Dr. Peter Gotzsche On Coronavirus: “A Pandemic Of Panic, More Than Anything Else”
In Brief
- The Facts:Respected Medical Researcher Peter Gotzsche is one of a growing number of health professionals that is calling out our authorities for the implementation of overly draconian measures in response to the Coronavirus.
- Reflect On:How can we participate in events like the Coronavirus pandemic in a way that empowers us individually and collectively?
Peter
Gotzsche, a Danish physician and medical researcher, is well placed to
comment on the
measures being imposed to combat the Coronavirus. And he
has his reasons to be suspicious of some of those measures.
In 1993, Gotzsche co-founded the
Cochrane Collaboration, an international and independent non-profit
organization that produces and disseminates systematic reviews of
healthcare interventions and diagnostic tests, and promotes the search
for evidence in the form of clinical trials and other interventional
studies. As I examined in-depth in a previous article ‘Bill Gates Donation Turns Respected Independent Research Company Into HPV Vaccine Supporter,’
a massive donation of over $1M USD from Bill Gates was part of the
transformation of Cochrane from an open and independent research company
to a top-down hierarchy in which ‘there is stronger and stronger
resistance to say anything that could bother pharmaceutical industry
interests.’
In an unprecedented move, Peter Gotzsche
was expelled from the Cochrane Collaboration in 2018 by a powerful
minority within the newly-instituted Governing Board. Gotzsche’s
outspoken and independent scrutiny of the pharmaceutical industry,
highlighted in his 2014 book Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime: How big pharma has corrupted healthcare, made
him an insufferable opponent to Cochrane’s new agenda. Suffice it to
say, when we hear Peter Gotzsche’s opinion on health-related issues,
they are sure to be direct, thoughtful, and unaffected by the prevailing
narratives.
Weighing In On The Coronavirus Pandemic
Gotzsche, a specialist in internal
medicine that has worked for two years at a department of infectious
diseases, is not shy about calling out the ‘Elephant in the Room’
regarding the Coronavirus pandemic, even as some of our governments and
medias organizations are treating it like the future of humanity is at
stake if draconian measures of the highest order are not instituted
across the board for the foreseeable future.
Gotzsche wrote in a recent blog post that he and most of those around him, both lay people and colleagues, ‘consider the Coronavirus pandemic a pandemic of panic,
more than anything else.’ He believes that fear and panic are
propagated by those with an agenda of control, not those who put the
health and safety of citizens first. He cautioned that if people with
mild symptoms are made to panic they are liable to flood the hospitals,
which does more harm than good.
I do find it very prudent that they told people to stay in their homes in South Korea if they fall ill, and only if they become very sick, will a car come and bring them to a hospital that is not overcrowded. If the infectious dose is high, mortality will also be higher because there will not be sufficient time to establish an immune response. Therefore, overcrowded hospitals will have higher mortality rates. The panic does just that: leads to overcrowded hospitals.advertisement - learn more
The Perils Of Panic
Panic, in and of itself, is never
useful. And during a crisis, it is even more dangerous. We see different
types of recommendations coming out from our elected leaders, doctors
and scientists, and mainstream media commentators. Often these
recommendations are made based on unduly dire predictions about
the danger of the virus.
It is important to have fine discernment
around who is advocating for calm and who is actually stoking the fires
of public panic. Whenever our elected leaders, with the power to
legislate societal rules, try to instigate fear in our hearts, and
threaten huge sanctions and punishment if we do not obey their decrees,
we need to pay close attention to what the real motivation may be.
In a broader sense, we need to ask
ourselves: how much are we agreeing to continue to play into the old
parent-child relationship that has long existed between our elected
leaders and ourselves? Do we really need to be shamed and threatened
into a certain type of behavior if we really believe that such behavior
will be beneficial for our community and world? And if a small
percentage of people are not obeying in lock-step, does this justify the
implementation of threats and more draconian measures for the rest of
us?
As citizens, it is our duty to avoid
following our elected leaders blindly. We actually need to be
self-responsible for our actions and their impact on the health and
well-being of the community around us. In the long run, it is much more
beneficial for society to cultivate self-responsible citizens rather
than blind followers. Of course, our leaders might not see it that way.
They are aware that self-responsible citizens are more able and likely
to hold them accountable and compel them to represent the will of the
people, not their own agenda.
How Much Is Too Much?
Peter Gotzsche is the
prototypical self-responsible citizen in this regard. And
he characterizes some of the responses and measures applied to the
Coronavirus as too much. He infers that if we had responded to
the viral infection and mortality rates in previous years the way we
have with the 2019 Coronavirus, the whole world would have had to
be shut down permanently years ago!
Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. So, our politicians and those working with public health do much more than they should do. No such draconian measures were applied during the 2009 influenza pandemic, and they obviously cannot be applied every winter, which is all year round, as it is always winter somewhere. We cannot close down the whole world permanently.Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. “Why do you blow the horn?” “To keep the tigers away.” “But there are no tigers here.” “There you see!”
Since politicians have little to lose by
overreacting, the citizens have to be vigilant about the current
response to make sure we are not being drawn into dangerous precedents.
Gotzsche calls out the ploy of the political establishment, which
constantly seeks to gain more control over the people while making
decisions based on what will make them look the best in the end. And the
point he made that ‘we can be damned sure draconian measures will be
applied again next time,’ is worth a much deeper examination–especially
in the context of comments made by none other than Bill Gates.
Bill Gates Gives Chilling Forecast
In a recent interview with
TED Talks founder Chris Anderson, Gates is given full latitude to speak
from his home about the things we should be learning from the Covid-19
pandemic. The following is a summary of what Gates states in the
interview:
(1) Covid-19 will fade away within a few months
(2) There will be fewer casualties than predicted
(3) That will be credited to strong action taken by governments
(4) Pandemics serve the purpose of testing and improving response
(5) The correct response centers on the development of vaccines, an industry in which he is heavily invested
(6) Pandemics and global warming have the common advantage of being sufficiently frightful to motivate the public and governments to accept drastic changes to society
(7) Leadership for this must come from technocrats, not politicians
What is most striking in this
interview is the way Gates begins to pivot towards his vision of a
post-Covid-19 world. Perhaps he had already given up on what may have
been his original goal to orchestrate worldwide Coronavirus vaccine
mandates; however, he takes the opportunity to explain that future
pandemics will be met much more swiftly with medical interventions, and
central to those interventions will be the timely development and
implementation of vaccines for the entire population. He urges that
scientists and technocrats, rather than our elected leaders, should be
the decision makers regarding such policies, further alienating the
general population from their individual sovereignty.
To listen to Bill Gates without
understanding the agendas that truly drive those with power, it may be
difficult to discern that he is not actually trying to help humanity.
Perhaps for just that reason, it may be interesting to listen to the
full interview to see if you can detect any signs of Bill Gates’ agenda
of personal profit, depopulation and the creation of a global
technocracy in which elite rulers like himself wield even more power
than they have today.
Peter Gotzsche certainly has personal
experience with how Bill Gates came into a company that was standing in
the way of his vaccine-fueled profits and used his money and influence
to turn that organization into an ally for his agenda. He has reason to
believe that some of the way the response to the pandemic is playing out
is aligned with that agenda.
Of course many in the public may dismiss
the need for our vigilance and simply spout “it’s better to be safe
than sorry.” And in principle I would agree with that sentiment. However
if this motto is simply applied to the Coronavirus pandemic in a lazy
and uncritical way, and we don’t collectively question seemingly
unnecessary draconian moves by our leaders, then a society led by
technocrats which further takes medical freedom away from individuals
may be the future we are contributing to.
The Takeaway
I’ll be honest. Some of the restrictions
and cancellations that have been put in place in our society have
benefited me in terms of allowing me to take care of things around the
house, reflect on my own life and spend more time with my family. But
let’s not get lulled into complacency here. This should not stop us from
being vigilant about the response to the Coronavirus in our communities
and contemplating and talking to others about whether the response is
measured and appropriate.
This applies as well to the responses
going on all around the world. I certainly believe that many who are
part of our global authority have agendas that are not in the best
interests of humanity. It is imperative that we not assume the position
that our political leaders and the medical ‘experts’ that are paraded
out in mainstream media have the answers and we should blindly follow
them. Would you not agree that the current goal for a humanity awakening
to what is going on is to break the bonds of authority and become
self-responsible and self-governing? In order to make this happen, we
need all hands on deck.
No comments:
Post a Comment