7.Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill: by Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., (with Sofia Smallstorm & Paul Preston) from Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill

by Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., 
(with Sofia Smallstorm & Paul Preston) 

 "I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the 
president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources 
said it was a false flag”— Paul Preston 

Sofia Smallstorm, who 
produced and directed the 
documentary, “Unraveling 
Sandy Hook”, which many 
regard as the best video 
study of the Sandy Hook 
event, recently interviewed 
a Los Angeles school 
expert, Paul Preston, about 
Sandy Hook and his knowledge of what had transpired. 

Governor Malloy had held a press conference that day, explaining that 
he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” that something like this might 
happen , which raised the question, what “something like this”? Did he mean 
he had been told a school shooting massacre would take place? or a drill that 
would be presented as a real event? 

Remarkably, we now have confirmation from an unexpected source. Paul 
Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S. Department of 
Education of the Barack Obama administration, who confirmed to him on 
the basis of their own personal knowledge that: 



101 




Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


(1) it had been a drill; 

(2) no children had been killed; and, 

(3) it had been done to promote an anti-gun agenda. 

Given his background of 41 years in the California public school 
system (from custodian to district superintendent) and having served as a 
teacher, coach, vice-principal and principal before retiring in 2012 as the 
superintendent of two charter schools, 1 thought what he had to say about 
Sandy Hook deserved widespread dissemination. 

So when we did a two-hour show on Revolution Radio, “False Flags 
(9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing)” on 30 May 2014, as the third 
segment, I included the second 30-minutes of Sofia’s interview with Paul 
Preston, which is archived on “The Real Deal”, radiofetzer.blogspot.com. 

Because Preston is also highly trained in school safety issues and had 
himself organized drills of many kinds, including active-shooter drills, what 
he has to say is especially telling. He has a website of his own at www. 
Agenda! IRadio.com, which he created to alert listeners to the perils of 
Agenda 21. 

Transcript of 30-minute clip of Sofia Smallstorm interviewing 
Paul Preston 

Transcription by Jeannon 

S = Sofia Smallstrom 

P = Paul Preston 

S - Welcome back 
everyone to the Speed 
of Light on the Pure 
Momentum Network. This 
is Sofia Smallstorm and 
we’re listening to a very 
interesting discussion - 
Paul Preston, school 
principal, school safety 
consultant, teacher, coach, and superintendent. He has been in the California 
system for 41 years. He is now retired. So Paul, let’s continue. Can we get a 
little bit into Sandy Hook now and what set off your antenna about it? 

P - Well, you know I’ve been involved in many many situations at schools 
that have been, you know, emergency type situations and was involved even 
to some degree with the Columbine situation in that we had an individual who 



102 


Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


was trying to blow lip the school, our school, at the time. In a similar fashion 
to what was a predicted bomb threat that occurred at Columbine three days 
before the Columbine shooting, and that’s how we kind of got in touch with 
the Columbine people. They got in touch with us because it turned out to be a 
similar neo-Nazi group that was related to the Trenchcoat Mafia, of all people. 

And so learning and watching and seeing all these incidences play out, 
all these school shootings, I took an enormous interest in because we were 
doing a study trying to determine because the neo-Nazis we had been working 
with in our school along the same time of the Columbine incident were telling 
us that there was going to be some big event take place. And so our staff, 
myself, we all wanted to sit down and figure where this was all going to and 
we studied a lot of the Nazi websites and so on, and we figured out that yes, 
something big was going to happen. 

Well then Columbine happened. So we watched with a lot of intensity- 
-especially under my own circumstances— and also by watching the videos 
and replays of the other active shooter situations, I became sort of a specialist 
in that and applied it to my own active-shooter training that I was doing and 
conducting with my own people. 

S - Right. And now can we get into Sandy Hook? 

P - Well yes. Of all the hundreds of hours that 1 spent watching these 
scenarios and investigating and reporting on them on my radio show, the first 
thing 1 noticed when 1 heard about Sandy Hook when 1 turned on the TV like 
everybody else . . .now 1 have always told everybody when you’re seeing these 
things play out in real time, the best news reporting is what’s happening in 
real time - that day of, you know, the moments that are around the incident. 
But document for yourself what’s going on because you’ll never see it again. 

And the first thing that caught my eye as I was watching everything play 
out was the lack of intensity with which people were moving and that really 
disturbed me. It hit me within the first few minutes, watching the video, the 
helicopters flying around and so on. Things just didn’t seem to be right, like 
I would always understand in an incident command system. People weren’t 
rushing around. People weren’t panicking. They ran that one guy off into 
the woods and then they arrested him. They took him away and there was 
no connectedness to that. 

I was also wondering why all the emergency equipment wasn’t around 
the school. And I didn’t see any students either and that really bothered me. 

S - So, it was almost like too slow motion for a real event. Not enough 


103 



Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


panic. Not enough chaos. You had mentioned chaos earlier being a part of 
these real situations. And a lot of support people rushing around like press 
and police but not running fast enough, not running with intensity and alarm 
and panic and concern, 1 think. 

P - None of that was there. 

S - Yes. So all right, and then what did you start thinking? 

P- Well, just within the first 10 or 15 minutes, it just all looked too staged 
to me, and I know about 
staging these things since 
I’ve staged a number of 
them. And, like I said, then 
when you stage something 
there’s a complete lack 
of intensity as you would 
have in a real scenario when 
there’s panic really taking 
hold of people and they’re 
really afraid and they’re 
screaming and yelling and 
so on. 

But the one thing that really bothered me was where were the kids. You 
know they had how many hundreds of kids there at the school. I didn’t see 
them. 

S - Right. 

P - And there was lack of accounting for them. And right away - and 
I’ll juxtaposition this with the situation that happened in Pennsylvania. You 
saw the kids right away. I know it’s a high school, but you know, you saw the 
kids right away and you saw their plan of evacuation of the school unfolding. 

Now this is where it really falls apart with Sandy Hook for me. saw. . .1 
saw no evidence of a real plan of student evacuation taking place. And that 
stuck in my head like crazy when 1 was in the moments watching this whole 
thing play out in real time. 

S - That’s very interesting. No evidence of a real plan. Because only 
someone. . .1 mean everybody had their own response to it. Some of us were 
already clued in from previous kinds of situations. All this has got to be not 
what they’re telling us it is. But you come from the industry, the business, 



104 


Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


and you felt that there is... I would say you knew ... It probably was not 
even a feeling. It was like, you know, set in stone in your head. Where’s the 
plan? I don’t see the plan playing itself out. Right? 

P - 1 saw some of your evacuation centers and I saw some of your colored 
tarps on the ground, the colored taps and so on, but even that was pretty odd 
because normally if you have the tarps out there... in every active shooter 
situation you have ever see, there’s somebody on the tarp or there’s been 
some help that’s been given to somebody when somebody has been wounded, 
but none of that was even evident. And I don’t see anybody trying to rush to 
anybody’s help at all in a mass casualty situation. 

See, when you don’t see that... I mean... I’ll go back to the example 
that I have before about the 13 who overdosed. We had people everywhere, 
and we had people everywhere until everybody was safe, which was 35, 40 
minutes, almost an hour. And that was never happening there at Sandy Hook. 
You didn’t see the mass of people doing that. 

S - Yes, it’s more like the press filled in for that missing element. The 
press sounded more concerned and panicked on TV as they reported but the 
actual participants were not so . . .And we got, you know, long after the fact 
we got the supposed 9 1 1 calls, we got various people giving their versions of 
it on television as they got interviewed. But we didn’t see it on the ground. 
And so how long did you watch it for? Over a period of days, weeks? And 
what were your thoughts? 

P - You know, I make it 
a study. I study these things 
intensely, and what really, 
what really put me over the 
top was the next morning 
with Robbie Parker going 
out there, and I saw that clip 
as it happened. And I said 
there’s something really 
wrong here. 

And that’s when I started thinking about the . . .the actors. You can actually 
rent these actors out. In fact they put these things up for training all the time. 

And I just said ‘this is not. . .first of all, his demeanor was terrible. I would 
never go out. . .and I know sometimes this happens but. . .to send a parent out 
to talk to the press in that fashion about the daughter that he just lost. None 
of that seemed to be appropriate. None of it seemed to fit. And his behavior 



105 


Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


with the smiling laughing thing and getting into character that you could see. 
I said ‘ hmmm. I’m not buying this. I’m just not buying it.’ 

S - Yes, 1 know. Very few other people did. So, did you contact anyone? 
Did you speak to anyone? I don’t mean officially but in your own network 
of friends. 


P - Yes. 


S - And what were their thoughts. 

P - Almost everybody was unanimous that it was a false flag. 

S - And when did you start looking it up on the Internet because I think 
people started posting immediately. You know, they were making YouTubes. 
The community began to express online. So when did you start looking into 
all of that? 

P - We-a side note to this is that 1 have a lot of sources in and around 
and in that area. 1 have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on 
with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my 
sources said it was a false flag. 

S - Now these are quasi-official. . . what kind of sources are these? 

P - Let me say that they are sources that are very close to this 
administration who know what’s going on. 

S - Really. So they are really like almost insiders then? 

P - Oh yes. 

S - And they all. . ..they say it was a false flag because they figured it out 
like you did, or they have actually factual knowledge of such.. 

P - They had factual knowledge of such. That’s part of the plan. 

S - 1 see. And so how much were they willing to tell you, and what else 
were they willing to tell you? Anything? 

P - Oh, they told me quite a bit, and some of it I can’t reveal to you, but 
it fits the narrative of the anti-gun movement and the disarmament of America 
and that’s what the focus was. 


106 



Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


S - And you realized that that’s part of the broader picture? That’s the 
Agenda 21 society? 

P - Absolutely. 

S - So do you want to tell us a little but about that or do you want to 
stick with the Sandy Hook material? I’ll let you decide. 

P - Well, let’s go ahead with the Sandy Hook material and then we can 
jump into that. 

S - OK, so we’re past Robbie Parker now, and what about the funerals? 
You must have known then that . . .Did you have any concept about victims 
or no victims, et cetera? 


P - Well, that whole thing was pretty shaky. What was really starting to 
filter into the system and was just confirming what I was already being told 
about these charity sites that had been developed. By the way, they were put 
up the day before the shooting. And I had gotten some screen shots, and I 
had confirmed with my sources. Some of them were thinking that it was a 
very sloppy operation actually. 


But there were 
reassurances to me that 
there really were no victims 
and that everything’s being 
staged. 



And of course the 
funerals to me . . .you go and 
look at the whole funeral 
process. It looked like they were all staged, from the Robbie Parker one in 
Utah, or the Sarah Parker one with the Parker family. 


And then I started getting information from people that actually had 
attended that funeral who lived in Utah and said that was something very 
funny about it. 


S - Now I would like to ask you whether your sense is that these are real 
families even, or are they patched together? 


P - Well, you know, that’s a good question because, you know, the thing 
that rolls around in my head, you know, the actors type of thing, you know. 
You know because you can put families together and these acting programs 


107 





Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


will do that under certain training scenarios. And so, it’s a good question. It 
really is a fair question to ask whether or not they were real families. 

S - And then of course because they continue to speak and organize and be 
called upon to comment, they have to be formed into these family groupings 
over time. And remain grouped like that whether they are truly married or not. 

You know, here’s one thing that 1 noticed. When you see a couple, if 
they seem really like an odd couple, then that kind of strikes you as weird. 
And I saw that. I saw a very odd coupled-ness with lots of these Sandy Hook 
families. It seemed to me, why would this person marry this person and live 
with them? They’re so totally different. That happens sometimes but in this 
context it really jumped out at me... myself anyway. I didn’t know if you 
noticed that. . . 

P - It’ difficult to say, you know, when you saw them together whether 
they are natural families or not. That’s... I’m suspicious of that. And like I 
say, I’m suspicious because I know that you can put these families together, 
you know, with some of these acting companies out there. And that just kind 
of blends in with what I was already being suspicious about. 

And so, there’s a lot of things that would go into the details of examining 
this. And I’ve see a lot of the pictures and so on, and some of the pictures 
don’t match up, especially the one of the Parkers in the White House. And it 
looks like to me that’s Sarah Parker sitting there that’s, you know, supposed 
to be a victim. 

S - There’s no Sarah Parker. . . 

P - Which one is it. . .maybe it’s not the Parker. . . 

S - Oh, you mean with Obama. . . 

P - Yes, right. 

S - Emily or Madeline 
...those are the two older 
sisters, and a lot of people 
felt that that was Emily 
Parker leaning on Obama. 

P - Yes, that was Emily 
Parker. . . 



108 


Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


S - Have you seen the Super Bowl video? 

P - Yes, 1 have seen that. 

S - Well, there is a girl who looks a lot like an older Emily Parker in that 
video. So if that was Emily at the White House, or actually 1 think. . .1 don’t 
know if it was at the White House. . .but with Obama, she couldn’t be six in 
one picture and then just a month or two later, twelve or thirteen. 

P- Right. 

S - That’s where we have to make a decision. 

But what did you think of all the photographs of the children? Did you 
notice anything - the portraits that we were shown that these were the victims? 
Did you notice anything about those portraits? 

P - No, other than some of the malformations of different parts of their 
bodies - seemed to be a pretty obvious thing. 

The whole thing ...when you take a look at the totality of this, in my 
opinion, it’s very sloppily done. 

S - Why would it have been sloppily done though? 

P- Well, you know, when . . .and again, it’s kind of like sometimes there’s 
order that comes out of chaos. And when you have these chaotic situations, 
people want to put things back together as best they possibly can to feel more 
comfortable or to recover from it. And I didn’t see any of that. 1 don’t know 
if that makes any sense to anybody. People don’t want to have that chaos. 
They want to heal. They want to come back together. They want to solve a 
problem so that they can move forward. 

And that’s part of what happens when you do these drills is that you take 
a day or so and you talk about what happened so that you can improve upon 
and make it better. People do that naturally even when there’s chaos and 
there’s an emergency situation because they want to seek normalcy again. 

I didn’t see the same kind of emotions, if you will, or the same kind of 
communications between parents, kids, that you would normally see in these 
situations. It just didn’t look. . .it looked phony to me. 

S - So you mean the community itself, they did not try to repair in the 
organic way...? 


109 



Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


P - I would say that is true, from the parents to the kids, to the entire 
community. 

S - What do you think of this privacy issue that has been bandied about 
by the authorities, that all the privacy needs to be respected, and you can’t 
reveal this or that. . .? 

P - That to me just adds more fuel to the fire because that’s not what 
you do in the normal situation of an incident command system. You get the 
facts out because you know oftentimes when you get the facts out, you’re 
also looking for criminal behavior, and the more information that you can 
get out that that’s way, the better. 

And I’m certainly not buying the notion that the parents weren’t allowed 
to see the kids. 

S - The bodies, identifying the. . . 

P- 1 just... that to me... 
that should be a red flag to 
anybody who has looked in 
to Sandy Hook. The parents 
weren’t allowed to do that. 

What’s up with that? 

S - And what did 
you think of the coroner’s 
behavior at his press conference? 

P - Well there’s many things about him. I just . . .1 . . .first of all, I didn’t 
understand why all of a sudden there’s 26 bodies and then there’s no coroner 
or doctor who’s looked at the bodies and they’re declared dead. And then 
all of a sudden the coroner comes out and everybody says that there was 
an automatic gun or a handgun that was used, and the coroner, on his own, 
comes out and says ‘oh no, that was an AR15 that was used.’ 

So there’s a lot of confusion, you know, about that coroner, his report, 
his reporting out. Nothing seems very clear and concise to me. And you 
know I would argue that, you know, as I looked at him and watched what 
was going on, he seemed to be just answering questions on the fly without a 
lot of knowledge behind the questions. 

S - And this suggested to you that this was a sloppily created event? 



110 


Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


P - Absolutely. 

S - And would you say that that was because of the portent of the whole 
thing that they... there were people involved in this... let’s say Dr. Carver, 
the coroner, who had some idea, if it was a scripted event, it was going to go 
big, and really big? So do you think that the sloppiness of it was because in 
being organized, it’s very difficult to juggle how people are going to perform 
given that they know how big this thing could get? 

P - Well, you know, what happens is that you... if you’re going to do 
these things and carry it through with the lie, everybody’s got to be telling 
the same lie at the same time all the time. 

And I think with my judgments about the parents and the kids, and seeing 
them lie, I was seeing a big lie being perpetrated right in front of me because 
nothing seemed to be consistent. And like you said, which 1 thought was 
interesting, is that oftentimes the media would fill in a lot of the blanks for you. 

A classic example of the blanks comes up when you talk about where 
are the kids that are evacuating the school. There were helicopters that were 
circling overhead. They certainly would have been able to show, you know, 
hundreds of kids exiting the school. 

That was never shown. 

But you did see a picture 
out in a parking lot, which 
by the way if you take a 
long look at this picture of 
all these kids being led out, 
about 15 or 20 kids being 
led out by teachers and 
adults from this parking 
lot, if you take a look at the 
parking lot from the aerial 
views, you can see that there are different cars in the parking lot in that area. 
So obviously that was done during some sort of drill. That’s my opinion. And 
it didn’t match with what was going on at the time. So nothing is matching 
in real time for me. That’s just another thing. 

But where are the kids? Where were the kids? They weren’t present. They 
just weren’t there. So that’s the kind of stuff that wasn’t worked out and, you 
know, they were doing things on the fly. That’s why I say... I would say it 
was very amateur, very amateurish as to what was going on. 



Ill 



Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


S - Which is surprising because given the powers that would have 
designed this thing - that it would be so amateur - but. . . 

You are familiar with the character, Gene Rosen? 

P - Gene Rosen - which one was . . .? 

S - Gene Rosen was the man who was very close to the school and 
he took the kids in and offered them juice and cookies, and he gave many 
different. . .he recounted his rescuing or fielding of these kids differently in 
many interviews. So can you comment on that? 

P - 1 can comment on this because this points to this proves my point 
that these kids . . .did they get off a bus? Where did they go? OK, 1 think that 
one of the stories was that the kids got off the bus and they made their way to 
his house, and there was all this panic or whatever was going on. OK, there’s 
something really wrong with that picture to begin with. 

First of all, when you’re doing these scenarios and this school had to have 
been trained for this because FEMA requires these trainings, and if you’re 
getting safety monies from the federal government, which every school does, 
they have to follow the proper protocols and that’s the proper release of the 
students to their parents. 

S - Right. He said, that children showed up on his lawn and they were 
with a bus driver, in one story. In another story, they were just there by 
themselves and they were repeatedly babbling that their teacher was dead. 
So what. . .would the protocol be that the children. . .the children, according 
to the story, left the school on their own. 

P - Well, that to me, that’s very suspicious in and of itself. 

S - Right, I mean the cops had not gotten there in the first five minutes. 
Apparently some of them could still hear shooting going on, and how did 
the kids get out and just run down the road, you know? 

P - All that seems to be ... and again, I want to go into the thing about 
the incident command system, evacuation, walk-outs and so on. None of that 
fits that protocol. None of it. 

The story of Gene Rosen or any of that stuff — None of that fits. That 
to me is just more evidence that there were no students other than the actor 
students that were there. 


112 



Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


S - Then what was the purpose of having the Gene Rosen player? 

P - Diversion. 

S - From what? 

P - A diversion from 
the other realities going 
on and to add more hype 
about the story. It’s the 
same thing about the guy 
that was chased through 
the woods. You know, they 
had a couple of guys that 
were chased through the 
woods. What were they 
all about? 

And there were no answers about any of that, about where they came 
from and even my people couldn’t come up with an answer about that. Some 
of my people say it was very sloppily done. 

S - These are your insider people, right? 

P - Right. 

S - Now did you see any of the videos of the people circling through 
the firehouse? 



P - Yes. 


S - And did that strike you . . .what did you think of that? 

P - Well, I had already come to my conclusion that this was a drill, and 
again, being very suspicious of the Obama administration, Diane Feinstein, 
Second Amendment issues, using Agenda 21 in particular, I had not see that 
until quite some time afterwards, maybe a couple of weeks after. We were 
engaged in our own things that we were doing in terms of investigations and 
stuff like that. We’re pretty intense about what we’re doing here on Agenda 
2 1 Radio, and we have some very highly placed sources of information that 
comes to us and which we’re very grateful for. 

I, for one reason or another, hadn’t seen that video maybe two or three 
weeks until after the incident. 


113 


Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. 


There’s more evidence right there because what in the world were all 
those people doing there to begin with? You see, if you’re doing an incident 
command situation, there’s a place for those people and those people can 
be moved on rather than seeing that circus that was going on, which is what 
that was. That was all staged. 

S - Right. And these were far too many adults, no children whatsoever, 
no panic. And to me the people that were there — they weren’t dressed for 
December. So some people have suggested that that particular drill, the 
circling in and out of the firehouse, took place a lot earlier, and it matches 
the time frame and the clothing of the children evacuated from the school. 
They did not have their coats. 

And I was going to ask you, is it normal when there’s an emergency for 
the teacher to evacuate the children without letting them get their coats, or 
would they take the extra time and say ‘Children, go put your coats on as 
fast as you can.’ How does that work? 

P - Well no. If there’s a signal to get them out of the building, and there’s 
always a signal of some sort to get them out of the building safely, they go 
directly out. Period. End of subject. 

And if they can get their coat, that’s great, but the safety thing is to get 
them away from where there potentially is a threat and that would be the 
key thing. And again, you pointed to something else and I brought this up 
earlier about the drill that we used to run and people would always, you know, 
screw up the drill because they would knock on the door in an active shooter 
situation and the teacher would open the door. 

Well, you know, how does that all play out? I was looking at things 
pretty much in real time within minutes of news being broadcast as it was 
happening from a helicopter. Now I am a real-time kind of guy. So I’m 
looking at maybe 15 minutes into the shooter, maybe 20 minutes into the 
shooter situation. I’m looking at clear video of the campus and so on. I’m 
not seeing anything happening. 

Where are the kids? The kids aren’t there. 

S - Right. 

P - And they should be released or what’s going on with them? 

S - And there were some people said that they were in closets for up to 
four hours. That doesn’t make any sense either. 


114 



Even Obama officials confirmed that it was a drill 


P - That does not many any sense to me because what happens, and 
again it goes back to the police, and back to Columbine, they will go in and 
check every nook and cranny. And quite frankly, 1 know how that’s done. We 
used to do that. We always used to look and check to see where people were. 

S - Right. And you would not miss large adults hiding in small closets. 

And the idea of Kaitlyn Roig and some of these teachers bundling up all 
their kids into the bathroom and having a few sit on the toilet. . .1 even heard 
the toilet roll holder, my God, that’s pretty tough to do even for a six year 
old. But what do you think of that? That doesn’t make sense to me. 

S of ia Small- 
storm, “Unraveling 
Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 
and 5 dimensions ” 

P - Well, you 
know, we tell people 
in an active shooter 
situation to seek... to 
hide or . . .if there is a 
shooter there to take 
the challenge. We used to do these things where we had these dummy books 
and we’d bring in an active shooter as the stage person and throw books at 
them, you know, because that really throws them off. You’re taught those 
kinds of little techniques to throw the active shooter off. 

But 1 can imagine some people getting holed up in a closet or something 
like that if they haven’t been able to lock the door. And that’s one of the 
things we tell our people all of the time. Lock the door. And we made sure 
in all schools, and all schools should have the, the doors should have the 
inside key on them, you know, so you can use an inside key on them also as 
we could on the outside. 

S - So we have a couple of minutes left of this first hour. Do you have 
anything to say about Adam Lanza - fiction, non-fiction, real? 

P- Well, just on the surface of it, and again 1 would throw out I’m highly 
specialized trained in drugs and alcohol recognition, obviously looks like he 
has some meds onboard just by the look. But you know if you couch that 
along the same lines that that this may be a fictional event, that he’s a fictional 
character, which fits his description of what I see there. 



115 



Jim Fetzer. Ph.D. 


And of course if you’re doing a fictionalized event like this, you want 
to have the most crazed individual that you can have looking at you through 
the picture there, and that’s exactly what you have. That’s my speculation. I 
think that’s what they wanted. That’s what they did. 

And he has a history and what is the history? We’re not real clear on 
the history. You know, first of all, they found out that he’s got his brother’s 
driver’s license. Then there’s some confusion. And you know it one of these 
kind of scenarios that just didn’t quite fit. 

And as a school person that to me was one of the big pieces of evidence. 
Why does he have his brother’s license? And then they made contact his 
brother that 1 guess was in New Jersey some place, wherever he was, and there 
was an investigation. That all seemed to be tracking with me as a distraction 
about what was really happening at the school. 

See, the more they under this situation. . . this is just my speculation - the 
more they could distract from the actual Sandy Hook school site itself and 
stage things away from there, the more they could sell the story of Sandy 
Hook on the whole. 

S - That’s a very very good point, Paul. Excellent. And we should add 
that the mug shot that they gave us of Adam Lanza was very painterly. It 
wasn’t even a photo, and it did have that, you know, ghoulish expression on 
it to make us think this is a real lunatic. 

But we are now at the end of our first hour and I really really thank you, 
Paul Preston, for being with us. And we will take up a second hour discussion 
in the Members Section. So this is Sofia Smallstorm thanking everyone for 
listening to this first hour and please do come to PureMomemtum.net and join 
us for the second hour in the Members Section with Paul Preston, 4 1 years 
in the public schools and someone who has been through a lot of staging of 
drills and has a lot of drill understanding and experience. 

This chapter originally appeared under the title, “Sandy Hook Redux: Obama 
officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died veteranstoday.com 
(13 June 2014) 


116 



Noone Died at Sandy Hook