Dave Hodges, The Path to Genocide has Begun in California with Proposition 63 and SB 1235
The greatest threat to a person is not being drafted into a war. The
greatest danger to every human being on the planet is its own
government. For governments have murdered more people, by far, than any
war ever fought.
Most people are familiar with the term, genocide. The more accurate term in which genocide is a tool of control for a government is called democide, or death by government and the University of Hawaii has the best information on the topic.
As you read this article, please realize that the path to democide is always the same:
Three governmental regimes have even murdered more than 20,000,000, which in by and itself is substantially more than the war dead of World War II.
When one tries to make sense of these numbers, cognitive dissonance sets in. The numbers are too astronomical to comprehend and make sense out this phenomenon.
Everyone is familiar with the Holocaust. Yet, the Holocaust is not the best example of Democide. Even most scholars seem to be unaware of the total scope of the Nazis scope of executions. The total number murdered by Hitler, totals over 21 million people.
Aside from the Holocaust, even most academicians seem to be unaware that that there were even greater examples of democide than the Nazis.
It is particularly instructive to take a long look at the Soviet
Democide numbers. Again, from the Univdersity of Hawaii Democide
Project”
In summing up the Soviet Holocaust, it is important to look at the numbers and how people were executed by the Soviet regime.
Half of all Soviet citizens that died violent deaths between 1917 and 1987 were killed in what, today, we would call FEMA Camps (ie Gulags).
People sometimes ask me why I pay attention to the topic of “using food as a weapon”. It is because 10% of all violent deaths, mostly in Ukraine, came from planned starvation.
Terrorism accounted for 10% of all violent deaths. These deaths would include mass roundups and execution, or going house to house and murdering entire families.
These numbers pale in comparison to the 26% of all violent deaths accounted for by war. In other words, for Soviets who would prematurely die by violent means, 3 out of 4 would perish at the hands of their own government.
Before proceeding with the full scope of the implications to California’s move to grab guns by cutting off ammunition sales, we need to discuss the concept of the incrementalism. It can take different forms. It can be the boiling frog in the pot, or the implementation of a grand plan can happen so gradually, it is not noticed.
And there is another principle that must be brought out. In every genocide covered by the University of Hawaii Democide Project, everyone one of them was preceded by gun confiscated.
Now, I am ready to share the unmistakable conclusion to subject of implications.
In California, the State Legislature is attempting an end run around the 2nd Amendment. They are attempting their version of gun confiscation by going after the bullets. On July 1st, the laws take effect (Proposition 63 and SB 1235 ). I would compare it to the Nazi Enabling Act.
There are 10 bills in pending in the California State Legislature which would expand on the law to gun confiscation based upon a whim of one ruling elite. The add-on provision would allow people to petition a court to disarm a resident deemed to be “at risk. Merely based upon the word of a snitch, a tattletale, a person could have their gun taken. This is incrementalism and this is gun confiscation. It is disguised and not direct, but make no mistake about it, this will result in gun confiscation. California, New York, Illinois today, and the other 47 state tomorrow. If you want to know how genocides begin, you now have a front row seat to the opening act.
From CRPA.org
One final word, never, never, never give up your gun. History speaks, will you listen?
Most people are familiar with the term, genocide. The more accurate term in which genocide is a tool of control for a government is called democide, or death by government and the University of Hawaii has the best information on the topic.
As you read this article, please realize that the path to democide is always the same:
- Elimination of the 1st Amendment. This has been largely accomplished thanks to Google.
- Gun confiscation, either direct or incrementally.
- Open season on undesirables who are now defenseless to defend themselves because their guns are gone.
The Scope and Totality of Democide
Seven governmental regimes have murdered 10,000,000 or more people which surpasses the death toll of World War I.Three governmental regimes have even murdered more than 20,000,000, which in by and itself is substantially more than the war dead of World War II.
When one tries to make sense of these numbers, cognitive dissonance sets in. The numbers are too astronomical to comprehend and make sense out this phenomenon.
Everyone is familiar with the Holocaust. Yet, the Holocaust is not the best example of Democide. Even most scholars seem to be unaware of the total scope of the Nazis scope of executions. The total number murdered by Hitler, totals over 21 million people.
Aside from the Holocaust, even most academicians seem to be unaware that that there were even greater examples of democide than the Nazis.
Half of all Soviet citizens that died violent deaths between 1917 and 1987 were killed in what, today, we would call FEMA Camps (ie Gulags).
People sometimes ask me why I pay attention to the topic of “using food as a weapon”. It is because 10% of all violent deaths, mostly in Ukraine, came from planned starvation.
Terrorism accounted for 10% of all violent deaths. These deaths would include mass roundups and execution, or going house to house and murdering entire families.
These numbers pale in comparison to the 26% of all violent deaths accounted for by war. In other words, for Soviets who would prematurely die by violent means, 3 out of 4 would perish at the hands of their own government.
Implications
There is a reason that Thomas Jefferson put the 1st Amendment before the 2nd Amendment. Proper use of the 1st Amendment could prevent bloodshed. Now that the 1st Amendment is almost dead, thanks to Big Tech, it is time to work, in earnest on the 2nd Amendment and that is what the globalists and the Deep State are busy doing in places like California. .Before proceeding with the full scope of the implications to California’s move to grab guns by cutting off ammunition sales, we need to discuss the concept of the incrementalism. It can take different forms. It can be the boiling frog in the pot, or the implementation of a grand plan can happen so gradually, it is not noticed.
And there is another principle that must be brought out. In every genocide covered by the University of Hawaii Democide Project, everyone one of them was preceded by gun confiscated.
Now, I am ready to share the unmistakable conclusion to subject of implications.
In California, the State Legislature is attempting an end run around the 2nd Amendment. They are attempting their version of gun confiscation by going after the bullets. On July 1st, the laws take effect (Proposition 63 and SB 1235 ). I would compare it to the Nazi Enabling Act.
There are 10 bills in pending in the California State Legislature which would expand on the law to gun confiscation based upon a whim of one ruling elite. The add-on provision would allow people to petition a court to disarm a resident deemed to be “at risk. Merely based upon the word of a snitch, a tattletale, a person could have their gun taken. This is incrementalism and this is gun confiscation. It is disguised and not direct, but make no mistake about it, this will result in gun confiscation. California, New York, Illinois today, and the other 47 state tomorrow. If you want to know how genocides begin, you now have a front row seat to the opening act.
From CRPA.org
One final word, never, never, never give up your gun. History speaks, will you listen?
Please follow and like us:
No comments:
Post a Comment