around the world who have come together to
support informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures.
Their information is based on science. Their mission is to deliver data
on infectious diseases and vaccines, and to unite doctors, scientists,
healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary
vaccinations. Their vision is that doctors and the public are able to
evaluate the data on infectious diseases and vaccines objectively and
voluntarily engage in informed decision-making about vaccination.
advertisement - learn more
They are not the only ones in the
‘academic world’ who make the point that COVID-19 perceptions of danger
and numbers are unsubstantiated. For example, John P. A. Ioannidis, a
professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University has said
that the infection fatality rate is close to 0 percent for people under
the age of 45 years old, explaining how that number rises significantly
for people who are older, as with most other respiratory viruses. You
can read more about that and access that here.
In fact, not long ago a study published by several academics from the
Stanford School of Medicine suggests that COVID-19 has a similar
infection fatality rate as seasonal influenza, you can read more about
that and access the study here.
The mainstream media has also addressed the low case fatality rate, warning the public not to be compliant.
Why This Is Important
This is important because the data
validates what many doctors have been emphasizing from the beginning of
the lockdown, that the new coronavirus is being made out to be far more
dangerous than it actually is. This is the opinion of many, not a
consensus. As a result, many scientists were extremely confused, and
still are, at the measures that multiple governments have taken. For
example, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of
the most cited research scientists in German history, was one of them. (source) There seem to be dozens upon dozens of doctors and scientists raising the same ideas.
Doctors and scientists of such a
prestigious background with decades of experience in the field have been
censored and silenced by multiple social media platform for sharing
their opinion and research, simply because it opposes the narrative
that’s being put out by organizations like the World Health Organization
(WHO) and the United Nations, for example. YouTube has flat out said that it’s censoring any information that contradicts the WHO.
It’s understandable why so many people
are confused. On one hand you have mainstream media outlets reporting an
overwhelming amount of dead bodies that have to be carted away in
freezer trucks, and on the other hand you have a number of scientists
and doctors letting people know that we are dealing something that we’ve
been dealing with for decades, just another non-severe respiratory
virus. Complimenting that is “fact checkers” that are going around
blindly upholding the government and health agency narrative. In
reality, they are censoring different perspectives, not fact checking.
Other factors are also confusing, like the fact that deaths are being attributed to Covid that are not a result of it.
Did you know that metapneumovirus has
been shown to have worldwide circulation with nearly universal infection
by age 5? We are talking billions of people. Did you know that
outbreaks of metapneumovirus have been well documented every single
year, especially in long term care facilities with mortality rates of up
to 50%? (source)
Did you know that human metapneumovirus infection results in a large
number of hospitalizations of children every single year? Did you know
nearly 1-2 million children every single year die of these types of
respiratory illnesses because they lead to acute respiratory illness?
Imagine if the infection rates and death numbers were constantly
tracked, and put on an easy to access website, mainstream media, radio
etc… Imagine if the other coronaviruses and respiratory illnesses that
are more severe in some cases, and arguably more infectious in some
cases were subjected to constant monitoring and beamed out to the
population every single minute, could you imagine the fear and hysteria?
Are fear and hysteria being used as a marketing tool for a vaccine?
What about Edward Snowden’s thoughts about the under-discussed consequences of the coronavirus pandemic and how it’s being used to take away more human rights?
Here’s a recent Instagram post I came across from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. It makes you wonder, doesn’t it?
The Takeaway
Right now, and we seem to see the same
thing with other major global events, there seems to be a great divide
amongst the population with regards to what is going on. How dangerous
is the virus is? Are receiving the correct information from not only our
federal, state, and provincial health authorities but the WHO as well?
This divide was further expressed by the
collective reaction to lockdown and other mandated measures that have
been put in place. There are simply a growing number of people who do
not agree with the actions governments have taken to combat Covid, and
many of them are doctors, scientists, and people who have some sort of
expertise in this area.
The point is, we are not obligated to
listen to our government. Although it seems that way sometimes, “obey or
be punished”, the ultimate power lies with the people. We as a
collective choose what direction we go, and right now many of us are
simply choosing to follow, obey, not question, and be wary of the ones
who are asking questions. This is OK, this path is not wrong, but how
does it feel to simply follow narratives that you don’t know are true?
Why are so many others questioning and backing up their conclusions with
facts? What world is created out of blind acceptance of anything?
Furthermore, the emergence of a digital
“fact-checker” going around the internet that’s censoring the opinions
and research of some experts in the field simply serves as a catalyst
for many to also question what is going on here. The fact checks, in
many cases, become so ridiculous that people are now realizing that the
information that is fact checked is often the information to reflect on.
One thing is for certain, the
coronavirus has served as a great catalyst for more people to start
questioning what they’re told, and to seek out information for
themselves. For quite a long time, we haven’t really been thinking for
ourselves, instead we’ve let “the corporation” do that for us. This is
why we are seeing the emergence of so much information that continues to
contradict what we are being told.
We have so much potential as a human
race, and to come closer to accessing that potential, a great step would
begin asking deeper and better questions about what we’re told. We can
do this by gathering different perspectives as opposed to s simply one
from mainstream media.
Reflect, is participating in our current
political process helping us thrive? Or are we simply giving our power
away to a system that is full of what we call corruption and that
doesn’t have our best interests at hand?
Our current system was created from a
level of consciousness that we as humans are evolving beyond. This is
why so many are feeling a desire to look for new ideas and ways of
seeing things, because our current ways no longer resonate with our
being, we are simply doing them out of. habit and unconsciousness.
In order to create a new system, you
can’t do it from the same level of consciousness we are at now or else
we will only create more of the same thing. If we want change, might we
create it when we as individuals operate from a greater sense of
awareness and inclusiveness, a higher state of consciousness? Might we
create it from a place of peace, understanding, and non-judgement as
opposed to ego consciousness and polarity?
At the end of the day no matter what is happening, we are all united in our desire to see humanity thrive.
Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!
You can stream conscious media 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, and documentaries and guided programs.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media that you won't see anywhere else.
No comments:
Post a Comment