For all those like me who have been calling John McCain a traitor to his
face for years --- this message goes out to every Republican nationwide
kindly reprinted from Judicial Watch:
------
John McCain & Staff Masterminded IRS Tea Party Targeting Scandal
Was this craziness your idea, or the tumor's idea John?
McCain minority staff director Henry Kerner to IRS official Lois Lerner and other IRS officials: “the solution is to audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous”
Judicial Watch today released newly obtained internal IRS documents,
including material revealing that Sen. John McCain’s former staff
director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security Permanent
Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including
then-director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner, to “audit so many
that it becomes financially ruinous.” Kerner was appointed by President Trump as Special Counsel for the United States Office of Special Counsel.
The explosive exchange was contained in notes taken by IRS employees at
an April 30, 2013, meeting between Kerner, Lerner, and other
high-ranking IRS officials. Just ten days following the meeting, former
IRS director of exempt organizations Lois Lerner admitted that the IRS
had a policy of improperly and deliberately delaying applications for
tax-exempt status from conservative non-profit groups.
Lerner and other IRS officials met with select top staffers from the
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in a “marathon” meeting to discuss
concerns raised by both Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Sen. John McCain
(R-AZ) that the IRS was not reining in political advocacy groups in
response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Senator McCain had been the chief sponsor of the McCain-Feingold Act and called the Citizens United decision, which overturned portions of the Act, one of the “worst decisions I have ever seen.”
In the full notes of an April 30 meeting,
McCain’s high-ranking staffer Kerner recommends harassing non-profit
groups until they are unable to continue operating. Kerner tells Lerner,
Steve Miller, then chief of staff to IRS commissioner, Nikole Flax, and
other IRS officials, “Maybe the solution is to audit so many that it
is financially ruinous.” In response, Lerner responded that “it is her job to oversee it all:”
Henry Kerner asked how to get to the abuse of organizations claiming
section 501 (c)(4) but designed to be primarily political. Lois Lerner
said the system works, but not in real time. Henry Kerner noted that
these organizations don’t disclose donors. Lois Lerner said that if they
don’t meet the requirements, we can come in and revoke, but it doesn’t
happen timely. Nan Marks said if the concern is that organizations
engaging in this activity don’t disclose donors, then the system doesn’t
work. Henry Kerner said that maybe the solution is to audit so many
that it is financially ruinous. Nikole noted that we have budget
constraints. Elise Bean suggested using the list of organizations that
made independent expenditures. Lois Lerner said that it is her job to
oversee it all, not just political campaign activity.
Judicial Watch previously reported on the 2013 meeting. Senator McCain then issued a statement decrying
“false reports claiming that his office was somehow involved in IRS
targeting of conservative groups.” The IRS previously blacked out the notes of the meeting but Judicial Watch found the notes among subsequent documents released by the agency.
Judicial Watch separately uncovered that
Lerner was under significant pressure from both Democrats in Congress
and the Obama DOJ and FBI to prosecute and jail the groups the IRS was
already improperly targeting. In discussing pressure from
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (Democrat-Rhode Island) to prosecute these
“political groups,” Lerner admitted, “it is ALL about 501(c)(4) orgs and
political activity.”
The April 30, 2013 meeting came just under two weeks prior to Lerner’s
admission during an ABA meeting that the IRS had “inappropriately”
targeted conservative groups. In her May 2013 answer to a planted question,
in which she admitted to the “absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and
inappropriate” targeting of Tea Party and conservative groups, Lerner
suggested the IRS targeting occurred due to an “uptick” in 501 (c)(4)
applications to the IRS but in actuality, there had been a decrease in such applications in 2010.
On May 14, 2013, a report by Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed:
“Early in Calendar Year 2010, the IRS began using inappropriate
criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status”
(e.g., lists of past and future donors). The illegal IRS reviews
continued “for more than 18 months” and “delayed processing of targeted
groups’ applications” in advance of the 2012 presidential election.
All these documents were forced out of the IRS as a result of an October 2013 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the IRS after it failed to respond adequately to four FOIA requests sent in May 2013 (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:13-cv-01559)). Judicial Watch is seeking:
All records related to the number of
applications received or related to communications between the IRS and
members of the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate
regarding the review process for organizations applying for tax exempt
status under 501(c)(4);
All records concerning communications
between the IRS and the Executive Branch or any other government agency
regarding the review process for organizations applying for tax exempt
status under 501(c)(4);
Copies of any questionnaires and all
records related to the preparation of questionnaires sent to
organizations applying for 501(c)(4) tax exempt status.
All records related to Lois Lerner’s
communication with other IRS employees, as well as government or private
entity outside the IRS regarding the review and approval process for
501 (c)(4) applicant organizations.
“The Obama IRS scandal is bipartisan – McCain and Democrats who wanted
to regulate political speech lost at the Supreme Court, so they sought
to use the IRS to harass innocent Americans,” said Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton. “The Obama IRS scandal is not over – as Judicial
Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions
about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and
DOJ to target the First Amendment rights of Americans.”
Let
us all realize that, first of all, banks and money are founded on the
iniquity of idolatry. Money is a "symbol" of value the same way that a
little stone or carved wood idol is a "symbol" of God. The same process
of idolatry is at the root of the entire idea and use of all forms of
money.
Let us also all realize that in the
modern world, money is a commodity, like beer or cheese. There are a
gozillion different kinds and brand names of money in exactly the same
way as there are brands of beer or cheese, and they all present their
own national characters and quirks.
Let us also realize that there is a
profound difference between "money" which has a value in-and-of-itself,
such as a gold coin that has some intrinsic value in trade, and "legal
tender currencies" --- like bonds and notes and letters of credit. And
there is additionally, a market in other "securities" --- like stocks
and commodity futures.
For the past week I have been
deluged by circumstance and correspondence to explain what is going on
in the banking world. Well, which banking world? The world of actual
asset-backed money, or the world of legal tender currencies, or the
stock market or.....?
If I were to explain in very general
terms --- there is a Gross Imbalance, at least so far as the
bookkeeping is concerned -- between actual assets and bonds, notes, and
letters of credit. And there is a terrible, inappropriate, and
looking-to-be fatal infringement of investment banking on the rest of
the banking world.
Up until the disaster of 2008 and
what has been called "The Big Short" on Wall Street, banking -- at least
in this country -- was separated according to function.
We have had traditional trade banks, limited commercial banks, international commercial banks, and investment banks.
It is this last category of banks that demands our attention: investment banks.
Investment banks have always been
the shadiest, most irresponsible, most intrinsically dishonest operators
on the block, and for decades prior to the 2008 Lehman Brothers et alia
debacle, they were prevented by the Glass-Steagall Act from
participating in general commerce and co-mingling their operations with
banks meant to serve the public and do "straight" transactions among
corporate clients.
By "straight" transactions, we imply
the honest mundane Point A to Point B transactions we associate with
normal banking, devoid of hidden agendas, double escrows, undisclosed
usury fees, undisclosed investments made "for" bank customers and
shareholders, and similar rotten business practices that no sane country
would condone.
In the aftermath of the 2008 mess,
Glass-Steagall was repealed and the investment banks were let loose like
a pack of wild hyenas to feast upon the flesh of the unsuspecting
world. For many large commercial banks this simply meant the merger of
their "investment bank" with their public commercial bank functions.
For some, like Wells Fargo, that had
already been skating the edge of the law by abusive use of copyright
non-disclosure (Wells Fargo hasn't been an actual bank for years, but is
instead a securities investment firm -- an investment bank operating
under the trademarked name of the old "Wells Fargo Bank"---otherwise
known as a wolf in sheep's clothing.) the repeal of Glass-Steagall meant
coming out of the closet and no longer having to worry about
enforcement of the actual law.
Investment banks presume upon their
shareholders and especially their depositors to use their deposited
assets as assets that can be invested by the bank. There is a (largely
undisclosed) quid pro quo, that if you leave your jewels in a deposit
box, they belong to the bank as assets that can be used to secure
investments for the bank or lines of credit for the bank. So by
removing Glass-Steagall, one of the immediate impacts of merging normal
commercial bank functions with investment bank functions was to open up
all the depositor's resources as investment assets.
Oh, you, the unwitting depositors,
are now supposed to be investors in the bank, just like you are
unwittingly being mischaracterized as corporate franchises of the
British Crown Corporation --- but never mind that your pants have been
dropped and you've been bent over.
Merrily, the banks seized upon this
incredible windfall of new investment assets and began investing ----
mainly on Private Trading Platforms.
What, you may ask, is a "Private Trading Platform"?
These are to a Credit Scheme what unlimited crude oil is to Exxon.
Like most evils, Trading Platforms
were initially designed for good reasons. They were intended to give
investors a safe way of using "unused assets" to generate cash for
philanthropic projects while also yielding generous profits for the
investors --- a sop to the Uber Wealthy to make themselves richer with
little or no risk, and make themselves out to be philanthropists at the
same time.
You have an asset in a bank --- say,
a ton of physical gold cashiered away back in 1956 -- and you agree to
"block" this asset for a stated period of time, say, one year. During
that time, the asset will not be available to you to use or withdraw
from the bank. The Trading Platform organization will take possession
of the transaction from there on, and will "trade upon" that asset for
the next stipulated period of time --- in this case, one year --- in
what amounts to a futures commodity market for assets.
Just like in any commodities futures
market, the participants are betting on values and setting values for
the assets in trade, making money off the transaction fees, and margins
and the 7 to 10 fold expansion of credit that takes place when a bank
--- acting under the bogus "fractional reserve banking system" -- issues
the "new money" created out of thin air into the system.
What happened in real life is that a
lot of parties who had assets just sitting in bank vaults all over the
world jumped on the band wagon. They were wealthy enough not to need
those assets anyway, so why not "block" them and go on the trading
platforms?
And the trading platform owners
thought, well, why not cut ourselves in for 10, 20, 30.... whatever
percent of the trade value? Guarantee the investors a 100% of return on
their blocked assets off the top of the "fractional reserve" --- an
amount of credit equal in value to the whole investment, plus a
percentage of the rest of the fractional reserve created by this
process?
And after 2008 and the repeal of
Glass-Steagall, the investment banks thought--- what ho! We can take
all these "unused" depositor assets and go on the Trading Platforms and
nobody will be the wiser.
This "system" is so insane, so
profitable --- on paper --- that some investors including the CIA
Retirement Fund, simply plunked down a gob of gold back when it all
began and "let it ride" indefinitely, with the result that there are now
Trading Platform Investment Accounts with 250 zeroes of "credit"
standing on the books, and still no visible help to the poor and
downtrodden, no relief for the "taxpayers" --- just more and more and
more credit for these madmen, and more purported debt imposed upon the
labor of the people and assets of the world.
The reason that there is no
substantial feedback into the world economy is that the Trading
Platforms are too profitable at too little risk. And nobody is holding
the investors--- whether investment banks or individuals -- accountable
for actually doing philanthropic projects with the money. They are
being allowed to just roll the investments over and over and over.
In terms of investments there is no
other show in town that can compare. So all the giant public employee
pension funds and giant State of State "un-budgeted accounts" have been
engaged in this hoop-la along with all the investment banks that have
surreptitiously seized upon their depositor's assets----and blocked and
invested their assets "for" them without their knowledge or consent.
Now we come to the issue of the
Historic Trusts.... as I have explained before, there are numerous kinds
of Historic Trusts, mostly old family trusts, some old business trusts
and banking trusts, some government treaty trusts -- but what they have
in common is that they hearken from a day when actual assets were used
as money, and nearly all of the assets belonging to these Historic
Trusts have been held as "Special Deposit Accounts" in banks that the
banks have used to underwrite their operations.
Historic Trust assets underwrite virtually all central banks on Earth.
Some of you will recall that in 2011
the Chinese Government asked for the return of Chinese gold that the
Nationalist Chinese Government left on deposit with the New York Federal
Reserve Bank back in 1928. Initially, the Chinese just wanted to be
paid some of the interest they were owed on the deposit, but instead of
paying on what was owed, the New York Fed stonewalled.
You may also remember a disturbing
similar report wherein the German Government made a similar request for
the return of gold held in trust and that they were told they could only
receive it back in relatively small installments over a period of
years.
What's happened? Why are all the
actual trustees and owners of the Historic Trusts being similarly
stonewalled when they ask for an accounting of their "Special
Deposits"?
Because the repeal of Glass-Steagall
allowed all the normal commercial banks to morph into investment banks
and as investment banks, they seized upon their depositor's assets and
"blocked" them and put them under contract to these private Trading
Platforms for periods of years unbeknownst to the victims of these
immoral, undisclosed, and non-consensual practices.
It was never the intention of these
out-of-control banks to share the proceeds of these surreptitious
investments with the victims of these crimes, so what they have been
trying to do is to circle the wagons and pretend that the records of
these Historic Trusts have been lost, or make up excuses for why neither
the assets nor the lines of credit that should be available from these
assets are available to the Depositors. Well, the assets are "blocked"
for varying periods of time, often years into the future, just like the
Chinese and German gold deposits, and the profits from all this have
already been contractually divided up between the offending banks and
the operators of these "Private Trading Platforms".
Meanwhile, Ted and Alice and Dick
and Kelly are down in the trenches, suffering the hyper-inflation and
bearing the purported (but odious) debt caused by this madness, and
virtually none of the 'philanthropic projects" that were the excuse for
letting this system exist in the first place are getting done, because
the lure of compiling more zeroes is just too attractive to the mentally
unhinged bankers and traders among us.
Bottom line: the Glass-Steagall
provisions need to be put in place again and the investment banks forced
back into their boxes without any ceremony or great deliberation. The
"Private Trading Platforms" need to be shut down as illegal gambling
arenas. The assets need to be returned posthaste to the control and
benefit of the actual owners. The odious debts and non-existent credits
need to be wiped off the books. Those who already profited from this
should be dinged for 100% of the profit, and that profit should be held
in a Victim's Fund for the benefit of the people of this world including
the permanent end of all taxation, the restoration of the natural
environment, and the building up of new beneficial technologies and
infrastructure.
Since they couldn't bring themselves
to actually carry through on the charitable and philanthropic projects,
we will do it "for" them.
In my opinion the members of the
Municipal and Territorial United States "Congress" that allowed this
whole situation need to run down a narrow track from DC to Boston being
pelted with rotten vegetables the whole way, while their counterparts in
London need to run a similar course all the way to Canterbury, where
the faithful can seek absolution.
As for the "Roman Pontiffs" and the
Conclaves of Cardinals that allowed this --- and they are ultimately
responsible for this entire mess -- no Hot Potato Reaction seeking to
wash their hands by closing the Pontifical Office can excuse both what
they have done and what they have left undone.
The people and the Earth are owed far better leadership.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
I Do NOT "recommend" establishing TDA Accounts
UNLESS you actually are a Federal United States Citizen (federal civil or
military employee) or dependent (receiving free gratis welfare that you did not
in fact pay for from the Federales).
TDA's are not any kind of Magic Bullet. They have,
apparently, been utilized in some cases (so far) to ameliorate debts owed by
federal citizens. If you are not a federal citizen--- employee or actual
dependent -- stay out of their system.
The difference is the difference between the relief
you get in bankruptcy from debts you ran up irresponsibly, and the relief you
get in probate when your property and assets are returned to you free and clear
following a hearing to determine your status.
If you actually want to buy Federal bonds, such as
Savings Bonds, Treasury Bonds, etc., and have logical need for such an account
on a continuing basis, that is what those accounts were primarily designed for.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
We
have been held -- incorrectly -- under "municipal law". And what is
"municipal law"? It is otherwise described as "private international
law". Of course, we discovered this and other fun facts some time ago
on the road --- as Cat Stevens put it -- "to find out", but beyond the
names and labels, what does that imply?
A state is governed by public
international law --- or is supposed to be; a commercial corporation,
however, is governed under private international law.
I make a distinction here between
commercial corporations which are chartered by states, and international
trade organizations which are not chartered and truly privately held
unincorporated entities.
Prior to this I have observed that
"unincorporated" indicates "sovereign" entities and political status,
and that it is entirely possible to be "corporate" without being
"incorporated".
So, in a nutshell, what the vermin
have done is to grant us all a franchise -- like a Dairy Queen franchise
-- to operate under our NAMES for their benefit. This franchise is
kept in a perpetual state of subjugation to their private municipal law
by their presumption of guardianship over it, and periodically, these
franchises are bankrupted for the convenience and profit of the parent
organizations.
Our lawful Trade Names, also known
as our "Good Names" and "Christian Names" have thus been infringed upon
and have been abused via legal chicanery and transported into the
jurisdiction of municipal (private international law) by fraudulent
actions undertaken by the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration and
more recently by actions undertaken by the Obama Administration.
Whereas FDR mischaracterized us as
Cestui Que Vie Estate Trusts, Obama has mischaracterized us as Public
Transmitting Utilities. And in both cases nothing is deserved but a
firm and resounding, "No way in Hell." from the American Public.
How to put an end to this pernicious
deceit and fraud and victimization? There are many issues to address,
but by far, the most potent (and for them, unanswerable) issue is the
issue of domicile. Where do you choose to live? And therefore, under
what form of law do you live?
You do have a choice. You have to have a choice guaranteed to you, for any of this to be legal in any sense of the word.
That is why the Expatriation Act was
passed by the Rump Congress back in July of 1868 the day before they
published their deceitfully disguised Articles of Incorporation as "The
United States of America, Inc." --- a Scottish Commercial Corporation
--- as "The Constitution of the United States of America".
The main pillar of their deceit has
been the presumption that you "voluntarily" chose to live and function
as a British Citizen, merely "residing" here for the purpose of
providing "essential government services".
If they and their presumptions were
to be believed, nearly all of the American population voluntarily went
to work for the Queen and the UK --- sans a paycheck or any actual work
assignments, of course.
All of this concerns only them and
their deceits and their internal issues and workings and multiple
bankruptcies. We are, in fact and in truth, not part of their
baileywick at all --- they are in fact, part our our baileywick when
they come ashore on American soil.
So how have they contrived to rob generations of Americans of the value of their material and intellectual and labor assets?
By making a false claim of
domicile. They signed you up as "citizens" of their version of "United
States" when you were a baby in your cradle. And they have used this
falsified public record against you all the days of your lives to make
your subject to both municipal and territorial law, instead of the
Public Law of your actual state and country.
Thanks to their fraud, deceit, and
Gross Breach of Trust, you now have to make a choice --- will you be
recognized as an American, free men and women owed all the rights,
benefits, and property assets of your heritage, or will you continue to
let these Euro-trash con artists continue to feed off of you and your
country like leeches?
Obviously, you need to change the
falsified public records by returning the Birth Certificates to their
Sources and by making the declaration of domicile (or as they spelled it
back then, "domicil") and expatriating from their foreign jurisdiction
back to the jurisdiction of your birthright.
We have made this Declaration of
Domicile part of the Certificate of Assumed Name process, but you must
all become aware of the importance of this issue of declaring your
domicile as "land and soil" of Georgia, Maine, Texas, etc. -- and
enabled to bring it forward properly in court.
What advantage does a proper declaration of domicile provide you?
It means you have to be tried under
the Public Law, not private international commercial law. It means that
there is no such thing as a "thought crime" or a "victimless crime" or a
"statutory infringement". It means that you retain the full roster of
trial options set forth in Blackstone's Commentaries, including "Trial
by Record"--- which, if you have done your homework, will more than
adequately prove that you are an American and that you are properly
domiciled on the land and soil of your birth state.
That cuts you free of their
municipal law, and it also demands that instead of being treated under
their territorial law, you are owed The Law of Peace from their military
courts, as a Third Party Civilian Non-Combatant having nothing to do
with their internecine power struggles and con games.
If you have not actually and
factually harmed someone who is bringing complaint or stolen or damaged
someone else's property by your direct actions for which a complaining
party appears --- there is no case, no prevailing law, and no presumable
jurisdiction for THEM to operate it.
You, therefore, have the option of
declaring yourself free of their enslavement and their false claims, and
merely have to become aware enough of the issues to do so and defend
yourself and your assets accordingly.
Here, courtesy a friend to the
cause, is the controlling British law summation from Foreign and
Domestic Law -- a Concise Treatise on Private International
Jurisprudence, by John Alderson Foote:
"The 'right of expatriation' is not,
perhaps, the happiest of phrases, but it is manifest that the
feudal theory of indissoluble allegiance had become an anachronism, and a
Royal Commission was appointed in May 1868 to inquire into the English
laws of naturalisation and allegiance generally."
"As to domicil
for testamentary purposes, or with relation to succession to personal
property on intestacy, the law has been considerably modified …”
"British
subjects dying in a foreign country shall be deemed for all purposes of
testate or intestate succession as to movables to retain the domicil
they possessed at the time of going to reside in such foreign country,
unless they have resided in such foreign country for a year at least,
and shall have made a formal and public written declaration of an
intention to become domiciled there.”
"Domicil being a question
of fact, it is not competent for individual States to enact restrictions
upon, or facilities for, its acquisition ; and such enactments should
not, in the tribunals of other States, obtain recognition."
"The
principle that laws are commands addressed to persons, which has been
referred to above,(«) renders it important to consider what entities
come within that term."
"With regard to any particular municipal
law, a foreign State must be regarded as occupying a position closely
analogous to that of a foreign corporation ; the personality of the
latter being conferred upon it by its own municipal law, while that of
the former is created by the public law of nations.”
"Foreign
States, or bodies politic created by international law, occupy a
position analogous to that of foreign corporations. In the case of
monarchical governments, the Sovereign may be regarded as a corporation
sole, representing the State; in the case of democratic or republican
governments, the State itself, under its international name or style, as
a body politic, may be regarded as a corporation aggregate."
"Neither
a personal Sovereign nor a body politic (or State) may be sued in an
English Court, unless the privilege of sovereignty has been waived,
expressly or impliedly, by voluntary submission to the jurisdiction or
otherwise."
Bring their BIRTH CERTIFICATE to
court and lay it down on a copy of The Holy Bible and on top of that,
lay down your Expatriation of your identical NAME from their domicile
and back to the land and soil of your birth state. Add the Certificate
of Assumed Name on top of that---- and stare the Judge in the eye.
You, as an American, are owed the
full faith and credit provided by every municipal and territorial
corporation on Earth. You, as a British Territorial or Municipal
"Citizen" are a slave and are owed nothing at all, not even common
decency.
You make the choice.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment