Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.


An American Affidavit

Sunday, September 17, 2017

3.Six Signs Sandy Hook Ele- mentary School was Closed by Dr. Eowyn, Ph.D.from Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

Six Signs Sandy Hook Ele- 
mentary School was Closed 

by Dr. Eowyn, Ph.D. 


The alternative media have blogged and made countless YouTube videos 
on what Wolfgang Halbig calls “things that don’t make sense” about the Sandy 

Hook Elementary School (SHES) shooting massacre of 20 first-graders and 
6 adults on December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut. 

Some of those “things that don’t make sense” are emergency medical 
helicopters not being called to the scene, parents showing no grief, donation 
websites with creation dates that preceded the massacre, government’s 
continuing refusal to release the death certificates and burial sites of the 
alleged victims, and homes with a sale transaction date of 12/25/2009 and 
a $0 sale price. 

Recently, 1 undertook a review of the “things that don’t makes sense,” 
which led me to conclude that the crux — the decisive and most important 
issue — of whether the massacre actually happened is this: 

Was Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES) operational on 
December 14, 2012, or had it long been abandoned? 

If the school already was closed, no children or teachers would be there 
on December 14 to be gunned down by Adam Lanza. 

Here’s the evidence supporting the contention that SHES had long been 
abandoned: 


29 



Dr. Eowyn 


1. What school’s neighbors said 

In an interview with Halbig on Truth Radio Show on March 21, 2014, 
Infowars reporter Dan Bidondi said (5:45 mark), “The school’s been closed 
down for God knows how long. [Neighbors] can’t understand why there were 
kids in that building because it was condemned.” 

2. Reports of shes being contaminated with asbestos, requiring 
expensive repairs 

SHES was built in 1956. Several reports in local newspaper The Newtown 
Bee indicate that years before the massacre, SHES was in a state of disrepair 
and contaminated with environmental toxins. 

As examples, in 2002, Consulting Engineering Services recommended 
to the school district that SHES be “worked on in 2010 over a nine-month 
period” to upgrade and renovate its heating and ventilation system at a cost of 
$4.5 million.Two years later, in 2004, the Newtown Board of Education was 
told “there were serious problems with the Sandy Hook elementary school 
roof.” Four years later, in 2008, there was yet more bad news: SHES was 
contaminated with asbestos. (Remember that 2008 date.) 

On October 5, 2013, nearly 10 months after the massacre, a city 
referendum passed by over 90% in support of the demolition and rebuilding 
of SHES with a generous $49.25 million grant from the State of Connecticut. 
The reason given for the demolition was “asbestos abatement”. On Dec 2, 
2013, Newtown’s Public Building and Site Commission Chairman Robert 
Mitchell issued a report to justify the already-approved demolition. 



30 


Six signs the school was closed 


He said that “had the town decided to reoccupy the school on Dickinson 
Drive, it would have faced a daunting and possibly insurmountable 
challenge regarding the presence of hazardous materials” because the school 
was contaminated by not just asbestos, but also PCBs under the flooring and 
in the foundations and footings. 

Just think: If the city already knew in 2008 that the school was 
contaminated with asbestos and, in 2013, used the contamination to justify 
tearing it down, why would the same asbestos-contaminated school be safe 
for children and teachers to inhabit from 2008 through 2012? IfSHES had 
remained open, wouldn ’t the school district be sued for endangering public 
health? 

It makes more sense that the school was shut down in 2008 and remained 
closed, until the massacre provided Newtown with the financial means — a 
windfall of $50 million from the state — to tear down the school and build 
a swanky, state-of-the-art replacement. 

3. Photographic evidence of an abandoned school 

Crime scene photos of the exterior and interior of SHES — from the 
website of the State of Connecticut’s Department of Emergency Services 
and Public Protection, and from a batch of photos that Halbig obtained via 
Connecticut’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), some of which are posted 
on Jim Fetzer’s blog — are consistent with the appearance of an abandoned 
school. 



Farr - Scene Pholos #34 

1) Boarded up wall (old wood) 

2) Unprotected metal pole 
could be dangerous to children 

3) Missing rail 


GunMtui- interior photo* *38 


31 



Dr. Eowyn 


Moss and grime covered the 
school building; repairs were left 
undone. 


Especially noteworthy, as 
pointed out by Jim Fetzer, is a 
dangerous, exposed metal rod on an 
exterior staircase (see #3 in photo 
below): 

Classrooms and hallways were 
used for storage, jammed with 
furniture and office supplies. If 
those rooms and hallways were 
actually in an operational school, 
then SHES was in clear violation 
of the fire safety code. 


Then there is this 
photo of a pile of dust 
underneath an alleged 
bullet hole in a wall 
outside Room 1C, which 
looks suspiciously like 
the debris from someone 
drilling a pretend 
“bullet” hole into the 
ceramic wall-tile. 

I’ve painted red 
circles around the 
“bullet” hole and the 
little pile of drilled dust 
underneath. 





4. Absence of handicapped parking spaces and signage 


But we don’t need crime scene photos for visual indicators of a long 
abandoned school. The many aerial photographic and video images of Sandy 
Hook Elementary School’s parking lot taken by news media on the day of the 
massacre would suffice, such as the one from a CNN news video. 


Although the CNN image on the next page shows a wheelchair symbol 
painted on a parking space closest to the school’s front door, it is not painted 


32 


Six signs the school was closed 



in the now-familiar blue and white colors that have become ubiquitous 
certainly by 2012. 


As an example, an August 22, 2011 article by Debbie Moore for My 
Parking Sign stated: 

Americans with Disabilities Act signed in 1990 ... details guidelines for 
every public area that needs to provide with ample accessibility’ options 
for the disabled.... 

ADA states the following rules that need to be followed while posting 
accessibility signs in designated areas - 

The international symbol of accessibility should be posted on all 
accessible parking spaces marking the reserved spot. The accessibility 
symbol is the well-known picture of a person using a wheelchair on top 
of a blue background. 

Van-accessible parking spaces to have additional ‘text’ or ‘sign ’below 
the accessibility symbol to mark the van-accessible area specifically. 

Signs should be placed at such a height (at least 60 inches above surface) 

that they do not get obscured by any parked vehicles or other obstructions. 
ADA handicap parking signs (commonly known as Access Signs) posted 
must be viewable from the drivers’ seat of the vehicle and located right 
in view of parking spaces. ” 

But aerial images of SHES’s parking lot, including the CNN image, show 
no blue-and-white signage for designated handicap parking spaces, which 
would make the school in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act 
of 1990 and the subsequent AD A Amendments Act of 2008 that broadened 
the meaning of disabilities. 


33 



Dr. Eowyn 


Indeed, Connecticut 
General Statutes, Sec. 

14-253a(h), clearly states 
that “Parking spaces 
designated for persons 
who are blind and persons 
with disabilities on or 
after October 1, 1979, 
and prior to October 1, 

2004, shall be as near 
as possible to a building 
entrance or walkway and shall be fifteen feet wide including three feet of 
cross hatch, or parallel to a sidewalk on a public highway.” 

Referring to that Connecticut state law, a 2009 ordinance of the town of 
Monroe, CT, about 9 miles from Newtown, specified that “Exterior accessible 
parking spaces [for the handicapped] shall be located on the shortest route 
. . . and identified by both a standing sign and painted on the pavement.” 

But aerial views of SHES’s parking lot show no handicap standing signs 
or the distinctive blue-and-white handicap sign colors. 



5. Absence of internet activity 2008-2012 

Arguably, the most compelling evidence that SHES had long been 
abandoned before the 2012 massacre is the testimony from the Internet 
Archive’s Wayback Machine of the school’s lack of of Internet activity from 
the beginning of 2008 through all of 2012. 

The Wayback Machine is a digital archive of the Internet which uses a 
special software to crawl and download all publicly accessible World Wide 
Web pages. It was Jungle Server_who first discovered that the Wayback 
Machine shows an absence of Internet activity from SHES since 2008 — the 
same year when the school was found to be contaminated with asbestos. 


To verify Jungle Surfer’s claim, I searched for SHES’s website. /? ftp:// 
newtownjd 2xt its/~sh , on the Wayback Machine, the result of which is below, 

IMTt*NBT A»C IIIV I 

mmmm NIP "newtown kl? Cl OS/-SH BROWSE HISTORY 

httfli/./pcwtQ.wnJf 1 

Saved 166 times between t :n: 17, 7000 and Octnbr-r 7 i., 7014. 

PLEASE DONATE TODAY. Your generosity preserves knowledge for future generations. Thank you. 


i hi 


1W7 IBM tBOJ 3000 3001 3003 3001 TOM 3000 3007 7001 3000 3010 


3011 3017 


3011 



3014 


34 



Six signs the school was closed 


showing the school’s lack of Internet activity from the beginning of 2008 to 
mid-2013. By mid-2013, we are told SHES temporarily had relocated to the 
nearby town of Monroe, about 9 miles from Newtown. 

6. Halbig’s FOI hearing 

On April 24, 2015, more than two years after Halbig first asked questions 
about Sandy Hook by phoning and writing letters to Connecticut officials 
invoking the FOIA, the state finally granted him the first of two hearings 
before the State of Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission. The 
respondents were the Newtown Police Department, First Selectman Patricia 
Llodra, the Town of Newtown, and Newtown’s Board of Education. They 
were represented by attorney Monte Frank, a gun-control activist who 
founded Team 26, a cycling group that lobbies for gun control. 

The purpose of the hearing was to determine if Newtown improperly 
withheld documents requested by Halbig. Halbig claims that he had 
requested the following documents from the respondents, but was denied 
— the denial being a violation of FOIA: 

SHES maintenance work orders, including: 

1. Copies of all maintenance work orders submitted by SHES 
principal Dawn Hochsprung (one of Lanza’s alleged victims who, 
strangely, was interviewed by The Bee about the massacre) or her 
designee to the school district maintenance department for any 
repairs, new classroom doors or painting from July 1, 2012 through 
December 13, 2012. 

2. Copies signed by Hochsprung or her designee showing the date 
of completion of the repairs together with time stamps showing 
job completion. 

2. Copies of all emails to and from Hochsprung and her assistant to 
various school district departments, e.g., food services provider, from 
May 1, 2012 through December 13, 2012. 

The requested documents presumably could prove that the school was 
operational on the day of the massacre. 

In a post on April 25, 2015, an anonymous contributor to SandyHookFacts. 
com, a blog that claims to debunk Sandy Hook “conspiracy theorists,” 
triumphantly crowed that the FOI hearing was a “total failure” for Halbig 
because attorney Frank said time-stamped SHES maintenance work orders 


35 



Dr. Eowyn 


signed by Hochsprung or her designee had been made available to Halbig 
six months before the hearing. 

SandyHookFacts.com is much too hasty and mistaken in its crowing, for 
in a memo on June 25, 2015, titled “Transmittal of Proposed Final Decision,” 
the State of Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission (FOIC) states 
the following: 

“it is found that the respondents, through counsel, informed the 
complainant [Halbig] that the respondents maintained 45 records 
responsive to the complainant’s request described in paragraph 2(a)(i), 
above, and that they would be provided upon payment of the copying 
fee. [...] 

It is found that the respondents’ counsel also informed the complainant 
that his request described in paragraph 2(a)(i), above, was vague, overly 
broad, and that it was not a request for ‘specific documents and would 
require research and analysis not required under the FOIAct. ' ” 

Most importantly, the FOIC states: 

“It is found that . . . the respondents, through counsel, also informed the 
complainant that the town had no records responsive to the request described 
in paragraph 2(a)(ii), above. ’’ 

Note that paragraph 2(a)(i) in the FOIC memo is 1 A in this post (see 
above), i.e., copies of all maintenance work orders submitted by SHES 
principal Dawn Hochsprung or her designee to the school district maintenance 
department for any repairs, new classroom doors or painting from July 1, 
2012 through December 13, 2012. 

Note that paragraph 2(a)(ii) in the FOIC memo is IB in this post, i.e., 
copies signed by Hochsprung or her designee showing the date of completion 
of the repairs together with time stamps showing job completion. 

By saying that “the town had no records responsive to the request 
described in paragraph 2(a)(ii),” the FOIC means the town of Newtown does 
not have documents signed by Hochsprung or her designee showing the 
date of completion of the repairs |to SHES] together with time stamps 
showing job completion. 

Furthermore, the FOIC memo also states: 

“It is found that the respondents ’counsel also informed the complainant 


36 



Six signs the school was closed 


that his request described in paragraph 2(b)(i), above, was vague, overly 
broad, and that it . . . ‘would require research and analysis not required 
under the FOIAct. ’ ” 

Note that FOIC’s paragraph 2(b)(i) is document 2 in this post, i.e., 
copies of all emails to and from Hochsprung and her assistant to various 
school district departments, e.g., food services provider, from May 1, 2012 
through December 13, 2012. 

In other words, Newtown cannot produce evidence that in the 
months preceding the massacre from May 1, 2012 through December 
13, 2012, repairs were made on Sandy Hook Elementary School or that 
Hochsprung had exchanged emails with school district departments. 

The reason is a simple one: the school was not operational, having been 
closed down for years, most probably since 2008 when it was discovered to 
be contaminated with asbestos. 

This chapter originally appeared as “Sandy Hook Hoax: 6 Signs that School 
was Closed before Massacre” (9 September 2015 ), fellowshipoftheminds.com. 


37 



Dr. Eowyn 

No comments:

Post a Comment