Devonshire, UK Halts The Installation of 5G Over Serious Health Concerns
In Brief
- The Facts:Volumes of
credible scientific data warn us about the dangers of 5G frequencies,
and in pockets here and there people are starting to respond to these
threats to our health and safety.
- Reflect On:How egregious and obvious do these threats have to become before we are able to band together as one and gain the power to transform these initiatives in ways that are aligned with human health and safety?
Seeking
real information and gaining critical awareness is now more important
than ever. In a day and age where mainstream media promotes only
corporate agendas and our federal health regulatory agencies are
completely ignoring a number of real concerns that people are
increasingly voicing, it’s time for us to act as a collective. If we
continue to grow awareness and present information in a credible way, it
will soon be impossible to ignore us and positive change will be the
end result.
The 5G rollout is one of these issues,
as the communications industry, along with complicit politicians and
mainstream media, still fail to acknowledge let alone address the health
concerns that a number scientists and doctors are bringing up in many
credible publications.
Specific Scientific Testimony
One of the main reasons why we could be
seeing a drastic rise in a variety of diseases and ailments is in the
area of neuropsychiatric disorders. A study entitled “Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression,”
published in the Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, outlines this quite
clearly. It’s one of thousands of peer-reviewed studies raising multiple
concerns in regards to this type of technology.
Some studies have linked this type of
technology, even at a lower radiation range than 5G, to a reduction in
sperm count, cancer, and more.
Dr. Martin L. Pall, PhD and Professor
Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State
University, says the following in his report “5G:
Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence
for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic
Field(EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them”:
“Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.”
Meanwhile, Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an
internal medicine physician & professor, recently
gave this bottom-line testimony at a cell tower hearing in Michigan
regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation, which should have us
delaying any further installations until the science is actually
settled:
“Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period.”
Dr. Martin Blank,
Ph.D., from the Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at
Colombia University, joined a group of scientists from around the world
who are making an international appeal to the United Nations
regarding the dangers associated with the use of electromagnetic
emitting devices like cell phones and Wi-Fi.
“Putting it bluntly, they are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely.” (source)
Weaponization
New research also shows how the
frequencies utilized in the 5G network are being tested and employed as
crowd control weapons, which physically impact our biology. In a lecture
from Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics at Hebrew University,
we can discover how these emissions actually interact with human skin
and eyes to and negatively impact our health. Human sweat ducts act like
a number of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths that are
put out by the devices that employ 5G technology.
Dr. Devra Lee Davis, founding director
of the board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S.
National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, founding
director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of
Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and President of the Environmental Health
Trust stated:
“If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers.”
You would think with more than 10,000
peer-reviewed studies showing clear danger with regards to
electromagnetic radiation overdose, something our planet is
experiencing, that these technologies would be required to go through
some safety testing. The truth is, if they went through any type of
safety testing there is no way they would be approved. The studies that
have already been published show clear links to neuropsychiatric
disorders, reduced sperm count, brain damage and cancer among other
serious ailments. The science is quite clear.
The Good News
The good news is that steps are already
being taken around the world to mitigate the rollout of 5G. Where I
live, for example, doctors treating patients from over-exposure to
wireless radiation joined scientists at Queen’s Park in Toronto who
assembled in front of parliament to urge the Ontario Government to take
steps to protect public health before the roll-out of 5G cell phone
technology. In this public hearing, Dr. Anthony Miller, Professor
Emeritus at the University of Toronto, and adviser to the International
Agency for Research on Cancer, said:
“Many scientists worldwide now believe that radiofrequency radiation should be elevated to a Class One human carcinogen, on the same list as Cigarettes, X-Rays, and Asbestos.” (source)
Several countries have already banned wireless technology that’s not even 5G. France, for example, passed a law in
2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools. In addition to that, the
law states that Wi-Fi must be turned off in all elementary schools when
it’s not in use.
Below is a statement made by CĂ©line
Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region,
responsible for housing, quality of life, environment and energy, from
an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:
I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.
Ms. Fremault accurately identified that
a 5G pilot project is not compatible with Belgian radiation safety
standards (9 V/m, or 95 mW/m2 according to this online converter), and stated that she does not intend to make an exception. In the Building Biology guidelines, the threshold for extreme concern is
1 mW/m2. However, many government agencies still only consider thermal
effects, instead of the cumulative body of thousands of peer-reviewed
scientific studies. You can read more about that story here.
Devonshire
The latest place making noise is in
Devonshire, UK. Many campaigners are protesting days after Chancellor
Sajid Javid announced a £5 billion Government package to support the
rollout of broadband, 5G and other high-speed networks aimed at reaching
the hardest-to-reach 20 per cent of the country.
Apparently, according to the Daily Mail,
the campaigners say residents are taking their message seriously and
more than 1,600 have signed a petition for more safety research. As a
result, town councillors have approved a moratorium. (source)
The Industry Claims 5G Is Safe
Despite all of the science that’s
emerged, the industry continues to claim that it’s safe without any
appropriate safety testing. If they claim it’s safe, why not just do the
studies and release the results to the public? Their claims strongly
contradict the science that’s already been put out by a number of
independent researchers.
Even Frank Clegg, Former President Of
Microsoft Canada, has released an insider’s view educational video
regarding the health and safety concerns of 5G and wireless
technologies. The video outlines the most current research and data on
wireless technologies, its implications and potential impacts on human
health. It also makes a call for policy makers and industry to explore
achievable safer solutions that will allow us to retain all the benefits
of our technology. Frank joins hundreds of scientists, experts and
medical professionals from around the world in appealing to world health
organizations, policy makers and governments calling for more studies
and safer technological products, practices and policy at all levels.
You can learn more about that and watch him speak here, where he made the following stark admission:
“I am not aware of a single study that shows 5G technology is safe.”
A lot of science that questions 5G safety has been published via The Environmental Health Trust. The
fact that the industry can ignore such voluminous scientific data and
works in collusion with federal health regulatory agencies to roll out
this technology is ridiculous. But it’s not actually much of a surprise.
There are several dozens of examples of extreme corruption within these
regulatory bodies. One of the best examples I like to use from is from
the Centres For Disease Control (CDC).
A group of senior scientists called
the ‘CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in
Research’, or CDC SPIDER, put a list of complaints in a letter to the
CDC Chief of Staff and provided a copy of the letter to the public watchdog organization U.S. Right to Know (USRTK).
We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors.
If the scientists themselves, who would
much rather do science than band together and speak out as activists,
make such a clear and unequivocal statement about agency bias and
corruption, risking their livelihoods in doing so, what more do we need
to see as a collective before we become ready to stand together for
fundamental change?
The Takeaway
A lot of this information can spark a
fearful reaction, and that’s normal. It could elicit the same fearful
reaction you may have to other humanitarian issues including the massive
amounts of pesticides being sprayed in our environment and on our food,
the rising deforestation rates, and several other aspects of the human
experience that need to be changed. As important as it is to not react
with fear and panic, it’s even more important not to completely ignore
these things and think everything will be okay.
The good news? Many of us have already
begun participating, and many steps are being taken. Products and
services are being banned, and the amount of awareness being created
within the past five years is promising. People are becoming aware of
this stuff, and with awareness comes action like the examples used in
this article. Ten years ago, the world was silent on such issues. Today,
we are making it difficult for services and products to make a profit,
as well as roll out and be approved. We are definitely moving forward.
So, what can you do? You could purchase
some EMF protective clothing and bedding, or you could even paint your
home with EMF protective paint. You can unplug your computer when not in
use, turn off your cell phone, and unplug all your electronic devices
before you go to sleep. You could have a wired internet connection,
which is actually much faster than any wireless connection. You can live
a healthy lifestyle, and you can use mind-body healing techniques to
help you.
I write a lot about parapsychology, and
it’s quite clear that our minds can have a significant impact on our
biology. I know it sounds a little ‘new agey,’
but the truth is, if you don’t believe you are being harmed, odds are
that the impact on your biology will be significantly different than
someone who is fearful and stressed out about health concerns.
Consciousness is huge, and it is one of the biggest factors in regards
to preventative measures.
Ultimately there is nothing to fear,
though we cannot allow this to make us complacent. Here at CE we move
forward with our work absent of fear, and in the energy of excitement
and joy. We invite all activists to join us in this spirit.
Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!
Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!It is the world's first and only conscious media network streaming mind-expanding interviews, news broadcasts, and conscious shows.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media videos, that you won't see anywhere else.
No comments:
Post a Comment