Ebola: question all basic assumptions

Ebola: question all basic assumptions
by Jon Rappoport
October 28, 2014
To understand what the sellers are selling, you have to go back to the beginning of their story.
You have to restrain yourself from buying the beginning, because if you do buy it, uncritically, you’re now on their river, you’re now traveling in their boat.
And even if you jump off later and claim, “They’re lying!”, you’re still holding the suitcase with their first assumptions in it.
At the beginning they say there has been an outbreak in three separate areas of West Africa.
The first part of “outbreak” means: accelerated dying is occurring.
How do you know that’s true? Where are the numbers to confirm that? Where is evidence that shows present deaths are jumping beyond recent past deaths?
The second part of “outbreak” means: the new accelerated deaths in all three geo-areas are linked by the same cause.
Where is the evidence for that?
The diagnostic tests? The antibody and PCR tests, both of which are useless, misleading, irrelevant, and rampant with false-positive results?
Is the evidence the symptoms these victims are showing? General symptoms like fever, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, bleeding, all of which can and do stem from a variety of causes? Of course not.
The third part of “outbreak” means: researchers have found what the link is among all the new deaths—the Ebola virus.
On what basis do they know this? Those useless diagnostic tests? Divining rods? The solemn assurance of the CDC? Quick eyeball diagnosis of every patient with a fever wandering into a clinic in West Africa?

On all counts, the beginning of the story is unproven—and the burden of proof is not on you, it’s on the “experts” making the claims.
Three cops are called to the scene of a death. In the apartment, a man is lying on the floor. He is, in fact, dead.
Upon examination, the cops and a medical examiner find no holes in his body. They find no shell casings, no weapons, no gunshot residue.
They confer. Their conclusion? He was killed at close range by two rounds from a revolver.
The papers and the local news broadcasts carry the story: “A man was shot to death in his apartment by an unknown assailant last night…”
The next day, the cops arrest a schoolteacher who has a revolver locked in the trunk of his car.
A few days later, you’re sitting in a bar watching the news on television. You see video of the schoolteacher’s arraignment on a charge of first-degree murder.
You say, “How do they know he did it?”
The people sitting near you break out into a chorus: “Who else could it be?”
Sixteen years later, while the schoolteacher is sitting on death row awaiting his execution, a lawyer manages to have the victim’s body exhumed.
On re-examination, the coroner finds no evidence of a gunshot wound…but the remains of the body are decayed beyond the point where a definitive judgment can be made.
Oh well, those are the breaks.
Here is what I’m encountering in many quarters. People are saying, or assuming: the CDC and the World Health Organization lie about everything under the sun EXCEPT…when they launch stories about outbreaks. Then they must be telling the truth. The basic beginning of their tale must be true.
In those crucial moments, they never lie.
Really, now. Think about that.
And then think about this: the 2009 “outbreak” called Swine Flu. In that situation, the CDC stopped counting cases in the US, because the overwhelming number of lab tests on diagnosed and likely Swine Flu patients were coming back…with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.
So…as a “big lie” strategy, with roughly ten thousand bogus cases of Swine Flu cases on their hands, the CDC suddenly claimed there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
That was their “outbreak” story.
And now, when they tell a story about an “outbreak” of a virus called Ebola…well, they must be telling the truth, right?
Egregiously lying THEN means they must be telling the truth NOW, right?
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com
This entry was posted in ebola.

6 comments on “Ebola: question all basic assumptions

  1. FS3 says:
    A summary what we know from this CAMPAIGN till now. With reference to some eye openers from “Nomorefakenews” inside…
    Thank you, Jon.
  2. From Québec says:
    Yes, that’s what they do and that’s what is frustrating me.
    Take Alex Jones for instance, he always talks about the lies and corruption of the CDC, the WHO, Big Pharma and vaccines, etc… but when something huge like the alleged Ebola outbreak is spreading in the minds of people, he takes for granted whatever these supposed expert agencies are saying… because they are the experts, right?
    It blows my mind. In other words, he is telling us to never believe them, except when something very big and very scary happens, then we have no other choice but to believe these liars. Who else would have the real number of deaths than these experts?
    I hate when he does that, it makes him looses all credibility. And it makes me so sad, because I really do like him and I appreciate watching his daily show. I have learn a lot on infowars.
    Could it be that he is naïve? WOW! That would be a first for someone like him.
  3. From Québec says:
    WOW! I’ve just finish listening to the interview with Steve Quayle about Ebola on the the Alex Jones show yesterday.
    This is an amazing interview that everybody here should listen to.
    The interview starts at 7:00
    Ebola Is The Endgame; Alex Jones talks with Steve Quayle
  4. Death Certificates says:
    Question about legal documentation of deaths:
    If roughly 5,000 people in Africa have already died and 70 to 80 percent of the 10,000 who are now afflicted with the “virus” are expected to die (so, 7,000 to 8,000 more dead), shouldn’t there already be about 5,000 DEATH CERTIFICATES filed somewhere in official health departments (or copies stored w/the W.H.O.) with the cause of death stated as “Ebola”?
    How hard would it be via some type of freedom of information act type of request for humanitarian organizations (doctors w/o borders, etc.) to get their hands on these death certificates and the next 10,000 certificates to be expected? Wouldn’t the global nature of this so-called pandemic call for the yielding of this info. to the world ASAP?
    If no such certificates exist, or access to them is prohibited, isn’t that more proof of hoax?
    If such certificates do in fact exist with the cause stated as Ebola couldn’t these then be used by “the authorities” to shove in our faces so they can say: “…see, you conspiracy theorists, here are all the death certificates showing the dead died of the virus… what more compelling proof do you need to prove to you that the virus has killed all of these thousands of folks…?
    By the way, the immediate family of the dead would legally be entitled to a copy of their loved one’s death certificate. So, accessing certificates from “the authorities” if they are uncooperative may not be necessary. Just go to each of the 5,000 families and ask to see a copy of their love one’s death certificate. If family are told by “authorities” that they are not entitled to such a certificate, wouldn’t that smell of hoax even more?
    Lastly, what if there are no such 5,000 families available b/c nowhere near 5,000 people have died? How do we know for sure that 5,000 have died and another 7 to 8 thousand are in the pipeline for death?
    The only proof would be 5,000 officially stamped death certificates (if they’re not faked)…
  5. blakmira says:
    Jon, have you seen this article announcing the “stockpile” of alleged-ebola vaccines they’ve been waiting to roll out… until it was “lucrative” to do so?! I wouldn’t be surprised if this wasn’t the surplus of H1N1 they couldn’t get rid of!

Leave a Reply