Thursday, July 5, 2018
1114-1117 A Tragic "Misunderstanding" -- Number 2 From Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
The second great error that we are heir to, is thinking that the United States Supreme Court is the Supreme Court for the Union States. It's not. It never has been. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds that honor --- and notice that I said "Supreme Court of Pennsylvania" not "Supreme Court of
the State of Pennsylvania".
The second great error that we are heir to, is thinking that the United States Supreme Court is the Supreme Court for the Union States. It's not. It never has been. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds that honor --- and notice that I said "Supreme Court of Pennsylvania" not "Supreme Court of
the State of Pennsylvania".
The United States Supreme Court is
the Supreme Court for the Federal Government --- all three branches:
Federal, Territorial, and Municipal. It's job is to tell the President
and the Congress when they have overstepped the limitations imposed by
the constitutional agreements. They are present to "interpret" the
Constitutions and render their "opinion".
It is important to realize that
although these people are presumed to be highly skilled and experienced,
at the end of the day, they give their opinions like anyone else.
There is nothing sacrosanct about the whole process nor its end result.
Supreme Court decisions have later been overturned by different Supreme
Court opinions.
Whether or not the United States
Supreme Court does its job and how well it performs is highly dependent
on the temperament and dedication of the Justices as a group. Some
Supreme Court groups are wise and dedicated. Others are petty and
incompetent or politically motivated to the point that they no longer
serve reason nor justice.
The retirement of Justice Kennedy
has opened up a flurry of controversies and general excitement, as
President Trump will have the opportunity to recommend another new
Justice.
We should all be concerned by the
flaw in our process which allows a President to choose and a Congress to
approve their own judges.
We should also note that the power
of the United States Supreme Court is a negative power. It offers its
opinion and guidance to stop (hopefully) abuses in contradiction to the
constitutional agreements, but has no ability to mandate or provide good
legislation or appropriate executive orders. It can only say --- yes,
this works or no, this doesn't work --- and here's why.
Thus, all these rulings of the
United States Supreme Court tell the President, the Congress, the
Departments and the Agencies what they can and cannot get away with.
They provide direction and guidance for Federal employees in the
accomplishment of their duties.
That said, the United States Supreme
Court --- especially when acting as the Territorial or Municipal
Supreme Court --- is totally unable to tell us what to do when we are
not acting in the capacity of a Federal employee, dependent, or
corporation.
So long as we properly declare
ourselves and the capacity in which we are acting, our private lives
remain private. And so do the affairs of our republics and States.
Notice again, I said "States" like
Vermont ---- not "States of States" like the State of Wisconsin or
"STATES OF STATES" like the STATE OF OHIO.
The States of States and STATES OF
STATES are foreign Territorial or Municipal entities with respect to us
and our States of the Union Federation, and they are subject to the
rulings of the United States Supreme Court because they are operating as
state franchises of the Territorial United States and Municipal United
States, respectively.
In this manner, the Territorial and
Municipal levels of the Federal Government have contrived to extend
their power and influence --- and the power and influence of United
States Supreme Court decisions --- down into our daily lives and to
secure control over local government via undisclosed proxy.
This is why United States Supreme
Court decisions seem to be so very important and to have such drastic
impact --- for good or ill. Rulings that should concern only the
Federal Government have usurped into the daily lives of Americans who
aren't even direct Parties to the constitutional agreements allowing the
Federal Government to exist.
Both the Territorial and Municipal
levels of the Federal Government have gone into business for themselves
and set up shop in our States of the Union and have used false
advertising and similar names deceits to fool people --- passing off the
"State of Hawaii" or the "STATE OF HAWAII" as Hawaii ---and subjecting
Hawaiians (in this example) to laws and powers that are, and are meant
to be, totally foreign to them.
So, all those United States Supreme
Court rulings are important, but they are supposed to be important to
Federal Employees, Dependents, and Corporations --- not to Joe Average
American, who is supposed to know and be operating his own court
system.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Comment on "Natural Law" and "Indigenous" Claims
By Anna Von Reitz
The "Natural Law" is that we are all here NOW, and we are the current proprietors--- all of us, black, white, brown, copper, yellow, pink---- and it doesn't matter where our ancestors came from or how long ago they arrived on these shores. All these "indigenous claims" are just more bullshit and excuses for one group of people to claim a hammer over other groups of people and I am sick of it.
We
are ALL "indigenous" to this soil who were born here. Our Mothers all
took up the nutrients and atoms to form our bodies from this same soil.
How dare anyone pretend otherwise?
So
we are all "indigenous" to this soil and this country and we are all
alive right now, having an equal standing and claim to be part of it
all. Stop all this whining about what went on in the past. The past is
past. Get your heads screwed on tight and make ready for the future
which you all get a chance to help decide.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
For a Young(er) Lawyer
By Anna Von Reitz
Our courts have not, generally, operated in any of the States of States since 1954. The pleadings all changed from Common Law to Statutory at that point. You are not old enough to remember that, but numerous members of my team lived through it. Nobody much questioned it at the time, but now we know how and why it was done to our eternal detriment.
For more information on this I suggest you read Melvin Stamper, JD., The Fruit From a Poisonous Tree.
Dr. Stamper was an early researcher
into these matters and he got some of the history and implications
wrong, but for the most part, he accurately describes what happened to
convert our courts into THEIR courts.
Milligan Ex Parte, then, does not
apply, because Milligan Ex Parte is talking about how we may get rid of
the usurping quasi-military tribunals by restoring and running our own
courts, but instead of restoring our own Common Law courts we let them
slip away and "vacated" them, so that all that typically now remains are
statutory courts and military tribunals. Thus you can now see how your
quote "martial rule can never exist when
the courts are open..." does not apply; our courts--the Common Law
Courts that the Justices assumed to exist in Milligan Ex Parte-- are not
open. They closed in 1954.
Our courts still exist --- on paper
--- and we are free to operate them, so long as we give up or never
accept Bar Association membership and correct our own political status
records. That said, there are precious few of us who have seen through
the Roman deceit [ Maxim of THEIR law -- "Let him who will be deceived,
be deceived."] and have made those necessary corrections. There are
only a few Common Law Courts operating in this entire country, and most
of them are operated by old people like me who have the knowledge and
skill to do it with a skeletal set of elected officers and the help of
volunteers.
We are the ones who can use Milligan
Ex Parte to shut down military law oppression in our States of the
Union. Everyone else's turf is up for grabs.
You can see how the "closed union
shop" practices of the Bar Association diminish the potential for
restoration of our court system, because most lawyers now do not
understand the difference between a "Counselor at Law" and an "Attorney
at Law" and they firmly but wrongly believe that they "have to have" a
Bar Card to practice law. Even many judges now assume that.
We are leading the effort to teach
people the truth about these matters and restore our lawful court
system. The Living Law Firm is overwhelmed with work and everyone
involved here has torn up their Bar Card for cause and learned how to
operate as Counselors at Law. We have also learned how to reopen and
operate our lawful courts accepting Common Law pleadings.
But all of that is in the civilian
world --- and the military courts I am talking about with respect to the
sealed indictments are not the quasi-military tribunals which are the
subject of Milligan Ex Parte. I am talking about true military courts
under international Admiralty, which is what Joe Average accused under
those indictments will face---specifically, civilians will stand trial
under The Law of Peace mandated by the Hague Conventions [Lieber Code in
this country.] People like Hillary Clinton, who were actually working
for the government, will stand trial under the Code of Military Justice
and may be executed for treason.
It's apparent that you are
knowledgeable and well-intended and support the rule of law and the
concept of Public Law. I sincerely encourage you to learn more and help
restore the Public Law and the Public Law Courts that Americans are
owed.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Gig Line Time -- Late Report Doozie!
By Anna Von Reitz
I'm a Big Girl when it comes to the crap the governments of the world
pull. But I have to admit, this report from Abel Danger addressed to
General Kelly is flat out the most fully detailed abstract report of the
Great Muck that I have ever seen come across my desk.
Abel Danger hit it all. From all directions.
If you were waiting for Something Big on the Fourth of July --- here it
is, enough to bring down the whole Dog Pile, and finally, the goods on
N. M. Rothschild and the US Patent Office is oozing out all over the
pavement, like evidence of a giant squashed bug.
Read on, Campers! Spread the word. I am so excited, and to quote the
Pointer Sisters, I think I like it. I'm ready. Let's go, go, go!
No comments:
Post a Comment