Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.


An American Affidavit

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Medically-Caused Deaths In America By Jon Rappoport An Exclusive Interview With Barbara Starfield


 
rense.com
 

Medically-Caused Deaths In America
By Jon Rappoport
An Exclusive Interview With Barbara Starfield
6-29-10
 
The American health system, like clockwork, causes a mind-boggling number of deaths every year.
 
The figures have been known for a decade. The story was covered briefly when a landmark study surfaced, and then it sank like a stone.
 
The truth was inconvenient for many interests. That has not changed. "Medical coverage for all" is a banner that conceals ugly facts.
 
On July 26, 2000, the US medical community received a titanic shock to the system, when one of its most respected public-health experts, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revealed her findings on healthcare in America. Starfield was, and still is, associated with the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.
 
The Starfield study, "Is US health really the best in the world?", published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, came to the following conclusions:
 
Every year in the US there are:
 
12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries;
 
7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals;
 
20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals;
 
80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals;
 
106,000 deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines.
 
The total of medically-caused deaths in the US every year is 225,000.
 
This makes the medical system the third leading cause of death in the US, behind heart disease and cancer.
 
The Starfield study is the most disturbing revelation about modern healthcare in America ever published. The credentials of its author and the journal in which it appeared are, within the highest medical circles, impeccable.
 
On the heels of Starfield's astonishing findings, media reporting was extensive, but it soon dwindled. No major newspaper or television network mounted an ongoing "Medicalgate" investigation. Neither the US Department of Justice nor federal health agencies undertook prolonged remedial action.
 
All in all, those parties who could have taken effective steps to correct this situation preferred to ignore it.
 
I interviewed Dr. Starfield by email. This is an edited version of the interview.
 
In the medical research community, have your medically-caused mortality statistics been debated, or have these figures been accepted, albeit with some degree of shame?
 
The findings have been accepted by those who study them. There has been only one detractor, a former medical school dean, who has received a lot of attention for claiming that the US health system is the best there is and we need more of it. He has a vested interest in medical schools and teaching hospitals (they are his constituency).
 
Have health agencies of the federal government consulted with you on ways to mitigate the effects of the US medical system?
 
NO.
 
Are you aware of any systematic efforts, since your 2000 JAMA study was published, to remedy the main categories of medically caused deaths in the US?
 
No systematic efforts; however, there have been a lot of studies. Most of them indicate higher rates [of death] than I calculated.
 
Can you offer an opinion about how the FDA can be so mortally wrong about so many drugs?
 
Yes, it cannot divest itself from vested interests. [There is] a large literature about this, mostly unrecognized by the people because the industry-supported media give it no attention.
 
Did your 2000 JAMA study sail through peer review, or was there some opposition to publishing it?
 
It was rejected by the first journal that I sent it to, on the grounds that 'it would not be interesting to readers'!
 
Would it be correct to say that, when your JAMA study was published in 2000, it caused a momentary stir and was thereafter ignored by the medical community and by pharmaceutical companies?
 
Are you sure it was a momentary stir? I still get at least one email a day asking for a reprint---ten years later! The problem is that its message is obscured by those that do not want any change in the US health care system.
 
Since the FDA approves every medical drug given to the American people, and certifies it as safe and effective, how can that agency remain calm about the fact that these medicines are causing 106,000 deaths per year?
 
Even though there will always be adverse events that cannot be anticipated, the fact is that more and more unsafe drugs are being approved for use. Many people attribute that to the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is (for the past ten years or so) required to pay the FDA for reviews---which puts the FDA into an untenable position of working for the industry it is regulating. There is a large literature on this. 
 
Aren't your 2000 findings a severe indictment of the FDA and its standard practices?
 
They are an indictment of the US health care industry: insurance companies, specialty and disease-oriented medical academia, the pharmaceutical and device manufacturing industries, all of which contribute heavily to re-election campaigns of members of Congress. The problem is that we do not have a government that is free of influence of vested interests. Alas, [it] is a general problem of our society-which clearly unbalances democracy.
 
What was your personal reaction when you reached the conclusion that the US medical system was the third leading cause of death in the US?
 
I had previously done studies on international comparisons and knew that there were serious deficits in the US health care system, most notably in lack of universal coverage and a very poor primary care infrastructure. So I wasn't surprised.
 
Do the 106,000 deaths from medical drugs only involve drugs prescribed to patients in hospitals, or does this statistic also cover people prescribed drugs who are not in-patients in hospitals?
 
I tried to include everything in my estimates. Since the commentary was written, many more dangerous drugs have been added to the marketplace.
 
INTERVIEWER COMMENTS:
 
This interview with Dr. Starfield reveals that, even when an author has unassailable credentials within the medical-research establishment, the findings can result in no changes made to the system.
 
Yes, many persons and organizations within the medical system contribute to the annual death totals of patients, and media silence and public ignorance are certainly major factors, but the FDA is the assigned gatekeeper, when it comes to the safety of medical drugs. The buck stops there. If those drugs the FDA is certifying as safe are killing, like clockwork, 106,000 people a year, the Agency must be held accountable. The American people must understand that.
 
As for the other 119,000 people killed every year as a result of hospital treatment, this horror has to be laid at the doors of those institutions. Further, to the degree that hospitals are regulated and financed by state and federal governments, the relevant health agencies assume culpability.
 
It is astounding, as well, that the US Department of Justice has failed to weigh in on Starfield's findings. If 225,000 medically caused deaths per year is not a crime by the Dept. of Justice's standards, then what is?
 
To my knowledge, not one person in America has been fired from a job or even censured as result of these medically caused deaths.
 
The pharmaceutical giants stand back and carve up the populace into "promising markets." They seek new disease labels and new profits from more and more toxic drugs. They do whatever they can-legally or illegally-to influence doctors in their prescribing habits. Some drug studies which cast new medicines in a negative light are buried. FDA panels are filled with doctors who have drug-company ties. Legislators are incessantly lobbied and supported with pharma campaign monies.
 
<http://www.newswithviewsstore.com/mm5/merchant.mvc>
 
Nutrition, the cornerstone of good health, is ignored or devalued by most physicians. The FDA continues to attack nutritional supplements, even though the overall safety record of these nutrients is good, whereas, once again, the medical drugs the FDA certifies as safe are killing 106,000 Americans per year.
 
Physicians are trained to pay exclusive homage to peer-reviewed published drug studies. These doctors unfailingly ignore the fact that, if medical drugs are killing a million Americans per decade, the studies on which those drugs are based must be fraudulent or, at the very least, massively incompetent. In other words, the whole literature is suspect, unreliable, and impenetrable.
 
© 2010 Jon Rappoport - All Rights Reserved
 
"Never in the history of the world has there been a situation so bad that the government couldn't make it worse."
 


 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Email
Article
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files,
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com

No comments:

Post a Comment